
Rights groups say Starmer's migration comments risk reigniting far-right riots
In a speech, which politicians and rights groups say recalled rightwing politician's Enoch Powell's notorious 'rivers of blood' speech, Starmer defended Labour's plans to curb net migration to the UK.
During Monday's speech he said that the country risked becoming 'an island of strangers' and that he intended to 'take back control of our borders', referring to the UK, and end a 'squalid chapter' of increased migration.
Powell's 1968 speech, which warned of a future Britain where the white population would be 'strangers in their own country', sparked widespread attacks on ethnic minorities.
Starmer outlined plans for sweeping reforms of the immigration system, including raising language requirements for all visas including dependents, requiring applicants for skilled workers visas to hold a degree, and an end to overseas recruitment for social care work.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Under the new rules, people will now have to wait 10 years rather than five before applying for indefinite leave to remain.
Rights groups have warned that the inflammatory comments risk sparking a resurgence of last summer's anti-immigration and anti-Muslim riots.
MP Shockat Adam says Starmer dodging issue of Gaza atrocities after Commons exchange Read More »
'It's not even a year since the racist riots,' Ravishaan Rahel Muthiah, director of communications at the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI), told Middle East Eye.
'A lot of people, including ourselves, are saying it's echoing the far right, but it's further than that, because the far right don't have the platform.'
'When the prime minister is saying things that maybe street fascists, or people who comment on our Instagram and social media accounts say, it has a massive effect,' he said.
Muthiah emphasised that the impacts of the measures will not just be felt by migrants, and could have broader implications for communities of colour in the UK.
'The ripple effect will be felt on our streets, will be felt by our clients and it will be felt by the broader communities of British South Asians, British African and Caribbean communities - not just migrants that have newly come to the country, but people that have lived in this country for decades,' Muthiah added.
A propaganda stunt
Campaigners pointed to Labour's anti-migrant rhetoric in fuelling last summer's riots which targeted mosques and hotels housing asylum seekers in towns and cities across the UK.
'Controlling the UK's borders' was central to Labour's election campaign, with Starmer pledging to slash 'sky-high' net migration figures and to 'smash the gangs', echoing the Conservative 'stop the boat' slogan.
Despite announcing the former Conservative government's flagship Rwanda scheme 'dead and buried,' Starmer's government has turbocharged deportations, releasing video footage of people being led onto deportation flights.
Chief executive of the NGO Care4Calais, Steven Smith, pointed out that although Starmer's speech was addressing legal migration, the policies and rhetoric effectively demonise those seeking asylum in the UK.
Labour MPs and supporters 'outraged' by slew of harsh anti-immigration measures Read More »
'It's interesting that within minutes of Starmer's speech finishing yesterday morning Nigel Farage was already proclaiming that 250 people seeking asylum had already been seen in small boats trying to cross the channel during the speech itself,' Smith told MEE.
'It's a massive propaganda stunt. Although the talk is about legal migration, the impact people think of is rubber boats and orange life jackets.
'We saw the riots over the summer, and if we continue to see language like this being used, we'll see riots again this summer,' Smith warned.
Maddy Crowther, co-executive director at the NGO Waging Peace, warned that the fallout of the new polices and Starmer's inflammatory rhetoric will be felt by the small number of Sudanese who have fled the conflict and sought refuge in the UK.
'We host a vanishingly small proportion of those fleeing deadly violence in Sudan given there are no safe and legal routes to seek safety here. We should be creating a culture of welcome for such individuals, not of antipathy,' she told MEE.
Rhetoric aside, JCWI is concerned about the impact of the new policies on its clients, which Muthiah highlighted will impact the poorest.
He described the new language requirements, which demand that every adult accompanying a worker to the UK pass an online English Level A1 test, as 'racist' and 'classist'.
Should workers apply for a visa extension, their dependents will be required to pass the English A2 test.
'I don't know whether that requirement will stand for the millionaires or billionaires that may be coming into this country. And I don't know whether it will stand for, for example, football players. There are football players that come to our country to multi-million pound deals - a lot of the time they don't speak English,' Muthiah said.
The changes will also directly impact JCWI'S staff.
