Boynton Beach moves closer to creating its very own downtown
It finally has moved a critical downtown development project that had been stalled for almost eight years a big step closer to becoming reality. The city's Community Redevelopment Agency approved a plan to bring in a new developer to finish the Town Square Project, a development that will give the community something it has lacked for some time — a viable and potentially bustling downtown.
For years, the city's $250 million effort to revitalize a four-block area off Boynton Beach and Seacrest boulevards has been left half finished and mired in legal proceedings. The project's government features — a new city hall and library complex, a children's museum, a cultural center and an outdoor amphitheater — were completed on time and had attracted residents and visitors with a promise of more to come. Unfortunately, the commercial side of the project that included office space, upscale restaurants, upscale condos and apartments, and a parking garage never materialized.
That all changed earlier this month when the CRA approved a plan to use $35.2 million to build two eight-story buildings that would include almost 900 apartments, including workforce housing, 23,000 square feet of retail and parking — the missing but essential elements to build a thriving core community that has eluded Boynton Beach for years.
It was not an easy decision, but the vote to move forward was the right call. More importantly, they made the decision the right way. They aired the proposal in public deliberations that at times had both the public and the city commissioners who serve as the CRA board going back and forth on the proposal's merits. Cost and the impact of development are always important considerations, but those conversations led to the right outcome — approval.
Boynton Beach has had its challenges when it comes to downtown development. Much of the area's growth skirted the city itself, occurring in unincorporated Palm Beach County. The city's geographic disadvantage of having limited access to the ocean, along with a lack of leadership and resources, has made it difficult to fashion an attractive downtown.
In 2018, the city came up with the Town Square project, a plan to build a downtown community around a new city hall and library. City officials found a developer and thought they were well on their way to revitalization. Three years later, half of the project was complete. The city could boast of a new city hall, library, children's museum and cultural center. The new plaza consistently drew crowds to cultural and music events at its amphitheater.
Editorial: Florida's leaders need to craft a budget to avoid our own government shutdown
Unfortunately, what remained undone was the private sector component of retail and residences that would have cemented the creation of a downtown Boynton Beach. The dispute with the initial developer dragged out in court and ended up costing the city because the 2018 agreement lacked a "reverter clause" that would have given the city the land back if the developer failed to meet its end of the bargain. Hopefully, the city has learned from that experience.
City residents grappled with the idea of a new developer and a proposal calling for the city to come up with $35.2 million in tax incentives to start construction next summer. The financing plan prompted criticism of unwanted growth and traffic that would change the city into a smaller and more congested version of Fort Lauderdale. In the back of many minds, though, was the notion that the city had been here before, and it had with the previous developer.
Editorial: With Trump's tariffs and federal cuts, Florida's tax plan comes at a bad time
"This isn't a perfect situation. This isn't a perfect project," Commissioner Thomas Turkin said. "You know how I feel about the project in its entirety. You know how split and divided the residents are. But, I think if you look at this economically and you look at the metrics ... they don't pick sides. I'm not going to let perfect be the enemy of good."
Boynton Beach now has the chance to develop a downtown that at the very least will generate new tax revenue and at most will become a new South Florida destination in the county's third-largest city. With so much promise on the line, the challenge for city officials is to ensure the final phase of development is completed without delay or drama.
