MAGA world swallows a difficult truth: Arresting Trump's opponents is easier said than done
Now, it appears the FBI is involved in the hunt.
But those screaming the loudest appear likely to wind up disappointed. There's no known evidence that the absconding lawmakers have actually broken any federal or state laws, despite Gov. Greg Abbott's strained suggestion that they may have committed bribery.
It's a familiar refrain for Trump's second term: The far right lusts to see prominent Democrats or Trump adversaries hauled off in handcuffs, only to be let down when their revenge fantasies run into reality.
'They voted for that and now they realize they can't have retribution because it's not legally sound,' said Gene Rossi, a white collar criminal defense lawyer who spent 30 years at the Justice Department.
This cycle — impetuous promises of criminal consequences followed by dejection when Trump's enemies aren't immediately arrested — has already happened with Jack Smith, with James Comey, even with Joe Biden and Barack Obama (and their top advisers). The Trump administration has ordered investigations of all these figures, but legal experts say the probes are largely performative and unlikely to prompt serious or legitimate criminal charges.
It's also happening, perhaps most profoundly, with MAGA loyalists' dissatisfaction over the Jeffrey Epstein saga. The base believed Trump would vindicate conspiracy theories about Democrats and other public figures being involved in Epstein's sex trafficking, leading to a new wave of arrests and prosecutions. That hasn't materialized.
Trump, of course, has long stoked his base's hunger for criminal reprisals, even dating back to his 2016 'Lock her up' pledge against Hillary Clinton.
He escalated that rhetoric during the 2024 campaign. 'I am your retribution,' he promised his supporters.
And ever since he returned to office, administration officials and influential MAGA figures have suggested that high-profile arrests are justified and imminent, often vowing that 'justice is coming.'
But both Trump and his base are learning that it's not simple to round up political opponents, even with Trump loyalists in charge of the Justice Department.
'I want arrest[s] not DOJ people making promises on Fox News,' said Trump-aligned podcaster and conspiracy theorist Alex Jones in a recent poston X, which appended a list of MAGA-fueled scandals that have not led to any notable legal consequences.
Jones isn't alone. A cascade of Trump's influential backers have wondered aloud why the president and his Justice Department have not delivered the arrests and indictments they crave.
The issue flared most prominently last month when the Justice Department and FBI made thewhiplash-inducing admission that the so-called Epstein files do not contain a 'client list' of celebrity sex traffickers. The existence of such a list has been an article of faith among MAGA influencers for years, and Trump aides' efforts to unwind the conspiracy theories have plunged the administration into weeks of turmoil and recriminations.
'What's the time? Oh look, it's no-one-has-been-arrested-o'clock again,' Elon Musk wrote in aJuly 7 post on X.
To be sure, the Trump administration has brought criminal charges against some Democrats and other officials who oppose — or are perceived as opposing — the president's agenda. They include Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.), who was arrested while visiting an immigration detention center, and Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan, who was charged with obstructing federal immigration authorities.
Trump has also used other powers of his office to target perceived foes, like yanking the security clearances of lawyers who have worked on cases against him and ordering agencies to cancel contracts with law firms that have employed those lawyers. (Those efforts have largely been blocked by federal courts.)
And he has ordered the Justice Department to investigate former Department of Homeland Security official Miles Taylor and former cybersecurity chief Chris Krebs, who have become vocal Trump critics. He has also called for the impeachment of judges who have blocked his policies.
But Trump's base wants more. Far-right influencers have clamored for arrests stemming from a range of other purported conspiracies, including:
the allegation that Obama and his top aides engaged in a 'treasonous conspiracy' in how they handled intelligence related to Russia's attempt to influence the 2016 election;
the theory that Biden's aides committed crimes by allegedly covering up his cognitive decline, and that Biden's end-of-term pardons are invalid;
the false claim that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump through rampant fraud; and
the false claim that the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol was orchestrated by the government.
Trump himself has floated investigations, arrests and prosecutions for many of those involved.
Each example, amplified by Trump and his closest allies, has been backed by little to no evidence but has nevertheless become dogma among MAGA supporters. Now they're seething over the lack of action.
