logo
General Assembly passes bill giving schools more say on classroom phone rules

General Assembly passes bill giving schools more say on classroom phone rules

Yahoo24-02-2025

A group of teenagers checking their cellphones. (Photo courtesy of SDI Productions via Getty Images)
Virginia school boards may soon have more control over how cell phones and smart devices are governed in classrooms. Legislation granting local districts the authority to craft their own policies cleared the General Assembly on Friday and now heads to Gov. Glenn Youngkin for consideration.
House Bill 1961, introduced by Sam Rasoul, D-Roanoke, and it's companion measure, Senate Bill 738 by Sen. Stella Pekarsky, D-Fairfax, comes amid growing concerns over the impact of smartphones on children's health. While research has linked excessive phone use to adverse effects on students' well-being, advocates also recognize the role devices play in providing educational resources and communication tools.
Last year, a similar measure aimed at allowing school boards to ban phones and other 'handheld communication devices' during school hours failed to pass. However, many schools had already implemented their own restrictions.
Unlike Yougkin's existing guidelines, Rasoul emphasized that his proposal provides more local flexibility and ensures age-appropriate policies across different schools. It also includes critical exceptions for students with disabilities who rely on electronic devices for communication.
Importantly, Rasoul said the legislation prevents harsh disciplinary measures, ensuring that violating a school's phone policy alone wouldn't lead to suspension or expulsion.
'We just wanted to ensure that this new cell phone policy wasn't weaponized against the students and that would lead to suspension and expulsion,' Rasoul said. 'While the student can be pulled from the classroom, of course, if they're acting up, we want to ensure that we are not utilizing this new policy in a way that, in and of itself, just by violating the policy would lead to expelling a student.'
Last summer, Youngkin signed Executive Order 33, directing his administration to implement cell phone-free policies amid rising concerns over children's mental health and declining academic performance.
Citing research by the American Psychological Association, the order highlights that adolescents who spend more than three hours daily on social media daily are twice as likely to experience poor mental health. It also references studies showing that children spend an average of 4.8 hours a day on social media and that students who use their phones during class learn less and earn lower grades.
Under the guidelines, which took effect on Jan. 1, elementary, middle, and high school students are required to be phone-free during the entire school day, with middle and high schoolers permitted to use their phones only before or after school.
Local school divisions have the flexibility to tailor specific rules to their district's needs. The policy also includes exemptions for students with disabilities and English Learner students with documented language barriers.
During a Senate Education and Health subcommittee hearing last month, Pekarsky said that the response to Youngkin's order was 'successful' and 'positive.' However, she stressed the need to formally establish these policies in state law to ensure consistency and local control.
'We just need to codify this to make sure that everyone knows that you have to have a policy, you have to talk with your community [and] discuss what policy works for you,' Pekarsky said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Says Musk Wants to Talk After Explosive Public Feud
Trump Says Musk Wants to Talk After Explosive Public Feud

Newsweek

time17 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Trump Says Musk Wants to Talk After Explosive Public Feud

President Donald Trump said Elon Musk is "the man who has lost his mind," brushing off their high-profile fallout despite headlines suggesting the two may soon speak, per ABC News Chief Washington Correspondent Jonathan Karl . "Not particularly," Trump said about whether he was interested in a call, claiming Musk was keen to speak. 08:28 AM EDT Russia offers political asylum to Elon Musk over Trump feud Elon Musk looks on during a news conference with US President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on May 30, 2025. Elon Musk looks on during a news conference with US President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on May 30, 2025. ALLISON ROBBERT/AFP via Getty Images A Russian official said the American billionaire Elon Musk could be offered political asylum in Russia over his fierce dispute with U.S. President Donald Trump. Dmitry Novikov, first deputy chairman of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs, commented to Russian state news outlet TASS. "I think that Musk has a completely different game, [so] he will not need any political asylum, although if he did, Russia, of course, could provide it," Novikov said, in remarks translated from Russian. Musk and Trump, ostensibly political allies over cuts to federal spending, publicly clashed on June 5 in a series of social media exchanges and comments to reporters. The dispute's origin is the impact of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill on U.S. public debt. Read the full story by Jordan King and Shane Croucher on Newsweek.

Republicans' new Medicaid red tape will push Missouri to the brink and block healthcare for millions
Republicans' new Medicaid red tape will push Missouri to the brink and block healthcare for millions

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republicans' new Medicaid red tape will push Missouri to the brink and block healthcare for millions

New paperwork and work rules for Medicaid will impose new burdens on state government systems (Getty Images). This week, Senators have started their consideration of President Trump's big tax bill, which was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives in May. Missouri U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley was clear in his priorities for the legislation, writing in early May that 'slashing health insurance for the working poor is … both morally wrong and politically suicidal.' President Donald Trump was blunter, telling lawmakers not to 'f**k around with Medicaid.' The bill passed by the House, does not pass their test – it does not, as Trump and Hawley claim, contain 'NO MEDICAID BENEFIT CUTS.' Instead, it will kick millions of people off of Medicaid by piling on new red tape. And it will bury under-resourced state Medicaid offices in so much paperwork that they will be at risk of collapse. Together, these forces will mean that eligible Americans in Missouri and around the country will not have access to their Medicaid. Many will be left without health care as they prepare to bring a child into the world, face a new cancer diagnosis, or manage a chronic illness. In other words, if this bill passes, Medicaid will be cut for Missourians when they most need it. The House bill imposes new bureaucratic requirements on Medicaid beneficiaries, forcing them to file piles of new paperwork about their jobs, schools, disabilities, or sick family members to keep the health insurance they are already eligible for under the law. These so-called 'work requirements' do not boost employment as advertised – experiments in other states have repeatedly failed to do so. This is, in part, because the vast majority of Medicaid beneficiaries who can work already do. That makes sense – you can't buy food and pay rent with a health insurance card. The reason this bill reduces the cost of Medicaid by billions of dollars is that it assumes regular people will get tangled in the red tape of proving they are eligible for Medicaid. Experts project that over 10 million eligible people will lose their health care because of all the paperwork, including over 180,000 Missourians. But we believe that even this prognosis is too optimistic. Most analyses only consider the difficulty that people will have proving that they are entitled to Medicaid under the law, but not the difficulty states will have in administering the new paperwork requirements. We have spent the last several years modernizing the systems that deliver benefits to millions of Americans, including Medicaid. What we have learned is that state Medicaid systems, including MO HealthNet, are already on the brink – and lack the resources and resilience to take on the onslaught of requirements and deadlines about to hit them. Trump's tax legislation, the new requirements it imposes, and the lightning-fast timeline it requires, are setting Medicaid up for a collapse. Here's how it could play out. States are responsible for determining Medicaid eligibility. They allow people to enroll in one of four ways – by mailing in documents, enrolling online, applying over the phone, or walking into a physical office. Each of these pathways is already at a tipping point. Medicaid agencies around the country have staff vacancies as high as 30 percent, which means there are already too few workers to open mail, process applications, answer the phones, and staff walk-in centers. As a result, even under the current system, eligible people can see their Medicaid lapse because their paperwork is not processed in time. Missourians have recent experience with the effects of an overburdened Medicaid system. By law, Medicaid applications are supposed to be processed in 45 days, but as of last May, Missouri missed that deadline 72% of the time – the worst record in the nation – causing the federal government to step in to help for the second time in two years. The wait time on the Medicaid call center was 56 minutes in February 2024. The House bill will immediately explode the workload for state Medicaid offices. Medicaid beneficiaries will need to prove their eligibility twice a year instead of annually. And then it piles on the new paperwork rules. Missouri will have to figure out how to verify that a beneficiary is working, going to school, or meeting the new requirements some other way. They'll need to send out millions of paper notices, emails, and text messages to notify enrollees about the changes and train staff to handle the deluge of documents that will flood in. Just hours before the bill passed, Congress quietly moved up the deadline for states to make these changes, requiring implementation by the end of 2026 or sooner. And all this new bureaucracy rests on technology that is already failing. We've seen just how broken states' health care infrastructure is – Luke helped uncover state software errors that improperly terminated coverage for nearly 500,000 eligible kids across 29 states after the pandemic. The added strain imposed by this legislation will crash websites, jam call centers, and trigger even more software errors – trapping working people in the chaos. Under these conditions, failure isn't just likely — it's inevitable. We don't need to guess at how this plays out. When Arkansas tried to implement Medicaid work requirements in 2018 the results were disastrous. People received confusing instructions about how to prove they were working and many never knew about the requirement. The state's website repeatedly crashed. In the end, more than 18,000 people lost coverage, employment rates did not budge, and the state wasted $26 million on a failed experiment. In some states, that will mean lines around the block at overwhelmed county offices. In others, dropped calls, system outages, and piles of unprocessed renewals. These challenges compound. When the website breaks, you call. When your call drops, you drive to the office. Attrition will spike as the overmatched Medicaid staff are increasingly under siege, overtime is mandatory, and time off is cancelled. Smaller and smaller numbers of staff will bear larger and larger workloads until the system collapses. And, eligible Americans – working adults, kids, seniors, students, and adults with illnesses and disabilities – will still have no Medicaid. Hospitals will provide more uncompensated coverage, putting some – especially rural hospitals and children's hospitals – at risk of failure. This bill sets up state Medicaid agencies to fail at their most basic task – ensuring that eligible people have health insurance. It doesn't matter to a pregnant mom why her Medicaid is cut, she is going to miss prenatal visits and skip her toddler's check-up. If Hawley wants to stand up for over one million Missourians who rely on Medicaid, he should oppose this bill. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Karine Jean-Pierre hoped to be a co-host on ‘The View' after exiting Biden White House: report
Karine Jean-Pierre hoped to be a co-host on ‘The View' after exiting Biden White House: report

