Air India Crash Sparks Renewed Calls for Cockpit Video Recorders, ET Travel
Advt
Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals. Subscribe to Newsletter to get latest insights & analysis in your inbox.
All about ETTravelWorld industry right on your smartphone! Download the ETTravelWorld App and get the Realtime updates and Save your favourite articles.
The deadly Air India crash last month has renewed a decades-old debate in the aviation industry over installing video cameras monitoring airline pilot actions to complement the cockpit voice and flight data recorders already used by accident investigators.One of the industry's most influential voices, International Air Transport Association head Willie Walsh , a former airline pilot, said on Wednesday in Singapore, there was a strong argument for video cameras to be installed in airliner cockpits to monitor pilot actions to complement voice and flight data recorders already used by accident investigators.Aviation experts have said a preliminary report from India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) raised questions over whether one of the pilots of Air India flight 171 cut off fuel to the Boeing 787's engines seconds after takeoff, leading to an irrecoverable situation.The crash in Ahmedabad, India, killed 241 of the 242 people aboard, as well as 19 people on the ground.As of now, "based on what little we know now, it's quite possible that a video recording, in addition to the voice recording, would significantly assist the investigators in conducting that investigation on the issue of mental health," Walsh said.Advocates for cockpit video cameras say the footage could fill in gaps left by the audio and data recorders, while opponents say concerns about privacy and misuse outweigh what they argue are marginal benefits for investigations.Video footage was "invaluable" to Australian crash investigators determining what led to the Robinson R66 helicopter breaking up in mid-air in 2023, killing the pilot, the only person aboard, according to the Australian Transport Safety Bureau's final report, which was released 18 days after the Air India crash.The video showed "the pilot was occupied with non-flying related tasks for much of this time, specifically, mobile phone use and the consumption of food and beverages," the report said.The ATSB commended Robinson Helicopters for providing factory-installed cameras and said it encouraged other manufacturers and owners to consider the ongoing safety benefits of similar devices.In 2000, U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Chairman Jim Hall urged the Federal Aviation Administration to require commercial airliners to be equipped with cockpit image recorders.Hall's recommendation came in the wake of 1999's Egyptair Flight 990 crash, when the first officer intentionally crashed the Boeing 767, according to the NTSB, killing all 217 people on board."In the balance between privacy and safety, the scale tips toward safety, unequivocally," air safety expert and former commercial airline pilot John Nance said. "Protecting the flying public is a sacred obligation."Another aviation safety expert, Anthony Brickhouse, said that as an accident investigator, he is in favour of cockpit video, but acknowledged that commercial pilots have real concerns.Video on Air India flight 171 "would have answered lots of questions," he said.Air India declined to comment. India's AAIB, which is expected to release a final report within a year of the crash under international rules, did not reply to a request for comment.U.S. pilots' unions such as the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) and Allied Pilots Association (APA) say the voice and data recorders already provide enough information to determine the cause of a crash and that the cameras would be an invasion of privacy and could be misused.Calls for cockpit cameras are an understandable reaction to "the stress of not knowing what happened immediately after an accident," said APA spokesperson Dennis Tajer, an American Airlines pilot."I can understand the initial reaction of the more information, the better," but investigators already have enough data to adequately determine an accident's cause, leaving no need for cameras, he said.To make flying safer, current safety systems should be enhanced to record higher-quality data, rather than adding video cameras, an ALPA spokesperson said.There are also concerns that the footage could be used by airlines for disciplinary actions or that the video could be leaked to the public after a crash, said John Cox, an aviation safety expert, retired airline pilot and former ALPA executive air safety chairman.A pilot's death being broadcast on "the 6 o'clock news is not something that the pilot's family should ever have to go through," he said.If confidentiality can be assured around the world, "I can see an argument" for installing cameras, Cox said.Cockpit voice recordings are typically kept confidential by investigators in favour of partial or full transcripts being released in final reports.Despite that, the International Federation of Air Line Pilots Associations said it was sceptical that confidentiality could ever be assured for cockpit videos."Given the high demand for sensational pictures, IFALPA has absolutely no doubt that the protection of (airborne image recorder) data, which can include identifiable images of flight crewmembers, would not be ensured either," the organisation said in a statement.Boeing declined to disclose whether customers are able to order cockpit video recorders , while Airbus did not reply to a request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
8 hours ago
- Economic Times
Julian Assange joins pro-Palestine protest on Sydney Harbour Bridge; what's his net worth and life like now?
