Council to cut post-16 school SEND transport
Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council said it was spending an "unsustainable" amount on the scheme for 105 students and that costs were expected to rise in the future.
It said it cost about £4,700 to provide the travel arrangements for each pupil, a total of about £500,000 a year.
As part of the cuts, transport will only be available for pupils who need to travel more than three miles. Post-16 SEND pupils currently receiving transport help will not be affected by the new policy unless they need to make a new application.
However, discretion may be applied in certain circumstances, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
The local authority will also ask parents to give evidence as to why they cannot provide transport for their children themselves.
It said work and other childcare commitments would "generally" not be considered a reason for the council to provide subsidised transport.
It also will not provide assistance for pupils enrolled in education providers outside of the borough, except for specific circumstances.
The new policy should take effect from the start of the next academic year.
The council has no statutory duty to provide transport for post-16 SEND pupils and receives no specific funding for this, it says.
A report detailing the plans also noted that many colleges and special schools already offered subsidised transport.
It also said the new policy would help young people aged 16 and over to develop independent travel skills. The local authority said it would aid this work with the use of "independent travel trainers".
Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Decision to scrap post-16 SEND transport delayed
Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Monkspath car park floodlights decision delayed as councillors raise concerns
Councillors have delayed their decision on already installed floodlights near a small Monkspath shopping centre car park saying they want more information. As the Local Democracy Reporting Service previously reported the row over the four metre high lighting columns surrounding electric charging points installed on the car park near the parade of shops at Shelly Shopping Centre in Farmhouse Way has been rumbling on for months. In the original application planning agents JMS Planning and Development had explained the applicant wanted retrospective approval for the floodlighting, stressing the installation of reflectors to direct light downward and reduce light spill would mitigate the impact on neighbours. READ MORE: Solihull village's 85 new homes hit snag as concerns raised over 'towering' buildings Get the latest court and crime news direct via our WhatsApp community here But in June's public consultation residents had lodged objections saying the lights impacted the character of the area and were 'very obtrusive'. The matter went before Solihull Council planning committee's latest meeting where ward councillor Ken Hawkins said: 'I can't remember the last time I came to the committee to object to anything. 'The issue is the amount of the light to be emitted. 'These lights, I was told when they were working, had a negative impact on the people who live opposite.' Solihull Council planning officers had recommended for approval subject to conditions including having motion sensors on the lights. In the members debate Councillor Bob Grinsell, the chairman of the committee, said: 'I'm surprised that a developer of this nature has chosen to install this without seeking planning permission in the first place. 'I asked to visit the site at night (to see the lights switched on) – I was told I can't because there is no electricity. 'It's not good enough. 'We need to see these, we can not make an accurate assessment of the effect.' Officer Mark Andrews, the council's head of planning, design and engagement services, suggested the lights could be switched on for a trial period and assessed before coming back to the committee for an extension. Coun Grinsell said: 'If it's a trial period, it's going to be a very short period in my view.' Councillor David Cole said: 'You are asking to make a decision without seeing it – I'd rather be there on the site and see what's happening, then I can make an objective decision.' Councillor James Bradley said: 'Do we have any information about how these charging points are expected to operate. 'Do we have any indication what the expected levels of use of these at night time is?' Councillor Dave Pinwell then said: 'We don't have enough information to understand what the justification for this is and the way it would be used.' The chairman moved to a vote on deferring the vote to get more information, with eight councillors voting in favour and one against. The meeting took place at the Civic Suite on Wednesday, (August 13).
