Leaning benches replace traditional benches at NYC subway station as part of MTA pilot program
The MTA has replaced traditional wooden benches with metal leaning benches at one popular Manhattan subway station.
Several leaning benches have been installed at the West Fourth Street-Washington Square subway station. Only one wooden benches remains on one platform.
In a statement, an MTA spokesperson said:
Leaders with the nonprofit Riders Alliance say traditional benches should be brought back right away precisely because it is a highly trafficked station.
"West Fourth Street has some of the most delayed and unreliable trains in the system," said Danny Pearlstein, policy and communication director for Riders Alliance.
He also raised concerns about the impact on people with disabilities, elderly individuals and others.
"If you're traveling with kids, carrying groceries or have trouble standing for long periods of time, it's really hostile to take away the benches and expect people just to lean," Pearlstein said.
The leaning benches were a relief to two tourists visiting from Oklahoma.
"We have been taking lots and lots of steps, so it's good to have an opportunity to kind of rest," one tourist said.
They also see it as an opportunity to make more space.
"It's streamlined, and it seems like it would expedite traffic on the platform," another tourist said.
New Yorkers also had a lot to say about the change.
"Leaning is just as good as sitting," West Village resident Deborah Lombardi said.
"I think they're better than having no benches at all, but they are probably less comfortable than actually being able to sit down," West Village resident Shayan Khan said.
"No. I mean, you just slide right off. Like, what? Like, this does nothing," Brooklyn resident Joey Gonzalez said.
"This is ridiculous and very unfair to anybody with troubled limbs," West Village resident Elissa Paskin said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
12 hours ago
- New York Post
Proposal to OK swimming in notoriously polluted Harlem River won't stop 2B gallons of sewage from being dumped there: activists
What a dump. Bronx activists are fuming that a proposal aimed at opening up the notoriously polluted Harlem River to swimming won't do anything to keep raw sewage from being dumped there. The state Department of Environmental Conservation said it wants to make the most polluted waterway in the city — and possibly all of New York — clean enough for swimmers to be able to take a dip in it. Advertisement But clean water activists are boiling mad about the effort, claiming the DEC's plan will effectively lock in poor quality standards, continuing to allow nearly 2 billion gallons of raw sewage to spill into the river every year. 3 An estimated 1.9 billion of raw sewage is dumped into the Harlem River every year. The Harlem River's current classification, 'Class I,' means it only needs to be clean enough to allow for 'secondary contact recreation,' like boating and fishing. Advertisement The crux of the activists' outrage lies with a proposal released by the DEC in April to reclassify the river as a 'wet weather (WW) limited use' waterbody — that could allow swimming there on so-called dry days. When it rains, the river routinely gets flooded with raw sewage and other pollutants because the overstrained systems cannot handle the additional stormwater, according to environmental advocates. As a result, the activists are calling out state and city officials for the plan to open up the river to swimming — without investing time and money into overhauling the Bronx's outdate sewage systems that overflow when it rains. It would cost around $9 billion to fix the outdated 'Combined Sewer Overflows' systems, which the DEC has ruled too costly. Advertisement 'By using an all or nothing argument to sewage pollution reduction, the city and state are attempting to justify maintaining the status quo of poor water quality for the Harlem River generations to come, and that improving water quality really is not all or nothing effort,' Ruby said. 'They're trying to say this is an upgrade when it's not,' argued Ruby. 'They're not proposing to do pollution reduction. This 'reclassification' is going to take generations to come. They need to set the goal as swimmable 100% of the time.' 3 A reclassification for the waterway would mean that the state would suspend all required water quality standards up to 36 hours after it rains. More than a dozen state and city politicians have already penned a letter to DEC Acting Commissioner Amanda Lefton demanding that the agency reconsider the proposed reclassification and replace it with a loftier goal — namely, to institute initiatives that would require the river to be swimmable at all times. Advertisement Two public hearings on the proposal are slated for the end of the month. Other New Yorkers also accused the DEC of throwing the towel on cleaning up the river, including kayaking and rowing groups groups who currently try their best to avoid touching the polluted water during their excursions. 'This is not making anything better. It's essentially observing that if it hasn't rained in a while, the river might actually be clean enough to swim in — maybe. I wouldn't swim in it by choice,' said Joy Hecht, a member of the Harlem River Rowing Community. 3 'We know the status quo is not good. The Harlem River deserves better,' said Em Ruby. metpromo_40733 'It's essentially saying, 'We give up. We're not going to try and improve it.'' A DEC spokesperson did not address the claims, saying the proposed 'landmark regulatory changes are unprecedented, building upon decades of ongoing progress to transform the Harlem River and other waters in and around New York City.' 'Collectively, New Yorkers are making significant progress in improving water quality, and the new requirements would provide additional ecological benefits and positive impacts to the region's fishing, boating, and swimming conditions,' the statement said. Chauncy Young, a coordinator at the Harlem River Coalition, griped that the proposed change marks another injustice that the borough has been dealt, pointing to other waterways throughout the city that boast free, city-run kayaking and canoe programs in their cleaner-by-comparison water. Advertisement Even the Hudson River has numerous swimming spots and opportunities throughout the year. 'We definitely feel like the forgotten borough,' Young said. 'We've been advocating for access to the river for decades and decades and decades …We definitely feel like the Bronx and upper Manhattan have been left out of development and resources that have been provided to communities in terms of access and programming and just beautiful parks.'
