
Merz's first 100 days by the numbers
Based on factual reporting, although it Incorporates the expertise of the author/producer and may offer interpretations and conclusions.
BERLIN – By the yardstick of recent history, Friedrich Merz's first 100 days in office have been a cake walk.
His predecessor, Olaf Scholz, faced Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine just 78 days into his term. Angela Merkel, who had four separate 100-day starts during her 16-year tenure, had to cope with everything from the Greek debt crisis to Russia's annexation of Crimea to Donald Trump.
That isn't to say Merz's challenges have been trivial since he was sworn in on 6 May. The threat from Moscow continues to loom large, as does economic malaise, the continued influx of asylum seekers, not to mention Israel's war in Gaza.
The new chancellor approached those challenges with grand pronouncements, rolling out not a 100-day programme, but an 'immediate action plan', promising that by mid-year, it would be "clear to everyone that Germany is moving forward."
As Merz reaches both the middle of the year and the 100-day mark on Wednesday, here are the numbers that indicate whether he is delivering on his grand mission. The angry 18 Merz vowed to end the infighting that plagued the previous three-party 'traffic light' coalition. But his coalition, consisting of his Christian Democrats and the Social Democrats (SPD), has one of the slimmest majorities in post-war history, leaving it vulnerable to rebellions.
It took Merz an unprecedented second attempt just to get elected by the parliament, as he received 18 fewer votes than his majority in the first ballot, leaving him six MPs short overall.
The secret vote left the rebels' motivation in the dark, but it's no secret that Merz's polarising style and poor management have made him many enemies among his own ranks. He failed to get frugal Christian Democrats onboard with his sudden decision to ditch Germany's strict debt rules, a fundamental departure from conservative orthodoxy. Left-leaning SPD lawmakers are wary of his hardcore conservatism.
Merz has not helped his reputation in office. He stumbled into a historic U-turn on Germany's stance on the Israeli military operation in the Gaza Strip, imposing the first ever country-level sanctions on Israel since the 7 October massacre – without consulting the cabinet or his own outraged MPs, which is bound to profoundly damage his internal standing.
He also failed to diffuse a conservative rebellion that thwarted the election of a liberal judge to Germany's top court, leaving the SPD angry.
Given this erratic leadership style, coalition drama is here to stay. The trillion-dollar man Merz's most dramatic measure came before he even set foot in the chancellery, when he ended the fiscal orthodoxy that had shaped German policy since the 2008 financial crisis.
Germany's constitutional borrowing limit, the debt brake, had severely constricted the fiscal leeway of the previous government, effectively bringing it down.
Merz's future coalition, instead, carved out a reform that exempts defence spending above 1% of GDP from the debt brake, and also set up a €500 billion infrastructure fund outside the regular budget.
The result: Germany is on track to rack up a record €850 billion – or $1 trillion – in debt during Merz's term, according to the government's budget drafts – a third more than over the five years before. Between 2014 and 2020, Germany took on no new debt at all.
Much of the debt will go towards plans to hit NATO's new 3.5% defence spending target six years ahead of the 2035 deadline – a notable turnaround for a country reluctant to rearm and struggling to reach the old 2% target.
Though the jury is still out on the economic impact of these moves, there are some early signs of optimism. Business confidence picked up moderately since Merz's election, confirming an upward trend. Modest growth is forecast for 2025–26 after two years of recession.
Yet Donald Trump's tariffs on EU imports, especially on cars, now threaten Germany's export-led economy, with experts warning that Merz's spending spree lacks structural reforms. Nine, not nein When it comes to travel, Merz outperformed all his predecessors, as he became the first post-war chancellor to drop by nine European capitals in his first month and to visit Poland on his first full day in office.
It underlines the former EU lawmaker's personal ambition to restore German leadership in Europe. He has generally lived up to this goal: When ever Europe needs to coo rdi n ate, the chancellor is ready to convene and guide his peers.
That isn't always to Brussels' benefit, however, as Merz prefers small-circle leadership – usually with Britain, France, and sometimes Poland – instead of working with the EU institutions.
Good intentions also don't necessarily equal delivery: Merz's bromance with French President Emmanuel Macron and his marriage of convenience with Commission President Ursula von der Leyen are already hitting policy roadblocks.
475 Auf Wiedersehens
Merz's promised
Migrationswende
look more like window dressing.
He had vowed to effectively close the border to all refugees after a string of violent attacks – some linked to rejected asylum seekers – during the election campaign. The measure took effect on his first full day in office without making a detectable difference so far.
Merz's government is pulling out all the stops, however, to accelerate the drop in irregular migration instigated by the previous government.
Diplomatic accord
The German press has dubbed Merz the Außenkanzler, a mix of foreign minister and federal chancellor, for his prolific diplomacy.
Merz's smart way of handling Trump is reportedly partly to credit for the US president's decision to let Europeans buy new weapons for Ukraine, though Merz failed to keep his key promise of delivering Taurus cruise missiles to Kyiv.
