logo
5 years after start of pandemic, experts say Manitoba can still learn lessons from COVID-19

5 years after start of pandemic, experts say Manitoba can still learn lessons from COVID-19

Yahoo12-03-2025
Five years after COVID-19 was first detected in Manitoba, experts say the province still has a ways to go to fully address the effects of the pandemic and set itself up to respond better in future emergencies — from the impact the pandemic had on mental health and trust in public health information, to the long-term effects of the illness and the amount of surveillance data about it now available to the public.
While the surge in mental health issues seen early in the pandemic by some accounts later returned to baseline levels, one clinical psychologist said the data on that return is mixed — which she attributes to certain groups being more affected than others.
"We know that groups such as those who had a lot of economic instability or sustained long periods of isolation, or those with compromised health problems or chronic health conditions, were at particularly elevated risk," said Dr. Renée El-Gabalawy, an associate professor at the University of Manitoba and a clinical psychologist with Shared Health who studied the effects of the pandemic on mental health.
El-Gabalawy said there were also positive outcomes reported in that research: most people reported being able to find a silver lining, like the importance of social support.
But she said there's still a need to address some of the remaining impacts of the pandemic that continue to affect mental health, such as improving the numbers around surgery cancellations and delays — "a significant area we really need to continue to focus on," she said.
And that's not the only area where the health-care system has struggled to keep up in the five years since Manitoba's first COVID-19 cases were reported in March 2020, according to an expert who's studied the effects of a condition known as long COVID, which can include symptoms ranging from physical weakness and shortness of breath to brain fog, anxiety and depression.
Dr. Alan Katz, a family physician and professor at the University of Manitoba, is part of a team that's researched long COVID in the province. (Trevor Brine/CBC)
Dr. Alan Katz, a family physician and health services researcher in the departments of family medicine and community health sciences at the University of Manitoba, said most people's long COVID symptoms have improved over time and resolved.
But for those still suffering, there's no specific clinic in Manitoba to help them, leaving many to get care online or outside the province, Katz said.
"We're struggling in Manitoba with people not having access to primary care. So it would potentially be helpful to have a specific group of physicians … and other providers who chose to provide care to those with long COVID," he said, calling that difficult work because of the multidisciplinary treatment the condition requires, and the fact that it has no one specific treatment or drug.
"It's a very challenging area. And right now we do not have anybody with a particular interest that I'm aware of."
Without reliable info, people 'go looking elsewhere'
The COVID-19 pandemic also exposed areas where Manitoba's public health communications could have been better, said another expert — particularly around vaccine information and ways to improve so it's ready for the next crisis it faces.
Michelle Driedger, a professor in the department of community health sciences at the University of Manitoba, said some of the challenges she saw were around parents deciding whether to vaccinate their kids, and people not understanding why public health guidance was shifting each time recommendations changed.
Michelle Driedger is a professor in the department of community health sciences at the University of Manitoba. (Submitted by Michelle Driedger)
"People were not always tracking at the same time with some of the shifts, because it just seemed so confusing," said Driedger, who studied vaccine decision-making processes and the factors people consider in making those choices.
"So I think we need to really do a better job of trying to make sure that we're trying to address why something has changed and repeating that a bit more often."
Driedger said if people don't have easy access to credible information they can understand, "they'll go looking elsewhere."
One Manitoba epidemiologist said that's exactly what she saw happen, in particular in conversations around vaccine effectiveness, with some taking the fact vaccinated people still got COVID-19 as confirmation the shots didn't work.
"We really didn't take the time to explain there's different kinds of effectiveness," said Cynthia Carr, founder of EPI Research.
Cynthia Carr is an epidemiologist and the founder of EPI Research Inc. (Travis Golby/CBC)
"It gave people a chance to go on sort of this misinformation campaign that, 'You were lied to, see, it doesn't work,'" she said.
"In fact, tens of thousands of Canadians did die, unfortunately, from COVID — but many are here today because they were vaccinated and … that vaccine gave your immune system enough information to get ready to fight."
Data from the province up to March 6, 2025, shows Manitoba has reported a total of 3,821 COVID-19-related deaths. Those include deaths that happened 10 days before or 30 days after a lab-confirmed case, and patients who tested positive for COVID-19 but may have died of other causes, a provincial spokesperson said.
Carr said the fact Manitoba's publicly available COVID-19 surveillance data has dropped off doesn't help either when it comes to building crucial trust.
"I understand we only have so many resources, but that again creates distrust — 'well, now you won't tell us how many people have been infected or hospitalized,'" she said.
"We can't continue to report all of that. But what is the key investment in surveillance and with that, what is the right messaging so that we don't get caught from behind? So that the next time something like this happens — and it will unfortunately — we've actually implemented some of those key learnings and not just moved on to the next thing."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dangerous hidden side effect of Covid infection revealed by new study
Dangerous hidden side effect of Covid infection revealed by new study

