
Is Asian talent still keen on the US as Trump tightens immigration rules?
But these days, would-be migrants could find more obstacles in their paths. Since his return to the White House, US President Donald Trump has issued various executive orders expanding deportations, cutting legal protections and reinstating travel bans.
Last month, his travel ban hit Southeast Asia for the first time, subjecting citizens from Laos and Myanmar to partial and full restrictions respectively.
While those policies have mostly targeted undocumented migrants and asylum seekers, even those with legal status are anxious about the government's widening anti-immigration policy stance.
In April, the Trump administration revoked hundreds of student visas, citing national security concerns. But it later reversed the decision.
Then last month, it resumed processing new student visa applications after a month-long pause but now requires applicants to unlock their social media accounts for review.
American immigration policies are reshaping the lives of foreign students and workers, both current and prospective — not least at a time when the new academic year is approaching.
And in the wake of the crackdowns and shifting rules, the question is, will Asian talent still be drawn to the US?
WORK AND FAMILY UNCERTAINTIES
For Indian national Neeraja Kulkarni, the US was more than a place of study. It was a launch pad for doing meaningful work in clean energy.
'I came to the US to get an education and exposure. Because at that point, I thought the US had the most influential effect in global politics,' said Kulkarni, who came to America in 2022 to pursue a master's degree.
'I was thinking I'd study for 16 months, and I'd work here for two, three years, get experience and then head back to India to support the development sector.'
She graduated in December 2023 and found work through the optional practical training programme. It allows international students in the US to work in their field of study for a year, commencing before or after graduation.
At the end of it, the employer must sponsor a work visa if the graduate is to stay on. Kulkarni began having second thoughts, however, before her year was up. 'It does feel unsafe in this country,' she said.
The US isn't just regressing right now — it's a rogue nation. And it's not a great time to be here.'
Recently, several approved H-1B work visa holders who sought re-entry into the US were turned away and had their visa revoked, which has been 'surprising to some,' said Erickson Immigration Group partner Hiba Anver.
The H-1B visa allows employers to hire highly educated foreigners in sectors like technology, engineering, finance and healthcare.
The government caps the annual number of new H-1B visas at 65,000, with another 20,000 available for individuals with advanced degrees from US institutions. Indians, followed by Chinese, take up the most H-1B Visas.
However, despite interning at a 'really famous' think-tank in Washington DC after graduation, Kulkarni found it difficult to find an employer that would sponsor her H-1B visa.
She believes 'changes in the new administration' led to a 'suspension (of) the decisions' by employers in the development sector about whether to hire international graduates like her.
Faced with these challenges, she left the US last month. She has moved back to India to join a local think-tank, bringing home her degree and her student loan debt.
'If I was doing a job in the US, it would've been easier and faster to pay back the loan,' Kulkarni said.
'But (my) decision … to go back came with the kind of job I wanted to do and … life I wanted to live, and being safer and (more) certain and supporting my people more.'
Other foreigners living stateside, such as married couple Amit Pandey and Sakshi Tripathi — both professionals on H-1B visas — have also had their American ambitions shaken amid the political turbulence.
In January, Trump signed an executive order seeking to end automatic birthright citizenship, which is granted under the US Constitution to anyone born on American soil, irrespective of the parents' immigration status.
'I was quite disappointed to know that this rule will come out soon, and my (future) children wouldn't be getting US citizenship and the rights that US citizens and their children are getting,' said Tripathi.
Should the executive order take effect, highlighted Anver, some children born in the US would 'essentially be stateless until their parents have taken some sort of proactive steps … to get some sort of alternative citizenship for them'.
Trump's order is still being challenged in court. The outcome could give pause to skilled Asian migrants, if there is no pathway to citizenship for their children.
Citizenship for their future children was a major factor in Pandey and his wife's decision to move to the US.
'I've gone through a lot in the Indian system and society,' he said, '(which) I wouldn't want my next generation to go through.'
But now the couple's pregnancy plans are on hold.
IN EDUCATION, A LOT OF PUSH-AND-PULL
The appeal of the US as the world's top destination for higher education, especially science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), is also clouded by growing unease.
Already, a survey done last October by the Keystone Education Group found that 42 per cent of foreign students were less likely to consider studying in the US under a Trump presidency.
