Miami school board votes to urge Trump administration to protect law-abiding immigrants
In a rare showing of bipartisan unity, the Miami-Dade School Board voted in favor of a symbolic resolution to ask the Trump administration to create new protections for immigrants who will soon lose their Temporary Protected Status, also known as TPS. Venezuelan and Haitian immigrants will lose the protection, which allows people from countries with challenging circumstances to live and work legally in the United States, this year.
The item passed with 5 votes in favor and 4 dissenting votes. Danny Espino was the vote that strayed from the board's usual conservative majority, allowing the item to pass. He joined with Steve Gallon, Luisa Santos, and Joseph Geller to propose the measure and Dorothy Bendross-Mindigal cast the fifth vote.
Espino represents District 5 which includes Doral, a stronghold for Venezuelan immigrants, many of whom have or have family on TPS and have expressed frustration with the canceling of the program.
The resolution urges the administration to consider new safeguards for law-abiding immigrants who were previously protected by TPS.
The school board proposal explains that many families in Miami-Dade County Public Schools are recipients of TPS and will be impacted by the revocation of their status.
'The elimination of TPS without alternative safeguards unfortunately may jeopardize the legal status of many law-abiding students and their families in our community,' reads the item.
The item calls on federal policymakers to 'create new measures that stabilize the immigration, employment, and protection status of law-abiding individuals who fled countries due to religious and political persecution, economic upheaval and civil unrest due to political corruption, and other similar crises.'
During the meeting, board member Steve Gallon called immigrants in the community 'friends,' and said, 'we support you.'
School board's role in influencing federal policy
During a committee meeting on Tuesday before the school board meeting, Espino encouraged his fellow board members to search their hearts and support the item.
The item was co-sponsored by Steve Gallon, Luisa Santos, and Joseph Geller. Gallon's district includes parts of Little Haiti, Miami Gardens, Opa Locka, North Miami, and North Miami Beach, which includes neighborhoods with large Haitian immigrant populations. Haitian capital Port-au-Prince is teetering on the verge of lawlessness as gangs are take over many of the institutions in the city, but as recently as last week a flight of Haitian deportees arrived back in the country.
Joseph Geller said he vehemently disagreed with the idea that Venezuelans are a danger to society. 'They are no danger or threat to anyone who lives in this country. They are trying to be safe and they have done that within the confines of our system,' he said.
Venezuelan migrants have been targeted by the Trump administration, which recently issued an executive order invoking the Alien Enemies Act, a law dating back to 1798, in order to deport alleged members of a Venezuelan gang to a prison in El Salvador. Several relatives of those deported claim their family members were not involved in a gang and were denied due process.
During the committee meeting, Luisa Santos mentioned the idea of including a statement that would offer support for students in public universities who are recipients of DACA – or Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival. Recently, in-state tuition for those students was revoked in the state.
Read more: 'What if I can't go?': Florida repeals in-state tuition for undocumented students
Santos also mentioned her own experience as an undocumented student in Miami and how much it meant for her to feel supported by her teachers. 'It can mean everything when a leader acknowledges that you are not a criminal, that you belong in our schools'.
Danny Espino said he was motivated to propose the item by residents who expressed their concern about TPS ending.
Board Chair Mari Tere Rojas said, 'because of the uncertainties I can understand the anxiety and fear.' But, she said she would not support the item because she believes the school board does not have the jurisdiction to support the measure.
Steve Gallon mentioned that in 2017 he introduced a similar item asking President Trump to extend TPS. It was approved unanimously.
Roberto Alonso, Monica Colluci, and Rojas expressed concern that the item would distract from the school district's role, which is to educate.
During Wednesday's school board meeting, Mari Tere Rojas re-stated her position, saying that although the district supports immigrants, 'the school board does not have jurisdiction over immigration policies.'
During the meeting, Maurits Acosta, the student representative on the board spoke out in favor of the item. 'It's not about where you are from it is about what you give to make this country better,' he said.
