South Africa's housing crisis: over 80% of households unable to afford local properties
Image: Rob McGaffin
An overwhelming majority of South African households are currently priced out of the local property market, and this trend is worsening.
'There's something very wrong if such a large demand is not being met and, although the problem is well known in the property industry, no real solutions are forthcoming from the government actors who are responsible for solving these problems,' says Renier Kriek, managing director of innovative home finance provider, Sentinel Homes.
He says the root causes are mainly systemic and need to be addressed by the government. It is simply not acceptable that the country has added close to 20 million inhabitants in SA, but the economy has managed to produce a mere 1.9 million homes.
In its June 2025 Property Newsletter, automotive and property data provider Lightstone reports that only one formal house exists per 3.3 families, who earn less than R26 000 per month. This accounts for more than 80% of South African households.
Sentinel Homes said not only are there not enough houses, but new developments are victims of rising construction costs, making each generation of property less affordable to consumers than previously.
The home finance provider said property prices have been outpacing wage increases for the past 70 years, not only in SA but in most of the world.
Earlier this year, this publication reported that the take-home pay of only 15.8% of South Africans would be sufficient to be able to afford a property of R1.3 million in value.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Following last year's BankservAfrica Take-Home Pay Index (BTPI), Elize Kruger, an independent economist, said according to the calculations of an estate agent, for a salary earner to afford a property of R1.3 million in value, with a repayment of R13 480 per month over 20 years, based on the prime rate of 11%, the gross income per month of such a salaried person must be R40 000.
She said that, assuming an effective tax rate of 23.1% (for an annual income of R480 000), that translates into a net salary/take-home pay (after income tax) of approximately R30 000.
Kruger said these numbers are based on a single income per household, so when assuming that two incomes are used to finance a property.
Add to this trend, Sentinel said South Africa's flaccid economic growth, resulting in low job creation and low wage growth, made it easy to see why affording a home is becoming harder and harder for low to middle-income earners.
Data analysed by Lightstone showed that there was one property for 4.8 households earning under R13 000 a month.
The ratio improved to 3.3 households for every one formal property if the salary threshold moved to R26 000 a month, said Hayley Ivins-Downes, the managing executive for real estate at Lightstone Property.
For higher income groups, this ratio was closer to 1.2 to 1.
The property market intelligence provider said there were nearly 12 million households earning less than R13 000 a month, with just under 2.5 million properties available if households stuck to the guideline that they spend no more than a third of their income on housing.
Kriek said that certain things need to change outside the property market before problems can be tackled from within, says Kriek.
He said South Africa sorely needs economic growth driven by a consistent economic policy. Not only graft but also mismanagement of state and parastatal finances needs to stop.
'For example, paying CEOs of dysfunctional utilities more than the Prime Minister of the UK is wasteful and robs citizens of funds that could go towards housing,' says Kriek.
He said the country needs structural reform that embraces deregulation, labour market reforms, trade liberalisation, privatisation or public-private partnerships, and tax reforms to encourage infrastructure investment.
This may also require currency devaluation, which is a difficult political proposition and is unlikely to be popular with richer consumers.
The MD lamented the fact that artisans are retiring faster than they can be replaced, which puts upward pressure on housing production costs. Most of South Africa's workforce is not well-suited to its services-oriented economy.
It needs to reindustrialise to create jobs for the skills we have, encouraging technical trades, such as plumbers or electricians.
He added that the country's restrictive labour policies make labour much more expensive than in competing economies, such as Bangladesh or Sri-Lankha. This could be resolved by devaluing the currency or reducing imports, or simply by liberalising labour laws.
That might mean workers are paid less, but that more people will have jobs as a way of creating an economy that works for all – and this would be a temporary situation that will correct itself as more jobs are created.
'Making such changes at a national level will ensure that problems in the property market are not intractable,' says Kriek. 'But these necessary reforms will also go a long way toward rejigging the economy generally for the better.'
Inside the property market, Kriek said several problems are making housing construction more costly and therefore less affordable when properties are sold.
He said this was bureaucratic sprawl, NIMBYism (Not In My Back Yard), fixed charges, small unit avoidance, slow land release, lender and landlord protection.
Sentinel said if 80% of South Africans cannot afford a home, and developers are unwilling to meet the demand, something is terribly wrong. It said this was not an innovation or economic problem but a systemic one that the government needs to rectify. The problem is market design, and that is something for which we rely on government, and for which the political will must exist to take some tough decisions, he said.
'The private sector is profit-driven and the demand clearly exists, so it's up to the government to create the incentives and ease the restrictions that prevent the private sector from earning its bread in the provision of affordable housing,' says Kriek.