His aforementioned decision to limit weapons exports to Israel marked another dramatic shift from an earlier position but aligns him with public opinion: 73% back at least some limits.
Making Scholz look popular
Merz's biggest deficit hasn't changed during his first 100 days, however: Many Germans simply don't like him.
Dissatisfaction with Merz is higher now than with Scholz after his first 100 – 65% versus 40%, according to the latest Deutschlandtrend poll.
A key problem is Merz's many U-turns, most notably his reform of the debt brake, which conservative critics see as a broken promise. His erratic coalition management has fed into pre-existing doubts over his leadership qualities .
The long and short
(mm)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euractiv
7 hours ago
- Euractiv
Germany fires boss of underperforming national rail company
BERLIN – German Transport Minister Patrick Schnieder dismissed Deutsche Bahn CEO Richard Lutz on Thursday, saying the underperforming state-owned rail operator needed a 'reset' in terms of management and structure. A private company, Deutsche Bahn (DB) is wholly owned by the federal government and dominates passenger rail traffic in Germany, but has suffered years of declining performance and service quality, drawing public ridicule for chronic delays. 'We are now working on the causes of the current situation in which the railway finds itself,' Schnieder, a Christian Democrat who became transport minister in May, said at an impromptu press briefing announcing Lutz's removal. Tackling DB's failures, he said, would require a 'reset' in structures and staffing. Lutz, a long-standing member of DB's management, had led the company since 2017 but had failed to engineer a turnaround. The share of long-distance trains arriving on time fell from 78.5% in his first year to a record low of 62.5% last year. Germany's rail infrastructure, also managed by DB, has deteriorated after years of underinvestment. Last month, the company reported a €760 million loss in the first half of the year – €1 billion less than in the same period last year. Lutz called this 'step-by-step" progress, but the new transport minister appears to have lost confidence in his leadership. 'The situation at Deutsche Bahn is dramatic, especially when you look at customer satisfaction, punctuality, and profitability,' said Schnieder. He said that the ministry would now work to finalise its "Agenda for satisfied rail customers" as part of its plan to reform DB before appointing a new CEO. The strategy is due to be presented on 22 September. The new government has also set up a €500 billion special fund for infrastructure modernisation, some of which will go towards modernising the rail network. Schnieder said he hoped to present the strategy and Lutz's successor 'within a relatively short period". (de)


Euractiv
13 hours ago
- Euractiv
Spain still runs on 2023 budget as Sánchez breaks unwanted fiscal record
Spain has never missed two consecutive budget presentations since in 1975. Now it may miss a third Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Inés Fernández-Pontes Euractiv Aug 14, 2025 13:00 3 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Spain enters the summer recess without a 2026 budget, and no clear path to one, for the third year in a row, as domestic troubles for Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez continue to pile up. Before packing his bag for his retreat in the Canary Islands, Sánchez promised that his government would submit the 2026 budget proposal. But Finance Minister María Jesús Montero walked back expectations last week, saying a draft would only be tabled if there were 'prior political consensus," which no one in Madrid is currently betting on. That means Spain is on course to miss its budget deadline for the third year in a row, this time because Catalan pro-independence parties and the far-left Podemos are threatening to block the plan before it even reaches parliament. The ordinary budget process normally begins in mid-June. The 'new' normal Spain has never missed two consecutive budget presentations since the restoration of democracy in 1975. Now, Sánchez will go down in history for missing it three times. Faced with another year of deadlock, Sánchez has leaned heavily on the 2023 spending plan – the largest in history – rolling it over again and again to keep the state running. In 2024, he bypassed the budget process, citing the Catalan regional elections, while in 2025, his government took a more forthright approach, arguing it would not even 'waste time' on a doomed budget. For now, Sánchez insists that Spain can function under the 2023 budget due to its generous scope. But José E. Boscá, economics professor and researcher at Fedea, called the situation 'highly unusual.' Without updated fiscal projections, he said, the state must resort to 'extraordinary mechanisms,' which lead to inefficiencies, policy delays, and underfunding of regions and municipalities. Centre-right opposition Popular Party has also accused the government of mismanagement and repeatedly demanded that Sánchez call elections to overcome Madrid's parliamentary deadlock. 'How can a country function with a budget that is three years out of date?' asked a PP party spokesperson. 'Regional governments don't even know how much money they'll receive.' A high-cost budget The delay reflects deeper political fractures. Sánchez's minority government depends on Catalan pro-independence parties and far-left Podemos, whose support remains more than uncertain. 'There will be no budgets in Catalonia and Spain until the government fulfils its commitments regarding tax collection, personal income tax, and the financing model," left-wing ERC president Oriol Junqueras warned the press last month. Right-wing separatist party Junts, meanwhile, is calling for payment of a supposed €50 billion debt to the region, full implementation of the controversial amnesty law, and Catalan's inclusion in the EU's list of official languages. Neither party responded to Euractiv's request for comment. Meanwhile, Podemos has repeatedly warned Sánchez that increasing defence spending in the 2026 budget is a red line the party is not willing to cross. Ironically, Sánchez, as opposition leader, once demanded the resignation of then-Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy for failing to present a budget. 'Without a budget, you can't govern,' he said then. With the opposition now calling for his head for failing to present a budget for the third consecutive year, it seems that Sánchez has come full circle. (cs, mm) Euractiv is part of the Trust Project


