
How aid becomes a weapon in Myanmar's war zone
On Tuesday night, an attack on an aid convoy further exacerbated concerns.At 21:21, a convoy of nine Chinese Red Cross Society vehicles carrying earthquake relief supplies was attacked by the military, according to Ta'ang National Liberation Army (TNLA), a resistance group in Shan State.The convoy was traveling toward Mandalay when it was fired upon by soldiers with machine guns, forcing it to turn back, the TNLA said in a Telegram post late on Tuesday.A junta spokesperson later confirmed that soldiers had shot at the vehicles, saying they had not been notified that the convoy would be passing through and fired warning shots after it failed to stop.But this is not the first time the junta has attacked aid workers, Mr Quinley said."They pick and choose when aid can go in, and if they can't monitor it and they can't use it how they want, they restrict it," he said. "They definitely also, on top of that, actively target humanitarian workers." The junta, which began fighting a civil war with resistance forces in Myanmar after it seized control of the country in 2021, has a history of weaponising aid and humanitarian assistance: funnelling it towards areas that are under its control and restricting it in areas that are not.The BBC assessed the power balance in more than 14,000 village groups as of mid-November last year, and found the military only has full control of 21% of Myanmar's territory, nearly four years on from the start of the conflict.
In previous natural disasters, such as Cyclone Mocha in 2023 and Typhoon Yagi in 2024, which left hundreds dead, the military obstructed relief efforts in resistance-held areas by refusing to release supplies from customs, authorise travel for aid workers or relax restrictions on lifesaving assistance."It's a worrying trend that happens in times of crisis, like the earthquake," Mr Quinley said. "The junta is blocking any aid to what they see as groups that are aligned with the broader resistance."James Rodehaver, head of the Myanmar team at the Office for the UN's High Commissioner for Human Rights, further suggested that the junta deprives Myanmar's population of aid as a form of punishment."They do that because the local population, by and large, does not support them, so by depriving them of humanitarian aid, they are both punishing them but also cutting off their ability to support themselves and be resilient," he told the BBC.There are already signs the junta may be repeating this tactic in Sagaing.Although central Myanmar, which includes the cities of Sagaing and Mandalay, is nominally run by the junta - meaning aid can only be delivered to the area with their co-operation - large parts of the broader Sagaing and Mandalay regions are considered resistance strongholds.The likelihood that the junta might tactically deprive these areas of aid has prompted outcry from hundreds of human rights and civil society organisations, who have urged the international community to ensure relief efforts get to where they're most needed, and aren't channelled through the military government.One such statement, signed by 265 civil society organisations and released on Sunday, notes that most of the worst-hit areas are under the effective control and administration of pro-democracy resistance groups."Myanmar's history provides stark warnings about the dangers of channelling aid through the military junta," it reads.
In Sagaing, the impact of aid shortfalls can already be seen in troubling ways, according to relief agencies.They speak of shortages of food, water and fuel, while trucks carrying aid are stranded at military checkpoints around the city. Hundreds of residents, suddenly homeless, are sleeping outside on the street. Rescue volunteers who were forced to dig through the rubble with their bare hands have run out of body bags for those they couldn't save.Other community members seeking to respond to the earthquake are being forced to get authorisation from junta authorities by submitting lists of volunteers and items to be donated, local media reported.This tactic – of bombarding responders with lengthy bureaucratic checklists and processes – is routinely deployed by the junta to restrict the activities of international aid organisations in Myanmar, humanitarian sources told the BBC.According to a registration law imposed in 2023, such organisations must attain a registration certificate, and often sign a memorandum of understanding with relevant government ministries, to legally operate inside the country.One source, who spoke to the BBC on condition of anonymity, said aid groups are often required to remove certain activities, areas or townships from their proposals, with no room for negotiation. Areas where the junta doesn't have oversight or control over the aid work are typically those that are disallowed, they added.Aid agencies have found ways to navigate the junta's restriction, however: a lot of humanitarian assistance in Myanmar happens underground, via local groups that can bypass checkpoints and distribute aid without attracting the attention of the authorities.Many financial transactions in humanitarian aid also happen outside of Myanmar's banking system, so that actors can avoid scrutiny and potential investigation from the country's central bank, a source told the BBC. In some cases, humanitarian organisations open bank accounts in Thailand so that they can privately receive aid funds, then carry the money over the border into Myanmar in cash.Such covert methods take time, however, and could lead to potentially fatal delays of days or weeks.