His administration's immigration policies are now creating 'a culture of fear' in the US, with 'reverberations' that could affect even those considering visiting the country, said Anver.
Besides the policies themselves, the anti-immigrant rhetoric at the governmental level 'gives permission for people to sort of target … a vulnerable population of our communities', said Asian American Federation interim co-executive director Joo Han.
In a survey conducted this year by The Asian American Foundation, 60 per cent of Asian Americans said they did not completely feel that they belonged in the US.
During the pandemic, there was a spike in anti-Asian hate. Then in the past few months, there has been a 'normalisation of hate', said Ashok Gladston Xavier, an associate professor of social work at Loyola College, Chennai.
And if more Asians are deterred from seeking educational and economic opportunities in the US, there are long-term economic costs that could hurt the country.
'The dependence on students coming from abroad in the US is very heavy,' highlighted Xavier, who has been working in the area of migration.
Between 2022 and last year, international students contributed over US$40 billion per academic year to the US economy. For every three foreign students, one job is created through tuition fees and demand for goods and services.
Many students also stay on in the US to work, with tech giants Amazon, Cognizant, IBM, Infosys, Microsoft and Tata Consultancy Services being the biggest H1-B visa sponsors.
But that pipeline for talent is starting to narrow. A survey of international students found last September that prospective advanced STEM students increasingly anticipated shorter-term stays in the US.
Four in 10 of these students anticipated staying three years or less after graduation, while three in 10 would plan to stay longer. In the 2021 survey, the results were the other way round.
'If the students stop going there, the talent pool in the US also reduces,' said Xavier. 'Ten years (from now) you'll see the impact.'
There is a reverse brain drain underway already. The rate at which China-born scientists have left the US surged 75 per cent in the years 2019 to 2021, according to a Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences research paper.
These scientists reported difficulty in pursuing their research and general feelings of anxiety. As most of them return home, China is closing the innovation gap with the US.
'People won't stop pursuing whatever it is that they want to do,' observed Kiara Bhagwanjee, head of growth at health technology startup Superscript. 'They'll go somewhere else where they can do it instead. It just won't be America.'
Meanwhile, legal resistance is mounting, with more than 200 lawsuits being brought against various Trump policies, including on immigration. Recent surveys also show a shift in opinion towards disapproval of his handling of the issue.
'The history of the US as a country that provides economic opportunities for immigrants will always be part of its image abroad,' said Han. 'But … we're at a precarious juncture.'
At this point, US universities still dominate, accounting for seven of the top 10 universities in the Times Higher Education rankings. And the American dream holds sway over many.
In Beijing, 17-year-old Lee Xiao Xing hopes to study film stateside.
'The US is a very diverse place. And it has infinite possibilities,' he said. 'It can offer so much experience, … which may be very helpful for you to find jobs all over the world in future.'
His path, however, has not been easy.
'When Trump won, and he immediately proposed tighter visa restrictions on foreign students, I was really scared,' Lee recalled.
I've been studying international courses (to go to the US) since first grade, so I feel I have no way back.'
He is making his fourth attempt at a US student visa and is now learning French — in case he must pivot towards studying in France.
'From Trump's perspective, he must feel that resources … should be channelled to Americans,' said Lee. 'If they could loosen things up a bit, … America's relationships with surrounding countries — with other countries — might also improve.'
Back in Delhi, devotees continue to flock to the Miraculous 'Visa-Granting' Hanuman Temple for a shot at living abroad. 'One benefit we get from working abroad is … a better living standard,' said Anand. 'In terms of salary, that's also more.