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Karine Jean-Pierre hoped to be a co-host on ‘The View' after exiting Biden White House: report

Former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre reportedly hoped to be a co-host of 'The View' after leaving the Biden administration. The former Biden spokesperson wanted a seat at the table on the liberal ABC News talk show, Politico reported Wednesday, citing former Biden administration officials. Advertisement Her predecessor, Jen Psaki, now has a primetime hosting gig at left-leaning MSNBC. Jean-Pierre revealed she was ditching the Democratic Party on Wednesday and becoming an independent in an announcement for her new book, 'Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines,' which is set to be released in October. Jean-Pierre appeared on 'The View' several times while she was press secretary. After former President Joe Biden exited the 2024 race, Jean-Pierre's first interview was in New York with the show's hosts. Advertisement According to Politico, no opportunity with 'The View' materialized. The show has had the same six rotating hosts since 2022; that year, it added Alyssa Farah Griffin and Ana Navarro as co-hosts to join Whoopi Goldberg, Sara Haines, Joy Behar and Sunny Hostin. After Biden's administration ended, the former press secretary also joined the co-hosts in March for her first television interview since leaving the White House. 3 Former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre reportedly wanted to be a co-host on 'The View' after she exited the White House. ABC via Getty Images Advertisement 3 Jean-Pierre has appeared on the talk show several times. ABC via Getty Images At one point, she was asked if she believed Biden would have beaten Donald Trump had he remained in the race by Griffin, who worked in Trump's first administration. Jean-Pierre largely dodged the question, ultimately responding, 'I don't know what would have happened. I really — and anybody that says they do, they don't really know, and so I don't want to go to rehash the past.' Jean-Pierre had previously likened the Democrats speaking out against Biden after last year's debate to a 'firing squad.' Advertisement 3 Jean-Pierre announced she left the Democratic Party and is now an independent. Getty Images Axios reported on Thursday that at one point Jean-Pierre wanted to appear on 'The View' as frequently as once a week while she was in the administration. 'The View' and Jean-Pierre did not immediately return requests for comment. Jean-Pierre, a veteran Democratic Party flack who also served as a spokeswoman for the far-left MoveOn advocacy group, said on Instagram that the book was about not always being in a 'partisan stance.' She received pushback from several former Biden officials, as reported by Politico and Axios. Officials were quoted saying the book was a 'grift' and a 'bizarre cash grab.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store