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Dangerous hidden side effect of Covid infection revealed by new study

Covid may prematurely age blood vessels by around five years, according to a new study, increasing the risk of heart attack and stroke. Research published in the European Heart Journal revealed that a Covid infection could accelerate the ageing of blood vessels, particularly in women. Vaccinated individuals show less stiffening in their arteries and stabilised symptoms over time in comparison to those who had not been protected against Covid. Lead researcher Professor Rosa Maria Bruno, from Université Paris Cité, said: "We know that Covid can directly affect blood vessels. We believe that this may result in what we call early vascular ageing, meaning that your blood vessels are older than your chronological age and you are more susceptible to heart disease. 'If that is happening, we need to identify who is at risk at an early stage to prevent heart attacks and strokes." The new study tested nearly 2,500 people from across the world, categorising them based on whether they had Covid and whether they had been hospitalised for it, both in a general ward and in an intensive care unit. Tests were taken six months after an infection and again after 12 months. It measured each person's vascular age with a device that examines how quickly a wave of blood pressure travels between the artery in the neck and the legs. The higher the measurement meant the stiffer the blood vessels, indicating a higher vascular age. It found that all three groups of patients who had a Covid infection had stiffer arteries compared to those who hadn't been affected. The average increase in women was 0.55 meters per second for those who had mild Covid, 0.60 for those who had been hospitalised, and 1.09 for those in intensive care. According to researchers, an increase of around 0.5 meters per second is "clinically relevant" and equivalent to ageing around five years. It also increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, like heart attack, stroke or sudden cardiac arrest, in 60-year-old women by 3 per cent. The difference between men and women could come down to immune systems, Prof Bruno added. She said: 'Women mount a more rapid and robust immune response, which can protect them from infection. However, this same response can also increase damage to blood vessels after the initial infection.' She said the virus acts on specific receptors in the body that are in the lining of the blood vessels. The virus will use these receptors to enter and infect cells. Last month, it was reported that a new strain of Covid had spread across the UK, accounting for the highest proportion of cases - around 30 per cent. Experts warned the Stratus strain was resisting immunity and had a unique symptom of giving people a hoarse voice.

US pediatric group breaks with CDC advice, recommends COVID vaccines for young children
US pediatric group breaks with CDC advice, recommends COVID vaccines for young children

USA Today

time4 hours ago

  • USA Today

US pediatric group breaks with CDC advice, recommends COVID vaccines for young children