Some aid workers are hopeful that, given the scale of Friday's earthquake and the international appeal for assistance by Min Aung Hlaing, it may be easier to overcome barriers and provide aid more efficiently."In the past we have faced some challenges," said Louise Gorton, an emergency specialist based in Unicef's East Asia and Pacific Regional Office."The scale of this emergency, though, is significantly higher… I think there will be pressure on the regime to ensure unfettered and unimpeded humanitarian access - and we'll continue to repeat the same need and find ways, sometimes low-key ways, to deliver aid."Cara Bragg, country manager for the Catholic Relief Services (CRS) team in Myanmar, said that while it's too early to tell whether the junta will truly "open all ways for foreign aid", her team is prepared to navigate the complex humanitarian situation to deliver assistance."It's certainly a concern that they [the military] may direct the aid in specific places, and not based on need," said Ms Bragg, who is based in Yangon. "But as humanitarian actors CRS works under a humanitarian mandate, and will be very focused on getting aid to the places it needs to go - to the hardest-hit areas, regardless of who controls them."Early indications suggest that, despite Min Aung Hlaing's plea to the international community, the embattled junta leader is unlikely to prioritise the unfettered flow of humanitarian aid. Shortly after the earthquake, military jets launched a series of airstrikes on affected areas, killing more than 50 civilians, according to the National Unity Consultative Council (NUCC).Then, on Tuesday, Min Aung Hlaing rejected ceasefire proposals that were put forward by resistance groups in a bid to facilitate aid. Military operations would continue as "necessary protective measures", he said.The junta changed its mind a day later, agreeing to 20-day ceasefire to help relief efforts. But it remains to be seen whether the pause in hostilities holds – the military stressed it would "respond accordingly" if rebels launched attacks.For many onlookers, this seeming contradiction - of asking for aid with one hand while conducting military strikes with the other - chimes with Min Aung Hlaing's history of duplicity.John Quinley, from Fortify Rights, suggested that the recent appeal for foreign aid is more likely an appeal for international recognition.Speaking before the military's ceasefire announcement, he noted that the junta leader had "lied on numerous occasions about ceasefires and the gross violations he's commanded".Against that backdrop, Mr Quinley added, it's critical to ensure earthquake relief gets to where it is most needed."I'm not hopeful when it comes to taking what Min Aung Hlaing says with any hint of truth," he said."I think as a human rights group we need to monitor: OK, [Min Aung Hlaing] allows aid in - but is it actually reaching people in need? Or is he weaponising the aid? Is he blocking the aid from getting to communities in need?"

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


JAMnews
9 hours ago
- JAMnews
Does Azerbaijan's GDP growth mean people are better off?
GDP growth in Azerbaijan Pro-government and state media regularly run headlines about GDP growth to suggest that Azerbaijan's economy is developing. But what does GDP actually tell us? Is it really a measure of economic development? Does it reflect people's living standards?Gross domestic product (GDP) is the market value of goods and services produced within a country over a set period of time, usually a year. In other words, GDP measures the total output of goods and services produced in a country and legally sold. It is calculated as the sum of consumer spending, investment, government expenditure, and the trade balance (exports minus imports). For example: GDP = household consumption + investment + government spending + (exports – imports). GDP provides a macro-level measure of economic activity and offers a rough indication of economic growth. However, economists stress that GDP has many limitations as a measure of wellbeing. As Joseph Stiglitz put it: 'GDP measures everything, except that which makes life worthwhile.' For example, GDP does not account for environmental quality, healthcare, education, aspects of social welfare such as inequality, or the long-term sustainability of the economy. An IMF study notes that GDP captures only market transactions and monetary exchanges, overlooking factors such as pollution, depletion of natural resources, and environmental degradation. It also excludes the informal economy and unpaid household labour. Ultimately, relying on GDP alone can be misleading: economic growth does not necessarily mean an improvement in people's living standards. Economist Toghrul Mashalli wrote on his Telegram