Step, snack, sit: Bank holiday walks and picnic spots
While many in the country flock to busy parks and beer gardens, some may prefer the off-the-beaten-track this bank holiday weekend.
The West Midlands is home to dozens of nature reserves that offer picturesque viewings and escapism.
With a backpack, flask of tea and a sandwich or two, West Midlands' nature guides have shared their favourite spots, perfect for a gentle walk during the long weekend.
Clent Hills, Ashlawn Cutting, Clowes Wood and Swift Valley are some walking routes that are wildlife-rich and accessible for all walkers to enjoy.
Adrian Jones from the National Trust has loved the outdoors since he was a little boy. Now 74-years-old he still finds joy in the discovery of new walking routes and comfort in those he has walked dozens of times.
Clent Hills in Worcestershire is Mr Jones recommended spot to visit, offering panoramic views over the Cotswolds, Shropshire Hills and Welsh borders.
"I've been walking up those hills since I was five with my parents, and I never get tired of the views.
"The bluebells are magnificent in the woodland areas, leaving a typical carpet of blue right across and covering underneath the trees - it is breathtaking."
Although the majestic bluebells will capture anyone's attention, Mr Jones warns to pay attention to the surroundings.
"There are lots of paths that sort of meander off the hill, and there aren't a massive number of signposts on the smaller paths, which is why many people like to keep to the summit of the hill," he said.
Visitors can easily access the hills from Nimmings Wood car park.
Warwickshire Wildlife Trust health and wellbeing manager, Anna Wright, said Clowes Wood, in Solihull, is her favourite route because of the mix of old trees with beautiful features in the trunks.
"There's a tree I've always called the hugging tree, since I was about four.
"It's grown up with a solid trunk in the middle, and stems out looking like it's got two arms, and in front of it is another tree.
"I still get the same excitement and welcoming feeling, like I'm going home, when I walk the route," she said.
Karl Curtis, the Director of Nature Reserves, said Ashlawn Cutting offers wildlife lovers a treat where birds, butterflies and insects are expected to be seen on the trail.
The nature reserve in Rugby was restored from a railway line.
"It sounds awful a disused railway line but it's this wonderful green vein that has become a green artery that comes from the middle of rugby out to the countryside," he said.
He added although the outdoors is do be enjoyed, that is only made possible if everyone is mindful.
"Be a responsible dog walker as this time of year, we have lambs and birds nesting on the ground.
"People need to take more ownership of their litter because the more time we spend having to clean up after other people it stops us from doing the good work, making sure our spaces are good for wildlife and accessible for people," Mr Curtis said.
Mrs Wright said being outdoors, whether in the sun or rain, the benefits are undeniable.
"We are built to be out outside, not to be inside four walls all the time, and it really does give the chance to awaken your senses in new and different ways."
Recommended walking routes across the West Midlands:
Clent Hills
Oakley Wood
Clowes Wood
Leam Valley
Ashlawn Cuttings
Rough Hill Wood
Brandon Marsh
Parkridge
Welcombe Hills and Clopton Park
Swift Valley
Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Six city beauty spots named among world's best
Canal routes to become 'nature havens'
Warwickshire Wildlife Trust
National Trust

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
How entry fees took over Britain's countryside
Growing stretches of the English countryside are 'falling behind a paywall,' campaigners warn as national parks grapple with drastic funding cuts. The Peak District National Park Authority caused uproar last week when executives said they were mulling the introduction of a £1 entry fee. Meanwhile, visitors to the New Forest face fresh parking charges. Elsewhere, centuries-old free access to Lord Bathurst's Cirencester Park in Gloucestershire was monetised last year, access to a popular waterfall on Dorset's Bridehead Estate was blocked as of Monday, and the National Trust has hiked its membership fees by 25pc in the space of just three years. While the fees may be small, campaigners say they underpin a crisis of growing inaccessibility to Britain's beauty spots. Recent government research found that 34pc of people do not have access to a woodland larger than 50 acres within 4km of their home. And just 8pc of land in England is covered by the right to roam – making it one of the worst rate rates in Europe, according to a separate 2022 study. Lewis Winks, of the Right to Roam campaign, said: 'From entry fees for historically open parks, to pay-for-permission wild camping and river swimming, the paywalling of the countryside is quietly shutting the public out. 