'The plans don't take into account people who are trying to plan their lives'
- Sarker Shams Bin Sharif, Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants
Sarker Shams Bin Sharif, JCWI's digital campaigner, is facing a prolonged wait before he can apply for indefinite leave to remain (ILR).
'The plans don't take into account people who are trying to plan their lives,' Sharif said.
Before the raft of measures was announced, Sharif had to pay a bill of over £20,000 ($26,500) to renew his skilled worker visa for himself and his family.
It will last him three years, but the changes mean he will have to renew the visa for another two years after that before he can apply for ILR.
'It's extremely punitive and taxing, and they've just doubled it without any consultation of anyone involved,' Sharif said.
Furthermore, Sharif noted that those on visas have no recourse to public funds, a visa condition which prevents most migrants from accessing the majority of state-funded benefits, including child care.
'The government doesn't cover any of it, your child is going to be one of those children who will not have the luxury of going to nursery. When they grow up, they will always be a few steps behind,' he said.
'This is the whole system, they want to create a class of people who will be suffering and who can be blamed. That's the desired effect they're having on every migrant.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
19 minutes ago
- The National
Normality on the streets, anxiety in the air: Tehran's people fear peace is illusory, renewed war inevitable
As the smoke of war clears over Iran, the scent of saffron once again fills the aisles of Tehran's Tajrish bazaar, where life appears to be back to normal almost two months after the conflict with Israel ended. The capital's jammed streets, bustling malls, reopened cafes and renewed festivals paint a picture of recovery. Yet, under the skin, Iranians are grappling with jitters of a conflict that could reignite at any moment. 'Yes, things are very much normal. We travel, we work, and listen to music. But every day I check the news with my heart in my throat,' Fereshteh Naeemi, a 34-year-old shopkeeper in the Tajrish bazaar, told The National. 'One day Israel threatens; the other day Iran says something. I try to stay away from the news, but it's inevitable. Everyone's talking about it. We live with this stress every day.' Iranians are not only faced with the continuous war of words between Israel and Iran, but also the economic pressures and security reshuffles that reflect Tehran's efforts to regroup and prepare for a possible return to fighting. Meanwhile, the country's leadership is doing everything to project normality. State broadcaster IRIB has dropped its wartime analysis shows and resumed routine programming. The supreme leader's latest address was delivered standing – rather than seated as usual – to symbolise resilience and survival. And perhaps most strikingly, the absence of morality police on the streets is seen as an attempt to rally different voices under the banner of national unity. But to many Iranians, these moves feel staged rather than organic. 'It feels like the 1980s' When Iranians woke up on June 13 to massive blasts in the heart of Tehran – scenes they had only seen in Syria, Lebanon and Gaza – they concluded it was finally Iran's turn. Israel, which for years had branded Iran as the 'head of the snake' of the so-called Axis of Resistance, had unleashed its strikes. It was over, many thought. Iran was caught off guard – not just its air defences, but people's psyche and above all, the economy. Prices skyrocketed. Food inflation surged by 50 per cent and some items, including bottled water, vanished off supermarket shelves as families scrambled to flee big cities, especially Tehran. The government moved quickly to stabilise prices and prevent unrest. It worked, and the focus rapidly shifted back to the war itself. Fast-forward to after the war, as Tehran's residents trickled back and were confronted by new prices. Bread and rice had doubled, gold soared and the rial collapsed past 900,000 to the US dollar. Meanwhile, property sales across the capital slumped amid fears that the conflict would resume. 'It feels like the 1980s again,' Hossein Javanzadeh, a 63-year-old taxi driver who remembers the Iran-Iraq war, told The National. 'Back then, too, everyone stopped buying houses. All they wanted was dollars and gold. It's the same now. Nobody knows what's coming next.' Iran's nuclear policy reflects the same duality. Its leaders maintain deliberate ambiguity – projecting their programme's resilience while simultaneously signalling an openness to dialogue. Military reshuffle Deep underground, uncertainty is even greater. Key atomic sites, including Natanz with its 60 per cent enrichment capacity and the heavily fortified Fordow facility, were struck by Israel and the US. While surface damage is visible in satellite imagery, the impact on underground infrastructure remains unclear. Both Iran and the US agree the strikes slowed enrichment, but Iran says it had removed its 400kg of highly enriched uranium beforehand. Since the end of the conflict, no media, even state outlets, have been allowed access to the underground facilities. Observers say this ' strategic ambiguity ' allows Iran to shield itself from war while keeping diplomacy on the table. 