'There's more than enough money floating around – government just needs to create a market that provides incentives for the available resources to flow to where the demand already exists.'
Independent Media Property
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Vows, views … and venue red flags: what every couple should know
Don't let the beauty of your wedding venue blind you to the warning signs. Image: Pexels. As you embark on the exciting journey of planning your wedding, choosing the perfect venue is a crucial step. It's easy to be whisked away by stunning settings, twinkling lights and picturesque views, but before you get swept away and sign a contract, it's important to keep your eyes peeled for potential red flags. Claudia Postigo, a seasoned wedding planner and founder of The Planner Co., shares her five red flags to watch out for when picking your wedding venue. Hidden fees lurking in the fine print That enticing "all-inclusive" deal might have some sneaky surprises. Many venues hide additional costs in the small print, think service charges, cleaning fees and overtime penalties. Postigo's advice: "Always ask for a complete breakdown of every possible fee before signing anything." Strict vendor restrictions limit your options Some venues have exclusive partnerships with certain caterers, florists or photographers. This can restrict your choices and inflate your costs. Postigo's advice: 'If a venue says you can only use their preferred vendors, that's a major red flag. You should be free to choose professionals who align with your vision and budget. Restrictive venues often have deals with these vendors that benefit them more than you." Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Make sure the venue has contingency plans if the weather turns bad. Don't take 'we'll figure it out' for an answer. Image: Pexels. Vague or non-existent weather backup plans If your heart is set on an outdoor ceremony, make sure the venue has contingency plans for bad weather. Postigo's advice: "Don't take 'we'll figure it out' for an answer. A reliable venue should have clear backup options, from sheltered areas to heating arrangements." High staff turnover or unclear staffing plans Take note of who you meet during your venue visits. If you're greeted by different coordinators each time, it might be a sign of instability. Postigo's advice: "Consistent communication with the same coordinator is key for a smooth wedding day. High turnover suggests your wedding details could get lost, and inexperienced staff may struggle to handle issues as they arise."


Daily Maverick
7 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Ramaphosa announces urgent measures to shield South African firms from Trump's tariff fallout
This comes after the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition launched an export support desk on Thursday night as one of its 'urgent interventions' to support South African exporters affected by the tariffs. South Africa is preparing a package to support companies that are vulnerable to the US tariffs, after it failed to secure a trade deal with Washington before a deadline set by US President Donald Trump. 'All channels of communication remain open to engage with the US, and our negotiators are ready pending invitation from the US,' President Cyril Ramaphosa said in a statement on Friday morning. 'In the meantime, government is finalising a package to support companies that are vulnerable to the reciprocal tariffs. The package consists of a number of measures to assist companies, producers and workers affected by the tariffs on SA exports to the US. The details of the measures will be announced in due course,' said Ramaphosa. This comes after the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition launched an export support desk on Thursday night as one of its 'urgent interventions' to support South African exporters affected by the tariffs. On Thursday, Trump signed an executive order placing new tariff rates on dozens of countries, hours before the 1 August 2025 deadline he had set for deals to be made. Some countries received modified tariff rates, while South Africa's remained at the 30% previously proposed by the US. (Source: The Outlier) According to the executive order, the higher import duty rates will take effect seven days from the date of the order. 'All applicable exceptions published in the previous US executive order are set to remain in force, and these exceptions covered products such as copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, lumber articles, certain critical minerals, stainless steel scrap and energy products,' said Ramaphosa. South African officials have been working frantically for months to secure a trade deal with the US to avert Trump's punishing tariffs. South Africa proffered a proposed framework deal to US trade representatives in Washington in May, before Ramaphosa and Trump met at the White House. Representatives were later told they needed to revise this proposal, in accordance with the Trump administration's new template for US trade with sub-Saharan Africa, which they were told would be shared ' soon '. Earlier this week, it appeared the country was still waiting for this template. In his statement, Ramaphosa said the department was in 'constant contact' with the US on its framework deal. He said trade relations between SA and the US were 'complementary in nature' and that South African exports 'do not pose a threat' to US industry. 'South Africa will continue to pursue all diplomatic efforts to safeguard its national interests. It is important that as a country we keep our people at work and our companies producing some of the high-quality products destined for many parts of the world. 