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
In a world without people, how fast would NYC fall apart? Here's the timeline.
Imagine the ceaseless cacophony of New York City suddenly stopped. No sirens wailed. No cars zoomed. No subways rumbled beneath sidewalks. All eight million New Yorkers disappeared overnight. Now, imagine what would happen next. If no one's around to sweep the sidewalks, weed Central Park, or turn the power grid on, nature would move in—and quick. Dandelions would spring up in asphalt cracks. Raccoons would move into abandoned apartments. Sidewalk trees would outgrow their planters. But just how swiftly would the city disappear beneath a curtain of green? We talked to architects and urban ecologists to map out a potential timeline. With no one to maintain the power grid, the Big Apple would go dark within a few days. The Milky Way would illuminate Midtown as light pollution disappears overnight. Without air conditioning and heat, 'you start getting weird temperatures inside the building. Mold starts to form on the walls,' says architect Jana Horvat of the University of Zagreb, who studies building decay. Some green energy projects in the city might stay lit for longer, such as the solar and wind-powered Ricoh Americas billboard in Times Square. Eventually, though, even the Ricoh billboard would go dark; not because the billboard would lose power, but because there would be no one to replace its LED lightbulbs. Without power, the pump rooms that clear out 13 million gallons of water daily from the subway would be useless, and the train tunnels would begin to flood. 'Probably this water would result in [the subway] being, you know, occupied by new species,' says Horvat. 'Some plants would start growing, some animals' would move in. Likely, species that already thrive in the subway—rats, cockroaches, pigeons, opossums—would be the first ones to take advantage of the human-free passages. Within the first month, the manicured lawns of Central and Prospect Park would grow wild and unkept. 'When you stop mowing a lawn, you get a meadow,' says botanist Peter Del Tredici, a senior research scientist emeritus at the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, who wrote a book on urban plant life. Within a month, dandelions, ragweed, and yellow nutsedge would start popping up in the now knee-high grasses of New York's iconic parks. 'First, it's herbaceous plants, but then, you know, you get trees and shrubs and vines,' says Tredici. In a year without people, many of New York's buildings would start to deteriorate. 'The glass facades would be the first to go,' says Horvat. The single-pane glass on brownstones and family homes would be the most vulnerable, but in a decade, even the heat-strengthened glass on skyscrapers would start to wear down and crack. And once windows break, water gets in. 'Then you'll have plants start growing in there,' says Tredici. Apartments would transform into humid hothouses, the perfect habitat for mosquitoes, water snakes, fungus, and rushes. 'It's like a wetland on the second floor.' Without maintenance, the asphalt streets and parking lots in New York would quickly degrade. Freeze-thaw cycles would create cracks. 'Water settles in that crack, and then that's all the plants need,' says Tredici. First, mosses would grow. Within a decade, young trees may even sprout. The London planetree, the most common street tree in New York, is particularly known for its resilience and fast growth rate, and any of its offspring could quickly find a toehold in a deteriorating asphalt parking lot. Within a decade, the Statue of Liberty would also start to deteriorate. The statue's copper plating would start to split, allowing sea spray to break down its interior steel skeleton. Steel 'is a very durable material, but it is very prone to corroding if it comes in contact with damp conditions,' says Horvat: That's bad news for New York, a city made from steel. In the decades since humans abandoned New York, a 'novel ecosystem' would emerge, says Tredici. 'It's not going to look like anything that's ever existed anywhere in the world.' Tredici points to Detroit as a case study. Today, crabapple trees—tough ornamentals native to the Central Asian mountains—blanket Detroit. 