'Iran's playing a skilful game of shadowboxing with its nuclear plans,' Iran-based journalist and commentator Amir Jaber says. 'It talks about surviving the strikes but hides its wounds, telling the west: 'Come talk, but don't expect to peek inside yet.' 'It buys Tehran time to rebuild and maybe push its nuclear programme further, but it's risky. If Israel and the US think Iran's too close to dangerous enrichment levels, they might skip talks and decide to strike again.' In the wake of unprecedented losses among Iran's top brass, the fiery anti-Israeli speeches once delivered by commanders have fallen silent, giving way to a new rhetoric that mixes defiance with pragmatism. Tehran has also moved to reshuffle its command structure. The creation of a Supreme National Defence Council, chaired by President Masoud Pezeshkian, shows that Iran's security architecture needed reshaping. The decision to reappoint Ali Larijani as head of the Supreme National Security Council further underscores a push for synergy in command should war reignite. Overall, Iran's military movements are silent, but they carry the unmistakable scent of war, which is detected not only on military bases but also mingles in the saffron-scented streets of Tehran. 'We must be prepared at every moment for confrontation. Right now, we are not even in a ceasefire [agreement]; we are in a cessation of hostilities,' said First Vice President Mohammad Reza Aref this week.


The National
an hour ago
- The National
Israel firm on ceasefire conditions, and US pushes Israel on Lebanon
Israel has demanded the release of all hostages in any Gaza deal. The US has called on Israel to comply with Lebanese government actions. Archaeologists have unearthed an ancient Christian cross in Abu Dhabi. On today's episode of Trending Middle East: Israel demands release of all hostages in any Gaza deal US must clarify Israel's obligations after disarmament vote, sources close to Hezbollah say Ancient Christian cross found on Abu Dhabi island as archaeologists dig into mysteries of the past This episode features Hamza Hendawi, Cairo Correspondent; Mohamad Ali Harisi, Foreign Editor; and John Dennehy, Senior Reporter. Editor's note: We want to hear from you! Help us improve our podcasts by taking our 2-minute listener survey. Click here.


The National
5 hours ago
- The National
Syria's Foreign Minister meets Israeli delegation in Paris
Syria's Foreign Minister Asaad Al Shibani on Tuesday met an Israeli delegation in Paris to discuss enhancing security in the region, according to Syrian state media. The discussions focused on de-escalation and non-interference, as well as monitoring the ceasefire in Sweida governorate, among other issues, Sana news agency reported. Israel's Channel 12 news outlet said the meeting included Israeli Minister of Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer. US special envoy for Syria Tom Barrack was also reportedly at the meeting. Washington has been mediating discussions between Israel and Syria. Mr Barrack met Israel's Druze spiritual leader Sheikh Muwaffaq Tarif in Paris, and he said they had a "warm and informative meeting". The two men "discussed the situation in Sweida and how to bring together the interests of all parties, de-escalate tension and build understanding", Mr Barrack said in a post on X. Tension continues to simmer between Israel and Syria. Sectarian violence surged in the Sweida region between the Druze and Bedouin communities last month. Syrian government troops were sent to contain the unrest but Druze militias, who distrust the new authorities in Damascus and accuse them of siding with the Bedouin, rallied to push them back. A military intervention by Israel, which calls itself a protector of the Druze religious community, removed government troops and allied militias from the provincial capital. Government forces have encircled the area amid a fragile truce, and Druze leaders have accused Damascus of barring most humanitarian aid from entering. More than 1,000 people have been killed and tens of thousands displaced amid the conflict. Israel and Syria have never established diplomatic relations, although both signed a disengagement agreement in 1974 that created a UN-monitored buffer zone separating them. Sana reported that the Paris discussions touched on reactivating the agreement. Cross-border Israeli strikes on Syria increased after the toppling of former president Bashar Al Assad and further intensified during the Sweida conflict, with targets including the Ministry of Defence in Damascus.