Stanford's student newspaper sues Trump administration over ‘ideological deportation' of pro-Palestinian students
, a student-run newspaper at Stanford University, has filed a federal lawsuit against the Trump administration, challenging what it calls an unconstitutional policy that targets noncitizen students over their political speech.
The case, filed in a California federal court on Wednesday, takes aim at two specific provisions within the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). These provisions, according to the complaint, have enabled the administration to pursue deportation of international students engaged in pro-Palestinian activism. The plaintiffs argue that this approach infringes on First Amendment protections and has created a climate of fear among noncitizen students on college campuses.
Fear of deportation leads to
self-censorship on campus
Attorneys representing
The Stanford Daily
and two unnamed former international students say that staff members have begun to avoid writing or publishing articles on the war in Gaza, or are requesting previous coverage be removed, fearing that their immigration status could be jeopardised.
According to court filings, the chilling effect has intensified since March 2025, when the administration began using the INA to remove lawfully present noncitizens on the grounds of their political expression.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
With temperatures hitting 95°F, this is the mini air conditioner everyone's buying in the U.S
News of the Discovery
The attorneys argue that these actions violate core constitutional protections by punishing individuals for speech that would otherwise be protected.
Legal focus on two provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act
At the heart of the legal challenge are two sections of the INA. One grants the Secretary of State broad discretion to revoke a noncitizen's visa at any time. The other allows the secretary to determine a person's removability if their beliefs are viewed as compromising 'a compelling United States foreign policy interest.'
These tools, the lawsuit claims, have been selectively deployed to silence dissent related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The legal team, which includes attorneys from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, contends that the government's actions have already reshaped student behaviour on campus. 'The First Amendment does not allow the government to retaliate against individuals simply because it disapproves of their message,' the lawyers wrote in the filing.
'When federal statutes are used to suppress protected speech, constitutional principles must prevail.
'
Ongoing legal scrutiny of the administration's immigration actions
The case follows a separate bench trial in Boston that concluded on July 21. During that trial, members of the Trump administration testified under oath about the government's coordination between the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the State Department in identifying noncitizen students and professors for immigration review based on their political views.
That trial, overseen by US District Judge William Young, now awaits a decision on whether the administration's 'ideological deportation policy' unlawfully chilled protected speech in violation of constitutional rights. Legal experts suggest the outcomes of both cases could have wide-reaching implications for how universities support international students engaged in political discourse.
For students working in campus journalism, especially those on temporary visas, the evolving policy landscape has introduced new layers of complexity.
Some international students are reevaluating the risks associated with participating in editorial decisions or publishing content that may be perceived as controversial.
The Stanford Daily's
legal action signals a broader concern that self-censorship could become normalised if legal safeguards are not clarified.
As the academic year approaches, institutions may also be called to reassess their support structures for international students facing legal and political uncertainty. For many, these developments are not just about legal protections, but about the core values of academic freedom and open expression on campus.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
here.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Gold steady amid Trump's 100% tariff threat on chip imports and trade tensions
Gold held a moderate loss, as traders looked past uncertainty created by US President Donald Trump's latest trade moves, including threatening a 100% tariff on chip imports. Traders also watched for Trump's nomination within days of a temporary Federal Reserve governor who is expected to be more aligned with his agenda to ease monetary policy.(AFP File Photo) Bullion was steady around $3,370 an ounce after a 0.3% decline in the previous session. This came after Trump said he would impose a 100% levy on semiconductor imports in a bid to force companies to move production back to the US. Meanwhile, relations with key trade partners soured, with the US leader doubling the tariff on Indian goods to 50% over the South Asian country's continued purchases of energy from Russia. Japan may also face higher duties than agreed last month on some products, Kyodo reported. Traders also watched for Trump's nomination within days of a temporary Federal Reserve governor who is expected to be more aligned with his agenda to ease monetary policy. Lower rates benefit gold, which doesn't yield interest. The precious metal's recent rally has been driven by rising expectation of rate cuts. Central bank buying and a broad trend of diversifying away from US dollar-denominated assets have also offered support. It's climbed nearly 30% this year, though the bulk of its gains happened in the first four months, as geopolitical and trade tensions rattled the market. Gold was 0.1% higher at $3,373.45 an ounce as of 8:42 a.m. in Singapore. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index was steady. Silver, palladium and platinum all rose.
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Big U.S.-India Escalation: Trump Threatens SANCTIONS After 50% Tariffs Over Russia Oil
Brazil's Big BRICS Snub At Trump Over Tariff War, Nikki Haley Warns US Not To Burn Bridge With India In a stunning diplomatic twist, Brazilian President Lula da Silva has refused to call US President Donald Trump amidst a growing trade war. While Trump imposed a crushing 50% tariff on Brazilian imports and threatened similar action on India, Lula declared that he would instead reach out to Indian PM Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Lula called the tariff day "the most regrettable" in Brazil-US ties and hinted at coordinated BRICS retaliation. India, too, faces tariff threats from Trump over Russian oil purchases. Meanwhile, Nikki Haley warned Trump against alienating India while soft-pedaling on China. As Trump dismisses BRICS as "fading fast," the bloc's symbolic banknote launch and anti-dollar stance suggest a global realignment, with India at its center. The global trade game is shifting, and New Delhi is no longer a silent player.#lula #donaldtrump #trumptariffs #brics #bricsbanknote #modi #xijinping #putin #nikkihaley #indianews #brazilnews #globaltradewar #usindia #usbrasil #russianoil #chinaus #wto #geopolitics #modigovernment #usforeignpolicy #trendingnow #india #breakingnews #trending #bharat #toi #toibharat #indianews 6.1K views | 20 hours ago
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
UCLA says Trump administration froze $584 million of its federal funding
President Donald Trump's administration has frozen $584 million in federal funding for the University of California, Los Angeles, UCLA said on Wednesday after the government reprimanded the university over pro-Palestinian protests. The Trump administration has threatened to cut federal funds for universities over pro-Palestinian protests against US ally Israel's war in Gaza. The government alleges universities, including UCLA, allowed antisemitism during the protests. Large demonstrations took place at UCLA last year. Protesters, including some Jewish groups, say the government wrongly equates their criticism of Israel's military assault in Gaza and its occupation of Palestinian territories with antisemitism, and their advocacy for Palestinian rights with support for extremism. 'Currently, a total of approximately $584 million in extra-mural award funding is suspended and at risk,' UCLA Chancellor Julio Frenk said in an update on the university website. University of California President James Milliken separately said the institution agreed to have talks with the federal government to restore its funding. Milliken said funding 'cuts do nothing to address antisemitism.' The White House had no immediate comment. Last week, UCLA agreed to pay over $6 million to settle a lawsuit by some students and a professor who alleged antisemitism. It was also sued this year over a 2024 violent mob attack on pro-Palestinian protesters at the height of the campus protest movement. The government has in recent weeks settled its probes with Columbia University, which agreed to pay over $220 million, and Brown University, which said it will pay $50 million. Both institutions accepted certain government demands. Talks to settle with Harvard University are ongoing. Rights advocates have raised concerns about academic freedom and free speech. The government has also attempted to deport foreign student protesters but faced judicial roadblocks. Stanford University's student-run newspaper sued the Trump administration on Wednesday, saying student writers censored themselves and turned down assignments related to Gaza to avoid being targeted for deportation. Rights advocates have noted a rise in antisemitism, anti-Arab bias and Islamophobia due to the war. The Trump administration has not announced equivalent probes into Islamophobia.
