Zelensky backtracks on corruption reform in attempt to end protests
The president said he had 'heard what people are saying' and decided to propose a new bill in parliament in two weeks' time.
'Very importantly, all norms for the independence of anti-corruption institutions will be included,' he said.
Despite the apparent climbdown, thousands still descended onto the streets of Kyiv for a large-scale protest on Wednesday night shortly after the president made the statement.
Some protesters said they did not believe the president's attempt to address criticism of the reform went far enough.
Olena, 19, a student from Sumy, told The Telegraph she was demonstrating because 'I want in my country not corruption, not usurpation of the government'.
She said she wanted Ukraine to embrace 'European values' adding that Ukraine's corruption watchdogs should be independent.
Mr Zelensky has faced unprecedented pushback from the public, serving soldiers and Ukraine's western partners over his move on Tuesday to strip the country's two key anti-corruption agencies of their autonomy.
AntAC, an anti-corruption NGO, said it remained to be seen how far the president would go in restoring the free operation of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (Nabu) and Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (Sapo).
Tetiana Shevchuk, the head of international relations at AntAC, said: 'We haven't seen the text of this new bill. And two weeks is a long time.
'If parliament was able to adopt the law in 24 hours, they should be able to rectify their mistake in the same time frame.
'I'm happy that Zelensky has the wisdom not to escalate with the public, but we will have to see if it is done properly.'
The law, passed on Tuesday, handed control of the agencies over to the prosecutor general, a position directly appointed by the president.
The bill raised fears that Mr Zelensky could prevent the bodies pursuing cases against his close allies, such as Oleksiy Chernyshov, the former deputy prime minister, who was recently charged with accepting bribes.
Earlier on Wednesday, Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, 'conveyed her strong concerns' over the law, her spokesman said.
Brussels chiefs warned Mr Zelensky's original legislation endangered both supplies of aid and Ukraine's eventual entry into the European Union.
Europe has become Ukraine's most influential partner, filling the gulf left by the almost complete cessation of US supplies of money and weaponry since the start of the year.
Protesters took to the streets across the cities of Kyiv, Dnipro, Lviv and Odesa on Tuesday night, and further demonstrations were due to be held on Wednesday.
Credit: Igor Zakharenko
The armed forces also spoke out against the measures, accusing the president of undermining morale at the front and handing a victory to Russia.
Vitalii Umanets, one Ukrainian soldier, said: 'Whoever isn't in the military, please go out to the protest for me, because without independent anti-corruption bodies, there's no point at all in our current struggle, in our future victory.
Mykhailo Lavrovskyi, a soldier in the 1st Azov Corps of the Ukrainian National Guard, wrote on X: 'You can argue for a long time about the effectiveness of anti-corruption bodies in Ukraine, but pulling off such bulls--- while fully aware that people will be against it is a deliberate provocation playing into Moscow's hands.'
One Ukrainian officer, speaking on condition of anonymity, told The Telegraph that the reform was 'definitely going to impact the morale of the soldiers, even simply by diverting attention from the fight'.
In ambiguous comments that could have been directed at the president's office or the protesters, Ukraine's spy chief warned that the country could be 'torn apart' by the crisis and called for 'open dialogue'.
Kyrylo Budanov said: 'Ukrainian history has taught us that a nation loses if it is torn apart by internal contradictions.'
Credit:Bohdan Ben
Opponents characterised the original legislation as a power-grab by an increasingly authoritarian leader, panicked by the launch of investigations into his own inner circle.
Mr Zelensky had attempted to justify the law, on Wednesday morning, saying he had met with the Nabu and Sapo leaders and agreed to produce a joint action plan in two weeks to ensure the country had a 'strong enough… anti-corruption system'.
'In our opinion, Zelensky acted [at first] because anti-corruption agencies got closer to his close allies,' Ms Shevchuk said.
'Zelensky is not against the fight against corruption, but it's not comfortable when it strikes so close… he feels it's going out of control.'
Mr Chernyshov was charged, along with his associates, of accepting bribes to give the go-ahead to an apartment block development. The charges, which he denied before being sacked in a reshuffle, allege that he accepted an apartment in exchange for the approval.
'This is the first big political protest in three and a half years, which is a lot,' Ms Shevchuk said. 'We don't like the pictures in foreign media, because we understand the war is going on.'
But corruption in defence procurement, for example, posed 'sometimes even a greater risk' to Ukraine than the fluctuating level of Western support.
'The resolution is very simple,' Ms Shevchuk added. 'Scrap the law and say this was a mistake. Otherwise it looks like a high-level attempt to protect corruption.'
On Wednesday night, Russian and Ukrainian negotiators met in Istanbul for the third round of peace talks, with both sides expressing some openness to further dialogue.
A Ukrainian spokesman emphasised that securing a meeting between Mr Zelensky and Vladimir Putin remained a top priority, saying that big issues like a ceasefire can only be resolved at the highest level.
Ukraine offered face-to-face talks between the two leaders before the end of August, which it said would suit the deadline Donald Trump gave Putin this month to end the war within 50 days or face 'very severe tariffs'.