Euractiv
14 hours ago
- Euractiv
The EU's moral collapse
Sven Kühn von Burgsdorff served as the European Union Representative to the occupied Palestinian territory, based in East Jerusalem, from January 2020 until his departure in July 2025. Prior to his role in Jerusalem, he served as a Senior Advisor on Mediation within the European External Action Service. The EU likes to think of itself as a normative power – a community of values, committed to upholding international law, promoting peace, protecting civilians, and building a rules-based global order. These are not just lofty ideals; they are enshrined in EU treaties and Council conclusions. But when it comes to the brutal destruction of Gaza and the continued occupation of Palestine, these principles seem to have become hollow rhetoric. Worse, they are being actively undermined by the craven inaction of the EU's institutions and the obstructionism of governments like Germany, Italy, Hungary, and the Czech Republic. While Germany undoubtedly has a historic responsibility to protect Jewish life and the security of the Jewish people, this does in no way justify placing Israeli government actions above international law. If the German government were serious about securing Israel's future and preventing another 7 October from happening, it would have to work tirelessly to end the occupation of Palestine and the ongoing military campaign in Gaza that, in my view, blatantly violates international humanitarian law. The European Commission has also been shamefully absent. Only as a result of recent pressure by many member states did it eventually propose the most tepid of measures by suspending access for Israeli SMEs under a dual-use innovation window of Horizon Europe. Even this minor proposal by the Commission is being blocked by spoiler governments. While tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians have reportedly been killed, maimed and starved, and nearly the entire population of Gaza displaced, the EU dithers. The ICJ has issued provisional measures towards Israel for what it sees as the risk of genocide in Gaza – warnings the Netanyahu government has flatly ignored – and declared that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territory is unlawful. The International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued an arrest warrant for Prime Minister Netanyahu for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity. The UN, human rights organisations, and many former Israeli top military and intelligence officials have sounded the alarm about Israel's actions in Gaza and its policies in the West Bank. The EU has ample tools at its disposal to pressure Israel to end its brutal war in Gaza, dismantle the occupation, and move towards a viable two-state solution, with an independent and democratic Palestinian state living side by side in peace with Israel. If the EU remains unable to muster political will for collective action, then the moral, political and legal burden falls on individual Member States. Countries like Spain, Ireland, and Slovenia have already taken encouraging steps in recognising the state of Palestine and demanding accountability. But much more is needed now. European countries that claim to support human rights and uphold international law must start acting within their own prerogatives to bring their influence to bear. For starters, this would mean u nilaterally suspending or revoking arms export licenses to Israel under their own national export control laws, including for dual-use equipment and technology. Individual countries can also stop funding national co-financed projects involving Israeli entities, or withdraw from joint research agreements with Israeli institutions. They can impose their own national sanctions regimes on human rights grounds, including visa bans and asset freezes. While some Nordic countries have such laws, others could use counterterrorism laws to freeze assets. S ettlement-linked companies can be excluded from public procurement and state investment funds. On top of this, state-owned enterprises or sovereign wealth funds can divest from settlement-linked companies, and national authorities can ban port calls or airspace use for Israeli military vessels and aircraft. Finally, member states with universal jurisdiction provisions can prosecute suspected Israeli and Palestinian war criminals if they enter their territory, or in some cases even in absentia. All member states are of course obliged to support the ICC in arrest warrants and investigations. Individual countries should establish coalitions of the willing that take matters into their own hands as long as the EU remains frozen. Europe's image as a principled, reliable, and rules-based actor is being destroyed – not by autocratic Russia and China, or other adversaries with dictatorial regimes, but by its own refusal to enforce international law when the perpetrator is an ally. At the heart of this disgraceful paralysis are governments that have chosen to side with impunity. The EU spoiler governments are not acting in the interest of peace between Israel and Palestine. They are undermining European unity and damaging the EU's global credibility and partnerships. They are also complicit in prolonging the suffering of millions of Palestinians, endangering Israel's security. The EU's inaction is not just a strategic blunder – it is an appalling moral failure as it enables Israel's impunity and entrenches a conflict that will continue to fuel instability, radicalisation, and despair for generations in the Middle East. Palestinians deserve freedom, dignity, and self-determination. Israelis deserve peace and security within internationally recognised borders. Both peoples deserve leaders – and international partners – who spare no effort in working towards peace and justice, not a never-ending cycle of violence and perpetual domination.