Petition launched over Reform councillor's co-option
A PETITION has been launched calling for a review of co-option procedures at Haverfordwest Town Council after a Reform UK candidate was appointed to a vacant seat.
Scott Thorley, who stood for Reform UK in February's Prendergast by-election, was co-opted to the town council on Thursday (Apr 17). Just two days later, political graffiti appeared at Withybush Retail Park—where he works—prompting further controversy.
Scott Thorley: Now co-opted as a town councillor he had stood for election onto Pembrokeshire County Council
The petition, organised by campaign group West Wales Stand Up to Racism, claims Thorley's appointment is incompatible with Wales' national commitment to building an anti-racist society. It calls on Pembrokeshire County Council to reaffirm its support for the Welsh Government's Anti-racist Wales Action Plan (AWAP), and for the town council to review its procedures to ensure future co-options reflect 'ethical governance and inclusivity'.
Campaigners have highlighted Reform UK's opposition to the AWAP, which they describe as a key equality strategy aimed at eradicating systemic racism in Wales by 2030. The party has publicly criticised aspects of the plan, including measures designed to increase ethnic minority representation in teaching and public life.
Graffiti messages reading 'KEIR STARMER OUT, REFORM IN! GOD SAVE US' and 'VOTE REFORM' were found sprayed in large letters across retail park walls on Saturday (Apr 19), two days after Thorley's appointment.
Speaking to The Pembrokeshire Herald, Thorley strongly condemned the vandalism: 'Whoever has done this, it is vandalism plain and simple. It doesn't help us—it's embarrassing.'
In response to the petition, Thorley issued a statement in full: 'As I have been invited to help on the anti-racist action plan by Councillor Randell Thomas-Turner, I'm really confused by their comments. I'm very much looking forward to helping integrate communities together in Haverfordwest using food, drink, culture, music and talking.
'In my experience from dealing with them they are far from fighting racism. Just because they say they're anti-racist doesn't mean they are—just as much as Jim Jones said he was the messiah.
'They don't stand for election or try and join the town councils—they are cowards and try to bully people into changing their opinions.
'Politics is about talking and helping people. They need to grow up, take their Che Guevara posters off their walls at home, and stop acting like stroppy teenagers.'
Reform UK has been openly critical of the Anti-racist Wales Action Plan, arguing that it promotes what they describe as divisive 'identity politics.' The party objects to measures such as offering higher education grants to ethnic minority trainee teachers, which they claim amounts to racial preference and undermines equality based on merit.
Reform figures have also criticised proposals to alter public spaces to accommodate cultural sensitivities, saying such policies are impractical and distract from core public concerns. Supporters of the plan argue it is a necessary step to address systemic racism and promote fairer opportunities across all sectors of Welsh society.
The petition, remains open and has been circulated online by local campaigners, comes just days after Reform UK achieved a significant breakthrough in West Wales. On May 29, Michelle Beer won a by-election in the Lliedi ward of Llanelli, becoming the first Reform UK councillor elected to Carmarthenshire County Council. Her victory marked a notable gain for the party in a traditionally Labour stronghold, reflecting its growing presence in Welsh local politics.
Reform UK has not issued a separate comment.