channel: 'We shouldn't stop at saying that GDP has grown. When we present this, we should also refer to other indicators.' According to him, looking at additional indicators makes it possible to understand whether GDP growth is actually positive or negative. The value of alternative indicators That is why additional measures have been developed alongside GDP, such as happiness indexes, environmental indicators, and others. The OECD's Better Life Initiative, the UN Human Development Index and similar projects aim to assess social wellbeing beyond GDP. The conclusion is that GDP shows the volume of economic activity as a primary indicator but does not reflect a society's true wellbeing. Economists therefore recommend going beyond the headline 'GDP has grown' and looking at the structure of that growth, income distribution and other social indicators. As Stiglitz notes, what we choose to measure shapes the choices we make, and focusing solely on GDP can lead to negative long-term outcomes. Comparing indicators in the South Caucasus The experience of countries in the region also shows that high GDP figures alone do not necessarily mean social development. In 2024, Azerbaijan's GDP stood at $74.3bn, placing it 86th in the world. However, its per capita income – about $7,268 nominally (€6,717) – is lower than in Georgia and Armenia. At the same time, Azerbaijan's score in the UN Human Development Index (HDI) for 2022 was 0.760, putting it in the 'high human development' category. This suggests that, unlike its neighbours, Azerbaijan has a high industrial and construction share in GDP, while other social factors lag behind. For comparison, Georgia's HDI in 2022 was 0.814 (ranking 58th), and Armenia's was 0.786 (76th). GDP growth in Azerbaijan: structure and sustainability Toghrul Mashalli | Photo: Meydan TV 'Whether it's needed or not, construction goes ahead. The private sector may not be very active, but state bodies will always find the money. As a result of this policy, the debt of local governments in China rose from 42% to 70% of their GDP in just seven years. In the past, 1% GDP growth in China led to 0.8% growth in household consumption. Between 2011 and 2019, that figure fell to just 0.06%. We haven't faced the same situation only because, here, debt is issued solely by the central government. If local authorities could borrow, it would be the same story. In countries like Azerbaijan, there's a limit to this – if you don't take on debt, your ability to invest is restricted, and that automatically limits GDP. For now, growth is being maintained. But what happens tomorrow?' – asks Toghrul Mashalli. As economist Toghrul Mashalli notes, in recent years the main driver of GDP growth in Azerbaijan has been state-led investment, particularly in construction. According to 2023 statistics, large-scale construction and infrastructure projects were under way in post-war Karabakh and Eastern Zangezur. Analyses show that the construction sector's contribution to GDP in 2023 grew by 13% in real terms and 18% in nominal terms. Since 2021, the region has seen the building of two airports, railways, tunnels and housing, with spending rising each year. However, as these investments relied heavily on imported machinery and materials, the economic activity did not come from within but from imports. As a result, while construction spending is counted in GDP, its impact on the national economy remains limited. Public debt and investment Over the same period, local government debt also rose sharply. According to some estimates, the ratio of public debt to GDP increased from 20% to 35% between 2017 and 2024, mainly as a result of borrowing to finance state spending and investment. With high debt levels, financial resources available to the private sector have shrunk. As the central bank has noted, this has driven up imports and negatively affected the trade balance. Rising public debt has also meant relatively less spending on education and healthcare, with the budget's main priority shifting towards construction projects. Oil dependence and diversification Azerbaijan's economy remains reliant on oil and gas revenues. When oil prices and production fall, GDP growth slows. In 2023, for example, GDP grew by only about 1%, reflecting lower prices and reduced energy output on global markets. Alongside oil, construction and infrastructure investment has created temporary growth, but competition and innovation in the real sector remain weak. As Stiglitz notes, sustainable growth in wellbeing depends on a combination of income, education, healthcare and environmental sustainability. In Azerbaijan, GDP growth figures alone say little about people's wellbeing; only by looking at other social and economic indicators can their real impact be understood.


