Singleton family agree to judgment in favour of Nine in landmark court battle
Had the NSW Supreme Court case proceeded to a hearing, the decision would have had implications for all Australian media outlets. The litigation was expected to involve a fight over the scope of a fair dealing exception in copyright laws, which allows images and video to be used for 'the reporting of news'.
Singleton's fiance, NSW police officer Ashley Wildey, and her mother, Julie Singleton, filed the lawsuit in April before Nine's 60 Minutes aired an interview with her father, former adman John Singleton.
Their claim was later expanded to include the publishing companies behind Nine-owned newspapers including the Herald, The Age and The Australian Financial Review.
Shortly before the trial, which was expected to run for two days from Tuesday, the parties agreed to orders entering judgment in favour of the Nine entities. The Supreme Court made the orders on Monday afternoon. The parties will bear their own legal costs.
Loading
The copyright claim centred on Nine's use of two videos and five photos from Dawn Singleton's public social media accounts.
Wildey and Julie Singleton had asked the court to make a declaration that the Nine outlets had infringed their copyright in the videos and photos, an order permanently restraining them from using the films and images, and damages.
In a written defence filed in court, the Nine entities admitted that 'there exists a practice within the Australian media of sourcing photos … and videos … from publicly available social media pages and using those photos and videos for the purpose of, or associated with, the reporting of news'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Queensland lion attack: What we know so far
The zoo said on Sunday the injured woman was 'not one of our immediate family, nor a keeper', and confirmed on Monday that the woman involved was not one of the zoo's owners. 'The lady involved in the incident is still in a stable condition in hospital and is surrounded by members of our extended family,' the zoo posted late Monday afternoon. 'She has lost her arm. She is not an employee, a keeper or a zoo visitor. She is a much-loved member of the zoo owners' family. 'It has still not been possible to interview her to establish what led to this tragic incident.' The woman was not in the enclosure with the lioness, the zoo said. A Metro South Health Services spokeswoman said the woman remained in a stable condition on Monday. The investigation After closing on Sunday and Monday, the spokesperson said in a statement it would reopen from Tuesday. Police and Workplace Health and Safety personnel arrived at the zoo on Sunday to begin investigations. 'The zoo is working with them to establish how this incident occurred, but the full details will not be known until our family member can be interviewed,' the Darling Downs Zoo spokesperson said. Workplace Health and Safety Queensland said investigations were continuing on Monday, but could not provide more detail. The zoo said it would not euthanise or otherwise punish the animal involved. What is the Darling Downs Zoo The Darling Downs Zoo is a two-hour drive from Brisbane, sitting 100 kilometres to the south-west. It is owned and managed by Stephanie and Steve Robinson, who purchased the 49-hectare property in 2001. Locals from nearby communities in Allora and Clifton – which boast populations of about 1500 each – said the zoo was particularly popular with people from Toowoomba, the nearest major town that sits about 40 kilometres directly north of the zoo. It has partnered with a number of local business and schools, who declined to comment. The Robinsons moved their animal collection to the property in 2022 and began building the zoo. They opened the zoo in 2005, but ran successful breeding programs for years beforehand. In recognition of its breeding programs working with vulnerable, endangered, and critically endangered native species, which have been returned to the wild in partnership with release programs across the country, the Australian government listed the zoo as charity in June this year. The zoo's big cats The zoo houses several (asked for exact amount) big cats, including white and tawny African lions, tigers and leopards, and several species of small cats, such as cheetahs, caracals, and servals. The cats are bred at the zoo, but its website says the animals in its breeding programs are not on display for visitors. It began its lion breeding program in 1997, and its social media pages say managing director Steve Robinson has almost five decades of experience specifically dealing with African lions. Some of the oldest lions at the zoo are almost 15 years old, which is approaching the natural lifespan of an African lion, but the oldest lion bred at the zoo is 24 years old, and now resides at the Mansfield Zoo, in north-eastern Victoria. The zoo currently boasts a handful of cubs, including a set of female cubs born in mid-May and a male cub, Caesar, born in August last year. Up-close encounters The zoo offers several 'strictly monitored' close encounter experiences with the lions, tigers and leopards for $150 per person, which are used to help fund conservation programs. Encounters are limited to four people per encounter, with two encounter offered per day. The zoo's website offers guests 'the thrill of a lifetime' with the opportunity to feed one of the zoo's big cats through the fence with tongs. Guests are offered '15 minutes of big cat time', alongside educational talks and photo opportunities with all three big cat species. Cubs are brought into the public-facing part of the zoo for tours at 10am each day. A statement from the zoo on Sunday said the lion involved in the attack was not currently 'cubbing' – raising young – which can make big cats more aggressive. How many big cats are in captivity in Queensland We asked the Department of Primary Industries this very question. Six hours later, the department provided a list of about 150 people and organisations with a current 'exhibited animal authority' that allows them to keep animals. There was no information regarding the actual animals. If DPI knows, they aren't sharing. Animal attacks at Queensland zoos Last September, a 47-year-old Gold Coast tiger handler was mauled while she was walking the animal at Dreamworld, suffering serious lacerations and puncture wounds. Also at Dreamworld, in 2011, a Bengal named Kato bit two Dreamworld tiger handlers – one in May and one in September. Kato was transferred to Symbio Wildlife Park in NSW the following year, where he died in 2018 aged 16. There were also a string of tiger-related injuries at Australia Zoo, on the Sunshine Coast, last decade. In November 2013, 120-kilogram Sumatran tiger Ranu bit 33-year-old handler Dave Style on the neck and shoulder in front of horrified onlookers during a public show at the popular attraction, made famous by the late Steve Irwin. The following July, another tiger, Juma, bit Australia Zoo handler Mark Turner on the calf during a routine walk. And in 2016, Che Woolcott received deep scratches to his arm and head after Ranu swatted at him with his paw. Monday's attack at Dreamworld came two days after a female pedestrian was taken to hospital with a potentially life-threatening injury after she was struck by a vehicle on the road approaching the theme park.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Queensland lion attack: What we know so far
