A $250 bill and ‘WMAGA': GOP lawmakers push legislation honoring Trump
The legislation also called for Metrorail, the system's flagship rail line, to be renamed the 'Trump Train.'
The bill, Steube said in a statement, would signal a 'cultural shift away from bureaucratic stagnation toward public-facing excellence and patriotism.'
Steube's proposal is just the latest in legislative offerings this year paying tribute to President Donald Trump. House Republicans have proposed at least eight bills since January to honor the president or burnish his image. They would, among other things, put Trump's portrait on U.S. currency, carve his face onto Mount Rushmore, rename Washington Dulles International Airport for him and make his birthday a national holiday. Two bills, both introduced by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia), called for the House to expunge Trump's impeachments in 2019 and 2021.
Longtime political observers say the GOP's legislative love fest for the president is well outside of congressional norms. While members have often proposed legislation that honors presidents, it is almost never while they are still in office.
'It is unprecedented and to be honest with you, it's completely wild,' John White, professor emeritus of politics at Catholic University, said in an interview. 'History shows that most things are named after presidents after they have either long left office or been deceased.'
Ronald Reagan was still alive in 1998 when Congress passed legislation renaming Washington National Airport for him. But by then, Reagan had been out of office for almost a decade and had been diagnosed with Alzheimer's. White also pointed to the renaming of Idlewild Airport in New York for John F. Kennedy in December 1963, just a month after his assassination. But that was a decision proposed by New York City's mayor at the time, not Congress.
In 2012, Congress passed bipartisan legislation that renamed federal buildings for former Democratic president Bill Clinton and former Republican presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush.
Steube's proposal to rename the Metro was cheered by many from Trump's's base and met with derision by Democrats and other critics who saw it as a craven appeal to the commander in chief.
'WMATA is not a vanity project for Donald Trump to steamroll. It's the backbone of our nation's capital,' Sen Mark R. Warner (D-Virginia) posted on X. 'When will House Republicans stop trying to suck up to Donald Trump and start focusing on lowering the cost of living?'
WMATA did not respond to a request for comment on the proposed change.
None of the current laundry list of Trump-praising bills are likely to become law, as they face a challenging legislative process and constitutional obstacles. But they do serve a purpose for the members who introduce them, said Casey Burgat, director of the Legislative Affairs masters program at George Washington University's Graduate School of Political Management.
'They're trying to stand out amongst their peers of who can be the most supportive of a president who has a complete hold on their party,' Burgat said. 'Attaching their name to something in their institutional capacity not only signals to their constituents that they're doing this, but more importantly, probably, the president who's looking for fealty.'
Three days after Trump's inauguration in January, Rep. Addison McDowell (R-North Carolina) proposed renaming Washington Dulles International Airport in Virginia to the 'Donald J. Trump International Airport.'
'President Donald J. Trump, the greatest president of my lifetime, was just sworn into office for a second term after a historic landslide victory,' Rep. Guy Reschenthaler (R-Pennsylvania), a co-sponsor of the bill, said in a statement. 'This legislation will cement his status in our nation's capital as our fearless commander in chief, extraordinary leader and relentless champion for the American people.'
Rep. Claudia Tenney (R-New York) chose Valentine's Day to submit a bill that would make Trump's birthday, June 14, a national holiday along with Flag Day.
'Just as George Washington's Birthday is codified as a federal holiday, this bill will add Trump's Birthday to this list, recognizing him as the founder of America's Golden Age,' Tenney said in a statement at the time. (A few days earlier, Tenney had introduced H.R.1216 — a bill that would end federal support for PBS and NPR. It is titled the Defund Government-Sponsored Propaganda Act).
'President Trump is arguably the most consequential president ever, and his place in history will be remembered for generations to come,' said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt in a statement. 'These proposals from Republican lawmakers serve as further proof there's never been a political leader in American history with such immense support from their Party as President Trump. The President appreciates the overwhelming support and these kind gestures from Republican lawmakers.'
Several lawmakers in the current session have served up bills that aim to make Trump's face more ubiquitous.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Florida) introduced legislation directing the secretary of the interior 'to arrange for the carving of the figure of President Donald J. Trump on Mount Rushmore National Memorial.' The National Park Service has previously said there is no suitable stable space on the monument for another face to be added.
Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) proposed H.R. 1790, the Golden Age Act of 2025, which directs the Treasury Department to print $100 bills with Trump's portrait on them. That was just after Rep. Joe Wilson (R-South Carolina) introduced the Donald J. Trump $250 Bill Act, which would require the Treasury to print 'Federal reserve notes in the denomination of $250 and such notes shall feature a portrait of Donald J. Trump.'
