
What is the point of Emma Watson?
There's a kind of tattered glory in this, knowing that you didn't toe the line (you were too busy snorting them) because you had talent to burn. Even if you do eventually find yourself on the ropes, you'll always have the satisfaction of knowing that you inspired a whole bunch of youngsters and were remembered by a whole bunch of oldsters – something which line-toers are highly unlikely to do.
Or you can get lucky big time, on a bit of fluke fortune, and spend the rest of your career toeing the exact line that the bold minority have turned their back on. But eventually someone will say 'X hasn't done much recently!' – and all those years of bowing to convention will count as nothing as other people in your profession, but without your head-start, overtake you. And then you might think: 'Sod it – I'm going to take a risk because I'm worth it!'
And then you get pulled over on a speeding charge.
Of all the showbiz has-beens this has happened to, the report this week that the ray of sunshine Emma Watson was in hot water filled me with glee. The Harry Potter actress – who played Hermione Granger in the films – was banned from driving for six months, after she was caught speeding. Watson – who already had nine points on her licence – was collared for driving her Audi at 38mph in a 30mph zone in Oxford last year. The 35-year-old, now – still! – a student, was made to pay a total of £1,044 at High Wycombe Magistrates' Court on Wednesday. Her lawyer told the court: 'She is in a position to pay the fine.'
The last line may be the understatement of the century. Watson is thought to have a net worth of around £65 million, most of which one imagines was garnered from the decade between 2001 and 2011, when she was busy pretending to be a witch.
In the years since, Watson has been busy – not least earning her status as a high-ranking Transmaid who, alongside the child 'stars' who played her wizard pals Harry and Ron Weasley, attempted to throw JK Rowling under the bus (folly, as she's made of titanium). One wonders if Watson missed a trick in court this week by not deploying her views on gender – that 'trans people are who they say they are' – to shape her defence. Did it cross her mind to put in a plea that she identifies as someone who doesn't drive badly?
Still, I suppose that her dirty driving licence tells its own tale, like the time her Audi was towed away last year in Stratford-upon-Avon after she blocked a car park and ignored a 'no parking' sign to visit a pub.
Watson is just the latest example of 'the Wokescreen' – a dichotomy which occurs when famous people who identify as Good do Naughty Things but, one feels, expect to be let off as they've proved how wonderful they are by mouthing the liberal establishment truisms about everything from trans to Trump.
Thus Watson can serve as a UN Women Goodwill Ambassador while taking a pop at Rowling – the woman who ultimately she should be thanking for bringing her fame and fortune.
Rowling must have enjoyed responding to Bungle (Emma Watson), Zippy (Daniel Radcliffe) and George (Rupert Grint) last year after the publication of the Cass review, which called into question the trans orthodoxy and medical intervention on matters of gender. One social media wag replied to Rowling after the report was published to say: 'Just waiting for Dan and Emma to give you a very public apology… safe in the knowledge that you will forgive them…'
'Not safe, I'm afraid,' replied Rowling.
How typical that Watson was the public face of the embarrassingly-named 'HeForShe' movement, which seeks to promote gender equality but, to me, appears to centre men at the core of feminism. Haven't we had enough of that?
Watson is also the environmental 'activist' who launched a fashion line with Alberta Ferretti, whose dresses cost thousands of pounds; the teetotaller who launched a gin line where bottles go for £40; and the feminist 'role model' who poses in revealing outfits on magazine front covers.
It's handy that Watson had all these irons in the fire, as since she finished the Potter films, her acting has hardly set the world on fire. She featured in Beauty and the Beast, The Bling Ring and The Perks of Being a Wallflower; her last role was in the 2019 remake of Little Women.
To be fair, she felt the need to return to her studies. Perhaps she figured out that a woman like her with a sky-high IQ owed it to the world to share her wisdom and her words, which were certainly of more worth than those state-schooled idiots who got lucky writing about boy wizards. Like many a thespian these days, Watson is from a wealthy background; a scion of the private prep Dragon School in Oxford (fees £28,000 a year) which coincidentally 'blessed' us with all the male leads in BBC One's 2016 smash The Night Manager – Hugh Laurie, Tom Hiddleston and Tom Hollander.
Now much older, if not necessarily wiser (nine points on that licence, remember!), Watson is back in Oxford studying for a master's degree in creative writing. This year, she announced that she'd be sticking around for a PhD. Joy!
I'd love to see some of Watson's writing – and I say that in a caring way – because she has always struck me as one of those clunkers who, for their own good and our own sanity, should be dissuaded from speaking unless reading from a script. I can't imagine what she'd sound like reading from a script of her own; it really does sound like the thespian equivalent of some kind of End Of Days portent.
On the other hand, I doubt that Watson could ever return to acting. The striking thing about the Harry Potter movies is how uniformly bad the acting of the lead children was in contrast to how good the adult actors were. This is odd as child actors usually steal every scene. Yet I've seen totem poles less wooden than Watson and Radcliffe.
There are some little girls who really do go through life hamming it up like terrible actors; it's clear from the books that Hermione Grainger was one of them. In the first couple of films, it's genuinely impossible to tell whether Watson is giving a pitch-perfect performance as a girl who acts like she can't act, or whether she just can't act; it was only her failure to grow out of it that gave the game away.
You can see that some child stars, from Judy Garland to Lindsay Lohan, were natural stand-outs from the start. But look at the young Radcliffe and Watson and tell me with a straight face that they had STAR QUALITY stamped on them; I've seen pairs of twice-used teabags with more charisma. Is it perhaps partly the knowledge of how purely lucky they were which causes these repeated jibes at the woman who made their lovely lives possible?
The next decade won't be an easy one for Watson; the new HBO adaptation of the Harry Potter books is currently in production, featuring 11-year-old Arabella Stanton as Hermione. Though I can't comment on her acting skills, photographs show a child who appears to have what it's hard not to call 'star quality', in contrast with the rather dull look Watson had even when young.
It's a fact of life that many established actresses (and actors) are not the best at their alleged craft, but they usually have some redeeming feature, such as being very good-looking or notoriously witty on chat shows; Watson has none.
You probably won't have heard of Geraldine Dvorak, but she was Garbo's stand-in, once described as having 'whatever it is Garbo has except that one thing Garbo has.' That's what I think of when I see Watson; she'd have made a really good stand-in. Instead, promoted far above her abilities thanks to a kind woman who gave her the benefit of the doubt, I think it's fair to say that we will remember Emma Watson as someone who was a very bad driver – and a very bad judge of her own abilities, whether behind the wheel of a car, or a career.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
4 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Pete Wicks says ‘I can't do it' as Sam Thompson addresses ‘girlfriend rumours'
Former Made in Chelsea star Sam Thompson has spoken-out after reports he has started dating against just weeks after he split from former Love Island star Samie Eilishi Former Strictly Come Dancing star Pete Wicks admitted 'I just can't do it' as best friend Sam Thompson addressed 'rumours' that he has a new girlfriend. It came after a social media post from Love Island contestant Helena Ford emerged on X. Helena, who was coupled-up with Harry, posted a racy tweet about the former Made in Chelsea star in 2017. Recent reports however have suggested that Sam has begun dating a new girl. Earlier this year he had been linked to former Love Island star Samie Elishi, but the pair are said to have split a couple of weeks ago. The Daily Mail claims Sam, 32, has recently been dating holistic nutritionist Steph Robinson. It prompted Sam to joke that he couldn't follow through with Helena's racy message. Speaking to Pete on their Staying Relevant podcast, he said: 'I couldn't do that anyway because apparently I have a girlfriend now as of yesterday's press articles.' Pete however urged Sam to 'leave it out'. He said: 'Do you really want to cover this one again? Because I'm going to be honest with you Sam, this podcast was meant to be about you and I but what it is is just your right to reply every week for the new person that you're dating. 'It's incredible, it is utterly, utterly incredible. I think we leave this one out and hope it goes away. I cannot go through another, 'We're just friends and I'm not dating at the minute', and then hearing about you going on four dates at the weekend. 'I can't do it anymore, I honestly can't do it. It's just utterly mental.' According to the MailOnline, Sam has grown close to Steph, who boasts 170,000 followers on TikTok. She is said to offer expert tips on wellness, gut health and nutrition. Sam is said to have declared he is 'not ready' to start dating again after his split from Samie. In a previous podcast episode, he said: "I'm going to work on myself. No dating, I'm not ready and I've realised that." He said his sister Louise hopes he would date someone like Harry Potter star Emma Watson. He added: 'Louise thinks I should go out with Emma Watson, who plays Hermione Granger in Harry Potter." Pete joked: "I think you have more chance with the ginger fella." Sam then added: "Ron! No, Louise thinks I should go for British thespian because she thinks its a little different, classy is the wrong word, but well to do." Sam had been in a long-term relationship with former Love Island contestant Zara McDermott, but the pair split last year. Zara has since gone public with her new boyfriend, former One Direction singer Louis Tomlinson. Sam has recently undergone a lifestyle overhaul, taking up fitness and getting a new haircut. Speaking to the MaiOnline, he said: 'Do you know what's funny? I sometimes and think, 'how s*** did I look?' "And it's true, because I remember, and I don't mind this going anywhere, I remember looking in the mirror and going, 'Damn it man, you've got to do something about yourself.' 'So I just went to the gym a little bit, sort of like started buying some clothes had a haircut, and then you're like, 'God, I feel so great'. I really, really do. I feel awesome, I'm so happy, which is so nice."


ITV News
5 hours ago
- ITV News
Two burglars jailed after two-month crime spree across the South East
Doorbell camera and footage inside home shows burglars break in and ransack property in broad daylight. Credit Surrey Police. Two burglars have been jailed after taking part in a two-month crime spree across the South East last year. Terence O'Reilly, 23, and James Carthy, 33, carried out burglaries across Surrey, Hampshire, Kent, and Sussex. O'Reilly would often be the one to approach the house first, wearing a cap and a mask, and knock or ring the doorbell to check if anyone was inside. Once satisfied the house was empty, he and Carthy would break in through rear doors and windows. The pair used covid-style surgical face masks to conceal their identities while they ransacked homes looking for safes, loose cash and jewlery. The pair also stole expensive cars and designer handbags. A distinctive modified silver Audi S3 with its front grille and badge painted black was seen in multiple CCTV clips at or close to the scenes of the offences. The car was also seen at the scene of a burglary in Billingshurst in September 2024, where a rare Mercedes E43 AMG was stolen. The Mercedes was recovered several weeks later stuck in a ford in Bordon, likely dumped after the driver misjudged the level of the water. A sledgehammer was found inside. The pair were caught on 2 October 2024, after the silver Audi made off from police in Hascombe, the driver and passenger discarding a Louis Vuitton and Chanel handbag and a dirty pillowcase containing jewellery out of the window before decamping a few minutes later. Officers swarmed the area and they were soon cornered. A police dog kept O'Reilly at bay on a hillside long enough for officers to detain him, and Carthy was found trying to hide from police under a bridge in the nearby river. Carthy and O'Reilly had discarded some of their clothes and shoes when they ran from police and covered the inside of the car with bleach in an attempt to cover their tracks. Inside the Audi officers found two baseball caps, a crowbar, a chisel, a pickaxe, and a pair of Covid-style surgical face masks. On Monday (21 July) at Guildford Crown Court, Terence O'Reilly, of Cranleigh, was sentenced to eight years imprisonment for burglary, conspiracy to commit burglary, and theft of motor vehicle. James Carthy, of Dunsfold, was sentenced to six years imprisonment for burglary, conspiracy to commit burglary, and theft of motor vehicle. O'Reilly and Carthy are also both subject to a Serious Crime Prevention Order (SCPO), a court order designed to stop persons from engaging in further serious criminal activity by setting restrictions on their behaviour and outlining conditions they need to adhere to. Investigating officer DC McBain said: "This was a challenging case of organised criminality spanning the Southeast. Carthy and O'Reilly showed no remorse or regard for the effects of their crimes and locking them up will prevent many more burglaries."


Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'Harry Potter made me think these things were magic - they're just British'
People have been left in stitches after American readers revealed what confused them in the Harry Potter books Americans have revealed what confused them about the Harry Potter books, and it turns out lots of readers mistook British references for magical inventions. The "hilarious" mistakes were highlighted in a video shared by TikTok user @kelley_morgan. Kelley Morgan told followers: "Here's some things that I used to think were magic but it turns out they're just British. It's pretty common for like a ten or an eleven-year-old American, like, first time they're learning about British culture, is through the Harry Potter books, so a lot of times they'll think certain things that are normal for British people are like magical and like Harry Potter." She explained: "The first one is true for me, but also the one that people joke about the most, and it's the one where they're punting students. There's a part in Harry Potter where there's a swamp in the hallways, and then the janitor has to punt students across to get to their classes. "In American English a punt is like a drop kick and because the world is like magical anyway we think oh he's kicking students really hard across the swamp, but it turns out in British English punting is like a boat with a stick, like a marsh boat. So it turns out he was just boating them across, he was not kicking them." Kelley was also confused by British schools. "Another one is school houses. We don't have those at all, and I know not everywhere in England has them but apparently a lot of schools do have different school houses and you actually get sorted into the houses and then you earn points for your house. It's kind of weird to me. It sounds fun, but we don't do that like at all." She added: "Along the same lines, prefects, which are like the authority figures within the houses is apparently a real thing. We don't have that at all. I think the closest thing that we might have is a hall monitor, but nobody really likes the hall monitor kids. Also, hall monitor is not a common thing. I don't think we ever had home monitors in my school, but it's just something you see on TV. Next, the American content creator revealed she was confused to read about Christmas crackers. "They always talk about having Christmas crackers and to us a cracker is a snack. I don't even know what you call it like a cracker, like a chip, not your kind of chip. Then I just assumed fun presents and confetti and stuff fell out of the cracker because they have candy with toys in them in the book. "So I'm like oh it must fall out of the cracker, but apparently it's a really common thing like in a lot of European countries where you pull both ends of a thing and it pops." Finally, she turned her attention to pudding. "I thought they just really liked pudding cause they always say like oh I'm gonna go eat some pudding, like I can't wait for pudding. They always have pudding after dinner cause over there pudding just means dessert and over here it's a very specific dessert." The video received over 400,000 views and lots of comments from American readers who had a similar experience. Someone commented: "What's most hilarious about the punting is not that it was a different word, but that we all collectively accepted that Filch drop kicked kids across a pond. No questions asked." A different response read: "I legitimately love pudding and was a little bit disappointed when I found out that it just means any dessert. I thought they were always having my favourite dessert!" Another comment said: "I had the reverse issue — thinking things that were unique to Harry Potter were actually just normal British things. I thought for way too long that all British kids wrote with quills."