Chief of staff of Ukraine's Zelenskiy: work proceeding on military component of security guarantees
"Our teams, above all the military, have already begun active work on the military component of security guarantees," Andriy Yermak wrote in English on the X social platform after a meeting of national security advisers from Western countries and NATO.
Yermak said Ukraine was also working on a plan with its allies on how to proceed "in case the Russian side continues to prolong the war and disrupt agreements on bilateral and trilateral formats of leaders' meetings."
A Western official had earlier told Reuters that a small group of military leaders was continuing discussions in Washington to work out options for security guarantees for Ukraine after the conclusion of a bigger virtual meeting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
6 minutes ago
- BBC News
BBC News quiz of the week: Why was a church in Sweden relocated?
This week saw President Donald Trump rule out sending US troops to Ukraine as part of a security deal, a council winning a legal challenge over asylum hotels and a shower gel advert being how much attention did you pay to what else happened in the world over the past seven days?Quiz collated by Grace Dean and George Sandeman. Fancy testing your memory? Try last week's quiz, or have a go at something from the archives.
The National
31 minutes ago
- The National
We must support Ukrainians in their resistance against invasion
What is completely absent from Mark Brown's piece is any sense of agency of the people of Ukraine, who he presents as the helpless victims of big-power politics. As in all modern conflicts, big-power politics do indeed play a role in Ukraine – but to deny the Ukrainian people any voice, as he does, is simply to reproduce the discourse of imperialism. READ MORE: David Pratt: Diplomacy is welcome but we must listen to what Ukraine wants The alternative is to support the people of Ukraine in their quest for self-determination, and in their resistance against Russian invasion. This calls for practical solidarity with Ukrainian civil society, and for military support if requested by Ukraine. Nato's expansion after the demise of the Soviet Union is no reason to turn our backs on Ukraine's people now. We have been here before, many times. For example, while one of the causes of World War Two was the imperialist carve-up of the Versailles Treaty after World War One, this did not invalidate support for the anti-fascist resistance in Europe, including the supply of weapons from Britain to the resistance in France, Norway and Yugoslavia. Readers of The National will need no convincing that the people of Scotland have the right to self-determination. But that right does not stop at Gretna: it applies to all nations, not least to Palestine and to Ukraine. In Scotland many organisations, such as Ukraine Solidarity Campaign Scotland ( are building that grass-roots solidarity. Join them if you can. Paddy Farrington Edinburgh I HAVE been involved in campaigning for LGBTQ+ equality in Scotland for 38 years and counting, and I really must protest at the counter-factual nonsense in Jim Taylor's letter of August 21. Trans people have been part of the campaign since it started. As a public example, in 1988 I was one of the organisers of Scotland's first ever Pride-style event, the Lark in the Park festival in Princes Street Gardens, protesting the introduction of Section 28. It was compered throughout by the excellent Fay Presto, the UK's first openly trans professional magician. Mr Taylor could google the Compton's and Stonewall riots of the 1960s, or the work of Magnus Hirschfeld in the early 20th century, to see earlier examples. READ MORE: Duolingo apologises after German app calls JK Rowling 'cruel' Mr Taylor goes on to write that the Gender Recognition Reform Bill should have been subject to a manifesto offer. It was! It was proposed in the SNP's manifesto for the 2021 Holyrood election (on page 33), and also in the Labour one (page 98), the LibDems' (page 51), and the Green manifesto (page 81). Unsurprisingly, therefore, the bill was introduced a year after that election, and was passed by 86 votes to 39. That's democracy! Had it not been for the profoundly anti-democratic use of Section 35 by the Westminster Tories, we would now have a de-medicalised statutory declaration system for gender recognition like that of our neighbours in Ireland, Iceland, Norway, Denmark and other countries. Needless to say, in none of those countries have the negative consequences predicted by the Tories and Mr Taylor come to pass. Tim Hopkins Edinburgh BRILLIANT letters in Thursday's edition by James Murphy and Jim Taylor in response to Ron Lumiere's. Jim Butchart via email RETURNING from holiday, I'm catching up on some articles I missed while away. After reading Kyle Renton's Long Letter on August 2 (It's Scots who should be telling stories about country's cultures and traditions), I read the Seven Days article of August 3 by Barbara Henderson about Andrew de Moray (The Invisible Man). In what was an informative article, there were a few word choices which made me think back to Kyle's letter: • John Balliol 'defied' Edward – surely as king of an independent country, John Balliol had to make the right decision for the people of Scotland, not necessarily to join England's wars? • The use of 'rebel' in relation to Andrew de Moray and William Wallace is also a strange choice. Rebelling against an invading force, or defending their homeland and fighting to preserve its independence? Having read Barbara's biography, she is certainly doing some wonderful work, but in this case, some more appropriate wording would have been more accurate. Steve Smart Newmachar, Aberdeenshire
Sky News
33 minutes ago
- Sky News
Promise of NATO-style security guarantees for Ukraine may be too good to be true
It all sounded so promising: A NATO-style mutual defence guarantee for Ukraine, provided by the US, and agreed to by Vladimir Putin. That was supposedly the concession won by Donald Trump during his summit with the Russian president in Alaska. US special envoy Steve Witkoff described the apparent breakthrough as "game-changing". But it seems it may be too good to be true. Because judging by the comments from Moscow since then, nothing has changed whatsoever. Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov described the current discussions about future security guarantees for Ukraine as a "road to nowhere". And now, "hopeless". On both occasions, the veteran diplomat made it clear that the only security guarantee Russia is willing to accept is one that involves them, referring each time to a proposal put forward by Moscow at talks with Kyiv in 2022. Under those terms, Russia would be among a group of guarantors, along with China, and would have an effective veto over any efforts to defend Ukraine. It was a non-starter for Kyiv then, and it still is now. But the Kremlin knows this. I think it's a proposal that's designed to be rejected, so that Russia can continue its attempts to portray Ukraine as the barrier to peace, and try to distance Trump from Europe. "[Ukraine is] not interested in a sustainable, fair, long-term settlement," Lavrov said in Moscow, while also accusing Europe of "undermining" the "progress" made in Alaska. But the only progress appears to be circular - there's plenty of movement, but it's going nowhere, like a hamster stuck in a wheel. The same goes for the potential meeting between Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Putin. At the start of the week, Trump claimed the two sides were "setting it up", but Moscow still has its caveats. "Our president has repeatedly said that he is ready to meet," Lavrov said, "with the understanding that all issues…are worked out". Moscow claims Zelenskyy is an illegitimate leader, and Russia's foreign minister hinted that he would need to be re-elected before any peace deal is signed, and before a presidential summit is held. So, despite the Trump administration's optimism that a peace deal is within reach, it is clear that two of the fundamental stumbling blocks remain.
