logo
Year above 1.5C suggests world is reaching long term warming threshold

Year above 1.5C suggests world is reaching long term warming threshold

Yahoo10-02-2025

A year with temperatures more than 1.5C above pre-industrial levels mean it is likely the world is reaching the key long-term warming threshold, studies suggest.
Under the global Paris climate treaty secured in 2015, countries agreed to limit global warming to 'well below' 2C and to pursue efforts to curb temperature rises to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels to avoid the worst impacts of extreme storms, floods, heatwaves, rising seas and the collapse of natural systems.
But global datasets of temperatures have found a record hot 2024 saw temperatures exceed 1.5C over the year for the first time.
Scientists caution that one year above 1.5C over pre-industrial levels does not mean the long-term threshold, measured over multiple decades, has been breached.
But two studies published in the journal Nature Climate Change have found it is likely the year at 1.5C means the world is in the 20-year period where the long term threshold will be exceeded – or even that we have already crossed it.
Scientists said the findings showed how urgently the world needed to act to cut the greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels, industrial processes and cutting down forests that are driving climate change.
In his study, Alex Cannon, from the Climate Research Division of Environment and Climate Change Canada, said that a few months or couple of years warmer than 1.5C does not 'automatically mean the goal has been exceeded'.
But analysis of climate model projections show that 12 consecutive months above 1.5C indicates the Paris Agreement threshold is likely to have already been crossed, he said.
While an El Nino weather pattern in the tropical Pacific, which pushes up global temperatures, contributed to 2024's record heat, the analysis shows that 1.5C for 12 consecutive months – regardless of El Nino conditions – usually occurs after the long-term threshold has been reached in simulations, he said.
He added that whether the findings signalled an earlier than expected crossing of the threshold in the real world depended on whether unaccounted-for factors, which are not considered in archived climate model simulations, played a large role in recent warming.
In a second paper, scientists from Germany looked at real-world observations of already-reached warming levels and climate models, and showed that the first single year exceeding each threshold have consistently fallen with the first 20 year period which averaged the same level of warming.
They found that 'unless ambitious emissions cuts are implemented', the world's first year at 1.5C warming is 'virtually certain' to fall within the 20-year period that reaches the 1.5C warming level.
They said it was very unlikely for the temperature of a single year to largely exceed the long term average, and 2024's record heat signals that 'most probably' Earth has already entered a 20-year period at 1.5C warming, they said.
Entering into the 20-year period in which temperatures averaged 1.5C did not mean that the world was already at long term warming of that level as that would fall in the mid point of the era, 10 years later, they added.
And they said that by rapidly slowing down the warming rate, stringent near-term action to curb climate change has the potential to substantially reduce risks of exceeding 1.5C of warming soon after the first year of heat at that level has occurred.
And rapid, urgent emissions action is needed to limit peak warming, which is also required to hold climate change below 2C if the 1.5 target is missed.
'A year above 1.5C is not the time for despair, but a call to action,' they said.
Responding to the findings, Dr Alan Kennedy-Asser, senior research associate at the University of Bristol Cabot Institute for the Environment, described them as 'sadly unsurprising' which suggested 'we may be already living in the 1.5C world the Paris Agreement referred to'.
'However, even though the planet may be in a period that is at or exceeds 1.5C, there is great value in taking rapid action to slow further warming, as the rate of change matters and every tenth of a degree matters,' he said.
Dr Vikki Thompson, scientist at the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, said: 'These studies use data from both observational sources and multiple climate models to show we should now expect to exceed the Paris Agreement within the next 20 years, much sooner than climate projections had suggested.
'The rate we have reached these levels is terrifying and shows, yet again, how urgently we need to act.
'Without adaptation and mitigation we will continue to feel the impacts of the accelerating warming with more and more extreme weather events,' she said.
Professor Stephen Belcher, Met Office chief scientist, said a single year exceeding 1.5C 'does not break the guardrail of the Paris Agreement'.
'However, it does highlight that the headroom to stay below 1.5C is now wafer thin,' he said, warning that a recent paper by Met Office scientists calculated current global warming at 1.3C and its forecast for carbon dioxide for the coming year is now inconsistent with pathways keeping to 1.5C.
'This suggests that only rapid and strong measures to cut greenhouse gas emissions will keep us from passing the first line of defence within the Paris Agreement,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Clean-Energy Investment Set to Double Fossil Fuel Financing in 2025, IEA Says
Clean-Energy Investment Set to Double Fossil Fuel Financing in 2025, IEA Says

Wall Street Journal

time3 days ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Clean-Energy Investment Set to Double Fossil Fuel Financing in 2025, IEA Says

Global investment in clean-energy technology and infrastructure is set to double that of fossil fuels this year despite geopolitical and market turmoil, according to a report on the sector by the International Energy Agency. Around $3.3 trillion in investments will flow into the energy sector in 2025, up 2% from 2024. Of that, around $2.2 trillion will go to renewable and nuclear energy, energy storage, low-emission fuels, efficiency and electrification—double the amount going to oil, natural gas and coal, according to the Paris-based organization.