'That's why I decided that if I'm getting an opportunity, I should go for it.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
30 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Netherlands uses new NATO channel to pay for US arms for Ukraine
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Military equipment are pictured as the Dutch government presents plans to increase spending on defence to 2% of GDP in the wake of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, in Amersfoort, Netherlands, September 5, 2024. REUTERS/Piroschka van de Wouw/File Photo AMSTERDAM/BRUSSELS - The Netherlands said on Monday it will contribute 500 million euros ($578 million) to purchase U.S. military equipment for Ukraine, becoming the first NATO country to contribute to a new mechanism to supply Kyiv with American weapons. President Donald Trump said last month the U.S. would provide weapons to Ukraine, paid for by European allies, but he did not provide details on how this would work. "As the first NATO ally, the Netherlands will deliver a €500 million package of US weapon systems (including Patriot parts and missiles)," Dutch Defence Minister Ruben Brekelmans said in a post on X. NATO chief Mark Rutte, a former Dutch prime minister, welcomed the announcement and said he has encouraged other alliance members to participate in the new mechanism, called the NATO Prioritised Ukraine Requirements List (PURL) initiative. 'This is about getting Ukraine the equipment it urgently needs now to defend itself against Russian aggression,' Rutte said in a statement. 'I have written to all NATO Allies, urging them to contribute towards this burden sharing initiative, and I expect further significant announcements from other Allies soon,' he added. The U.S. ambassador to NATO, Matthew Whitaker, told Reuters on Monday that he expected many more countries to announce over the coming weeks that they will participate. 'We're moving as fast as possible,' Whitaker said in an interview at NATO headquarters in Brussels. Asked about a timeline for getting U.S. deliveries to Ukraine under the new mechanism, he said, 'I think we'll see it moving very quickly, certainly in the coming weeks, but some even sooner than that. 'The Dutch are just the first of many. You're going to see a series of announcements in the coming weeks,' he added. NATO said it would coordinate the new initiative, which is funded by European members of the alliance and Canada and will be divided into packages worth approximately $500 million. In a statement, the alliance said, "Working closely with Ukraine and the United States, the Supreme Allied Commander Europe Alexus Grynkewich will validate packages that correspond to Ukraine's needs, such as air defence, ammunition and other critical equipment for rapid delivery from U.S. stockpiles". Kyiv welcomed the Dutch decision. "Ukraine, and thus the whole of Europe, will be better protected from Russian terror," Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy wrote on X. "I am sincerely grateful to the Netherlands for their substantial contribution to strengthening Ukraine's air shield," he added. REUTERS


CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
US to Require Bonds of Up to $15,000 for Some Tourist Visas Under Pilot Programme
WASHINGTON: The United States could require tourist and business visa applicants to pay bonds of up to US$15,000 under a pilot programme launching in two weeks, as part of efforts to deter overstays, according to a government notice released on Monday (Aug 4). Under the one-year initiative, US consular officers will have discretion to impose the bonds on travellers from countries with high rates of visa overstays or where screening and vetting information is considered insufficient. The scheme, set to begin on Aug 20, is part of President Donald Trump's broader crackdown on illegal immigration, which has included ramped-up border enforcement and tighter entry restrictions. Trump's administration issued a travel ban in June affecting citizens from 19 nations, and his immigration agenda has led to a decline in inbound tourism. According to industry data, transatlantic airfares fell to pre-pandemic levels in May, and travel from Canada and Mexico to the US dropped 20 per cent year-on-year. Consular officers will choose from three bond amounts, US$5,000, US$10,000 or US$15,000, though they are generally expected to require at least US$10,000. The funds will be returned if travellers leave the country in line with their visa terms. The pilot mirrors a similar initiative launched in November 2020 during Trump's first term, which was not fully implemented due to the collapse in global travel caused by COVID-19. It remains unclear how many travellers will be affected. However, many countries named in Trump's current travel ban, including Chad, Eritrea, Haiti, Myanmar and Yemen, have among the highest overstay rates. Several African nations, such as Burundi, Djibouti and Togo, were also identified for excessive visa overstays in US Customs and Border Protection data for fiscal year 2023.

Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Tesla board awards ‘good faith' shares worth $37 billion to CEO Elon Musk
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Tesla has granted CEO Elon Musk shares worth about US$29 billion (S$37 billion) in a new pay deal aimed at keeping the billionaire entrepreneur at the helm during a crucial pivot from its struggling core auto business to robotaxis and humanoid robots. The company described the 'interim award' of the 96 million new shares as a first step, 'good faith' payment to honour Mr Musk's more than US$50 billion pay package from 2018 that was struck down by a Delaware court in 2024. Mr Musk can claim the new award if he remains in a top executive role for another two years and a court does not reinstate the 2018 package currently on appeal. He has to hold the shares for five years and can buy them for US$23.34 per share, the same as the exercise price of the 2018 award. Tesla will also put to vote a longer-term CEO compensation plan at its annual investor meeting on Nov 6. The move is meant to keep Mr Musk, the public face of Tesla and architect of its robotaxi strategy, focused on the electric-vehicle maker as it navigates a shift to cybercabs and robotics from its mainstay auto business. It also seems to quell any speculation that the board's patience with Mr Musk could be wearing thin because of the recent tumultuous months, including the CEO's foray into politics. The move to give Mr Musk greater control of the company suggests that directors still see him as best-suited to tackle Tesla's growing list of challenges in the years ahead. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Singapore launches review of economic strategy to stay ahead of global shifts Singapore A look at the five committees reviewing Singapore's economic strategy World Trump says he will 'substantially' raise tariffs on India over Russian oil purchases Singapore Strong S'pore-Australia ties underpinned by bonds that are continually renewed: President Tharman Singapore All recruits at BMTC will be trained to fly drones and counter them: Chan Chun Sing Sport Singaporean swimmer Gan Ching Hwee at 'crossroads' after World Aquatics C'ships display Singapore Ong Beng Seng to be sentenced on Aug 15, prosecution does not object to fine due to his poor health Singapore Pritam Singh had hoped WP would 'tip one or two more constituencies' at GE2025 Sales have been falling at the company due to its ageing vehicle line-up, tough competition and Mr Musk's right-wing political stances that have tarnished its brand. S&P Global Mobility data shared exclusively with Reuters showed on Aug 4 that Tesla's brand loyalty had plunged since Mr Musk endorsed US President Donald Trump last summer. Mr Musk's involvement in politics and his wider business empire, including AI startup xAI, have also sparked concerns about his devotion to Tesla, the main source of his wealth. Mr Musk has threatened to leave unless he gets more control over Tesla. The new stock award will take his Tesla stake, already the largest, to more than 15 per cent from the 12.7 per cent currently, according to Reuters calculations based on data compiled by LSEG. Before Aug 4's grant, Mr Musk had no active compensation plan and Tesla said he had not received meaningful pay since 2017. With the legal fight over his 2018 package expected to continue, the board said it moved to retain Mr Musk's 'extraordinary talent.' Talent magnet 'While we recognise Elon's business ventures, interests and other potential demands on his time and attention are extensive and wide-ranging... we are confident this award will incentivize Elon to remain at Tesla,' said a special committee Tesla formed this year to consider Mr Musk's compensation. It consists of chair Robyn Denholm and independent director Kathleen Wilson-Thompson. The company said it would not record compensation expense for the award as it does not currently expect the performance condition to be 'probable of being met.' It will re-evaluate and recognise the expense if it determines the award is likely to be met, including after the two-year vesting period. The new shares will also be forfeited or offset if the Delaware courts fully reinstate the 2018 stock award, ensuring there is no 'double dip,' the special committee said. Investors and analysts welcomed the news, with Tesla shares rising nearly 2 per cent in early trading. The stock has lost a quarter of its value this year, as of last close. 'Under normal circumstances, a compensation package in the billions would raise some eyebrows. (But) clearly investors have benefited from Musk's stewardship of Tesla,' said Camelthorn Investments adviser Shawn Campbell, who owns Tesla shares. 'This stock grant will bind Musk to Tesla for the next two years.' Battle for pay The Delaware ruling on Mr Musk's 2018 pay package, the largest in Corporate America, had cited flaws in the board's approval process and unfairness to investors. Mr Musk kicked off an appeal against the order in March, claiming a lower court judge made multiple legal errors in rescinding the record compensation. He has argued that the package resulted in spectacular growth for Tesla and yet was determined by the lower Court of Chancery to be unfair to shareholders, who voted twice to approve the plan. Tesla shares have risen nearly 2,000 per cent over the past decade, far outperforming the around 200 per cent rise in the benchmark S&P 500 index in the same period. 'This is simply a repackaged version of what was done years ago and was ruled improper by a judge. It renders the Delaware court decision effectively meaningless,' said Mr Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Centre for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware. 'You don't have to incentivise him to stay. If he leaves, he throws away 13 per cent of the company, which is still a huge part of his net worth, said Mr Elson, who had filed amicus briefs supporting the court's decision to void Mr Musk's 2018 award. REUTERS