'They actually will spread all over,' says Tredici, and after 50 years without humans, Central and Riverside Park's crabapple trees would grow among a young forest full of London planetrees, honeylocusts, pin oaks, and Norway maples (the last three being common New York street trees). Nightshade vines and poison ivy would creep up buildings, and mosses and resilient weeds would cover the higher reaches of exposed windy skyscrapers. Among the greenery, more and more animals would call Manhattan home. Deer, rabbits, groundhogs, and wild turkeys would move in. Larger predators—coyotes, bobcats, black bears, and copperhead snakes—would follow. Peregrine falcons, bald eagles, red-tailed hawks, and great horned owls would nest in hollowed-out buildings, while feral cats prowl the abandoned upper floors of apartment buildings, feasting on mice and birds. Despite their futuristic look, the city's newest spires, such as 10 Hudson Yards and 111 West 57th Street, would be the first to fall. These buildings rely on slender, reinforced steel skeletons encased in reinforced concrete. But when the power shuts off and water seeps in through these buildings' glass curtain walls, these high-rises would rot from the inside out. The Empire State Building and Chrysler Building would likely outlast their younger rivals. Built to support much more weight than necessary (a safety precaution in the early days of skyscrapers), these giants' steel frames are bolstered by thick masonry and interior walls. Ten Hudson Yards might last a century. The Empire State Building might last 50 years longer, but eventually even these historic titans would collapse. After a century, New York City would 'become a forest,' says Tredici. A canopy of mature trees over a 100-feet-tall would replace the city's skyscrapers. Soil would regenerate. Concrete, one of the world's 'strongest' construction materials, says Horvat, would dissolve. New York's carefully manicured river parks, such as the Hudson River and East River Park, would transform into wetlands teeming with eels, egrets, turtles, beavers, and muskrats. But even as skyscrapers fell and forests grew, parts of New York would 'survive for centuries in this ruinous state,' says Horvat. Cracked marble lions would stalk the forest floor. Soil and underbrush would obscure once-gleaming granite fountains. Rusted steel beams would jut out from dense root systems. Even without humans, pieces of New York would endure—a fragile legacy for the future to either uncover or forget. This story is part of Popular Science's Ask Us Anything series, where we answer your most outlandish, mind-burning questions, from the ordinary to the off-the-wall. Have something you've always wanted to know? Ask us.
New York Times
4 days ago
- New York Times
Video Shows Fiery Fatal Crash After Police Chase
It was still dark when the driver of a stolen Honda CRV sped down a ramp off the Henry Hudson Parkway and careened out of control into a building in Upper Manhattan. Flames immediately erupted from the rear of the vehicle, according to video surveillance footage released by a lawyer for the driver's family on Thursday. About 10 seconds later, at 4:40 a.m. on April 2, the police car that had been chasing the S.U.V. drove down the same ramp. The flames had diminished but still appeared to be flickering when the cruiser, its siren lights off, reached the bottom of the ramp. The officer driving the cruiser slowed down, but instead of turning toward the Honda he turned left on Dyckman Street in the Inwood neighborhood of Manhattan and left the wreckage behind. The driver, Francisco A. Guzman Parra, 31, died from blunt impact injuries to the head and torso and 'thermal injuries,' according to the medical examiner's office. The video, which the family obtained from the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, gave the first visual account of a crash that is now being investigated by the Manhattan district attorney's office and led to the suspension of the two officers in the cruiser. Mr. Guzman Parra's family said the video confirmed what they had feared for months: that the police left him to die. 'They could have helped get him out,' said Carmen Colon, his stepmother, who, along with Mr. Guzman Parra's sisters, spoke with reporters after watching the video at their lawyer's office in Lower Manhattan. 'I think that when we see that video we're seeing a crime being committed,' she said. About 16 minutes after the crash, firefighters and officers from the 34th Precinct, which covers Inwood, received a 9-1-1 call about a car on fire. When they arrived, they found the Honda fully engulfed in flames. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
