
Nigerian business owner subjected to ‘rabid racism including monkey grunts', court told
Ms Justice Eileen Roberts heard allegations of how a motor mechanic and neighbouring Lithuanian businessman, Vilmantas Zutkis, was responsible for 'rabid racism' against Stanley Abayeneme, who owns the car-cleaning business.
Barrister Femi Daniyan told Ms Justice Roberts on Tuesday Mr Abayeneme was seeking a restraining order against Mr Zutkis, regarding the alleged racism, and against John McLaughlin, the landlord to both, regarding Mr McLaughlin's alleged blocking of Mr Abayeneme's valeting unit by placing a 40ft-long steel container in front of it.
Although interim restraints were sought by Mr Abayeneme in the absence of Mr Zutkis and Mr McLoughlin, of Laurel Walk, Bandon, Co Cork, Ms Justice Roberts granted only an order for short service of proceedings against both defendants.
READ MORE
Mr Abayeneme told the judge in written evidence he rented unit two at Greenhills Bungalows, Blessington Road, Tallaght, Co Dublin, from Mr McLoughlin and he said Mr Zutkis rented the adjoining unit one for his car-servicing business.
'I have always been subjected to racial and physical violence [by Mr Zutkis] and have made a number of complaints to gardaí and the landlord with nothing done by either of the two,' Mr Abayeneme stated.
He said Mr Zutkis's conduct was aggressive and obstructive and included direct racial abuse of him in front of his customers, threats to his employee and interference to footfall with his business.
'[Mr Zutkis] will come to my unit and racially abuse me and my worker, John Onuigbo Obinna, calling us monkeys, placing bananas in front of our shop and threatening [us] with deportation back to Nigeria in a container,' Mr Abayeneme stated.
Although Mr Zutkis had claimed not to have any English, he would make racist slurs at every opportunity trying to provoke a reaction, Mr Abayeneme said.
He had suffered daily stress, reputational damage and financial loss and, having reported him to their landlord, Mr McLoughlin had failed to intervene, but had admitted to placing the container in an attempt to get him out and instructing him to vacate the unit, he said.
He said Mr Zutkis, by parking cars, and Mr McLoughlin, by placing the container, were obstructing access to and even the view of his unit. Last week his unit had been burgled and tyres, tools and cash worth €200,000 had been taken.
Counsel opened correspondence between Kevin Tunney Solicitors, for Mr Abayeneme, and Dillon Eustace, for Mr McLoughlin, of the Remcoll Group, in which it was alleged Mr Abeyeneme was responsible for anti-social behaviour.
Dillon Eustace stated in a letter of August 5th that Mr McLoughlin had video evidence of Mr Abayeneme attacking Mr Zutkis with a stick and visibly breaking it on his leg, throwing a ladder at Mr Zutkis and damaging property by spray-painting windows.
Ms Justice Roberts heard Mr Abayeneme had made seven complaints to gardaí at Tallaght, quoting Pulse numbers, and instead of any action having been taken by them on his behalf, he was now facing prosecution for the alleged breaking of two window panes in Mr Zutkis's unit.
The judge directed that notification of short service of the application for injunctions be made to Mr Zutkis and Mr McLoughlin. The matter is due back before the court on Friday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Irish Examiner
14 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
'Trying' is not good enough when it comes to children's lives
Earlier this month, the High Court determined a failure to provide the transport a child needed to attend a school appropriate to his educational needs, did not amount to a breach of his constitutional and statutory rights. The child in question had been able to access the transport required to attend school 13 days in the school year, with 10 of those being for July tutoring. This case marks the latest in a series of judicial review proceedings being taken by families of children with disabilities in relation to their educational access needs. It goes hand in hand with the exponential rise in cases being taken under the Disability Act in relation to Assessments of Need and section 67 under the Education Act, in relation to the allocation of school places. In refusing the declaratory relief sought, Ms Justice Marguerite Bolger outlined a belief that this was not comparable to cases where 'little or nothing has been done'. Respectfully, I must disagree. In 2018, a Leaving Cert student successfully brought judicial review proceedings in relation to her results. Mr Justice Richard Humphreys focused on the "untold stress" of losing "initial crucial weeks" of a third-level course due to a marking error. One could be forgiven for wondering how the same system could produce this entirely different result in a case of a primary aged child who missed an entire year of school. Ms Justice Bolger outlined that everyone was trying here, the school tried to hire an escort to accompany the child, the bus company tried to find a taxi, the State eventually granted a home tuition grant (so the parents could hire their own teacher) over halfway through the school year. It all sounds terribly familiar though, doesn't it? These failures are not that of Bus Éireann or the schools. These are failures in the system itself that drive these children en masse out of their communities and then forces them to not only endure treatment that would be considered unacceptable for a non-disabled child, but which expects reverence and gratitude in return. This ruling is a missed opportunity for the courts to clarify that "trying" needs to stop being an acceptable defence to the flagrant disregard for the rights of children with disabilities in this country. It is clear a despondency has taken hold within our courts if we cannot see that a child unable to access an education, has in fact and in law, suffered a breach of the rights afforded to him under the constitution. It is further clear the role that parent carers in this country have subsumed has now grown so exponentially that our right to access employment is next to be sacrificed at the alter of "trying". Children denied access to education