Yahoo
10-08-2025
- Yahoo
Call to ‘take back' high streets overrun with barbers, nail shops and salons
Changes to planning regulations are needed to allow local authorities to 'take back control' of high streets, councillors have urged. A motion supported by Redcar and Cleveland councillors expressed concern about a 'growing concentration' of barbers, nail shops and beauty salons in some areas, along with takeaways. Eston ward councillor David Taylor, who successfully proposed the motion, said of 47 retail units in Eston, 25 were of this ilk and included in the category 'Class E' in planning terms. (Image: LDRs) Reform of national planning guidance in 2020 merged a wide range of commercial uses into this category, removing the need for planning permission for many new ventures. Cllr Taylor said at the time it was a sensible measure during the covid-19 pandemic to support the economic survival of businesses wishing to adapt. But the result had been an undermining of the variety and character of many high street environments, which required a balanced mix of places for the public to visit to survive and thrive. Worse still, a number of councillors who lent their backing to the motion referenced fears of criminality and organised gangs infiltrating the high street. Earlier this year the National Crime Agency said businesses such as barber shops, nail bars and vape shops were often fronts for a whole range of criminality, including money laundering, drug trafficking and even modern slavery. It launched a three-week crackdown involving 19 different police forces and regional crime units, raiding premises and making dozens of arrests, as well as seizing illegal goods. Cllr Taylor said his motion was not an attack on local businesses nor to restrict opportunities, but about 'ensuring a better balance and also returning planning decisions to where they belong – with local authorities and the community, not private landlords acting without local input or accountability'. He said: 'Without local control we risk losing the very variety and vibrancy that make our town centres places worth visiting and investing in.' He referenced the new Eston Precinct development now underway which he said was a 'real opportunity to bring in a more vibrant and diverse mix of shops and services' The motion adopted at a meeting will see the council writing to the Government to ask that consideration be given to removing barber shops, nail bars and beauty salons from the Class E use legislation. Local MPs will also be asked to raise the matter with the Department for Housing, Communities and Local Government. Council leader Alec Brown said his Labour group would support the motion, although it called it 'very un-Conservative' since it sought to interfere with the free market. Conservative councillor Paul Salvin said what was being discussed was a country-wide issue and about 'taking back some control of our high streets'. Guisborough councillor Bill Clark, an independent, said he fully supported the motion. He said: 'The abuse of this [planning use] category is there for all to see in our towns and villages. 'Let's get a grip of this, if we don't it is going to get worse.' Cllr Clark also said 'certain types of shops in the town' regularly disregarded rules and regulations in what were conservation areas. Another independent, councillor Wayne Davies, who represents Loftus, said: 'There is far too much criminality involved in some of these types of businesses.' Loftus High Street (Image: LDRs) Cllr Davies also said more enforcement was required from the authorities and the current situation was unfair on many legitimate businesses that had been trading for a long time. Cllr Taylor said: 'Many residents believe that a lot of these properties are owned by the council and it is the council making these decisions.' He also suggested some form of licensing scheme should be in operation for people involved in what he called personal care – for instance hairdressers and salon workers. He said: 'They would be required to have a DBS check and carry a visible licence, similar to those used in the security industry. 'This wouldn't just protect customers, it would also safeguard staff and ensure there's full accountability over who is working where.' The motion was carried unanimously.
Yahoo
10-08-2025
- Yahoo
Plans for 415-home development set for approval
Plans to build 415 homes on the edge of Hinckley as the second phase of a massive new housing estate are set to be approved. Richborough Estates has earmarked land north of the A47 Normandy Way for the properties. Plans for the homes were submitted to Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council last year after the company won permission at appeal to build 475 houses on an adjacent site. Planning officers have advised councillors to approve the application for the smaller development at a meeting on Tuesday despite objections from nearby residents. Concerns include potential traffic issues, the impact on existing infrastructure, including GP surgeries and schools, and the loss of green land, the Local Democracy Reporting Service said. But, in a report, council officers said the new homes were "a significant benefit", which would outweigh any impact on the landscape. Their report also states that the first phase of the project gaining planning permission at appeal was a major consideration in deciding whether councillors should approve the application. According to the document, 83 of the homes must be set aside by the developer as affordable housing, and financial contributions of more than £5m are being requested from Richborough Estates for health, education, roads, sports provision, library and other local facilities and services. Access to the development, if approved, would be from a new roundabout on the A47 Normandy Way. The developer previously said the two developments would be separated by a large park. There will also be other public green spaces, including play areas for children, according to planning documents. Follow BBC Leicester on Facebook, on X, or on Instagram. Send your story ideas to eastmidsnews@ or via WhatsApp on 0808 100 2210. More on this story Developer earmarks 900-home housing estate for town Developer sets out new details for 475-home estate Warning new homes traffic will 'strangle' town Related internet links Local Democracy Reporting Service Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council