PHOTO CAPTION:
Under fire: Scott Thorley, pictured earlier this year with local police, says critics are more interested in 'bullying' than dialogue (Pic: Reform/Facebook)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
25 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Reform UK-led council serving ‘plate of chaos' as deputy leader leaves role
Joseph Boam, who was elected as a Reform councillor for Leicestershire County Council in May, is also no longer cabinet lead member for adult social care and communities, the leader of the Leicestershire Conservatives Deborah Taylor said in a social media post. Mr Boam, who is councillor for Whitwick in North West Leicestershire, said in a statement on social media: 'Despite the recent news, nothing's changed, I'll keep fighting for Whitwick at County Hall and doing everything I can to help get a Reform UK government and Nigel Farage as our next prime minister.' It is currently unclear why Mr Boam no longer holds the two positions in the council. The leader of the main opposition to the authority, Ms Taylor, said in a statement released on social media that the Reform-led council is delivering a 'shambles'. She said: 'The Reform Administration at Leicestershire County Council has lacked leadership and direction from the very start. 'So it comes as no surprise to us that Cllr Joseph Boam has been shown the door after just three months as Deputy Leader of Leicestershire County Council and Cabinet Lead Member for Adults. 'Frankly, he was wholly unqualified for such a critical role and lacked the experience or judgment to bring anything of value to the position. 'Adult Social Care and Communities is one of the most important and challenging portfolios in local government. 'It requires steady hands, long-term commitment and a depth of understanding. 'What it has been given instead is instability, poor judgment, and revolving-door appointments. 'At a time when Leicestershire needs stability, vision, and experienced leadership more than ever, residents are being served a plate of chaos. 'Reform promised change, what they're delivering is a shambles.' A Reform UK source said: 'Joseph deserves thanks for his role in helping to establish the Reform Group at Leicestershire County Council and we wish him well as he moves into a new role where he will continue to support the group's efforts at County Hall.' Ms Taylor said in a video posted on social media on Monday that the leader of the Reform-led county council, Dan Harrison, had 'sacked' Mr Boam over the weekend. Reform won 25 out of the 55 seats on the council and formed a minority administration after the local elections in May, taking control from the Conservatives. Mr Boam was not the youngest Reform councillor with a senior county council position, as 19-year-old George Finch is currently the leader of Warwickshire County Council.
Leader Live
37 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Reform UK-led council serving ‘plate of chaos' as deputy leader leaves role
Joseph Boam, who was elected as a Reform councillor for Leicestershire County Council in May, is also no longer cabinet lead member for adult social care and communities, the leader of the Leicestershire Conservatives Deborah Taylor said in a social media post. Mr Boam, who is councillor for Whitwick in North West Leicestershire, said in a statement on social media: 'Despite the recent news, nothing's changed, I'll keep fighting for Whitwick at County Hall and doing everything I can to help get a Reform UK government and Nigel Farage as our next prime minister.' It is currently unclear why Mr Boam no longer holds the two positions in the council. The leader of the main opposition to the authority, Ms Taylor, said in a statement released on social media that the Reform-led council is delivering a 'shambles'. She said: 'The Reform Administration at Leicestershire County Council has lacked leadership and direction from the very start. 'So it comes as no surprise to us that Cllr Joseph Boam has been shown the door after just three months as Deputy Leader of Leicestershire County Council and Cabinet Lead Member for Adults. 'Frankly, he was wholly unqualified for such a critical role and lacked the experience or judgment to bring anything of value to the position. 'Adult Social Care and Communities is one of the most important and challenging portfolios in local government. 'It requires steady hands, long-term commitment and a depth of understanding. 'What it has been given instead is instability, poor judgment, and revolving-door appointments. 'At a time when Leicestershire needs stability, vision, and experienced leadership more than ever, residents are being served a plate of chaos. 'Reform promised change, what they're delivering is a shambles.' A Reform UK source said: 'Joseph deserves thanks for his role in helping to establish the Reform Group at Leicestershire County Council and we wish him well as he moves into a new role where he will continue to support the group's efforts at County Hall.' Ms Taylor said in a video posted on social media on Monday that the leader of the Reform-led county council, Dan Harrison, had 'sacked' Mr Boam over the weekend. Reform won 25 out of the 55 seats on the council and formed a minority administration after the local elections in May, taking control from the Conservatives. Mr Boam was not the youngest Reform councillor with a senior county council position, as 19-year-old George Finch is currently the leader of Warwickshire County Council.
The National
44 minutes ago
- The National
Every plan to achieve indy must be subject to the test of practicality
As an incumbent administration and being at the core of the cause for a very long time, they are fully aware of the practical limitations and constraints of the various possibilities that people promote. Therefore, their plan is already couched in terms of what is achievable. Of course there are always lots of fancy ideas of what people wish were workable, but they will not have any better chance of success than the ones that actually take account of the forces arrayed against us. READ MORE: Holyrood 2026 is the first step in regaining our political mojo This does not necessarily mean that ideas are summarily dismissed, but as with any strategy the individual steps are the most important and hence critical. All plans have to be subject to the test of practicality, and that is what the SNP have been doing for many decades and particularly since the last Labour administration. There are two critical things that complainers ignore. The first is that regardless of whichever plan is pursued – and it may require several running in parallel – they all absolutely must as a prerequisite have the support of a recognisable majority of voters, at the time of being tested, which is in the absence of a referendum based on elections. Without such a majority no plan is ever going to get off the ground, regardless of whoever's ghost is leading it. A minority appeal to the UN or EU or whoever gets nowhere other than an acknowledgement that there are some people wishing for a change. So, secondly, complainers must also bear in mind what we will end up with if they continue to undermine the SNP. Nothing but at best a Unionist Labour administration or even worse, one that is Reform/Tory. Ordinary voters will, unless they are long-term politically astute, invariably vote in accordance with their more immediate needs based around their perception of the parties on offer. So exactly what do the anti-SNP activists think they are achieving? READ MORE: A single electoral outcome could open up many routes to independence Voters will only look as far as the fact that even the so-called independence supporters cannot agree with each other, and base their choice around that. Criticism is one thing but the creation of workable plans and strategies demands working together, and if people think that arguing against the SNP is likely to make them fall in line with whichever minority shouty group is around then they are being naive. The SNP have the experience and detailed knowledge of the situation and are best placed to produce the plan. Such a plan is also tested by those arrayed against us who are in fact the only ones preventing the plans from succeeding. The progress has been stalled not by the SNP but by the Unionists who also happen to be supported, hopefully unintentionally, by those among us arguing against the SNP. And the Unionists seize on that disunity – united we stand, divided we fall. Fair enough, produce a different party to elect after we have independence, but let us achieve that goal first. Nick Cole Meigle, Perthshire I FIND myself in agreement with James Murphy, Campbell Anderson, George T Watt and Selma Rahman (Letters, Aug 16). It appears that the leadership of the SNP are unwilling to consider views other than from the coterie surrounding them. The main idea being to suppress other views and thus contain ideas on how achieve independence to those that the leadership favours. READ MORE: It's clear we need a new way of doing politics and economics No matter that this seems to be keep asking for a referendum until Westminster relents out of sheer boredom with the issue. What matter if independence is thus delayed for another decade or two. Awkward questions can be ignored and issues kicked further down the road. A quiet life had by all at the top as the independence gravy train rolls on! Frustration with current 'strategy' is rising amongst independence supporters and is likely to result in an increase in 'stay at home' by them come next May. This by default is likely to result in a better result for Unionist parties. Drew Reid Falkirk IT is with some dismay and incredulity that I am informed that a motion on a strategy to gain independence submitted by 42 SNP branches for the agenda of the SNP national conference in October has not been included in the preliminary agenda. What is on the agenda is only one motion on independence in the names of leader John Swinney and depute leader Keith Brown. Their motion has been criticised as being a flawed prospectus to gain independence. The 42 branches were to meet in Perth on August 9 to consider their motion and organise support for it. They did not expect that it would be omitted from the agenda, which was published the day before. There has been no explanation, as far as I can tell, as to why it was not included. READ MORE: Tommy Sheppard: Why a plebiscite election won't deliver Scottish independence This denial of basic party democracy, whereby a significant number of branches submit a motion for consideration by delegates that does not reach the preliminary agenda, is outrageous and should not be accepted. I am not a member of the SNP but have long been of the opinion that the arcane practices and rules relating to how the organisation is run are unacceptable. This particular situation must be resolved and it is up to the members of the SNP to do so. As said, I am not a member and some will say that I don't have the right to question their actions. It may be said that I don't have a dog in the fight, but I have, and that dog is independence. I welcomed the fact that there would be a debate with opposing views and strategies being expressed as the right way forward to gain our independence. We have to get it right. I say to the SNP leadership – get a grip. John Milligan Motherwell