This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: At last, a downtown Boynton Beach is closer to reality | Editorial

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Wire
2 days ago
- Business Wire
KBRA Assigns AAA Rating to State of Wisconsin General Obligation Bonds of 2025, Series B; Affirms Related Ratings
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--KBRA assigns a long-term rating of AAA to the State of Wisconsin General Obligation Bonds of 2025, Series B. KBRA additionally affirms the: long-term rating of AAA for the State's outstanding General Obligation Bonds; the short-term rating of K1+ for the State's General Obligation Commercial Paper (CP) Program and General Obligation Extendible Municipal Commercial Paper (EMCP) Program; and, the long-term rating of AA+ for the State's Master Lease Certificates of Participation. The rating outlook for the long-term ratings remains Stable. Key Credit Considerations The rating actions reflect the following key credit considerations: Credit Positives Strength and breadth of the G.O. pledge, coupled with liquidity and market access to support short-term debt. Trend of conservative budgets, strong financial results and improved reserve levels. Strong liquidity position based on all sources of available cash for operations. Essentiality of assets under the Master Lease Program, supported by a strong, well-established legal framework. Credit Challenges Drawdown of unusually large fund balance in 2025-27 biennium to a more historically normal level leaves outyear gaps to be addressed in next biennium. Federal policy changes for Medicaid cost-sharing and SNAP administration costs will increase program costs for the State beginning in FY 2026, escalating thereafter. These additional costs are not yet known and are not fully accounted for in the 2025-27 biennium budget. Rating Sensitivities For Upgrade Not applicable. For Downgrade Material financial weakening, driven by budgetary imbalance over an extended period. While unlikely, limited and/or expensive market access that impedes the State's ability to manage maturing CP and EMCP Notes. A change in the essentiality of assets leased under the Master Lease Program that increases the risk of non-appropriation. To access ratings and relevant documents, click here. Methodologies Disclosures A description of all substantially material sources that were used to prepare the credit rating and information on the methodology(ies) (inclusive of any material models and sensitivity analyses of the relevant key rating assumptions, as applicable) used in determining the credit rating is available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) located here. Information on the meaning of each rating category can be located here. Further disclosures relating to this rating action are available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) referenced above. Additional information regarding KBRA policies, methodologies, rating scales and disclosures are available at About KBRA Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC (KBRA), one of the major credit rating agencies (CRA), is a full-service CRA registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as an NRSRO. Kroll Bond Rating Agency Europe Limited is registered as a CRA with the European Securities and Markets Authority. Kroll Bond Rating Agency UK Limited is registered as a CRA with the UK Financial Conduct Authority. In addition, KBRA is designated as a Designated Rating Organization (DRO) by the Ontario Securities Commission for issuers of asset-backed securities to file a short form prospectus or shelf prospectus. KBRA is also recognized as a Qualified Rating Agency by Taiwan's Financial Supervisory Commission and is recognized by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners as a Credit Rating Provider (CRP) in the U.S. Doc ID: 1010761


Business Wire
5 days ago
- Business Wire
KBRA Assigns Preliminary Ratings to Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2025-8 (SEMT 2025-8)
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--KBRA assigns preliminary ratings to 67 classes of mortgage pass-through certificates from Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2025-8 (SEMT 2025-8), a $550.3 million prime RMBS transaction. The pool is comprised of 445 first-lien, fully amortizing fixed rate mortgages with 20-year and 30-year maturity terms. The collateral is characterized by a weighted average (WA) original credit score of 779 and moderate borrower equity, with a WA original LTV of 72.3% and WA original CLTV of 72.3%. KBRA's rating approach incorporated loan-level analysis of the mortgage pool through its Residential Asset Loss Model (REALM), an examination of the results from third-party loan file due diligence, cash flow modeling analysis of the transaction's payment structure, reviews of key transaction parties and an assessment of the transaction's legal structure and documentation. This analysis is further described in our U.S. RMBS Rating Methodology. To access ratings and relevant documents, click here. Click here to view the report. Methodologies RMBS: U.S. RMBS Rating Methodology Structured Finance: Global Structured Finance Counterparty Methodology ESG Global Rating Methodology Disclosures Further information on key credit considerations, sensitivity analyses that consider what factors can affect these credit ratings and how they could lead to an upgrade or a downgrade, and ESG factors (where they are a key driver behind the change to the credit rating or rating outlook) can be found in the full rating report referenced above. A description of all substantially material sources that were used to prepare the credit rating and information on the methodology(ies) (inclusive of any material models and sensitivity analyses of the relevant key rating assumptions, as applicable) used in determining the credit rating is available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) located here. Information on the meaning of each rating category can be located here. Further disclosures relating to this rating action are available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) referenced above. Additional information regarding KBRA policies, methodologies, rating scales and disclosures are available at About KBRA Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC (KBRA), one of the major credit rating agencies (CRA), is a full-service CRA registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as an NRSRO. Kroll Bond Rating Agency Europe Limited is registered as a CRA with the European Securities and Markets Authority. Kroll Bond Rating Agency UK Limited is registered as a CRA with the UK Financial Conduct Authority. In addition, KBRA is designated as a Designated Rating Organization (DRO) by the Ontario Securities Commission for issuers of asset-backed securities to file a short form prospectus or shelf prospectus. KBRA is also recognized as a Qualified Rating Agency by Taiwan's Financial Supervisory Commission and is recognized by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners as a Credit Rating Provider (CRP) in the U.S. Doc ID: 1010683