The zoo said on Sunday the injured woman was 'not one of our immediate family, nor a keeper', and confirmed on Monday that the woman involved was not one of the zoo's owners. 'The lady involved in the incident is still in a stable condition in hospital and is surrounded by members of our extended family,' the zoo posted late Monday afternoon. 'She has lost her arm. She is not an employee, a keeper or a zoo visitor. She is a much-loved member of the zoo owners' family. 'It has still not been possible to interview her to establish what led to this tragic incident.' The woman was not in the enclosure with the lioness, the zoo said. A Metro South Health Services spokeswoman said the woman remained in a stable condition on Monday. The investigation After closing on Sunday and Monday, the spokesperson said in a statement it would reopen from Tuesday. Police and Workplace Health and Safety personnel arrived at the zoo on Sunday to begin investigations. 'The zoo is working with them to establish how this incident occurred, but the full details will not be known until our family member can be interviewed,' the Darling Downs Zoo spokesperson said. Workplace Health and Safety Queensland said investigations were continuing on Monday, but could not provide more detail. The zoo said it would not euthanise or otherwise punish the animal involved. What is the Darling Downs Zoo The Darling Downs Zoo is a two-hour drive from Brisbane, sitting 100 kilometres to the south-west. It is owned and managed by Stephanie and Steve Robinson, who purchased the 49-hectare property in 2001. Locals from nearby communities in Allora and Clifton – which boast populations of about 1500 each – said the zoo was particularly popular with people from Toowoomba, the nearest major town that sits about 40 kilometres directly north of the zoo. It has partnered with a number of local business and schools, who declined to comment. The Robinsons moved their animal collection to the property in 2022 and began building the zoo. They opened the zoo in 2005, but ran successful breeding programs for years beforehand. In recognition of its breeding programs working with vulnerable, endangered, and critically endangered native species, which have been returned to the wild in partnership with release programs across the country, the Australian government listed the zoo as charity in June this year. The zoo's big cats The zoo houses several (asked for exact amount) big cats, including white and tawny African lions, tigers and leopards, and several species of small cats, such as cheetahs, caracals, and servals. The cats are bred at the zoo, but its website says the animals in its breeding programs are not on display for visitors. It began its lion breeding program in 1997, and its social media pages say managing director Steve Robinson has almost five decades of experience specifically dealing with African lions. Some of the oldest lions at the zoo are almost 15 years old, which is approaching the natural lifespan of an African lion, but the oldest lion bred at the zoo is 24 years old, and now resides at the Mansfield Zoo, in north-eastern Victoria. The zoo currently boasts a handful of cubs, including a set of female cubs born in mid-May and a male cub, Caesar, born in August last year. Up-close encounters The zoo offers several 'strictly monitored' close encounter experiences with the lions, tigers and leopards for $150 per person, which are used to help fund conservation programs. Encounters are limited to four people per encounter, with two encounter offered per day. The zoo's website offers guests 'the thrill of a lifetime' with the opportunity to feed one of the zoo's big cats through the fence with tongs. Guests are offered '15 minutes of big cat time', alongside educational talks and photo opportunities with all three big cat species. Cubs are brought into the public-facing part of the zoo for tours at 10am each day. A statement from the zoo on Sunday said the lion involved in the attack was not currently 'cubbing' – raising young – which can make big cats more aggressive. How many big cats are in captivity in Queensland We asked the Department of Primary Industries this very question. Six hours later, the department provided a list of about 150 people and organisations with a current 'exhibited animal authority' that allows them to keep animals. There was no information regarding the actual animals. If DPI knows, they aren't sharing. Animal attacks at Queensland zoos Last September, a 47-year-old Gold Coast tiger handler was mauled while she was walking the animal at Dreamworld, suffering serious lacerations and puncture wounds. Also at Dreamworld, in 2011, a Bengal named Kato bit two Dreamworld tiger handlers – one in May and one in September. Kato was transferred to Symbio Wildlife Park in NSW the following year, where he died in 2018 aged 16. There were also a string of tiger-related injuries at Australia Zoo, on the Sunshine Coast, last decade. In November 2013, 120-kilogram Sumatran tiger Ranu bit 33-year-old handler Dave Style on the neck and shoulder in front of horrified onlookers during a public show at the popular attraction, made famous by the late Steve Irwin. The following July, another tiger, Juma, bit Australia Zoo handler Mark Turner on the calf during a routine walk. And in 2016, Che Woolcott received deep scratches to his arm and head after Ranu swatted at him with his paw. Monday's attack at Dreamworld came two days after a female pedestrian was taken to hospital with a potentially life-threatening injury after she was struck by a vehicle on the road approaching the theme park.