do not exist in some suspended animation until the State finds the time to meet their needs — someone still has to provide full-time care. The right to earn a livelihood does not apply to parent carers it seems, so long as someone, somewhere, is "trying". In closing remarks, it was acknowledged the minimal progress made in this case was likely as a direct result of the family initiating legal proceedings, and any parent who has been through it will instantly recognise that statement; the resources that are suddenly found once the lawyers come in. My daughter is among the many who will soon re-commence travelling across the city each morning to access a school that can meet her needs. Her brother will have the luxury of attending the local school, alongside the other children from our neighbourhood. Rebecca O'Riordan: 'My daughter is among the many who will soon re-commence travelling across the city each morning to access a school that can meet her needs.' Picture: David Keane They have access to a different childhood you see, one where parents speak at the school gates, where September brings opportunities for dance and drama classes. His childhood is not catalogued in court documents like his sister. She goes into first class in September with a mere two court cases under her belt, because in this macabre gauntlet, she's one of the lucky ones. This result is a missed opportunity and a worrying development within judicial review. These children's views are not ascertained when we design systems that dictate their existence, their dignity not considered when we design spaces that fail to account for their access requirements. When it comes to assessing their educational needs, when it comes to providing them with school places, lifesaving scoliosis surgeries, dignity-preserving adaptive equipment, all it takes is for the system to say its doing its best and it is instantly absolved of wrongdoing. We cannot stem the tidal wave of litigation in this area unless we acknowledge a failure to deliver policy is not personal. If we keep creating policies without consulting the end users, then we will continue to witness this spiral of needless suffering, where children's rights are continuously diluted. Critique of the systems that fail these children is not critique of the actors it is made up of. We do not have the time nor energy for personalisation — we merely ask that the courts acknowledge that "trying" is not good enough. Rebecca O'Riordan is a law student and full time carer

Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Gardaí investigate alleged fraudulent resale of Electric Picnic tickets
Gardaí are investigating the alleged fraudulent resale of Electric Picnic tickets reported in recent weeks and are warning people not to trust third-party sales for a sold-out event. The Electric Picnic arts and music festival is due to take place in Stradbally, Co Laois, next weekend. The festival is sold out, but reports have circulated on social media of people allegedly being scammed while attempting to purchase third-party tickets. 'It is important that people exert a great degree of caution if attempting to purchase tickets for a sold-out event through any third-party, known or otherwise,' a Garda press officer said. 'Do not trust that the tickets you believe you are purchasing are real. It is likely that they will not materialise and, in fact, do not exist.' READ MORE 'Please do not send money through any app in advance,' the spokesperson said. Anyone who believes they may have been a victim of online fraud is asked to report it to gardaí.


Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Dublin Bus driver beaten with metal object during ‘random' daylight attack, court hears
A Dublin Bus driver was beaten to the back of the head with punches and a metal object during a 'random and unprovoked' daylight attack on a street in the capital, a court has heard. Romanian national Ionut Christian Biraz (39), of no fixed address, arrived in Ireland three months ago. He was charged with assault causing harm to the 63-year-old driver, who was walking at the time on Beresford Place, near the Custom House, in the city centre. Mr Biraz is also charged with producing a weapon during the incident at about 2pm on Tuesday. He was refused bail after appearing before Judge Brennan at Dublin District Court on Wednesday. READ MORE Garda Katherine Ward cited a flight risk, Mr Biraz's lack of ties to the State, the seriousness of the case and fears for public safety. She alleged Mr Biraz used a metal implement and attacked the driver in a random and unprovoked manner. She said the Dublin Bus driver had been walking home after his shift and was 'struck in the back of the head with a metal article, 12 inches in length, from behind'. The contested bail hearing was told that before the victim registered what had occurred, he was punched again to the back of his head from behind, which caused him to fall to the ground. The court heard several people were on the street at the time, and the officer said it was fortunate that gardaí were in the immediate area. Directions from the Director of Public Prosecutions must be obtained, and an additional charge could be brought, the court heard. It will be recommended that the case proceed to the Circuit Court, which can impose lengthier sentences. Garda Ward cited the level of aggression and violence used, adding that gardaí had to use pepper spray to arrest him. Garda Ward said the driver suffered swelling to his head and neck and significant emotional distress, and was 'quite shook up' afterwards. The article used to strike him was seized. She agreed with defence solicitor Eoin Lysaght that Mr Biraz had the presumption of innocence.. In response to the garda's belief the accused was planning to leave the country, Mr Lysaght said his client has no means after losing his job due to having no PPS number. Judge Brennan did not accept he was a flight risk, but refused bail on the other grounds. Mr Biraz, who listened to the proceedings with the help of an interpreter, was granted legal aid. The judge directed that he should get medical attention in custody. He will appear again at Cloverhill District Court on Thursday.