The American Academy of Pediatrics released its vaccine recommendations on Aug. 19 in a break from federal guidance shaped by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The AAP, in tandem with multiple other professional medical associations, previously decried a May announcement made by Kennedy Jr. that the COVID-19 vaccine would no longer be included in the Centers for Disease Control's recommended immunizations for healthy children and pregnant women, a move that went against previous expert guidance and bypassed the normal scientific review process. The AAP, a professional organization of over 65,000 board-certified pediatricians dedicated to advancing children's medicine, said in a June 26 statement that it would "continue to publish its own evidence-based recommendations and schedules," as the creation of federal immunization policy is 'no longer a credible process." Kennedy Jr. drew further ire from medical communities when he fired all 17 original members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, the committee of health experts that provides guidance on vaccine use to the CDC, replacing them with members that critics have called unqualified. Some of the members, like Kennedy Jr., have a history of anti-vaccine advocacy and involvement in anti-vaccine groups. Here's what to know about the new AAP guidance and how it differs from federal guidelines. What is the AAP guidance on COVID-19 vaccines for children? The AAP schedule lists which vaccines children should get at certain ages and provides updated guidance on influenza, RSV, and COVID-19 immunizations for children and adolescents from birth to age 18. The schedule recommends that all children between six months and 23 months receive the latest COVID-19 vaccine to reduce the chance of serious illness. Children and adolescents aged 2 to 18, without other high-risk factors like immunosuppression, can receive and should be offered the vaccine if they were not previously immunized, according to the guidance. Children, teens, and adults alike who are at increased risk of serious infection should receive the vaccine if they have not already, AAP said, adding that its recommendation differed from the CDC, which it said is now staffed with people who have a history of spreading vaccine misinformation. "The AAP will continue to provide recommendations for immunizations that are rooted in science and are in the best interest of the health of infants, children, and adolescents," AAP President Dr. Susan J. Kressly, MD, said in a statement. "Pediatricians know how important routine childhood immunizations are in keeping children, families and their communities healthy and thriving." What is the federal guidance on COVID-19 vaccines for children? The CDC did not go as far as completely removing COVID-19 vaccination from its immunization schedule despite Kennedy Jr.'s insistence. Instead, the agency changed its language from recommending the vaccine annually to suggesting parents consult with their child's physician on whether to vaccinate. Kennedy Jr. previously said that the CDC planned only to recommend the COVID vaccine for people over the age of 65 and those at high personal risk of infection, though the agency's website still contains information recommending it for everyone over the age of six months. A notice on the top webpages on the topic reads, "COVID-19 vaccine recommendations have recently been updated for some populations. This page will be updated to align with the updated immunization schedule," as of Aug. 19. This change to whom the vaccine is recommended could make it harder for others who want the COVID-19 vaccine to get it, experts warned. Since insurance coverage typically follows federal recommendations, anyone who wants the shot but isn't on the CDC's recommendation list may have to pay the price out of pocket HHS Communications Director Andrew Nixon defended the decision in a statement to USA TODAY, accusing the AAP, which receives funding from pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer, of failing to have proper conflict-of-interest safeguards in place. "By bypassing the CDC's advisory process and freelancing its own recommendations, while smearing those who demand accountability, the AAP is putting commercial interests ahead of public health and politics above America's children," Nixon said. Kennedy Jr. shared a separate response on social media on Aug. 19, pointing out that the agency's top donors are four companies that "make virtually every vaccine on the CDC recommended childhood vaccine schedule" and saying that the AAP recommendations are "corporate-friendly" and may "promote commercial ambitions of AAP's Big Pharma benefactors" instead of public health. "AAP should also be candid with doctors and hospitals that recommendations that diverge from the CDC's official list are not shielded from liability under the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act," his post concluded. USA TODAY reached out to AAP for comment on Aug. 19 but has not received a response. The new Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices didn't vote on COVID-19 vaccine recommendations when they met in June and are expected to reconvene in "September/October," according to the CDC. The FDA has signaled intentions to revoke the Pfizer COVID-19 shot for young, healthy children. In early August, HHS announced that it would pull $500M in funding from mRNA vaccine research and development.

RFK Jr. attacks pediatricians' group over vaccine recommendations
RFK Jr. attacks pediatricians' group over vaccine recommendations

Politico

time4 hours ago

  • Politico

RFK Jr. attacks pediatricians' group over vaccine recommendations

In May, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention dropped its recommendation that all children 6 months and older get Covid shots. Kennedy at the time said the move was based on 'common sense' and 'good science. ' The AAP, however, said it had retained its guidance for young children to get the shots because they are still at risk of severe cases of the disease. 'COVID-19 continues to result in hospitalization and death in the pediatric population,' the group said in a release explaining its recommendations, adding that 'children younger than 2 years old are especially vulnerable to severe COVID-19 and should be prioritized for vaccination.' The pediatric group did not immediately respond to POLITICO's request for comment regarding Kennedy's remarks. Earlier Tuesday, HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon accused the pediatricians of 'freelancing its own recommendations, while smearing those who demand accountability' in a statement to POLITICO. AAP President Susan J. Kressly defended her group's guidance in response, saying they were 'based only in the science, the needs of children, and the care that pediatricians have for the children in every community.' Despite the disagreement over vaccination of young children, both the new CDC guidance and the pediatricians continue to recommend shots for children with underlying conditions that could put them at risk for severe disease. Both have also scaled back recommendations for healthy children older than 6 months, saying that parents of children without underlying conditions should decide on vaccination in consultation with their pediatrician . Why it matters: The pediatricians' split with the CDC underscores the depth of the distrust between the medical establishment and Kennedy — a longtime vaccine skeptic who once said the Covid vaccine was 'the deadliest vaccine ever made' in defiance of scientific consensus.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store