
Besotted hitwoman in burka disguise jailed for trying to kill shop owner in botched shooting after falling for his rival
Aimee Betro travelled from the US to the UK after being hired by Mohammed Nazir, 30, and Mohammed Aslam, 56, to kill the head of a rival family.
9
9
9
The 45-year-old arrived in Birmingham, West Midlands, and disguised herself under a burka to carry out the contract hit.
Lovestruck Beto had fallen in love with Nazir despite the pair meeting just three times.
But when she pointed the gun at Sikander Ali's head and pulled the trigger, the weapon jammed and the target was able to flee.
Undeterred, she later went to Sikander's home and fired three shots before flying back to America.
Betro has now been jailed for 30 years after she was convicted of conspiracy to murder and possessing a self-loading pistol with intent to cause fear of violence.
She was also found guilty of a charge of illegally importing ammunition following a trial.
Judge Simon Drew KC said: "You went beyond simply reaching an agreement to kill and, in reality, you did intend to kill Mr Ali.
"It is only a matter of chance that Mr Ali wasn't killed."
Nazir and Aslam were previously jailed for a total of 42 years after they were found guilty of conspiracy to murder.
Birmingham Crown Court heard the pair hatched the plot following a fight at a boutique clothing store in 2018.
Both Nazir and Aslam harboured a grudge against Aslat Mahumad and his family after they came off worse in the scuffle.
Hell-bent on revenge, they enlisted the help of the hitwoman - flying her over from the US so she could execute him or a loved one.
CCTV showed Betro lying in wait outside the shop owner's family home in a Mercedes she had bought earlier that day.
Around 45 minutes later, Aslat's son Sikander arrived home - with Betro leaving her car with her face covered.
She was seen firing the gun at point-blank range before it jammed during the September 2019 attack.
Sikander then escaped by reversing his SUV out of the road, clipping the car door of the BMW and damaging it so badly it would no longer close.
After the failed shooting, Betro messaged Aslat asking him where he was hiding.
She added: "Stop playing hide and seek, you are lucky it jammed."
Betro later returned to the scene in a taxi and fired three shots through the windows of Aslat's home.
The damaged Mercedes was later found dumped, with cops finding a black glove with Betro's DNA on it.
Meanwhile, Betro fled to Manchester Airport and was back in the US the following day.
A global hunt was launched for Betro, who had taken selfies before the shooting, and she was arrested in Armenia.
She denied conspiracy to murder, possession of a firearm with intent to cause fear or violence and smuggling of ammunition into the UK.
9
9
9
9
9

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Secret indignities of murder-suicide mother: Friends reveal final hours before she shot terminally ill husband, their two young children and herself
Wife and mother Emily Long gunned down her husband and two of their three young children at her $600,000 home in Madbury, New Hampshire on Monday, before killing herself. Now the Daily Mail can reveal that Long, 34, was struggling to cope: Her husband, 48, was terminally ill with brain cancer and bedridden, and she hated her job.


BBC News
18 minutes ago
- BBC News
Westbury man caught driving 100mph 'no match' for police dog
A man who was caught driving at more than 100mph, including on blind bends and into oncoming traffic, has been jailed for a year after being detained by a police Kibblewhite, of Castle View in Westbury, Wiltshire, also tried to flee officers on foot during the pursuit in Bathampton on 10 31-year-old drove round the back of a warehouse and got out to run, but "was no match for police dog Stan", said PC Layton of Wiltshire Police, who described Kibblewhite's actions as "incredibly reckless".He was sentenced at Swindon Magistrates Court on 20 August after pleading guilty to multiple driving offences. The chase began at about 10:15 BST on Bradford Road in the direction of Bradford on Avon, said refusing to stop, Kibblewhite was followed. Officers briefly lost sight of him until they spotted a huge dust cloud in a roadside there said the vehicle had been driven round the back of a large warehouse, where Kibblewhite was seen walking away, then running when he saw in an empty horsebox by Stan, he tried to flee but was detained by the dog before being arrested, during which he racially abused an officer. PC Layton said: "Kibblewhite's driving was incredibly reckless and dangerous, putting numerous lives at risk as he attempted to escape justice."After he fled his vehicle he tried to hide, but he was no match for police dog Stan."Kibblewhite pleaded guilty to dangerous driving, driving without a licence, driving without insurance, failing to stop for police, failing to provide a specimen for analysis and racially aggravated public order.


BreakingNews.ie
18 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Noel Clarke set to learn outcome of libel claim against Guardian publisher
Actor Noel Clarke is set to discover whether he has been successful in his High Court libel claim against the publisher of the Guardian on Friday. Clarke, 49, is suing Guardian News and Media (GNM) over seven articles and a podcast, including an article in April 2021 that said 20 women who knew him professionally had come forward with allegations of misconduct. Advertisement Clarke denies the allegations, while GNM is defending its reporting as being both true and in the public interest. Noel Clarke is set to discover whether his High Court libel claim has been successful. Photo: Jordan Pettitt/PA. A trial earlier this year heard from multiple witnesses who made accusations against Clarke, including that he had allegedly shared nude photographs of them without their consent, groped them, and asked them to look at him when he was exposed. Barristers for Clarke told the court that there is a conspiracy of people with financial and personal grudges against him who engineered his downfall because they could not bear to see him receive a Bafta award. Mrs Justice Steyn is set to hand down her ruling at 10.30am on Friday. Advertisement The trial of the libel claim was held from early March to early April at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. Clarke, who has previously appeared in TV shows including Doctor Who, Auf Wiedersehen, Pet and Bulletproof, gave evidence over several days. At one stage, he appeared visibly emotional as he claimed the publisher had 'smashed my life'. He said: 'They have smashed my life for four years with this rubbish, this nonsense. Four years.' Advertisement He continued: 'I did not do this, I would not do this. I have got children. This is not true.' He later said that while he was 'a flawed guy', he added: 'The reason I stand here four years later is I am not what they have branded me.' Philip Williams, representing the actor, said that his client was a 'casualty' of a media 'purge' following the emergence of the MeToo movement. He continued that Clarke was made a 'scapegoat' and was an 'easy target' because he was at the height of his success when the media industry 'zealously sought to correct itself'. Advertisement The barrister also criticised the Guardian's investigation, saying the newspaper 'manifestly failed to do its job properly'.Mr Williams asked the court to find the claim successful, saying the Guardian's reporting has caused serious harm to Clarke's career, with 'continuing hostile reactions online and in public discourse'. Gavin Millar KC, for GNM, said there is 'not a shred of evidence' to support Clarke's claim of a conspiracy, describing it as 'nonsensical and rather desperate speculation'. He said Clarke has a 'very clear motive to lie' because he 'stands to lose a great deal'. In written submissions, Mr Millar said Clarke 'used his power to prey on and harass female colleagues' over a period of 15 years. Advertisement He said: 'This was a careful and thorough investigation conducted conscientiously by Guardian journalists who were aware of the potential pitfalls. 'They received information from a wide range of sources with direct evidence of misconduct and in each case carefully considered and tested the information they were given, electing to publish only such information as they believed was credible.'