The $250 bill is meant to help the nation celebrate its 250 birthday next year, Wilson said in a statement, which concluded, 'The most valuable bill for the most valuable President!' Numerous House members co-sponsored the bill including Steube, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-New York), Rep. Diana Harshbarger (R-Tennessee), Rep. Ralph Norman (R-South Carolina) and Rep. Darrell Issa (R-California).
U.S. Treasurer Brandon Beach, who was appointed by Trump, wrote to Wilson in late May expressing his support for the bill but acknowledging that the law does not allow living people to appear on U.S. currency. In a letter Wilson's office shared with The Washington Post, Beach wrote, 'I am willing to help in any way that I can to make this a reality.'
A spokesperson for House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) did not respond to an email seeking comment. Spokespeople for other Republican representatives contacted for this story pointed to statements made when the bills were introduced.
Former Republican congressman Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania, who served in Congress from 2005 to 2018 and was a chair of the House Ethics Committee, said he thinks the bills honoring Trump would probably make some current GOP House members uncomfortable and he doesn't see much appetite for action on any of them.
'It's better to name buildings and institutions and airports for politicians long after they're out of office, after there's been some time to reflect on their records and their place in history,' he said.
The various proposals honoring Trump this session are 'being done to please the president,' Dent said in an interview on Friday. 'I mean, he loves that kind of attention.'
Dent added that he thinks it is 'ill-advised' to pass legislation bestowing honor on people in such a politically charged atmosphere.
'Usually when you do these types of honorifics, they are moments of celebration and joy to remember that individual,' Dent said. 'I don't think that's what would happen today with the current president, certainly not while he's in office. Maybe over time, after he's long gone, maybe people's views will shift on him. Who knows?'
GW's Burgat says there's a risk involved that the legislation introduced extolling Trump diminishes the institution's reputation and its work.
A 2023 Congressional Research Service report on commemorations noted that beginning in the 1960s, Congress attempted to reduce legislative proposals for naming federal buildings, designating federal holidays and establishing monuments.
'These initiatives were in response to concern that the legislative time spent on commemorative measures was excessive,' the report stated.
'It undermines the job itself,' Burgat said. 'Your job is to write laws, to study them. Not just memorialize the current president.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Much You Could Save in Every State Under Trump's Proposed Capital Gains Tax Cut
Last week, President Donald Trump told reporters he would consider legislation proposed by Representative Marjorie Taylor Green to eliminate capital gains taxes for homeowners who sell their primary home and earn a profit. Learn More: Read Next: Currently, homeowners who sell their homes and earn a profit above the exclusion amount, which is $250,000 for single tax filers and $500,000 for spouses filing jointly, are required to pay. Considering home values rise over time, more home sellers could face the fact they could be on the hook for capital gains taxes. But how much could you save if the proposed capital gains tax cut goes through? How Many Homeowners Could Be Affected Research by CoreLogic found that homeowners who have mortgages have an average of $303,000 in home equity. High cost of living areas like San Francisco and Hawaii could see higher home equity values. Find Out: According to data by around one in three of homeowners are over the exclusion amount if they sell their home. The outlet also looked at data of the percentage of homeowners that will be over the exclusion by 2030, which is outlined below. State Percentage of Homeowners with Equity Over $250,000 Percentage of Homeowners with Equity Over $500,000 Alaska 22.5% 2.7% Alabama 13.4% 2% Arkansas 11.5% 1.7% Arizona 48.5% 10.3% California 62.2% 30.8% Colorado 59.5% 18.2% Connecticut 23.9% 6.8% Delaware 25.8% 3.9% Florida 47.8% 11.7% Georgia 31.3% 5.5 % Hawaii 79.1% 46% Idaho 54.9% 13.8% Illinois 12.5% 2.4% Indiana 13% 1.6% Iowa 9.8% 1% Kansas 15.3% 2.5% Kentucky 14.1% 1.9% Louisiana 9.8% 1.6% Massachusetts 62.3% 23.5% Maryland 31.8% 6.9% Maine 39.2% 8.3% Michigan 15.4% 2.3% Minnesota 22.5% 3.7% Missouri 14.3% 2.1% Mississippi 7.9% 0.7% Montana 53.6% 18% North Carolina 33.9% 6.7% North Dakota 16.7% 2.2% Nebraska 16.9% 2.3% New Hampshire 50% 9.3% New Jersey 46.2% 12.7% New Mexico 20.9% 3.5% Nevada 43% 7.6% New York 46.1% 18.7% Ohio 12.6% 1.5% Oklahoma 12% 1.7% Oregon 51% 12.9% Pennsylvania 20.4% 3.4% Rhode Island 47.2% 9.2% South Carolina 28.5% 6.3% South Dakota 25.4% 4.4% Tennessee 36.1% 8.3% Texas 32.9% 7.1% Utah 61.2% 16.1% Virginia 35% 9.4% Vermont 35.6% 7.9% Washington 64.8% 24.7% Wisconsin 17.7% 2.6 % West Virginia 6.8% 0.6% Wyoming 27.6% 8.3% Washington DC 51.6% 25.4% How Capital Gains Tax Work on Home Sales The current tax law stipulates that profits about the exclusion amount will be taxed at long-term capital gains rates. So if your home sale profit was $350,000, as a single filer you would only be taxed on $100,000. Depending on your taxable income, you could be taxed anywhere from 0% to 20%. These homeowners who are above exclusion amounts could save a significant amount but that's assuming their taxable income is higher to where the tax actually kicks in. Here's a simplified example: As a single person, your taxable income is $45,000 and you sold your home at a $300,000 profit. Since you profited $50,000 above the exclusion, you're responsible for long-term gains tax. But since your income sits below $48,350, your tax rate is 0%. What this spells out is that those who are high-income earners and have significant home equity will most likely benefit from the proposed tax cut that's not in effect yet. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates New Law Could Make Electricity Bills Skyrocket in These 4 States I'm a Self-Made Millionaire: 6 Ways I Use ChatGPT To Make a Lot of Money 5 Strategies High-Net-Worth Families Use To Build Generational Wealth 6 Hybrid Vehicles To Stay Away From in Retirement This article originally appeared on How Much You Could Save in Every State Under Trump's Proposed Capital Gains Tax Cut Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Charleston attorney Mullins McLeod becomes first Democrat to join the race for governor
A Lowcountry attorney announced his campaign for governor in a YouTube video on August 11, officially becoming the first Democratic candidate to formally enter the party's primary. Mullins McLeod is a personal injury attorney based in Charleston. He ran for governor in 2010 as a Democrat but dropped out of the race months before his party's primary election day. He said he is joining the race now because he thinks there is a job that needs to be done in Columbia. "That job is curing a cancer that has infiltrated our state government over the last 25 years," McLeod said in his campaign video. "The name of that cancer is corruption." McLeod said the Columbia establishment sells out South Carolinians to benefit their "large, corporate, for-profit friends." He said the establishment has promised and failed to take a tax burden off the backs of South Carolinians every election cycle. "In the real world where I live in, that's called fraud," McLeod said. "In Columbia, that's just business as usual." He called on voters to choose a governor who is a "servant leader" and will act in their best interest at all times. He said he is the only person running for governor who is not a politician and has experience fighting corruption in the courtroom. "We know the cure. It's servant leadership," McLeod said. "It's time that we the people kick corruption's teeth in at the statehouse." Another Democrat, State Rep. Jermaine Johnson (D-Richland), previously said he is working with an exploratory committee and is considering joining the race. More: Rep. Nancy Mace enters race for governor: 'I went from making waffles to making history' The Republican primary is packed with five candidates: Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette, Attorney General Alan Wilson, U.S. Reps. Nancy Mace (1st District), and Ralph Norman (5th District), and State Sen. Josh Kimbrell (R-Spartanburg). Bella Carpentier covers the South Carolina legislature, state, and Greenville County politics. Contact her at bcarpentier@ This article originally appeared on Greenville News: Lowcountry attorney joins South Carolina governor's race as a Democrat
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lawsuit over Epstein files could expose Trump administration's handling of the matter
Denying the Justice Department's motion to unseal Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury transcripts on Monday, a federal judge rejected the DOJ's professed interest in transparency as disingenuous. What the judge described as the government's feigned interest in revealing Jeffrey Epstein-related information puts a finer point on a separate new lawsuit regarding the Trump administration's handling of the matter. The lawsuit, from nonprofit Democracy Forward, seeks to shed light on the administration's actions by asking a judge in Washington, D.C., to order the government to comply with the Freedom of Information Act. The group filed Freedom of Information Act requests, detailed in its complaint filed Friday, seeking senior administration officials' 'communications regarding the Epstein matter, including those regarding correspondence between President Trump and Epstein, as well as records concerning agency review of the Epstein matter.' The suit has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who presided over Donald Trump's federal election interference case, which the DOJ moved to dismiss after he won the 2024 presidential election. The legal claim in the new suit is that the government failed to comply with FOIA by not granting speedy processing of the group's requests under the federal transparency law. 'By failing to grant Plaintiff's requests for expedited processing on Plaintiff's FOIA requests concerning matters of widespread and exceptional media interest in which there exist possible questions about the government's integrity that affect public confidence, ... and national urgent need to inform the public, ... [government] Defendants have violated FOIA,' the complaint alleges. The administration will have an opportunity to respond in court. How it does so will reveal its latest stance in the affair that has dogged the White House for its lack of transparency and failure to fulfill its promise to release the full Epstein records. Subscribe to the Deadline: Legal Newsletter for expert analysis on the top legal stories of the week, including updates from the Supreme Court and developments in the Trump administration's legal cases. This article was originally published on