Solve the daily Crossword

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
Luna says she'll force House vote on member stock trading ban
Luna is moving forward with the highly sensitive effort after internal talks over proposals to curb lawmaker trading have gone sideways on Capitol Hill, with Republicans themselves at loggerheads over the way forward after months of talks. The issue, however, is gaining new momentum among a bipartisan faction of members who argue a crackdown is necessary to root out corruption. The House Ethics Committee concluded last week that Rep. Mike Kelly's wife bought shares in the steelmaker Cleveland-Cliffs after Kelly's office learned the Commerce Department was launching an investigation that could result in tariffs benefiting the company — before notice of the investigation was made public. Kelly, a Pennsylvania Republican, is a senior member of the Ways and Means Committee. House Republicans also have privately raised concerns about Rep. Rob Bresnahan, another Pennsylvania Republican who has been a prolific stock trader after promising on the campaign trail to push a trading ban in Congress. Bresnahan has since introduced his own legislation and argues someone else manages the portfolio. A discharge petition allows a majority of the House to sidestep the majority party leadership's control of the floor agenda. Forcing a vote requires gathering signatures from 218 House members, but successful discharges are rare because it is considered a serious breach of party loyalty for majority members to sign them. The uproar adds to the politically explosive challenges Johnson will face when lawmakers return from their recess. He's already facing the threat of a separate discharge petition from Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) that would force a vote on a bipartisan bill to release Jeffrey Epstein-related documents. On stock trading, a bipartisan group of House members — including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) — have been trying to chart a way forward on a ban for months without a resolution, according to five people granted anonymity to discuss the private conversations. They have been unable to settle on a compromise between several competing bills, including Burchett's legislation and a separate, more comprehensive bipartisan bill from Reps. Chip Roy (R-Texas) and Seth Magaziner (D-R.I.).
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Turbocharges His Putin Threat After Being Relentlessly Humiliated
President Donald Trump said he will reduce a previous 50-day deadline he issued to Vladimir Putin to reach a peace deal with Ukraine after admitting the Russian leader seems to have no intention of complying with it. While speaking to reporters alongside British Prime Minister Keir Starmer during his visit to Scotland, Trump said he was 'disappointed' with Putin and warned the Russian president the already arbitrary deadline ending Sept. 3 he gave under threat of possible U.S. sanctions will be decreased by weeks. 'We thought we had [a ceasefire deal] settled numerous times, and then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kyiv and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever,' Trump said. 'You have bodies lying all over the street, and I say 'that's not the way to do it.' 'I'm disappointed in President Putin, very disappointed in him. I'm going to reduce that 50 days that I gave him to a lesser number, because I think I already know the answer to what's going to happen,' Trump added. Trump, who long vowed to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict within one day of returning to the White House, is now saying Moscow has a deadline of 10 to 12 days for taking steps in agreeing a ceasefire, reported Reuters. Trump warned Putin on July 14 that Russia will face 'very severe tariffs' of up to 100 percent unless Moscow agrees to a ceasefire and stop killing civilians within 50 days. The threat has been widely ignored by Putin, who has been trying to take over Ukraine since Feb. 2022. Shortly after Trump issued his original 50-day threat, Russia bombarded the Ukrainian cities of Kryvyi Rih, Vinnytsia, Kharkiv, and Dobropillia, in a deadly large-scale drone and missile attacks. Other high-profile Russian officials even mocked Trump for issuing the threat alongside the 50-day deadline. 'Trump issued a theatrical ultimatum to the Kremlin. The world shuddered, expecting the consequences. Belligerent Europe was disappointed. Russia didn't care,' Dmitry Medvedev, the former Russian president and close Putin ally, posted on X on July 15. It is unclear if Trump's original plan of imposing 100 percent tariffs against Russia if they do not meet the new deadline is still in place, or if harsher sanctions are now threatened. The Kremlin did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Daily Beast. Solve the daily Crossword


Boston Globe
4 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Russian strikes on Ukraine kill dozens, despite Trump push for cease-fire
The strikes - the latest in Moscow's nightly aerial campaign against Ukrainian cities and infrastructure - also targeted the city of Kamianske in Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region, striking a maternity hospital and city hospital department, President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a statement Tuesday. Three people were killed, including a 23-year-old pregnant woman named Diana, he said, calling the attack 'deliberate, targeted.' Advertisement On Tuesday morning, authorities in the northeastern city of Kharkiv also reported that rockets fired on a nearby village killed another five civilians. Earlier Monday, Trump said he was 'disappointed' that Russian President Vladimir Putin had failed to introduce a cease-fire. Shortly thereafter, Trump said that he would impose sanctions on Russia within 10 to 12 days if the situation did not change, moving up a previous deadline set for early September. In his statement, Zelensky said Trump 'delivered very important words about how Russia's leadership is wasting the world's time, talking about peace while continuing to kill people.' Advertisement He added: 'When everyone once again felt a glimmer of hope for an end to the killings, the Russian army killed 22 people in Ukraine.' Russian officials have rejected Trump's demands. On Tuesday, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that Russian officials had 'taken note of President Trump's statements' but that the 'special military operation continues,' using the Russian description of its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which began more than three years ago. On Monday, former president Dmitry Medvedev, who now sits on Russia's Security Council, said, 'Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step toward war.' Peskov also rejected Ukrainian accusations that Russia had targeted civilians in the penal colony in Zaporizhzhia. 'The Russian army does not strike civilian targets,' he said. 'The strikes are carried out on military and near-military infrastructure.' Russian forces have sharply increased their strikes against Ukraine's cities since the beginning of June, using a combination of guided and ballistic missiles and self-detonating drones, resulting in a surge in civilian casualties. Embed code: