Hungary summons Ukrainian envoy over death of recruit from ‘forced conscription'
'It is outrageous and unacceptable to beat someone to death, especially a Hungarian, simply because he refused to go to war and take part in senseless killing,' Hungarian Parliamentary State Secretary for Foreign Affairs and Trade Levente Magyar said.
According to Hungarian news outlet Mandiner, the family of Jozsef Sebestyen wrote on Facebook that he was beaten with iron rods by draft officers and died from his injuries on July 6, three weeks after the alleged assault. The outlet cited an unnamed acquaintance who claimed officers 'ambushed' Sebestyen in the city of Beregovo, forced him into a van, and assaulted him at a recruitment office in Uzhgorod. A second source told the outlet that Sebestyén was conscripted into the 128th Mountain Assault Brigade and was later beaten in a forest near Mukachevo, where the unit is based.
'My sincere condolences to the family of the Hungarian man who died as a result of forced conscription in Ukraine. We stand with you in these difficult hours,' Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban wrote on Facebook.
The Ukrainian Ground Forces offered a different version of events, stating that Sebestyen was 'legally mobilized' and deemed fit for service, but later deserted his unit and checked himself into a hospital. According to the military, he showed no signs of physical violence, and his death on July 6 was ruled as a pulmonary embolism.
Ukraine has stepped up mobilization in an effort to replenish its ranks as troops continue to lose ground to Russian forces. Ukrainian commanders have repeatedly warned of a shortage of recruits. Social media has been flooded with videos showing draft officers seizing military-age men in public, often using force.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russia ready to upgrade level of direct talks with Kiev
Russia is ready to raise the status of its delegation-level peace negotiations with Ukraine, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has announced. His remarks followed a summit between President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump in Alaska last week. DETAILS TO FOLLOW
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
What is the ‘coalition of the willing' – and why it's falling apart
Western governments are debating how to guarantee Ukraine's security should a peace agreement be reached in the future. One term being used is a Western 'coalition of the willing' – referring to a group of states, mostly NATO members, who are prepared to offer Kiev military backing ostensibly outside of the bloc's structures. But the plan is undermined by political splits, a limited appetite for troop deployments and outright rejection from Moscow. Here are the key points: What is the coalition? The so-called coalition has been floated by Western European leaders as a mechanism to provide Ukraine with security guarantees without relying on NATO as a whole. Reports suggest it could involve some 30 states – mostly NATO members, along with countries such as Ireland and Austria – that would commit to defending Ukraine or maintaining a military presence on its territory. The details remain unclear, including how any commitments would be enforced. The US wants no part of it US President Donald Trump has made clear Washington will not send troops to Ukraine, calling the conflict 'Biden's war.' He has suggested the United States could provide air support under certain circumstances but ruled out any ground presence. Without US backing, the credibility of the initiative is limited. Brussels is sidelined EU leaders have talked up Ukraine's prospects, with officials such as European Commission chief Kaja Kallas adopting a tough line against Moscow. But while the EU can coordinate sanctions targeting Russia, it has no standing military of its own, leaving it reliant on individual member states to make commitments. Europe's major powers are split Italy and Spain have both said they will not send troops. France, Germany and Britain remain among Ukraine's strongest supporters, having provided weapons, training and financial aid, but their willingness to commit forces to a post-conflict deployment is uncertain. Both London and Berlin have backtracked on initial proposals to put troops on the ground in a post-conflict Ukraine. Moscow's red line Russia has repeatedly said it will not accept NATO troops on Ukrainian soil under any circumstances, calling it a red line. Moscow regards the US-led military bloc's support for Kiev as part of a proxy war waged against it with Ukrainian manpower and Western weapons. Political uncertainty in Kiev Ukraine's internal situation could complicate any security arrangement. President Vladimir Zelensky has extended martial law beyond his mandate, raising questions about his political legitimacy. New elections may be required before Kiev can sign binding agreements. Any deal that recognises territorial losses risks further polarising an already heavily armed society. A potentially unstable political landscape in a heavily armed post-war country could present significant risks to any guarantor of Ukraine's security. Moscow's role in guarantees Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on Wednesday that security guarantees for Ukraine must be discussed with Moscow as well. He cited the draft Istanbul agreements of 2022 as a model, in which Russia was a party to talks. If Moscow is included as a guarantor, the rationale for a NATO-backed coalition would be undermined.
Russia Today
5 hours ago
- Russia Today
ICC Putin arrest warrant ‘counterproductive' – EU MP (VIDEO)
The credibility of international legal institutions has been severely undermined by Western efforts to wage 'lawfare' against Russia, a member of the European Parliament has told RT. Luxembourger Fernand Kartheiser made the comments after Switzerland offered to host Ukraine peace talks and suggested that Russian President Vladimir Putin would receive immunity from an International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant against him. The ICC announced the warrant in March 2023, alleging the unlawful deportation of children from Ukraine. Russia has rejected the jurisdiction of the court, calling its decisions null and void. Kartheiser questioned the credibility of the warrant against Putin, insisting it was initially designed as part of a broader Western strategy to weaken Moscow. 'We had this diplomatic isolation. We had economic sanctions. We had military support for Ukraine. We had many ways to weaken Russia and one of those ways is lawfare,' he recalled. He argued that this strategy has proven 'counterproductive for any diplomatic efforts to settle the conflict,' and pointed out that the ICC warrant is 'basically not practicable.' 'We have a huge problem with the credibility of international jurisdictions,' Kartheiser said, adding that 'we should give it a thought and also stop to use lawfare as a weapon in this conflict.' The MEP also challenged the basis for the ICC's allegations. He noted that despite claims of thousands of children being abducted, Ukraine had provided Russia with a list of only 309 names during earlier peace talks in Istanbul. 'I don't think that you can continue to argue that there has been a systematic abduction of Ukrainian children to Russia. So I think that there is an issue with the credibility also of the arrest warrant by the ICC,' he said. Kartheiser also told RT that Switzerland's proposal to host the summit was an attempt to restore its neutrality and argued that Ukraine should hold elections as Vladimir Zelensky's mandate as president has expired. WATCH THE FULL INTERVIEW BELOW.