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Here's why the CRA should keep taxing tips even as the U.S. shies away from it
Early on in my career, I started going out for lunches and dinners with key contacts and clients. Providing gratuities, or tips as they're better known, for good service was, of course, customary. I wondered if it was a requirement for the servers to pay tax on their received tips. The short answer was yes and still is. I also learned that the reporting of tip income by recipients is very inconsistent and the subject of myths. A number of people, even seasoned tax professionals, would tell me — and continue to do so — that as long as the recipients reported something, say 10 per cent of their wage, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) would leave them alone. Not true and never has been. The CRA has long provided administrative guidance about the requirement to report tip income. For employers, especially if the tips are originally in their control, the CRA has provided guidance regarding proper tax withholdings from such amounts. Tips are indeed taxable income and need to be reported in their entirety. For the recipient, there are often good reasons to fully report your tip income. The first is that you're breaking the law by purposely not reporting it. In a worst-case scenario, it could be considered criminal tax evasion, resulting in significant financial penalties and possible jail time. Don't purposely under-report. Second, the reporting of your tip income can possibly make you eligible for certain types of government programs. For example, I'm aware of some servers who didn't report their tip income, so their income was too low to qualify for all the government handouts when COVID-19 came along. Third, it increases your registered retirement savings plan (RRSP) contribution room and future Canada Pension Plan payouts. Lastly, it can increase your income for the purposes of loan and mortgage eligibility. A basic policy in the design of any country's tax system is that any economic enrichment received by a taxpayer is taxed. The exceptions to such a basic rule are what cause many of the complications. For example, in Canada, lottery winnings are not taxable; only one-half of capital gains are included in taxable income; and dividend income received by individuals is taxed at a lower overall rate to give credit for the underlying corporate tax that has already been paid on such distributions. These are all deliberate policy choices. Tip income has intentionally not been excluded from being subject to tax in Canada. That is correct. There aren't any good and obvious policy reasons to exclude tips from tax. That's why I was surprised when Donald Trump promised to introduce a rule to not tax tips and overtime in the United States during the election campaign last year. I guffawed at such a promise since, again, I couldn't understand any good tax policy reasons to do that. I also wondered how such a law, if implemented, would be administered and to what occupations such an exclusion would apply. For example, perhaps a lawyer could issue an invoice for services rendered for US$100, but mandate a non-taxable 'tip' of US$100,000. Would the law encourage that kind of abuse? Fast forward to the implementation of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act that became U.S. law on July 4. It implemented the election promise, but didn't give a free pass on all tips. It also implemented limited non-taxability on overtime pay as well. Under new Internal Revenue Service code section 70201, for 2025 through 2028, employees and self-employed individuals may deduct up to US$25,000 of qualified tips (voluntary cash or charged tips received from customers or through tip sharing) received in occupations listed by the tax agency as customarily and regularly receiving qualified tips. For self-employed individuals, the deduction can not exceed their net income. The deduction phases out for those that have adjusted gross income in excess of US$150,000 or US$300,000 for joint filers. The IRS has not yet provided its list of occupations that 'customarily and regularly' receive tips and has until Oct. 2, 2025, to do that. Obviously, that list will be narrow to try to curtail some of the abuses that could be done, as illustrated in the example above. Should Canada do something similar? No. The new U.S. rule is very silly and a blatant example of politics driving tax policy for votes. Does it make any sense that a person who customarily receives tips should not pay tax on such amounts, whereas a person working in another industry — such as a retail sporting goods store — will pay tax on their compensation? No, it makes zero sense. If that makes sense to you, well, I have a bridge for sale down the street. Let's chat. There are obvious administrative benefits to exempting tips from tax (tips are usually small dollar amounts and can be a nuisance to track) and equity arguments (tips are often earned by lower-income people, so exempting such tips from income tax can perhaps improve equity), but the real risk is the erosion of the tax system. In other words, instead of relying on existing exemptions and credits to exempt and/or reduce lower-income households from tax, having no tax on tips would encourage no tax on other types of income. It would be a slippery slope. As former U.S. president Ronald Reagan once quipped, 'The most terrifying words in the English language are: 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'' Canada should take another look at how it taxes death Canada's personal tax rates need to come down Is the U.S. government helping by complicating their tax laws with non-principled carveouts that are not grounded in good tax policy? If Canada followed suit, what's next? The tax system works best when it's clear, consistent and based on sound policy, not vote-hunting gimmicks. Canada should keep tips on the serving tax table. Kim Moody, FCPA, FCA, TEP, is the founder of Moodys Tax/Moodys Private Client, a former chair of the Canadian Tax Foundation, former chair of the Society of Estate Practitioners (Canada) and has held many other leadership positions in the Canadian tax community. He can be reached at kgcm@ and his LinkedIn profile is __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data