'We must demand those who built their lives here have a right to stay. They came to contribute, work, and dream.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
26 minutes ago
- Axios
Miami leaders condemn Trump travel ban
Haitian and Venezuelan community leaders in Miami called President Trump's travel ban xenophobic as South Florida's immigrant communities face further restrictions. The big picture: Trump's order fully bans Haitian citizens from traveling to the U.S. and partially bans entry for Venezuelans and Cubans, among a total of 19 nations impacted. Greater Miami is home to the largest Venezuelan, Haitian and Cuban diasporas in the U.S. The Trump administration has already revoked the legal status of many immigrants from these countries through restrictions on humanitarian parole and Temporary Protected Status. Zoom in: The order suspends the issuance of most immigrant and non-immigrant visas for Cubans and Venezuelans, while fully banning entry from Haitians, the Miami Herald reports. Trump writes in the order that Venezuela "lacks a competent or cooperative central authority for issuing passports or civil documents and it does not have appropriate screening and vetting measures." For Haiti, he noted a 31% visitor visa overstay rate and said mass migration from Haiti creates "acute risks of increased overstay rates, establishment of criminal networks, and other national security threats." There are exemptions for current visa holders, green card holders, dual citizens, persons seeking visas through U.S. citizen family members and refugees granted asylum, per the New York Times. The order takes effect Monday. What they're saying: Miami-Dade County Commissioner Marleine Bastien, who was born in Haiti, issued a statement warning that Trump's "unjust policy will sow chaos in our communities, separating families and disrupting lives." "This is not only a cruel and xenophobic policy proposal – it is a blatant attempt to scapegoat an already suffering people." Adelys Ferro, executive director of the Venezuelan American Caucus, told the Herald that the ban targeted nations "ravaged by war, dictatorships, famine, and death."
The Intercept
27 minutes ago
- The Intercept
LA Protesters Aren't Inviting Violent Authoritarianism, They're Mobilizing to Stop It
Protesters gather to demand an end to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement workplace raids in Los Angeles on June 8, 2025. Photo: Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu via Getty Images When President Donald Trump announced on Saturday night that he would send the National Guard to Los Angeles to crush protests, a narrative emerged on social media that demonstrators had somehow given a gift to the authoritarian president by escalating confrontations with U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. 'Los Angeles — violence is never the answer. Assaulting law enforcement is never ok,' Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., posted on Sunday. 'Indeed, doing so plays directly into the hands of those who seek to antagonize and weaponize the situation for their own gain. Don't let them succeed.' Would the situation somehow be less violent were ICE left to snatch and disappear people without impediment? 'It is the fight President Trump had been waiting for,' began the New York Times's analysis on Monday morning. 'Trump and his top aides leaned into the confrontation with California leaders on Sunday, portraying the demonstrations as an existential threat to the country.' Sen. Bernie Sanders added his own unhelpful entry to the predictable chorus. 'Dr. King defeated racist government officials & ended segregation through disciplined non-violent resistance,' he wrote, eliding militancy in the civil rights movement. 'Violent protests are counterproductive and play right into Trump's playbook.' After over a decade of reporting on police brutality, fascist acceleration, and dissent, I have come to expect this sort of framing from centrist politicians and media organs, and occasionally those further on the left like Sanders. It is a willful refusal to correctly locate the agents of violence in a violent scenario. In reality, the protesters throwing rocks at heavily armed security forces or attempting to damage the vehicles used to kidnap their immigrant neighbors did not introduce violence. They are instead acting in militant community defense. After all, would the situation somehow be less violent were ICE left to snatch and disappear people without impediment? Does Schiff imagine either his pronouncements or the empty condemnations of his Democratic Party colleagues will slow down the deportation of our neighbors? The 'situation' that Schiff named — which he did not want Trump to 'antagonize and weaponize' — was already a state of intolerable violence. Militarized federal immigration agents were carrying out raids across LA to rip immigrants away from their lives and loved ones in service of the whitening of America. Contrary to the New York Times's description, Trump had not been waiting for a fight that then presented itself in the LA protests. His border regime, which Democrats helped build for over three decades, has already been waging an all-out war throughout the country. Read Our Complete Coverage Six months into Trump's draconian second term — Venezuelan men have been sent to a gulag in El Salvador on the basis of their tattoos; students and graduates have been kidnapped and face deportation for protected speech; and judges and members of Congress face federal prosecution for doing their jobs — it is laughable to imagine that the president and his loyalists would moderate their responses were protesters to remain placid. The Los Angeles Police Department itself put out a statement describing the demonstrations as 'peaceful' on Friday, but Trump's deputy chief of staff, maniacal white nationalist Stephen Miller, had already posted on X earlier that day that the protests were an 'insurrection against the laws and sovereignty of the United States.' His post was above a video of a slow march of a few hundred people surrounding LA's federal detention center. It should be abundantly obvious by now that the Trump administration will conjure its own perverse reality out of thin air and treat all opposition as an enemy in need of crushing. 'One side is for enforcing the law and protecting Americans,' Newt Gingrich, the former Republican House speaker and Trump ally told the Times, 'and the other side is for defending illegals and being on the side of the people who break the law.' Gingrich conveniently leaves out that, according to today's Republican Party, the law is whatever Trump says it is. The old 'good protester, bad protester' canard, which has always served to divide movements, is a particularly absurd line to draw in the face of an authoritarian government that has made clear it will enforce 'law and order' on solely ideological, loyalist lines. January 6 rioters are free; Mahmoud Khalil is caged. Here, a reference to Martin Luther King Jr. can prove useful — but not Sanders's vanilla rewriting of the civil rights movement. We might instead recall King's 1963 letter from Birmingham jail, in which he decried 'the white moderate who is more devoted to order than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says, 'I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action.''