'Britain already has the lowest levels of nature connectedness in Europe – we should be making it easier for everyone to get outside, not creating more barriers.' An entry fee to England's most accessible national park, the Peak District, has been suggested by its chief executive Phil Mulligan. The authority's financial troubles have been blamed on a fixed government grant that has not accounted for inflation or other costs such as the rise in the minimum wage. The dwindling of funds comes as the Peak District grapples with parking mayhem, overcrowding and litter problems which have blighted popular attractions such as Mam Tor. Mr Mulligan told the BBC that the park, which has around 13 million visitors per year, has cut 10pc of its staff in recent months and suffered a 50pc real terms funding cut over the last decade. A 10p per person fee would cover its recent losses, while a bolder £1 rate would eliminate the need for core government funding. The idea has been backed by the Reform UK leader of Derbyshire County Council. But the Peak District isn't alone in considering an admission charge. Kevin Bishop, chief executive of the Dartmoor National Park Authority, questioned if the rugged moorlands need to become the 'equivalent to a low-emission zone' where 'you get charged entry'. As reported by The Times, he said a public debate was needed on how national parks' upkeep should be paid for. 'Are you going to have a national park funding model whereby you have to pay a hiking licence, like you have to do in some countries every time you want to go for a walk?' The prospect of enforcing entry fees to access our national parks – which would need to be greenlit by the Government – has split opinion. Diane Drinkwater, of the British Beekeepers Association, believes access to nature 'should never become a luxury', and stresses that revenue raised must be ring-fenced and reinvested into the natural world. Kate Ashbrook, of the Open Spaces Society, said the group 'would certainly object to a fee just to enter an area', while regular Peak District hiker, Chloe Groom, said: 'The people who will be hit hardest are those that visit the national park two or three times a week. This takes enjoying the outdoors from a free and accessible activity to one that has a price tag.' Reacting after news broke of the potential £1 charge, Telegraph reader, Lee McLoughlin, commented: 'Here begins the monetising of outdoor spaces. Hell awaits society.' Mike Ross, who labelled the proposal 'ridiculous', said 'soon we won't be able to visit any part of the country without paying fees. What is life coming to?'. A Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs spokesman said: 'Our national parks are a source of great national pride, which is why this government is providing them with a capital uplift of £15m. 'This is in addition to the £400m we are investing in restoring nature across the country. We are also helping national parks cut through bureaucracy and take an entrepreneurial approach to boost earnings.' Cash-strapped authorities have also been accused of exploiting Britain's beauty spots via their car parking fees. A minimum stay at Snowdon's popular Pen-y-Pass car park costs £20. Staying for a full day sets visitors back £40. Examples of rate increases at beauty spots are endless. Despite strong opposition, Leeds City Council this year introduced parking charges at five of its parklands, while Labour-run Birmingham City Council is pushing to bring in controversial rates at a trio of parks visited by thousands each year. The year-round fees, costing up to £5 a day, are proposed for Sutton Park, Sheldon Country Park and Lickey Hills Country Park. Ewan Mackey, a Conservative councillor, said: 'These parks were given to the people of this city for their use in perpetuity, for the benefit of their health and well-being. 'They weren't given to the council to be used as an out in Labour's ongoing cycle of crises.' The council concedes the charges are 'unpopular', but said in a report that it is 'reasonable to ask park users to contribute financially to [their] upkeep'. Elsewhere, Forestry England is considering introducing fees at its 130 car parks in the New Forest. Branded 'highly immoral' and a 'penny pinching' tactic by critics, the public body is understood to be eyeing up the parking price plan for next year. It partly blamed the need to charge motorists on 'prolonged bad weather' which has damaged its car parks and increased maintenance bills. A spokesman said: 'Caring for the New Forest has become increasingly expensive in recent years. This includes the price of vital materials needed to repair and maintain the car parks that have increased by more than 50pc over the last three years. 'At the same time, higher levels of damage to trails and car parks have been caused by prolonged bad weather and increasing usage.' Forestry England said less than 20pc of its funding comes from the Government. The spokesman added: 'We need to raise the majority of funds for car parks, trails and all of the work we do, ourselves. A sustainable approach to funding is needed if we are going to be able to continue to do this vital work and provide these facilities.' For those regularly using beauty spot car parks, annual membership with charities and organisations such as the National Trust, RSPB and Forestry Commission continues to be the most cost-effective option. Locations such as the White Cliffs of Dover (£6 per car) charge for parking, but the sites are free to use for members. Those looking to save on National Trust annual membership can purchase a National Trust for Scotland annual pass for £74.40, and still benefit from the parking perks in the rest of the UK. This is £22 cheaper than buying traditional National Trust membership. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
How entry fees took over Britain's countryside
