logo
Marshall Mitchell: Mitchell housing development and transmission service approved for tax breaks

Marshall Mitchell: Mitchell housing development and transmission service approved for tax breaks

Yahoo08-05-2025

May 7—MITCHELL — The city of Mitchell has refined its tax increment district guidelines.
The Mitchell City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, May 5 approved the addition of Tax Increment Districts (TID) No. 41 and No. 42.
TID No. 41 was approved for Paul Groeneweg's Woods Apartments, a proposed 70-unit complex with two-and-three-bedroom apartments across 12 buildings.
The boundary of TID No. 41 includes the empty lots
south of First Avenue between Tiger Street and Mattie Street, as well as all of Mattie Street south of First Avenue and north of East Havens Avenue.
TID No. 42 will aid the expansion of the Dale's A1 Transmission service building, located south of East Ivy Street between South Burr Street and South Capital Street, and will generate an estimated $340,000.
TID No. 41 will be a total maximum of $4.3 million in tax financing. TID No. 41 covers the infrastructure cost of the developer at $2.28 million. Additionally, TID No. 41 is projected to cover the city's construction of Mattie Street, estimated at $2.02 million.
"We know that there is projected to be some portion of unused tax increment that should be available to support that project," City Attorney Justin Johnson said.
The city has five years to develop Mattie Street if it wishes to capture the increment revenue of the TID district, according to Johnson.
"The city holds the cards," Johnson said. "There's really no risk to us. You'll know with a lot more certainty how much is going to be able to come in to help fund the Mattie street construction."
TID developers have to certify their costs and provide final receipt totals to the city.
"If something comes in less than what they estimated that construction cost to be, then it would free up some of those funds to Mattie Street," City Administrator Stephanie Ellwein said.
Council member Mike Bathke asked why this was the second time that Mattie Street had been included in a proposed tax district, and why it failed to move forward the last time.
"There's no teeth in these deals," Bathke said.
The city's TID evaluation process has changed since that TID was proposed, according to Ellwein. Since then, the city council has requested developers to provide more reporting and certifications. Additionally, affordable housing rental rates are a key part of TID developments.
"We have a lot more oversight than what we found in the past," Ellwein said.
In 2012, the original Mattie Street project,
TID No. 17,
was proposed when the city was still accepting the debt of developments. In 2015,
Davison County Tax District No. 4
also sought to develop Mattie Street between Quiett Lane and State Highway 38, but was rejected by county commissioners.
In 2021, after a four-year hiatus from approving tax districts, the city approved
TID No. 26
and no longer takes on the debt of tax district developments.
Don Petersen, of the Morgan Theeler law firm,
who represented both TID developers, also aided the creation of the first Mattie Street tax district proposal. Times have changed for proposed tax districts.
"They've tightened down the rules and the developers have accepted those and we have to play by those rules," Petersen said.
Petersen reminded the council that developers carry the risk when building, and that a developer has five years to finish construction, according to the terms of the TID. Groeneweg plans to construct the first five apartment buildings by November, Petersen said.
Groeneweg has other housing developments as well. Groeneweg's first approved tax district was TID No. 27 for Fiala Road. Every lot in the Fiala Road development has been sold within three years, according to Petersen.
"That's just kind of a monument that shows that there's a need for this type of housing in Mitchell," Petersen said.
TID No. 41 requires the developer to guarantee rental rates will be in line with affordable housing restrictions.
"Affordable housing is expensive to build," Petersen said.
Entry-level positions in Mitchell can't afford a $350,000 house, noted Petersen, who painted the picture of saving for a down payment while living in a family-oriented apartment could enable someone to one day own a house of their own.
In the future, Ellwein plans to add more requirements for job creation to preliminary TID evaluations.
Dale's A1 Transmission plans to add 10 jobs with full benefits, according to Petersen.
Local resident Steve Sibson questioned how the South Dakota Department of Revenue would possibly approve TID No. 41 when it appears to be a mix of two different kinds of tax districts with two different goals. Sibson noted that a local tax district benefits a local government but does not have a regional or statewide benefit.
If the state classifies TID No. 41 as a local tax district, the TID would expire.
"If that were to happen, we may need to reconsider the TIF at a future date, take out whatever component the state had an issue with, and then reprocess a new TIF," Johnson said.
Petersen confirmed that the state no longer pre-approves tax districts before city council approval, a recent change at the state level.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Eagles DC Vic Fangio Breaks Silence on CJ Gardner-Johnson Trade
Eagles DC Vic Fangio Breaks Silence on CJ Gardner-Johnson Trade

Yahoo

time44 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Eagles DC Vic Fangio Breaks Silence on CJ Gardner-Johnson Trade

Eagles DC Vic Fangio Breaks Silence on CJ Gardner-Johnson Trade originally appeared on Athlon Sports. In the midst of the offseason, the Philadelphia Eagles shocked the league and dominated the headlines by trading safety C.J. Gardner-Johnson to the Houston Texans for offensive guard Kenyon Green and a fifth-round pick. Advertisement This was a decision that scratched many heads, as Gardner-Johnson was a key piece of the Eagles' defense that held the Kansas City Chiefs to 22 points in their Super Bowl LVIII win. Philadelphia Eagles safety C.J. Gardner-Johnson© Bill Streicher-Imagn Images At the NFL annual meetings, Eagles general manager Howie Roseman made more sense of the decision, noting how many high-value players they have on the roster. "We got eight guys who are making $15 million or more — we have from the 2022 to 2024 drafts, we have eight starters who are on the Super Bowl team, none of those guys have long-term contracts," Roseman said. "In those drafts, probably have five or six players that will be competing for starting jobs." Advertisement Juggling a roster with several players on long-term contracts and several who are not, Roseman wanted to avoid a situation where he would need to part with 20 guys in one offseason. "We've been very fortunate to be aggressive in keeping our guys and signing guys in free agency, and it's also got to align with the draft and having young players," Roseman said. On Tuesday, defensive coordinator Vic Fangio confirmed Roseman's statements, stating that he agreed with the final decision. Roseman was likely aiming to avoid a contract dispute with Gardner-Johnson in preparation for paying his younger players. Cam Jurgens, Jordan Davis, Nakobe Dean, Nolan Smith, Jalen Carter, Quinyon Mitchell, and Cooper DeJean are all on rookie contracts. Carter is also projected to reset the defensive tackle market next year. Advertisement The Eagles also made extending Zach Baun, Saquon Barkley and Lane Johnson their top priorities, each of which requiring a pretty penny. Philadelphia also let several other key contributors walk due to financial constraints, including Milton Williams, Josh Sweat and Isaiah Rodgers. Roseman also admitted that he was too sentimental toward retaining players after the Super Bowl LII win, and he didn't want to make the same mistake again. The Eagles' aim was to maintain a strong foundation, and Gardner-Johnson fell victim to the process. Regardless, Gardner-Johnson joins an incredible secondary unit in Houston consisting of Derek Stingley Jr. and Kamari Lassiter. Advertisement Related: Houston Texans Star Defender Earns Eye-Popping Ranking This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 4, 2025, where it first appeared.

Speaker Johnson: Trump ‘not delighted' at Musk ‘180' on megabill
Speaker Johnson: Trump ‘not delighted' at Musk ‘180' on megabill

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Speaker Johnson: Trump ‘not delighted' at Musk ‘180' on megabill

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said Wednesday that President Trump is 'not delighted' with Elon Musk's shift to oppose the megabill of the president's tax cut and spending priorities, saying that the billionaire tech mogul had reversed positions by trashing the legislation. 'He's not delighted that Elon did a 180 on that,' Johnson said Wednesday. Trump himself has not personally weighed in on Musk calling the One Big Beautiful Bill Act — which is meant to be a defining legislative achievement for the president — a 'disgusting abomination' in post Tuesday on social platform X. Johnson said he talked to Musk for half an hour Monday, arguing that the bill is 'just the beginning of a long process of making government more efficient and effective, of cutting wasteful spending, fraud and abuse.' 'Elon was encouraged by that conversation,' Johnson said. 'We left on a great note. We were texting one another, you know, happy texts, you know, Monday' 'And then yesterday, you know, 24 hours later, he does a 180 and he comes out as opposed to the bill. And it surprised me, frankly,' Johnson said. Musk railed against the 'one big, beautiful bill' in the post Tuesday, calling it 'outrageous' and 'pork-filled' due to its effects on federal deficits. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said Wednesday the bill would add $2.4 trillion in deficits over a decade, though top Republicans reject that math by arguing it does not adequately take into account economic growth that will be spurred by the tax cuts. The bill, in part, extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts and boosts funding for border and defense priorities, while making cuts to spending on social safety net programs such as Medicaid and food aid. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,' Musk added. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Tuesday that Trump knew where Musk stood and that 'It doesn't change the president's opinion' about the bill. Johnson said he called Musk Tuesday night, but the billionaire did not answer. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Sen. Ron Johnson rips into 'immoral' GOP spending bill: 'I can't accept it'
Sen. Ron Johnson rips into 'immoral' GOP spending bill: 'I can't accept it'

CNBC

timean hour ago

  • CNBC

Sen. Ron Johnson rips into 'immoral' GOP spending bill: 'I can't accept it'

Republican Sen. Ron Johnson on Wednesday blasted President Donald Trump's "one big, beautiful bill" as "immoral" and "grotesque," and reiterated that he will vote against it unless his GOP colleagues make major changes. "This is immoral, what us old farts doing to our young people," Johnson said on CNBC's "Squawk Box" after sounding alarms that the massive tax-and-spending-cut bill would add trillions of dollars to national deficits. "This is grotesque, what we're doing," Johnson said. "We need to own up to that. This is our moment." "I can't accept the scenario, I can't accept it, so I won't vote for it, unless we are serious about fixing it," he continued. Johnson has been among the Senate's loudest GOP critics of the budget bill that narrowly passed the House last month. Johnson and other fiscal hawks have taken aim over its impact on the nation's debt. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated later Wednesday that the bill would add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Johnson has proposed splitting the bill into two parts, though Trump insists on passing his agenda in a single package. "The president and Senate leadership has to understand that we're serious now," Johnson said of himself and the handful of other GOP senators whose opposition to the bill could imperil its chances. "They all say, 'Oh, we can pressure these guys.' No, you can't." Republicans hold a narrow 53-47 majority in the Senate, so they can only afford to lose a handful of votes to get the bill passed in a party-line vote. "Let's discuss the numbers, and let's focus on our children and grandchildren, whose futures are being mortgaged, their prospects are being diminished by what we are doing to them," Johnson said. Johnson's comments came one day after Elon Musk ripped into the spending bill, calling it a "disgusting abomination" that will lead to exploding deficits. The White House brushed aside Musk's comments. Johnson said that Musk's criticisms bolster the case against the bill. "He's in the inside, he showed ... President Trump how to do this, you know, contract by contract, line by line," Johnson said of Musk. "We have to do that." Johnson said that his campaign against the bill in its current form is not a "long shot," because he thinks there are "enough" Republican senators will will vote against the bill. "We want to see [Trump] succeed, but again, my loyalty is to our kids and grandkids," he said. "So there's enough of us who have that attitude that very respectfully we just have say, 'Mr. President, I'm sorry, 'one, big, beautiful bill' was not the best idea," he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store