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
World Cup host city organizers acknowledge immigration crackdown may impact next year's tournament
From left, Atlanta president Dan Corso, North Texas organizing committee president Monica Paul, Houston president Chris Canetti, San Francisco Bay Area CEO Zaileen Janmohamed, Philadelphia executive Meg Kane, (New York/New Jersey CEO Alex Lasry, Miami CEO Alina Hudak, Seattle chief strategy officer April Putney, Kansas City CEO Pam Kramer, Boston CEO Mike Loynd, and Los Angeles vice president Jason Krutzsch meet at the Paley Center in New York a year ahead of the 2026 World Cup, on Monday, June 9, 2025. (AP Photo/Ronald Blum) NEW YORK (AP) — Philadelphia's host city executive for the 2026 World Cup says organizers accept that an immigration crackdown by President Donald Trump's administration may be among the outside events that impact next year's tournament. "There are certainly things that are happening at the national level, the international level, there are going to be geopolitical issues that we don't even know right now that are going affect the tournament next year, so we recognize that we're planning within uncertainty,' Meg Kane said Monday at a gathering of the 11 U.S. host city leaders, one year and two days ahead of the tournament opener. Advertisement The World Cup will be played at 16 stadiums in the U.S., Mexico and Canada from June 11 to July 19 next year, a tournament expanded to 48 nations and 104 games. All matches from the quarterfinals on will be in the U.S., with the final at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey. 'Whether it's the Olympics, whether it's a World Cup, whether it's a Super Bowl, you name it, anytime you've got a major international sporting event, geopolitics is going to have a role,' said Alex Vasry, CEO of the New York/New Jersey host committee. Kane said the host committees must adapt to decisions made by others. 'One of the things that I think we all recognize is that we have to be really good at operating within that uncertainty,' Kane said. 'I think for each of our cities, we want to be prepared to make any person that is coming and makes the decision to come to the United States or come to this World Cup feel that they are welcome. We do not play a role necessarily in what is happening in terms of the decisions that are made.' Advertisement Trump's travel ban on citizens from 12 countries exempted athletes, coaches, staff and relatives while not mentioning fans. 'We allow for FIFA to continue having constructive conversations with the administrations around visas, around workforce, around tourism,' Kane said. FIFA is running the World Cup for the first time without a local organizing committee in the host nation. Asked in late April whether FIFA president Gianni Infantino was available to discuss the tournament, FIFA director of media relations Bryan Swanson forwarded the request to a member of the media relations staff, who did not make Infantino available. Legislation approved by the House of Representatives and awaiting action in the Senate would appropriate $625 million to the Federal Emergency Management Agency 'for security, planning, and other costs related to the 2026 FIFA World Cup.' Advertisement The 11 U.S. host committees have been consulting with each other on issues such as transportation for teams and VIPs, and for arranging fan fests. At the last major soccer tournament in the U.S., the 2024 Copa America final at Hard Rock Stadium in Miami Gardens, Florida, started 82 minutes late after fans breached security gates. 'Certainly we were not involved in the planning or the logistics for that particular match,' said Alina Hudak, CEO of the Miami World Cup host committee. She said local police 'have done an extensive review of the after-action reports related to that in collaboration with the stadium and so all of the things that happened are in fact being reviewed and addressed and I can assure you that everything is being done within our power to make sure that the appropriate measures are being placed, the appropriate perimeters.' ___ AP soccer:
