logo
Social media-sourced news grows, readers express 'distrust' with mainstream media

Social media-sourced news grows, readers express 'distrust' with mainstream media

The Advertiser17-06-2025
How you are reading this sentence - whether from a social media link or directly on a news website - may determine how much you trust it. According to an annual global study of news habits, it is most likely the former. Social media as Australians' main source of news has increased to 26 per cent and has overtaken online news sites (23 per cent) for the first time. Meanwhile, the number of readers who say they no longer trust news reporting has risen to 32 per cent (up 8 per cent since 2016).
These figures come from the Digital News Report: Australia 2025 conducted by the News and Media Research Centre at the University of Canberra surveyed 2006 adults. It is part of a global annual survey of digital news consumption in 48 countries, commissioned by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford.
The Report paints a picture of growing distrust in mainstream news and the perception of a polluted online information environment where people find it hard to discern facts from fake news.
Worryingly, of the 48 countries surveyed, Australians have the highest level of concern about what is real or fake online, with three-quarters saying they are worried about it. This is especially true of social media where Australians see Facebook (59 per cent) and TikTok (57 per cent) as the two social media platforms posing the biggest threat of spreading misinformation.
Facebook is still the most visited social media site for news (38 per cent) but other video-based platforms are gaining popularity with almost one-third of consumers saying they use YouTube and one-in-five using Instagram for news. TikTok is the fastest-growing social media platform for news at 14 per cent which is up 12 per cent since 2020, particularly among younger generations.
The growing use of social media and the decline in trust is accompanied by a loss of interest in news, and growing news avoidance. Over the past decade, there has been a significant drop in news interest, particularly among women and those aged 35+. More than two-thirds (69 per cent) of Australians say they often, sometimes or occasionally avoid the news. The reasons given range from the negative impact it has on their mood (46 per cent), perceptions of untrustworthiness or bias (37 per cent), and news fatigue (32 per cent).
Trust is also an important factor that correlates with people's decision to avoid news. Consumers who trust the news are much less likely to say they avoid it (60 per cent) than those who distrust the news (79 per cent). People who are concerned about misinformation are also much more likely to say they avoid news (71 per cent) compared to those who are not worried about it (53 per cent). This implies that the environment in which news is situated has an impact on audiences' attitudes toward it. While they may not necessarily see misinformation on news platforms, the sheer volume of information online and concerns about false information can lead people to withdraw from news consumption.
How can news organisations re-engage audiences who are losing faith in news?
While much of the data reflects the decline of mainstream news consumption, it also points to possible remedies for these downward trends.
In this year's survey, we asked if respondents had received any type of education or training - formal or informal - about how to use the news. News literacy is a sub-concept of media literacy and refers to the skills that help audiences have control over their relationship with news, alongside knowing how news is produced and distributed.
News literacy education aims to develop a critical understanding of news, and how to analyse and assess the quality of sources. In Australia, there are few news literacy programs. However, broader media literacy education has been conducted in primary schools since 2012 after the Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority identified it as a mandatory learning objective. But, for adults and vulnerable social groups, there is not much on offer.
The majority of participants (70 per cent) in our survey say they have not had any news literacy education or training. There is a big generational gap. Only 5 per cent of participants aged 65 or older say they have received any kind of education about the news over their lifetime, compared to more than half of 18-24-year-olds. Notable differences are also found between men (29 per cent) and women (19 per cent), city (26 per cent) and regional participants (19 per cent).
More importantly, there are critical differences in the attitudes and behaviours between Australian consumers who have received news literacy education and those who have not.
Not only are people with news education more likely to pay for news, they are also more interested in news and less likely to avoid it. While they are more likely to be concerned about misinformation, their knowledge of how things work in an online environment means people with news literacy are not deterred by this because they feel more confident in their ability to discern misinformation.
When it comes to checking online information that may be false, misleading, or fake, people who have received news literacy education are much more likely to say they go to news sources they trust (50 per cent) compared to those who have not (36 per cent). They are also more likely to turn to official websites and fact-checking. These active verification behaviours confirm the importance of news literacy education in helping Australian consumers navigate the complex online environment.
Combined, this year's data provides a strong signal to policymakers and the news media to educate the public about how the news works, its role in society and how to critically evaluate it. Given concerns about social cohesion in Australia, and the rise of more populist approaches to politics, there is a growing need for citizens to be equipped with news literacy education. With half of people who pay for news saying they have received some kind of news literacy training, increasing media literacy levels across the population also makes good economic sense for the news industry.
Digital News Report: Australia is produced by the News and Media Research Centre (N&MRC) at the University of Canberra. YouGov conducted the survey in January-February 2025. The data are weighted for age, gender and region. Education and political quotas were applied. In Australia, this is the eleventh annual survey of its kind produced by the N&MRC.
How you are reading this sentence - whether from a social media link or directly on a news website - may determine how much you trust it. According to an annual global study of news habits, it is most likely the former. Social media as Australians' main source of news has increased to 26 per cent and has overtaken online news sites (23 per cent) for the first time. Meanwhile, the number of readers who say they no longer trust news reporting has risen to 32 per cent (up 8 per cent since 2016).
These figures come from the Digital News Report: Australia 2025 conducted by the News and Media Research Centre at the University of Canberra surveyed 2006 adults. It is part of a global annual survey of digital news consumption in 48 countries, commissioned by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford.
The Report paints a picture of growing distrust in mainstream news and the perception of a polluted online information environment where people find it hard to discern facts from fake news.
Worryingly, of the 48 countries surveyed, Australians have the highest level of concern about what is real or fake online, with three-quarters saying they are worried about it. This is especially true of social media where Australians see Facebook (59 per cent) and TikTok (57 per cent) as the two social media platforms posing the biggest threat of spreading misinformation.
Facebook is still the most visited social media site for news (38 per cent) but other video-based platforms are gaining popularity with almost one-third of consumers saying they use YouTube and one-in-five using Instagram for news. TikTok is the fastest-growing social media platform for news at 14 per cent which is up 12 per cent since 2020, particularly among younger generations.
The growing use of social media and the decline in trust is accompanied by a loss of interest in news, and growing news avoidance. Over the past decade, there has been a significant drop in news interest, particularly among women and those aged 35+. More than two-thirds (69 per cent) of Australians say they often, sometimes or occasionally avoid the news. The reasons given range from the negative impact it has on their mood (46 per cent), perceptions of untrustworthiness or bias (37 per cent), and news fatigue (32 per cent).
Trust is also an important factor that correlates with people's decision to avoid news. Consumers who trust the news are much less likely to say they avoid it (60 per cent) than those who distrust the news (79 per cent). People who are concerned about misinformation are also much more likely to say they avoid news (71 per cent) compared to those who are not worried about it (53 per cent). This implies that the environment in which news is situated has an impact on audiences' attitudes toward it. While they may not necessarily see misinformation on news platforms, the sheer volume of information online and concerns about false information can lead people to withdraw from news consumption.
How can news organisations re-engage audiences who are losing faith in news?
While much of the data reflects the decline of mainstream news consumption, it also points to possible remedies for these downward trends.
In this year's survey, we asked if respondents had received any type of education or training - formal or informal - about how to use the news. News literacy is a sub-concept of media literacy and refers to the skills that help audiences have control over their relationship with news, alongside knowing how news is produced and distributed.
News literacy education aims to develop a critical understanding of news, and how to analyse and assess the quality of sources. In Australia, there are few news literacy programs. However, broader media literacy education has been conducted in primary schools since 2012 after the Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority identified it as a mandatory learning objective. But, for adults and vulnerable social groups, there is not much on offer.
The majority of participants (70 per cent) in our survey say they have not had any news literacy education or training. There is a big generational gap. Only 5 per cent of participants aged 65 or older say they have received any kind of education about the news over their lifetime, compared to more than half of 18-24-year-olds. Notable differences are also found between men (29 per cent) and women (19 per cent), city (26 per cent) and regional participants (19 per cent).
More importantly, there are critical differences in the attitudes and behaviours between Australian consumers who have received news literacy education and those who have not.
Not only are people with news education more likely to pay for news, they are also more interested in news and less likely to avoid it. While they are more likely to be concerned about misinformation, their knowledge of how things work in an online environment means people with news literacy are not deterred by this because they feel more confident in their ability to discern misinformation.
When it comes to checking online information that may be false, misleading, or fake, people who have received news literacy education are much more likely to say they go to news sources they trust (50 per cent) compared to those who have not (36 per cent). They are also more likely to turn to official websites and fact-checking. These active verification behaviours confirm the importance of news literacy education in helping Australian consumers navigate the complex online environment.
Combined, this year's data provides a strong signal to policymakers and the news media to educate the public about how the news works, its role in society and how to critically evaluate it. Given concerns about social cohesion in Australia, and the rise of more populist approaches to politics, there is a growing need for citizens to be equipped with news literacy education. With half of people who pay for news saying they have received some kind of news literacy training, increasing media literacy levels across the population also makes good economic sense for the news industry.
Digital News Report: Australia is produced by the News and Media Research Centre (N&MRC) at the University of Canberra. YouGov conducted the survey in January-February 2025. The data are weighted for age, gender and region. Education and political quotas were applied. In Australia, this is the eleventh annual survey of its kind produced by the N&MRC.
How you are reading this sentence - whether from a social media link or directly on a news website - may determine how much you trust it. According to an annual global study of news habits, it is most likely the former. Social media as Australians' main source of news has increased to 26 per cent and has overtaken online news sites (23 per cent) for the first time. Meanwhile, the number of readers who say they no longer trust news reporting has risen to 32 per cent (up 8 per cent since 2016).
These figures come from the Digital News Report: Australia 2025 conducted by the News and Media Research Centre at the University of Canberra surveyed 2006 adults. It is part of a global annual survey of digital news consumption in 48 countries, commissioned by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford.
The Report paints a picture of growing distrust in mainstream news and the perception of a polluted online information environment where people find it hard to discern facts from fake news.
Worryingly, of the 48 countries surveyed, Australians have the highest level of concern about what is real or fake online, with three-quarters saying they are worried about it. This is especially true of social media where Australians see Facebook (59 per cent) and TikTok (57 per cent) as the two social media platforms posing the biggest threat of spreading misinformation.
Facebook is still the most visited social media site for news (38 per cent) but other video-based platforms are gaining popularity with almost one-third of consumers saying they use YouTube and one-in-five using Instagram for news. TikTok is the fastest-growing social media platform for news at 14 per cent which is up 12 per cent since 2020, particularly among younger generations.
The growing use of social media and the decline in trust is accompanied by a loss of interest in news, and growing news avoidance. Over the past decade, there has been a significant drop in news interest, particularly among women and those aged 35+. More than two-thirds (69 per cent) of Australians say they often, sometimes or occasionally avoid the news. The reasons given range from the negative impact it has on their mood (46 per cent), perceptions of untrustworthiness or bias (37 per cent), and news fatigue (32 per cent).
Trust is also an important factor that correlates with people's decision to avoid news. Consumers who trust the news are much less likely to say they avoid it (60 per cent) than those who distrust the news (79 per cent). People who are concerned about misinformation are also much more likely to say they avoid news (71 per cent) compared to those who are not worried about it (53 per cent). This implies that the environment in which news is situated has an impact on audiences' attitudes toward it. While they may not necessarily see misinformation on news platforms, the sheer volume of information online and concerns about false information can lead people to withdraw from news consumption.
How can news organisations re-engage audiences who are losing faith in news?
While much of the data reflects the decline of mainstream news consumption, it also points to possible remedies for these downward trends.
In this year's survey, we asked if respondents had received any type of education or training - formal or informal - about how to use the news. News literacy is a sub-concept of media literacy and refers to the skills that help audiences have control over their relationship with news, alongside knowing how news is produced and distributed.
News literacy education aims to develop a critical understanding of news, and how to analyse and assess the quality of sources. In Australia, there are few news literacy programs. However, broader media literacy education has been conducted in primary schools since 2012 after the Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority identified it as a mandatory learning objective. But, for adults and vulnerable social groups, there is not much on offer.
The majority of participants (70 per cent) in our survey say they have not had any news literacy education or training. There is a big generational gap. Only 5 per cent of participants aged 65 or older say they have received any kind of education about the news over their lifetime, compared to more than half of 18-24-year-olds. Notable differences are also found between men (29 per cent) and women (19 per cent), city (26 per cent) and regional participants (19 per cent).
More importantly, there are critical differences in the attitudes and behaviours between Australian consumers who have received news literacy education and those who have not.
Not only are people with news education more likely to pay for news, they are also more interested in news and less likely to avoid it. While they are more likely to be concerned about misinformation, their knowledge of how things work in an online environment means people with news literacy are not deterred by this because they feel more confident in their ability to discern misinformation.
When it comes to checking online information that may be false, misleading, or fake, people who have received news literacy education are much more likely to say they go to news sources they trust (50 per cent) compared to those who have not (36 per cent). They are also more likely to turn to official websites and fact-checking. These active verification behaviours confirm the importance of news literacy education in helping Australian consumers navigate the complex online environment.
Combined, this year's data provides a strong signal to policymakers and the news media to educate the public about how the news works, its role in society and how to critically evaluate it. Given concerns about social cohesion in Australia, and the rise of more populist approaches to politics, there is a growing need for citizens to be equipped with news literacy education. With half of people who pay for news saying they have received some kind of news literacy training, increasing media literacy levels across the population also makes good economic sense for the news industry.
Digital News Report: Australia is produced by the News and Media Research Centre (N&MRC) at the University of Canberra. YouGov conducted the survey in January-February 2025. The data are weighted for age, gender and region. Education and political quotas were applied. In Australia, this is the eleventh annual survey of its kind produced by the N&MRC.
How you are reading this sentence - whether from a social media link or directly on a news website - may determine how much you trust it. According to an annual global study of news habits, it is most likely the former. Social media as Australians' main source of news has increased to 26 per cent and has overtaken online news sites (23 per cent) for the first time. Meanwhile, the number of readers who say they no longer trust news reporting has risen to 32 per cent (up 8 per cent since 2016).
These figures come from the Digital News Report: Australia 2025 conducted by the News and Media Research Centre at the University of Canberra surveyed 2006 adults. It is part of a global annual survey of digital news consumption in 48 countries, commissioned by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford.
The Report paints a picture of growing distrust in mainstream news and the perception of a polluted online information environment where people find it hard to discern facts from fake news.
Worryingly, of the 48 countries surveyed, Australians have the highest level of concern about what is real or fake online, with three-quarters saying they are worried about it. This is especially true of social media where Australians see Facebook (59 per cent) and TikTok (57 per cent) as the two social media platforms posing the biggest threat of spreading misinformation.
Facebook is still the most visited social media site for news (38 per cent) but other video-based platforms are gaining popularity with almost one-third of consumers saying they use YouTube and one-in-five using Instagram for news. TikTok is the fastest-growing social media platform for news at 14 per cent which is up 12 per cent since 2020, particularly among younger generations.
The growing use of social media and the decline in trust is accompanied by a loss of interest in news, and growing news avoidance. Over the past decade, there has been a significant drop in news interest, particularly among women and those aged 35+. More than two-thirds (69 per cent) of Australians say they often, sometimes or occasionally avoid the news. The reasons given range from the negative impact it has on their mood (46 per cent), perceptions of untrustworthiness or bias (37 per cent), and news fatigue (32 per cent).
Trust is also an important factor that correlates with people's decision to avoid news. Consumers who trust the news are much less likely to say they avoid it (60 per cent) than those who distrust the news (79 per cent). People who are concerned about misinformation are also much more likely to say they avoid news (71 per cent) compared to those who are not worried about it (53 per cent). This implies that the environment in which news is situated has an impact on audiences' attitudes toward it. While they may not necessarily see misinformation on news platforms, the sheer volume of information online and concerns about false information can lead people to withdraw from news consumption.
How can news organisations re-engage audiences who are losing faith in news?
While much of the data reflects the decline of mainstream news consumption, it also points to possible remedies for these downward trends.
In this year's survey, we asked if respondents had received any type of education or training - formal or informal - about how to use the news. News literacy is a sub-concept of media literacy and refers to the skills that help audiences have control over their relationship with news, alongside knowing how news is produced and distributed.
News literacy education aims to develop a critical understanding of news, and how to analyse and assess the quality of sources. In Australia, there are few news literacy programs. However, broader media literacy education has been conducted in primary schools since 2012 after the Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority identified it as a mandatory learning objective. But, for adults and vulnerable social groups, there is not much on offer.
The majority of participants (70 per cent) in our survey say they have not had any news literacy education or training. There is a big generational gap. Only 5 per cent of participants aged 65 or older say they have received any kind of education about the news over their lifetime, compared to more than half of 18-24-year-olds. Notable differences are also found between men (29 per cent) and women (19 per cent), city (26 per cent) and regional participants (19 per cent).
More importantly, there are critical differences in the attitudes and behaviours between Australian consumers who have received news literacy education and those who have not.
Not only are people with news education more likely to pay for news, they are also more interested in news and less likely to avoid it. While they are more likely to be concerned about misinformation, their knowledge of how things work in an online environment means people with news literacy are not deterred by this because they feel more confident in their ability to discern misinformation.
When it comes to checking online information that may be false, misleading, or fake, people who have received news literacy education are much more likely to say they go to news sources they trust (50 per cent) compared to those who have not (36 per cent). They are also more likely to turn to official websites and fact-checking. These active verification behaviours confirm the importance of news literacy education in helping Australian consumers navigate the complex online environment.
Combined, this year's data provides a strong signal to policymakers and the news media to educate the public about how the news works, its role in society and how to critically evaluate it. Given concerns about social cohesion in Australia, and the rise of more populist approaches to politics, there is a growing need for citizens to be equipped with news literacy education. With half of people who pay for news saying they have received some kind of news literacy training, increasing media literacy levels across the population also makes good economic sense for the news industry.
Digital News Report: Australia is produced by the News and Media Research Centre (N&MRC) at the University of Canberra. YouGov conducted the survey in January-February 2025. The data are weighted for age, gender and region. Education and political quotas were applied. In Australia, this is the eleventh annual survey of its kind produced by the N&MRC.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'People see injustice': fight goes on for Vietnam vets
'People see injustice': fight goes on for Vietnam vets

The Advertiser

time2 days ago

  • The Advertiser

'People see injustice': fight goes on for Vietnam vets

Australians who fought in Vietnam have been acknowledged at ceremonies around the nation to mark the 59th anniversary of the costliest battle of the contentious conflict. The end of the Vietnam War, Australia's longest military engagement of the 20th century, was commemorated on Monday, the anniversary of the Battle of Long Tan in 1966. Services throughout Australia included a major gathering of servicemen and women in Sydney's Martin Place. But for many a different battle drags on. Bernie Cox attended in Sydney and told AAP people had gained a greater appreciation for what veterans of the conflict faced. "People can see the injustice of the whole thing," he said. After being conscripted to serve in Vietnam, he faced "animosity" attending university after he returned home. "Even some of those people now would say that was a bit unfair," he said. Relatives of Mr Cox served in World War I and World War II. "I just thought that's what Aussie kids did, join the army ... it's normal," he said. He found out that wasn't necessarily the case after being conscripted. "I got a bit of a shock, it wasn't such a great adventure in the end." Having not always felt fully recognised, 2500 Australians excluded from receiving the Vietnam Campaign Medal continue their struggle to be acknowledged despite increasing public awareness of what veterans went through. The Vietnam Veterans Association and the RSL are calling on the federal government to award the honour to the contingent, who were among 60,000 Australians to serve in the conflict between 1962 and 1975, but remain without acknowledgement because of a technicality. This year marks the 50th anniversary of the end of the war. Navy veteran Bob Braithwaite finally received his medal last week after multiple applications and rejections. After joining up as a teenager, he served 120 days in Vietnam before having to return because of injury. "It's very hard, very hard," Mr Braithwaite told AAP from his home in Adelaide in the lead-up to Vietnam Veterans' Day. "You weren't recognised as a full veteran in my books ... you could say it felt like being a car with only three wheels." Conscripted into service and sent to fight in a deeply unpopular war, the veterans awaiting recognition completed at least 60 days in-country, serving under harrowing conditions. Because their national service obligations ended before they reached the 181-day threshold, they were sent home and denied the campaign medal - and the recognition and respect many of their comrades received. Made to feel like they had not done enough, some were labelled "short-timers" and have since carried the burden. Mr Braithwaite takes medication for PTSD and undergoes a twice-yearly psychological check-up. "You'd go to a hotel on Anzac Day to have lunch and celebrate with your wife and a couple of close friends and the guys with the full medals would kind of look at you a bit funny, and you'd think, 'oh, OK, I haven't finished the process to become a full veteran'. "But the stigma has slowly worn off ... and we seem - the older we get, the fewer we get - to get more appreciation for what we've done." Christopher Anderson said some of his fellow veterans felt more closely aligned with Vietnam Veterans Day than other memorial days such as Anzac Day. "It is still an experience that is close to the hearts of those who participated," he said. "Many of us lost good friends." The broader community and RSL failed to treat veterans well or welcome Vietnam vets when they returned. Then-RSL NSW president Ray James, a veteran of the Vietnam War, was among those to deliver a formal apology on Vietnam Veterans Day in 2023. Some 3000 Australians were wounded throughout the conflict and 524 died during or as a result of their service in Vietnam. Lifeline 13 11 14 Open Arms 1800 011 046 Australians who fought in Vietnam have been acknowledged at ceremonies around the nation to mark the 59th anniversary of the costliest battle of the contentious conflict. The end of the Vietnam War, Australia's longest military engagement of the 20th century, was commemorated on Monday, the anniversary of the Battle of Long Tan in 1966. Services throughout Australia included a major gathering of servicemen and women in Sydney's Martin Place. But for many a different battle drags on. Bernie Cox attended in Sydney and told AAP people had gained a greater appreciation for what veterans of the conflict faced. "People can see the injustice of the whole thing," he said. After being conscripted to serve in Vietnam, he faced "animosity" attending university after he returned home. "Even some of those people now would say that was a bit unfair," he said. Relatives of Mr Cox served in World War I and World War II. "I just thought that's what Aussie kids did, join the army ... it's normal," he said. He found out that wasn't necessarily the case after being conscripted. "I got a bit of a shock, it wasn't such a great adventure in the end." Having not always felt fully recognised, 2500 Australians excluded from receiving the Vietnam Campaign Medal continue their struggle to be acknowledged despite increasing public awareness of what veterans went through. The Vietnam Veterans Association and the RSL are calling on the federal government to award the honour to the contingent, who were among 60,000 Australians to serve in the conflict between 1962 and 1975, but remain without acknowledgement because of a technicality. This year marks the 50th anniversary of the end of the war. Navy veteran Bob Braithwaite finally received his medal last week after multiple applications and rejections. After joining up as a teenager, he served 120 days in Vietnam before having to return because of injury. "It's very hard, very hard," Mr Braithwaite told AAP from his home in Adelaide in the lead-up to Vietnam Veterans' Day. "You weren't recognised as a full veteran in my books ... you could say it felt like being a car with only three wheels." Conscripted into service and sent to fight in a deeply unpopular war, the veterans awaiting recognition completed at least 60 days in-country, serving under harrowing conditions. Because their national service obligations ended before they reached the 181-day threshold, they were sent home and denied the campaign medal - and the recognition and respect many of their comrades received. Made to feel like they had not done enough, some were labelled "short-timers" and have since carried the burden. Mr Braithwaite takes medication for PTSD and undergoes a twice-yearly psychological check-up. "You'd go to a hotel on Anzac Day to have lunch and celebrate with your wife and a couple of close friends and the guys with the full medals would kind of look at you a bit funny, and you'd think, 'oh, OK, I haven't finished the process to become a full veteran'. "But the stigma has slowly worn off ... and we seem - the older we get, the fewer we get - to get more appreciation for what we've done." Christopher Anderson said some of his fellow veterans felt more closely aligned with Vietnam Veterans Day than other memorial days such as Anzac Day. "It is still an experience that is close to the hearts of those who participated," he said. "Many of us lost good friends." The broader community and RSL failed to treat veterans well or welcome Vietnam vets when they returned. Then-RSL NSW president Ray James, a veteran of the Vietnam War, was among those to deliver a formal apology on Vietnam Veterans Day in 2023. Some 3000 Australians were wounded throughout the conflict and 524 died during or as a result of their service in Vietnam. Lifeline 13 11 14 Open Arms 1800 011 046 Australians who fought in Vietnam have been acknowledged at ceremonies around the nation to mark the 59th anniversary of the costliest battle of the contentious conflict. The end of the Vietnam War, Australia's longest military engagement of the 20th century, was commemorated on Monday, the anniversary of the Battle of Long Tan in 1966. Services throughout Australia included a major gathering of servicemen and women in Sydney's Martin Place. But for many a different battle drags on. Bernie Cox attended in Sydney and told AAP people had gained a greater appreciation for what veterans of the conflict faced. "People can see the injustice of the whole thing," he said. After being conscripted to serve in Vietnam, he faced "animosity" attending university after he returned home. "Even some of those people now would say that was a bit unfair," he said. Relatives of Mr Cox served in World War I and World War II. "I just thought that's what Aussie kids did, join the army ... it's normal," he said. He found out that wasn't necessarily the case after being conscripted. "I got a bit of a shock, it wasn't such a great adventure in the end." Having not always felt fully recognised, 2500 Australians excluded from receiving the Vietnam Campaign Medal continue their struggle to be acknowledged despite increasing public awareness of what veterans went through. The Vietnam Veterans Association and the RSL are calling on the federal government to award the honour to the contingent, who were among 60,000 Australians to serve in the conflict between 1962 and 1975, but remain without acknowledgement because of a technicality. This year marks the 50th anniversary of the end of the war. Navy veteran Bob Braithwaite finally received his medal last week after multiple applications and rejections. After joining up as a teenager, he served 120 days in Vietnam before having to return because of injury. "It's very hard, very hard," Mr Braithwaite told AAP from his home in Adelaide in the lead-up to Vietnam Veterans' Day. "You weren't recognised as a full veteran in my books ... you could say it felt like being a car with only three wheels." Conscripted into service and sent to fight in a deeply unpopular war, the veterans awaiting recognition completed at least 60 days in-country, serving under harrowing conditions. Because their national service obligations ended before they reached the 181-day threshold, they were sent home and denied the campaign medal - and the recognition and respect many of their comrades received. Made to feel like they had not done enough, some were labelled "short-timers" and have since carried the burden. Mr Braithwaite takes medication for PTSD and undergoes a twice-yearly psychological check-up. "You'd go to a hotel on Anzac Day to have lunch and celebrate with your wife and a couple of close friends and the guys with the full medals would kind of look at you a bit funny, and you'd think, 'oh, OK, I haven't finished the process to become a full veteran'. "But the stigma has slowly worn off ... and we seem - the older we get, the fewer we get - to get more appreciation for what we've done." Christopher Anderson said some of his fellow veterans felt more closely aligned with Vietnam Veterans Day than other memorial days such as Anzac Day. "It is still an experience that is close to the hearts of those who participated," he said. "Many of us lost good friends." The broader community and RSL failed to treat veterans well or welcome Vietnam vets when they returned. Then-RSL NSW president Ray James, a veteran of the Vietnam War, was among those to deliver a formal apology on Vietnam Veterans Day in 2023. Some 3000 Australians were wounded throughout the conflict and 524 died during or as a result of their service in Vietnam. Lifeline 13 11 14 Open Arms 1800 011 046 Australians who fought in Vietnam have been acknowledged at ceremonies around the nation to mark the 59th anniversary of the costliest battle of the contentious conflict. The end of the Vietnam War, Australia's longest military engagement of the 20th century, was commemorated on Monday, the anniversary of the Battle of Long Tan in 1966. Services throughout Australia included a major gathering of servicemen and women in Sydney's Martin Place. But for many a different battle drags on. Bernie Cox attended in Sydney and told AAP people had gained a greater appreciation for what veterans of the conflict faced. "People can see the injustice of the whole thing," he said. After being conscripted to serve in Vietnam, he faced "animosity" attending university after he returned home. "Even some of those people now would say that was a bit unfair," he said. Relatives of Mr Cox served in World War I and World War II. "I just thought that's what Aussie kids did, join the army ... it's normal," he said. He found out that wasn't necessarily the case after being conscripted. "I got a bit of a shock, it wasn't such a great adventure in the end." Having not always felt fully recognised, 2500 Australians excluded from receiving the Vietnam Campaign Medal continue their struggle to be acknowledged despite increasing public awareness of what veterans went through. The Vietnam Veterans Association and the RSL are calling on the federal government to award the honour to the contingent, who were among 60,000 Australians to serve in the conflict between 1962 and 1975, but remain without acknowledgement because of a technicality. This year marks the 50th anniversary of the end of the war. Navy veteran Bob Braithwaite finally received his medal last week after multiple applications and rejections. After joining up as a teenager, he served 120 days in Vietnam before having to return because of injury. "It's very hard, very hard," Mr Braithwaite told AAP from his home in Adelaide in the lead-up to Vietnam Veterans' Day. "You weren't recognised as a full veteran in my books ... you could say it felt like being a car with only three wheels." Conscripted into service and sent to fight in a deeply unpopular war, the veterans awaiting recognition completed at least 60 days in-country, serving under harrowing conditions. Because their national service obligations ended before they reached the 181-day threshold, they were sent home and denied the campaign medal - and the recognition and respect many of their comrades received. Made to feel like they had not done enough, some were labelled "short-timers" and have since carried the burden. Mr Braithwaite takes medication for PTSD and undergoes a twice-yearly psychological check-up. "You'd go to a hotel on Anzac Day to have lunch and celebrate with your wife and a couple of close friends and the guys with the full medals would kind of look at you a bit funny, and you'd think, 'oh, OK, I haven't finished the process to become a full veteran'. "But the stigma has slowly worn off ... and we seem - the older we get, the fewer we get - to get more appreciation for what we've done." Christopher Anderson said some of his fellow veterans felt more closely aligned with Vietnam Veterans Day than other memorial days such as Anzac Day. "It is still an experience that is close to the hearts of those who participated," he said. "Many of us lost good friends." The broader community and RSL failed to treat veterans well or welcome Vietnam vets when they returned. Then-RSL NSW president Ray James, a veteran of the Vietnam War, was among those to deliver a formal apology on Vietnam Veterans Day in 2023. Some 3000 Australians were wounded throughout the conflict and 524 died during or as a result of their service in Vietnam. Lifeline 13 11 14 Open Arms 1800 011 046

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store