Climate change is here, but don't give up. We can still avoid the worst of it.
Climate change is here, but don't give up. We can still avoid the worst of it.

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

Climate change is here, but don't give up. We can still avoid the worst of it.

2024 was the hottest in at least 125,000 years and the past 10 years have been the 10 hottest in nearly 200 years of record-keeping, the World Meteorological Organization reports. 2024 also has the dubious distinction of being the first calendar year in modern record-keeping in which global average surface temperatures exceed the Paris Agreement's aspirational 1.5°C guardrail to prevent disastrous global warming effects. Why does this matter? Holding long-term warming to the 1.5-degree target compared to the preindustrial era is crucial for lowering the risk of triggering climate change tipping points, beyond which potentially catastrophic impacts have a higher likelihood of occurring, studies show. Holding warming to that target is viewed as necessary for small island states and other extremely vulnerable nations to avoid being wiped out by sea level rise, drought and other threats. Seven years ago, the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicted that the world wouldn't warm 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels until 2040. Then two years ago, the group predicted the world would pass that threshold between 2030 and 2035. Now, new data from the WMO released this month indicates that Earth will cross this point in just two years. The accelerated timeline means that irreversible tipping points in the climate system — like the melting of Arctic ice sheets or the wide-scale collapse of coral reefs — are closer at hand than scientists previously believed. Greenhouse gas emissions from the burning of fossil fuels are the chief culprit, dangerously heating up the planet, imperiling biodiversity, increasing sea level rise and drought and making extreme weather events more common and more destructive. And the oil industry has known this for decades. The American Petroleum Institute commissioned a study by the Stanford Research Institute in 1968 which found: 'Significant temperature changes are almost certain to occur by the year 2000, and these could bring about climatic changes. ... there seems to be no doubt that the potential damage to our environment could be severe. ... pollutants which we generally ignore because they have little local effect, CO2 and submicron particles, may be the cause of serious world-wide environmental changes.' Opinion: Congress must fund Farm Bill conservation programs to protect local ranches It was the first of dozens of studies the industry paid for or knew about, all predicting climate change dangers, including major reports in 1979, 1982, and 1991. Then the 'climate denial' began. In 2015 and again in 2025, the Union of Concerned Scientists documented decades of internal industry memos and strategy sessions that were organizing, funding and detailing roughly four decades of lies foisted on the American public. The industry and its executives' efforts were all, apparently, in the service of preserving their profits and avoiding any liability for the deaths and destruction they knew would one day come as a result of their product poisoning our atmosphere. The election of Donald Trump is a clear setback to the world's ability to rein in dangerous levels of warming. Mr. Trump, who has called global warming a hoax, pulled out of the Paris accord on his first day in office. He has also, as requested by the oil industry, reversed or plans to rescind a raft of regulations to clean up climate pollution. These include tail pipe and fuel economy standards, a fee on methane emissions from oil and gas facilities, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) waiver that has allowed California — and 11 other states — to set emissions standards stricter than those at the federal level. In addition to largely isolating the United States on the global climate-diplomacy stage, actions like these would also hand a geopolitical win to the country's main rival, China, which has spent a decade building up a powerful clean-energy industry and is now increasingly exporting it worldwide. Most damaging, however, we would lose more precious time. If we act now — decisively and dramatically — we still have a chance at avoiding climate change's most catastrophic impacts. Think about this as we suffer through another sweltering summer. Mike Altshuler is a retired educator and environmental activist who lives in Edmond. This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Weather is hot, dangerous here. We can't let it get worse | Opinion

Pierre Nora, 93, Who Probed Role of Memory in Writing of History, Dies
Pierre Nora, 93, Who Probed Role of Memory in Writing of History, Dies

New York Times

time5 days ago

  • New York Times

Pierre Nora, 93, Who Probed Role of Memory in Writing of History, Dies

Pierre Nora, a French scholar whose ideas about the role of memory and identity in the writing of history gained prominence both in France and abroad, and who became a kingpin in his country's intellectual community through his great influence over publishing, died on Monday in Paris. He was 93. His death, in a hospital, was confirmed by his son, Elphège Nora, who said the cause was multiple organ failures. Mr. Nora's major contribution to historiography was the concept of 'lieux de mémoire' ('sites of memory'), a term he coined to describe elements of the past that a community chooses to remember and which become symbolic of a shared identity. Examples would be Joan of Arc, the national anthem 'La Marseillaise' and the rooster — 'le coq gaulois' — as an unofficial icon of France. This concept has been highly influential in the field of memory studies, shaping discussions elsewhere in Europe, the United States and Asia about how memory functions in societies, particularly in how nations remember and forget. Mr. Nora wrote during a period when French scholars were increasingly interested in the roles of language, symbols and discourse in forging social realities. His approach to history seemed to complement then-current theories like Claude Lévi-Strauss's structuralism and Jacques Derrida's deconstructionism. Mr. Nora's approach also sparked debate and criticism, particularly regarding the potential for 'sites of memory' to oversimplify or sanitize history, obscuring more complex or contentious aspects of the past. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store