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
BREN CARLILL: Politicians' reactions ring hollow in echo chambers of outrage
The shock and sorrow that politicians express after violent anti-Semitic incidents tends to ring hollow in the ears of Australia's Jewish community. Let me explain why. On Friday night in Melbourne, in two separate incidents, a synagogue was set alight and an Israeli-owned restaurant was invaded by vocal, violent protesters. The attackers were shouting and motivated by now-common chants, like 'All Zionists are terrorists', 'Death to the IDF' and 'Globalise the intifada'. Their actions on Friday evening proved — yet again — that violent rhetoric leads to violent actions. But the violence didn't start with the chants. It started with the wild accusations of colonialism, apartheid and genocide, that are regularly thrown at Israel. There is a clear path from one to the other. Pro-Palestine activists are nurtured by the algorithms of social media, a wilful ignorance of the details and history of the conflict, and agitators who are motivated by hate, not misplaced goodwill. Combined, these factors have long resulted in accusations against Israel of the most heinous crimes. Such accusations naturally send pro-Israel people straight to their corner, forced to defend themselves in black and white terms, in social media sound bites, about Israel's righteousness and, as context, about the hateful nature of Palestinian society, based on its statements, polls and actions. What is lost in the melee is the chance for nuanced discussion, where the legitimate claims and grievances of both sides can be locking themselves into their outrage echo chambers, pro-Palestine activists have convinced themselves that anyone who doesn't wholly agree with them — anyone who wants to engage in nuanced discussion — is 'complicit in genocide'. In their sense of self-righteousness they seethe, more and more convinced that the only possible reason the Government isn't sending home Israel's ambassador, or boycotting the country is because of a grand Jewish — ahem, Zionist — conspiracy that controls government and media. Little wonder then, that when their efforts in social media and street protests don't shift public or government opinion, they turn to violence. Every non-religious terrorist in history has followed a version of the same playbook. And on whom do they inflict their violence? Why, the Jews, of course. If, according to these people, the very existence of Israel is morally beyond the pale, then it remains that anyone who supports Israel's existence is likewise reprehensible and must be punished. 'Zionists' are the targets, but it just so happens that most Zionists out there are Jews, and almost all Jews are Zionists. And, certainly, the protesters don't usually bother to discriminate. Which is why synagogues are burnt. Which is why Jewish schools are graffitied and students are taunted. Which is why Jewish artists are de-platformed. Without taking agency away from the perpetrators, our political leaders share quite a bit of the responsibility for Friday night's attacks. They mouth platitudes about there being 'no place for ant-Semitism in Australia', which is nice. But they've usually looked the other way when hateful and violent chants are made, and when outrageous accusations are flung. The haters are always seeking to push the envelope. When they don't meet resistance to obscene chants and the patently false accusations, these chants and accusations become normalised. And the haters up the ante, to push the envelope that little bit more. Given the percentages, when a handful of people accept hateful slurs as the truth, the chance for violence is small. But when hundreds, and then thousands, accept hateful slurs as the truth, that small percentage of people who want to take the next step suddenly balloons into tens, then hundreds. That's when we see the sort of things that we saw on Friday night. It is a day late and a dollar short when politicians decry hateful attacks, as they've all dutifully done since Friday evening. When they condemn anti-Semitism as a concept ('there is no place for anti-Semitism'), but ignore all the warning signs pointing to future violence, it comes across as a little hypocritical. Oh, sure, they give the Jews money to build physical protection around their schools and synagogues and cultural centres. But all that does is encourage the mob. The solution is courage. It is leadership. From the PM and Foreign Minister down, people who want Israeli–Palestinian peace and realise the situation is complex must push back against these kind of hateful chants and black and white, objectively false accusations. They must tell those that utter them, plainly and loudly, 'you are part of the problem'. Nothing that happens on Australian streets will bring forward or delay Israeli–Palestinian peace. But if we want social cohesion in Australia — if we actually want it, as opposed to merely wanting to talk about it — then our leadership must push back, not when things become violent, but when the haters spread hatred. Silence or platitudes is merely complicity in the violence that will inevitably follow. Dr Bren Carlill is the director of special projects at the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council.