Growing stretches of the English countryside are 'falling behind a paywall,' campaigners warn as national parks grapple with drastic funding cuts. The Peak District National Park Authority caused uproar last week when executives said they were mulling the introduction of a £1 entry fee. Meanwhile, visitors to the New Forest face fresh parking charges. Elsewhere, centuries-old free access to Lord Bathurst's Cirencester Park in Gloucestershire was monetised last year, access to a popular waterfall on Dorset's Bridehead Estate was blocked as of Monday, and the National Trust has hiked its membership fees by 25pc in the space of just three years. While the fees may be small, campaigners say they underpin a crisis of growing inaccessibility to Britain's beauty spots. Recent government research found that 34pc of people do not have access to a woodland larger than 50 acres within 4km of their home. And just 8pc of land in England is covered by the right to roam – making it one of the worst rate rates in Europe, according to a separate 2022 study. Lewis Winks, of the Right to Roam campaign, said: 'From entry fees for historically open parks, to pay-for-permission wild camping and river swimming, the paywalling of the countryside is quietly shutting the public out. 'Britain already has the lowest levels of nature connectedness in Europe – we should be making it easier for everyone to get outside, not creating more barriers.' An entry fee to England's most accessible national park, the Peak District, has been suggested by its chief executive Phil Mulligan. The authority's financial troubles have been blamed on a fixed government grant that has not accounted for inflation or other costs such as the rise in the minimum wage. The dwindling of funds comes as the Peak District grapples with parking mayhem, overcrowding and litter problems which have blighted popular attractions such as Mam Tor. Mr Mulligan told the BBC that the park, which has around 13 million visitors per year, has cut 10pc of its staff in recent months and suffered a 50pc real terms funding cut over the last decade. A 10p per person fee would cover its recent losses, while a bolder £1 rate would eliminate the need for core government funding. The idea has been backed by the Reform UK leader of Derbyshire County Council. But the Peak District isn't alone in considering an admission charge. Kevin Bishop, chief executive of the Dartmoor National Park Authority, questioned if the rugged moorlands need to become the 'equivalent to a low-emission zone' where 'you get charged entry'. As reported by The Times, he said a public debate was needed on how national parks' upkeep should be paid for. 'Are you going to have a national park funding model whereby you have to pay a hiking licence, like you have to do in some countries every time you want to go for a walk?' The prospect of enforcing entry fees to access our national parks – which would need to be greenlit by the Government – has split opinion. Diane Drinkwater, of the British Beekeepers Association, believes access to nature 'should never become a luxury', and stresses that revenue raised must be ring-fenced and reinvested into the natural world. Kate Ashbrook, of the Open Spaces Society, said the group 'would certainly object to a fee just to enter an area', while regular Peak District hiker, Chloe Groom, said: 'The people who will be hit hardest are those that visit the national park two or three times a week. This takes enjoying the outdoors from a free and accessible activity to one that has a price tag.' Reacting after news broke of the potential £1 charge, Telegraph reader, Lee McLoughlin, commented: 'Here begins the monetising of outdoor spaces. Hell awaits society.' Mike Ross, who labelled the proposal 'ridiculous', said 'soon we won't be able to visit any part of the country without paying fees. What is life coming to?'. A Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs spokesman said: 'Our national parks are a source of great national pride, which is why this government is providing them with a capital uplift of £15m. 'This is in addition to the £400m we are investing in restoring nature across the country. We are also helping national parks cut through bureaucracy and take an entrepreneurial approach to boost earnings.' Cash-strapped authorities have also been accused of exploiting Britain's beauty spots via their car parking fees. A minimum stay at Snowdon's popular Pen-y-Pass car park costs £20. Staying for a full day sets visitors back £40. Examples of rate increases at beauty spots are endless. Despite strong opposition, Leeds City Council this year introduced parking charges at five of its parklands, while Labour-run Birmingham City Council is pushing to bring in controversial rates at a trio of parks visited by thousands each year. The year-round fees, costing up to £5 a day, are proposed for Sutton Park, Sheldon Country Park and Lickey Hills Country Park. Ewan Mackey, a Conservative councillor, said: 'These parks were given to the people of this city for their use in perpetuity, for the benefit of their health and well-being. 'They weren't given to the council to be used as an out in Labour's ongoing cycle of crises.' The council concedes the charges are 'unpopular', but said in a report that it is 'reasonable to ask park users to contribute financially to [their] upkeep'. Elsewhere, Forestry England is considering introducing fees at its 130 car parks in the New Forest. Branded 'highly immoral' and a 'penny pinching' tactic by critics, the public body is understood to be eyeing up the parking price plan for next year. It partly blamed the need to charge motorists on 'prolonged bad weather' which has damaged its car parks and increased maintenance bills. A spokesman said: 'Caring for the New Forest has become increasingly expensive in recent years. This includes the price of vital materials needed to repair and maintain the car parks that have increased by more than 50pc over the last three years. 'At the same time, higher levels of damage to trails and car parks have been caused by prolonged bad weather and increasing usage.' Forestry England said less than 20pc of its funding comes from the Government. The spokesman added: 'We need to raise the majority of funds for car parks, trails and all of the work we do, ourselves. A sustainable approach to funding is needed if we are going to be able to continue to do this vital work and provide these facilities.' For those regularly using beauty spot car parks, annual membership with charities and organisations such as the National Trust, RSPB and Forestry Commission continues to be the most cost-effective option. Locations such as the White Cliffs of Dover (£6 per car) charge for parking, but the sites are free to use for members. Those looking to save on National Trust annual membership can purchase a National Trust for Scotland annual pass for £74.40, and still benefit from the parking perks in the rest of the UK. This is £22 cheaper than buying traditional National Trust membership. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


New York Post
2 days ago
- New York Post
Supermom runner claims gold in grueling marathon — even after stopping to breastfeed three times
Who runs the world? Moms. A new mom won an ultramarathon — even with stopping to breastfeed her newborn three times. Stephanie Case, 42, came in first place at a 100-kilometer race in Wales on May 17. 4 This woman is the definition of a supermom. The Canadian woman who lives in Chamonix, France, sat down at three different points during the Ultra-Trail Snowdonia in Eryri National Park to breastfeed her six-month-old daughter. It was her first race post-partum, according to NPR. After a three-year break from competing, three rounds of IVF and two miscarriages, she was excited to be back in the race with her baby by her side. And all that excitement must have hyped her up because she powered through faster than any of the other women on the course. 'Well that was a surprise,' Case wrote on Instagram. 'I WON?!?' The runner didn't know she'd placed first until after she'd crossed the finish line because she'd started the race 30 minutes after the first group of competitors. She got special permission to pause to breastfeed, on the one condition that she couldn't accept aid during the stops, so she did. 4 Case explained how she took many breaks to breastfeed her child in the midst of the race. Case's partner carried their baby to the 20-, 50- and 80-kilometer checkpoints and handed the little one over for a few minutes to feed. Mom would then kick it back into gear and continue running after her baby was fed. She paid more attention to her fuel intake and feeding schedule than to her time. 'During the race, I was taking in about 80 to 100 grams of carbohydrates an hour,' she told NPR. 'And I kept that up until about 65K, and then I had to pull back a bit because I was getting quite nauseous. And then I ramped it back up again and was kind of done at 95K.' 4 'Well that was a surprise,' Case wrote on Instagram. 'I WON?!?' Instagram/theultrarunnergirl 'That's when I started getting really nauseous.' And this Welsh course isn't a flat plain. 'It's not what you would think of as a typical running race,' Case noted. Snowdonia has 21,325 feet of elevation gain as runners have to traverse the highest mountain in Wales — Snowdon — known in Welsh as Yr Wyddfa. 'Really it's almost like scrambling or climbing, where you're going up kind of a vertical wall of rock,' Case said. Yet, she finished the race in just over 16 hours and 53 minutes — beating the other 60-something females. Her time was four minutes faster than the runner-up's. 'It was meant to be my warmup to Hardrock,' Case posted on Instagram, referencing the July 11 Hardrock Hundred Mile Endurance Run in Colorado. That course is 102.5 miles in length, with 33,000 feet of climb. Warm up or not, Case acknowledges how difficult the race she won was. 'I don't want anyone to feel badly about themselves out of a story like this. I'm quite open about how hard it is and how much support I have, and the messy parts of it,' Case told the Guardian. 'At 95k, I was done, dry heaving and peeing all over myself. I ran with devices internally. It's not all rainbows and bunnies and a lot of things have to come together for something like that to happen.' Based on the response she's received from people, Case's accomplishment is inspiring people. 4 Case finished the race in just over 16 hours and 53 minutes — beating the other 60-something females. Her time was four minutes faster than the runner-up's. Instagram/theultrarunnergirl 'I think the response has been overwhelmingly positive,' Case told NPR, adding that the reaction 'has shown me that we still have these ideas in our head culturally about what a new mom should look like.' 'We don't have to lose ourselves in becoming a mom and we can keep setting big goals for ourselves.'