JAMnews
13 hours ago
- JAMnews
‘Victims of the global reshaping of the world': opinion on the causes and outcomes of the 1992–93 Georgian-Abkhaz war
Goals and outcomes of the Georgian-Abkhaz war On 14 August, Abkhazia commemorated the victims of the Georgian-Abkhaz war, which began on that day in 1992. The war ended in 1993 with Georgia's defeat, but the conflict remains unresolved. The authors of the Telegram channel Abkhazia-Centre analyse what they see as the goals pursued by each side at the time and conclude that both became victims of the global reshaping of the world. Circumstances and objectives of the parties as of 14 August 1992 Georgian side: A coup had taken place, leaving the new authorities without legitimacy, and armed clashes were under way between supporters of ousted president Zviad Gamsakhurdia and forces backing the coup. Eduard Shevardnadze was looking for a way to shift public attention from internal confrontation to another issue. Outcome: The goal was only partly achieved. Shevardnadze managed to stay in power at the cost of civilian lives, chaos and upheaval. Abkhaz side: A set of actions aimed at seceding from Georgia. The inability to achieve legal separation from Georgia by democratic means, and an effort to alter the ethnic balance in their favour. Outcome: The goals were only partly achieved. Abkhazia is now fully dependent on Russia, economically backward and in a state of civilisational self-isolation. In the 32 years since, none of the pressing issues of that time – the status of the native language, demographics, the ability to independently decide matters of state, and so on – have been resolved. Russia: To create tools for exerting pressure on Georgia, the first state to declare its exit from the USSR, refuse to join the CIS and call for the withdrawal of Russian troops. To establish a buffer zone along Russia's southern border and maintain a managed conflict in which Moscow could present itself as mediator and peacekeeper, placing both sides in a position of dependence. To deploy armed forces with legal status and the consent of both warring sides. Outcome: The goals were achieved only partly and for a short time. Georgia was brought into the CIS, Russian military bases were legalised, and several pro-Russian leaders were installed. But within 12 years the bases were closed, and within 15 years Georgia withdrew from the CIS. The war in Abkhazia left Georgians viewing Russia exclusively in a negative light. The conflict also became a catalyst for major wars in the North Caucasus, shaking the very foundations of the Russian state. The blocking of transport links harmed Russia's economic interests, and the Russian-speaking population of Abkhazia dwindled to a minimum. United States: To distance the South Caucasus from Russia, create conflict zones along strategic transport routes (Abkhazia and South Ossetia), revert to the 19th-century route via Upper Lars, and ensure Russia is seen solely as an aggressor and occupier. Outcome: The goals were fully achieved. Conclusion The Abkhaz and Georgian sides became victims of the global reshaping of the world and the geopolitical shifts of the late 20th century. Toponyms, terminology, views and opinions expressed by the author are theirs alone and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of JAMnews or any employees thereof. JAMnews reserves the right to delete comments it considers to be offensive, inflammatory, threatening or otherwise unacceptable. News in Abkhazia


The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Russia clamps down on WhatsApp and Telegram over data sharing
Russia has announced restrictions on the messaging apps WhatsApp and Telegram, accusing the foreign-owned platforms of failing to share information with law enforcement in fraud and terrorism cases. Moscow has clashed with foreign tech platforms for several years over content and data storage in a simmering dispute that intensified after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Critics say Russia is trying to expand its control over the country's internet space. Vladimir Putin has authorised the development of a state-backed messaging app integrated with government services, as Moscow seeks to establish what it calls digital sovereignty by promoting homegrown services and reducing its dependence on foreign-owned platforms. 'In order to counteract criminals … measures are being taken to partially restrict calls on these foreign messengers,' the Interfax news agency quoted the communications regulator Roskomnadzor as saying. 'No other restrictions have been imposed on their functionality.' Russia's digital ministry said: 'Access to calls in foreign messengers will be restored after they start complying with Russian legislation.' In a statement, WhatsApp's owner, Meta, said: 'WhatsApp is private, end-to-end encrypted, and defies government attempts to violate people's right to secure communication, which is why Russia is trying to block it from over 100 million Russian people. We will keep doing all we can to make end-to-end encrypted communication available to people everywhere, including in Russia.' Telegram said it 'actively combats misuse of its platform, including calls for sabotage or violence, as well as fraud' and removes 'millions of pieces of harmful content every day'. Reuters reported that voice calls on Telegram had barely functioned since 11 August and that WhatsApp calls had been rendered impossible due to intermittent sound and a metallic buzzing. The digital development ministry said Telegram and WhatsApp had ignored repeated requests to take measures to stop their platforms being used for activities such as fraud and terrorism. Anton Gorelkin, deputy head of the lower house of parliament's information technology committee, said the platforms would need to open legal entities in Russia and cooperate with Roskomnadzor and law enforcement as part of their compliance with Russian law to lift the blocking measures. Meta was labelled an extremist organisation by Moscow in 2022, but WhatsApp, widely used in Russia, was allowed to remain. The messenger has received some penalties for failing to remove information banned by Russia. Sign up to This is Europe The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment after newsletter promotion Gorelkin last month said that WhatsApp should prepare to leave the market. Another lawmaker described WhatsApp's presence in the Russian market as a breach of national security. Critics have voiced concerns that Russia's new state-backed messaging app may track its users' activities and have suggested Russia could slow WhatsApp's speeds in order to get users to migrate to the new platform. Human Rights Watch said in a report last month that Russia's government was increasing its technological capacities and control over the country's internet infrastructure, allowing for more widespread blocking and throttling of unwanted websites and censorship circumvention tools.