Synopsis Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks founder, joined a pro-Gaza march in Sydney. He returned to Australia after a plea deal with the US. Assange's net worth is around $300,000. He showed early computer skills and hacking. He studied at the University of Melbourne but did not graduate. In 1991, he faced hacking charges. He sought asylum in London to avoid extradition. AP WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange prepares to march with protesters across the Sydney Harbour Bridge during the Palestine Action Group's March for Humanity in Sydney, Sunday, August 3, 2025. (Dean Lewins/AAP Image via AP) WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was among the tens of thousands who marched across the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday, August 3, as part of a 'Humanitarians for Gaza' protest in pro-Palestine demonstration called for an end to the war in Gaza and featured Assange walking alongside former Australian Foreign Minister Bob Carr and his own family who returned to Australia last year after his release from a British prison, did not speak at the name gained global recognition after 2006, when Assange launched WikiLeaks, a platform for publishing classified and sensitive information to promote transparency. It gained international attention for exposing major government and corporate 2007 to 2010, Assange traveled extensively for WikiLeaks. The site released controversial information such as internet censorship lists, documents on drone strikes, and details of political unrest in China and Yemen. In 2008, WikiLeaks drew headlines after publishing bank documents from the Swiss firm Julius Baer. During the 2008 US presidential race, the contents of a hacked Yahoo! account belonging to Sarah Palin also appeared on WikiLeaks. Here is a closer look at his life, wealth, education and career. Julian Assange is known globally as a journalist, computer programmer, and activist. According to Celebrity Net Worth, his estimated net worth is around $300,000. He has received several recognitions, including the 2009 Amnesty International Media Award and the Readers' Choice for TIME magazine's 2010 Person of the Year. Julian Assange was born Julian Paul Hawkins on July 3, 1971, in Townsville, Queensland, Australia. His parents separated before his birth. He took the surname Assange from his stepfather, actor Brett Assange, whom he regards as his an early age, Assange showed an interest in computers. By age 16, he had begun hacking under the pseudonym "Mendax" and co-founded a group called "The International Subversives."Julian Assange's educational path was unconventional and shaped by his early interest in computers and hacking. He enrolled at the University of Melbourne in 2003 to study programming, physics, and mathematics. However, he did not complete his degree. At the university, he was known to keep a low profile and was deeply focused on computer science. By the time he began formal studies, Assange had already built a reputation as a skilled hacker. During his teenage years, he was involved in several high-profile intrusions. While incomplete, his formal education contributed to the technical foundation that would later support his work with WikiLeaks and his role as a global advocate for transparency and information 1991, Assange was caught hacking into the Melbourne master terminal of Nortel, a Canadian telecom firm. In 1994, he was charged with 31 hacking-related crimes. He pleaded guilty to 24 charges in 1996 and was released on a good behavior Assange returned to Australia in June 2024 after striking a plea deal with the US government that ended a 14-year legal pleaded guilty to a single charge of unlawfully obtaining and disclosing national defense information and was sentenced to time already had spent nearly five years in a British high-security prison after being removed from Ecuador's London embassy in 2019, where he had sought asylum since 2012 to avoid extradition.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
IndiGo bars man who hit a co-passenger on plane flying from Mumbai to Kolkata from its flights
NEW DELHI: IndiGo has barred a passenger who had assaulted a co-flyer on an aircraft headed from Mumbai to Kolkata Friday, from all its flights indefinitely. "Following due diligence, the incident involving an unruly customer has been formally reported to the relevant authorities for necessary action. In line with our commitment to discourage such unruly behaviour onboard flights, the individual has been suspended from flying on any IndiGo flights, in accordance with regulatory provisions," IndiGo said Saturday. Now it is upto other Indian airlines whether they also decide on doing the same with the accused till the due legal process of putting him on the national no fly list is taken. Before this provision for unruly flyers was in place, state-owned Air India, under its then CMD Ashwani Lohani had about a decade back had barred at least two people, including an MP, from its flights. At that time, other airlines had also decided to do the same for these people. The no fly list in India was enacted after these instances. IndiGo had initiated legal action against the unruly flyer on Saturday itself after the aircraft landed in Kolkata. So apart from being put on no fly list, there is likely to be other action too against the assaulter. The Bidhannagar Police said on X: "On Aug 1, 2025, a complaint was received from IndiGo regarding two Indian male passengers who were travelling on flight 6E-138 from Mumbai to Kolkata. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like (1) Activate Antivirus License Now Click Here During the flight, a heated altercation ensued between the two, following which Hafijul Rahaman slapped the other, Hossain Ahmed Majumder). Passenger declared unruly by the cabin crew of Indigo and handed over to Police. Legal action has been initiated. " The unruly passenger hit a co-traveller who had a panic attack on an IndiGo Mumbai-Kolkata flight Friday. The assaulter was handed over to security agencies by the airline. The victim had suffered a panic attack when the aircraft was taxiing in Mumbai. He started sobbing and walking in the aisle, requesting to be allowed to alight from the plane. At this time a passenger is seen slapping this person as he was passing by his seat in videos of the assault that went viral on social media. All other passengers and airline crew immediately came to the victim's support. 'He was comforted and seated. The aircraft then took off for its destination and had an uneventful flight,' said people in the know. "At IndiGo, the safety and well-being of our customers and crew remain our foremost priority. We remain committed to fostering a safe, respectful, and comfortable environment for all onboard," IndiGo said on X Saturday while announcing its decision to put the assaulter on its no fly list.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
a day ago
- Business Standard
Fraudsters pose as govt officials to dupe A-I crash victim's kin, FIR filed
The family of Vardi Chand Menaria, a victim of the Air India flight AI171 crash, has filed a complaint against two individuals, who allegedly tried to deceive them by pretending to be government officials and a Supreme Court lawyer to help the family get compensation, The Indian Express reported. The flight, bound for London, had crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad airport on June 12, killing 260 people. According to the FIR, the accused claimed they could help the family get compensation worth ₹8 crore-₹10 crore if they agreed to sign some documents. The police have registered a case under Section 329(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for 'criminal trespass'. This offence carries a punishment of up to three months in jail or a fine of ₹5,000. Vardi Chand Menaria's son, Deepak, said in his complaint that on the evening of July 17, he received a call from a man named Bhupendra. The caller introduced himself as a representative from the central government and said a 'secret verification' would be conducted at their home by a team from Delhi and Mumbai. He asked Deepak to arrange a copy of his late father's passport and ticket, the news report said. Duo visits house, pressures family to sign The next day, on July 18 at around 7:45 pm, a man and a woman arrived at the Menaria home in Rundeda village in a car bearing a Gujarat registration number. They entered the house and spoke with Deepak's mother, making confusing claims and eventually introducing themselves as representatives from the Supreme Court. 'When I returned home, they pressured us to sign and put thumb impressions on some documents related to a supposed case against Boeing in America,' Deepak said. He refused to sign without understanding the purpose. Eventually, the two left the house at around 8:40 pm, the news report said. FIR filed after legal authority's intervention On July 19, the same individuals returned and parked their car a kilometre away from the family's house. Sensing danger, Deepak called his neighbours and the Vallabh Nagar police station. The police arrived and took the two to the station. However, Deepak claimed that the station house officer refused to register the FIR and asked him to collect it from the superintendent of police's office as he had lodged a complaint there. It was only after Deepak approached the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA) that the FIR was officially filed on July 29, the news report said. The crash, one of the worst air disasters in India in decades, involved a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner that crashed into a medical hostel complex in Ahmedabad's Meghani Nagar area shortly after takeoff on June 12. Of the 242 people onboard, 241 were killed, with only one survivor. The total death toll stood at 270, including casualties on the ground.