'Number of tweets that President Trump & his team have sent about arresting Russia Hoax traitors: 275,322. Number of arrests that President Trump & his team have made of Russia Hoax traitors: 0,' Emerald Robinson, a prominent pro-Trump broadcaster, recently posted.
Another pro-Trump activist, Laura Loomer, demanded the Justice Department arrestComey, the former FBI director, for a controversy over an Instagram post of seashells spelling out '86 47,' which Trump allies said was a coded threat against the president.
For now, the administration appears willing to open all manner of investigations, even those seen as flimsy and unlikely to lead to actual arrests. Attorney General Pam Bondi this week ordered a grand jury investigation of the Russia-related allegations. Fox News' Laura Ingraham recently reported that Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) is being eyed by the U.S. attorney in Maryland over mortgage paperwork — an allegation Schiff has called political retaliation. Smith, the former special prosecutor who brought two federal criminal cases against Trump, is under the gaze of the Office of Special Counsel, which probes allegations of improper political activity by government officials.
None of the matters have yielded any criminal or ethics-related charges to date.
Now, the Texas redistricting battle has ignited the cycle anew.
Texas House leaders have authorized the civil arrest of Democrats to compel their attendance at a special session to consider redistricting legislation. But their power only extends to Texas' borders, and more than 50 of the Democratic lawmakers have fled to friendlier turf, like Illinois and Massachusetts.
This week, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), who is locked in an uphill primary campaign against state Attorney General Ken Paxton, urged the FBI to support Texas' efforts to locate the fleeing lawmakers. On Wednesday, Abbott indicated that the FBI had agreed to assist.
The FBI declined to comment on its involvement, but the agency is tasked with federal law enforcement and it's unclear what role the bureau could play in the matter. Still, the news of the bureau's apparent involvement reignited Trump allies' belief that arrests could be imminent.
Paxton too welcomed possible help from the FBI, despite saying earlier that he thought the feds had no role to play.
'Let me first say, this is a state issue,' Paxton said on pro-Trump podcaster Steve Bannon's 'War Room' podcast. 'I don't know what the FBI would have to do with this, nothing.'
On Wednesday, Bannon also hosted a Texas lawmaker, Rep. Brian Harrison, who has become a vocal critic of GOP leaders for what he says was a failure to thwart Democrats' effort to block the redistricting measure. He says Republicans aren't doing enough to hold those Democrats accountable.
To Trump's detractors, the chaos is the point, even if stoking supporters' hunger for arrests never results in legitimate criminal charges.
'There isn't really a plan and he doesn't see, look for or care about a bigger picture,' said Ty Cobb, a former Trump attorney who has since become a vocal critic. 'Courts will disrupt or halt many of these nascent efforts as they mature but that is fine with him too as it helps further discredit the courts in the eyes of his followers and weakens democracy even more. It is all such a waste.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas Democrats face Republican deadline to stop standoff or face consequences
Texas Democrats on Friday are gearing up for another day defying Republican Gov. Greg Abbott and the state GOP as they try to move forward with controversial redistricting. The Texas House is set to meet as Republican legislators say that Friday is the deadline for Democratic legislators who've fled the state to return or face consequences. House Republicans will try to vote on GOP-proposed new congressional maps that would give Republicans more seats in Congress -- potentially allowing the GOP to keep control of the U.S. House of Representatives in Washington. Abbott has also requested the Texas Supreme Court to remove Democratic state Rep. Gene Wu, the Texas House minority leader, from office over the Democrats' defiance. The court gave Wu until 6 p.m. ET Friday to respond to the governor's case. Wu told ABC News Thursday that he believes his caucus will hold out on Friday and once again deny the legislature a quorum, though he said they would be willing to come back to Austin if state Republicans promise to focus solely on other issues before the special session, including flood mitigation and disaster preparedness. Democrats who have fled the state appear likely to stay away until Aug. 19, the end of the special session, meaning there will be not be enough lawmakers present for the Texas House to conduct business. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton told Fox News on Friday that he is willing to take other Democrats to court if they don't return. MORE: Texas governor orders police to find and arrest Democrats who fled over redistricting "If they show up today, we're all happy, we can get our business done, and everybody is good. If they do not show up, we will be in an Illinois courtroom ... [trying] to get them back to the state of Texas, hold them in contempt, and if they refuse to come, hopefully put them in jail," he said. He shrugged off concerns that the optics of arresting Democrats would give them a public opinion win. "I think in Texas -- I don't know what it's like in other states, but I do know in Texas, people expect their representatives to go to work," Paxton said. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows targeted the wallets of the absent members in an effort to draw them back. On Thursday, he sent a memo to all members and their staff requiring that any member who is absent from the special session to break quorum must collect their monthly check in person. Direct deposits were suspended for those skipping out until the House reaches quorum, according to memo. Abbott has called for the Democrats' arrest, and Republican Sen. John Cornyn has called on the FBI to track down those elected officials. The governor said in a podcast released Friday that he was willing to go further than creating more than five new seats the GOP could flip if the Democrats continued to block. "We may make it six or seven or eight new seats we're going to be adding on the Republican side," he said during an interview on the podcast "Ruthless." MORE: GOP's Texas map has Austin residents sharing district with rural Texans 300 miles away In the meantime, the Texas Democrats have fled to various blue states, including Illinois and California. California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom is slated to hold a news conference with those Democrats Friday afternoon, along with Rep. Nancy Pelosi and California state Democrats to show their support. "The governor and state leaders have floated a potential statewide ballot measure that would reaffirm California's commitment to national independent redistricting and allow voters to temporarily adjust the state's congressional map only if Texas or other GOP-led states manipulate theirs," Newsom's office said in a statement. California Democrats are preparing to respond to Texas Republicans' proposed new congressional districts by possibly targeting five GOP-held districts in the Golden State, sources recently confirmed to ABC station KGO-TV. But the office of the California Secretary of State told ABC News that if legislators don't move fast, it becomes nearly impossible for the state to run a statewide election that meets federal standards. ABC station KGO-TV's Monica Madden contributed to this report.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kristi Noem Slams South Park's ‘Petty' Portrayal of Her: ‘It's So Lazy to Make Fun of Women for How They Look'
No surprise here: Kristi Noem isn't thrilled with her unflattering portrayal on the most recent episode of South Park. The United States Secretary of Homeland Security called in to Glenn Beck's radio show on Thursday to share her thoughts on the Aug. 6 episode, in which an animated Noem recruited mild-mannered elementary school guidance counselor Mr. Mackey into joining ICE. More from TVLine South Park Savages ICE and Kristi Noem, Sends Trump to Mar-a-Lago - Read Recap South Park Premiere Delivers 6 Million Viewers, Best 18-49 Share Since 1999 Save the Dates: South Park Sets Return, Kelly Clarkson's NBC Series and More In addition to being ruthlessly racist, South Park's version of Noem had a penchant for shooting puppies — a nod to Noem's real-life memoir, in which she recalled killing her young dog Cricket after he was deemed too 'aggressive.' The show also gave Noem a melting face, which required an entire team to reapply each time it fell off. 'It never ends, but it's so lazy to constantly make fun of women for how they look,' Noem said to Beck. 'It's always the liberals and the extremists who do that. If they wanted to criticize my job, go ahead and do that, but clearly they can't. They just pick something petty like that.' Despite her strong opinions, Noem claims that she didn't watch the episode, as she was otherwise occupied 'going over budget numbers and stuff.' One person who likely did watch this week's South Park was Vice President JD Vance, who responded to his own portrayal by posting 'Well, I've made it' on X. The episode reimagined Mar-a-Lago as a Fantasy Island-esque retreat, with President Donald Trump as Mr. Roarke and Vance as Tattoo. Noem's displeasure with South Park comes two weeks after the White House released a statement regarding Trump's portrayal in the season premiere. 'The Left's hypocrisy truly has no end,' White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in response to Trump's portrayal as a whiny-voiced, flappy-headed, Satan-loving, small-membered dictator. 'For years, they have come after South Park for what they labeled as 'offense' content, but suddenly they are praising the show,' the statement continued. 'Just like the creators of South Park, the Left has no authentic or original content, which is why their popularity continues to hit record lows. This show hasn't been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention. President Trump has delivered on more promises in just six months than any other president in our country's history — and no fourth-rate show can derail President Trump's hot streak.' What did you think of South Park's portrayal of Noem? And what are your thoughts on Season 27 so far? Drop 'em in a comment below. An A-to-Z List of 300+ Scripted Series View ListBest of TVLine 'Missing' Shows, Found! Get the Latest on Ahsoka, Monarch, P-Valley, Sugar, Anansi Boys and 25+ Others Yellowjackets Mysteries: An Up-to-Date List of the Series' Biggest Questions (and Answers?) The Emmys' Most Memorable Moments: Laughter, Tears, Historical Wins, 'The Big One' and More
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
XRP Army Celebrates Being on 'Right Side of History' as SEC's Ripple Lawsuit Ends
In the wake of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission formally closing its legal dispute against Ripple Labs Inc., the XRP Army believes it is confirmation that the group is on the 'right side of history'—a mantra that's been repeated among the community since 2020. It stems from a blog post from Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse, who said at the time: 'We are not only on the right side of the law, but we will be on the right side of history.' The SEC alleged that Ripple had participated in a $1.3 billion unregistered securities offering via the sale of XRP, suing the company and two executives in December 2020. Ripple denied the allegations, asserting that XRP is not a security. SEC and Ripple End Appeals, Closing Landmark Crypto Case as XRP Soars At the time, XRP was worth approximately $0.56 with a budding community that had been growing since the token's launch in 2017. It tanked 62% to $0.21 in the days following the news, according to CoinGecko. Ironically, it was the SEC's lawsuit against Ripple that acted as the community's call to arms and the evolution of the XRP Army, pseudonymous group member MackAttackXRP told Decrypt. 'I personally mobilized supporters to defend XRP and Ripple,' MackAttackXRP said. 'The XRP Army grew significantly through social media and initiatives from influential figures within the community, such as John Deaton, who provided legal support on behalf of 75,000 XRP holders in the SEC lawsuit.' Prior to the lawsuit, he said, the XRP Army moniker was mostly used as an insult by outsiders taken aback by the group's vocal support for the token. 'Absolutely it brought us together. Hundreds of us submitted affidavits to the court per John Deaton, and we won,' XRP Army member James Rule told Decrypt. An affidavit is a written statement that can be used as evidence in court. A fortunate side effect of the legal battle was that it gave the Army time to accumulate XRP tokens, Rule said, because the lawsuit suppressed the token's price. Although he added he'd much rather it hadn't happened. "We emerged from this battle bigger and stronger together,' MackAttackXRP said. 'And we've known for years that we were on the right side of history.' As Decrypt spoke to several XRP Army members following the close of the legal battle, they all repeated this feeling of being on the right side of history. It all led back to Garlinghouse's 2020 blog post, which had become the source material for an XRP Army mantra. 'While we always believed we were on the right side of history, it's not truly proven until it's decided in court. Now that the case has been dropped, it's been confirmed,' pseudonymous XRP Army member CryptoinsightUK told Decrypt. 'I think there was regulation by enforcement, and the regulators picked winners and losers, which shouldn't happen in free markets.' Ripple Cannot Control XRP Ledger: CTO David Schwartz Ripple fighting the SEC, the Army believes, not only clears the coast for XRP but also the entire crypto industry. 'This legal battle became a landmark event in the crypto industry, as it not only concerned the status of XRP itself, but also had broader implications for the regulation of cryptocurrencies in the U.S.,' MackAttackXRP explained. 'It was perhaps the biggest dispute in American financial history, but it had and continues to have consequences for the entire crypto industry globally.' After almost five years of aiding Ripple's legal battle, he added, the XRP Army is going to get some much-needed rest. But soon, MackAttackXRP confirmed, the squad will rally its troops and 'push XRP to great heights.'