'To this end, government will intensify its diversification strategy to create resilience of our economy, and is working with export councils and industry associations, as well as top exporters to the US with a view to assist with alternative markets,' he said. Call to renew 'intensive negotiations' Dr Boitshoko Ntshabele, the CEO of the Citrus Growers Association, told Daily Maverick the 30% tariff 'will be felt most acutely in rural communities in the Northern and Western Cape, the two provinces from which we export to the US'. Ntshabele said it was still possible to reach a trade deal with the US before 7 August, and called on Ramaphosa to renew 'intensive negotiations'. 'The category of seasonal fresh produce offers clear mutual benefits to both countries. South African citrus is exported to the US during the northern hemisphere's summer months. This secures continued supply in the category and in no way threatens domestic US growers. 'It is notable that Brazilian orange juice has been exempted from US tariffs. Fresh South African citrus plays a significant role in keeping America healthy, keeping citrus consumers in the category, and in avoiding possible citrus price increases. 'We have passed the middle of the southern hemisphere's citrus season, and local citrus growers have managed to accelerate a limited number of shipments to the US in the past weeks, which has mitigated some of the effects of the tariff on the current season's US exports. But should a beneficial trade deal not be concluded, our next export season will feel the full effect of the tariff.' Ntshabele welcomed the department's emergency measures, but said that without a deal, 'Our growers in the Western and Northern Cape will face a potentially devastating scenario, especially since the US citrus market's appetite for our produce until very recently offered the potential for creating many more local citrus jobs.' 'No company can compete with 30% tariffs' The Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) on Friday said it was 'extremely concerned' about the impact of the 30% tariff on all South African goods, barring minerals. 'We fear the devastation this will wreak upon farmworkers in the citrus industry from the Western Cape to Limpopo, to motor manufacturing workers from the Eastern Cape to Gauteng. No company can compete with 30% tariffs. Many may close,' said Cosatu in a statement. Daily Maverick reported previously that Trump's punishing tariffs would kneecap South African industries, including the automotive sector and the citrus industry. 'This calamity has been made worse as South Africa has been unfairly made a global skunk with comparatively far better tariffs of 15% announced for neighbouring states, economic sector competitors and most of the world, ironically including many regimes with dubious understandings of the rule of law and real human rights abuses and genocides, who will now have a real advantage over South African exports,' Cosatu added. In a statement on Friday morning, DA spokespersons on Trade, Industry and International Relations, MPs Toby Chance and Ryan Smith, said that the commencement of the 30% tariffs on SA goods was a 'devastating outcome' for the country. 'Both the departments of Trade, Industry and Competition, and International Relations and Cooperation should hang their heads in profound shame today. This 'no deal' scenario is due to sheer negligence, failed diplomacy and ineptitude,' they said. The Nelson Mandela Bay Business Chamber said that the imposition of the 30% tariffs was a 'big blow for local businesses, especially in the automotive and agricultural sectors'. 'The Eastern Cape economy is likely to be the most adversely affected in the country by these developments. 'We are deeply concerned about the impact these developments may have on our automotive industry, which is anchored by the Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) which undertake completely knocked down assembly in South Africa. These OEMs are responsible for creating well over a 100,000 jobs at their own operations and within their components supplier networks. 'Furthermore it is estimated that the knock-on employment impact of these OEMs and components manufacturers results in over 500,000 formal jobs being created across the entire automotive supply chain. Around 40% of automotive employment in the country is located in the Eastern Cape,' the chamber said in a statement. DM


The Citizen
7 hours ago
- The Citizen
US tariff of 30%: Rand weakest in 3 months, thousands of jobs in danger
The confirmed US tariff on South Africa that will apply from 7 August is bad news for the South African economy, rand and jobs. After the White House announced new tariffs on exports into the US, many countries could heave a sigh of relief, but unfortunately, South Africa was not one of them, with a 30% tariff. The rand fell to its lowest level in three months, while thousands of jobs are in danger. In the early hours of Friday morning (South African time), the White House announced its sweeping new trade policy. The main announcement was that the 'universal' 10% tariff will remain for countries the US has a trade surplus with, while countries the US has a trade deficit with will face a minimum of 15%. Lesetja Kganyago, governor of the Reserve Bank, has warned that an unchanged tariff could cost the country 100 000 jobs. The citrus industry alone could shed 35 000 jobs, threatening rural livelihoods in areas like Citrusdal in the Western Cape and Addo in the Eastern Cape where communities heavily depend on citrus farming for employment and economic survival, Harry Scherzer, CEO of Future Forex, says. Automotive exports to the US have already collapsed by more than 80%, and further decline is expected. These tariffs now apply even to goods previously covered under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa), which essentially dismantles tariff-free access for many South African exports. ALSO READ: US tariff of 30% confirmed for SA but negotiations continue, president says US tariffs make the rand suffer The rand was trading at R18.23/$ on Friday morning but strengthened later in the day to R18.06/$. Tracey-Lee Solomon, economist at the Bureau for Economic Research (BER), says as a result, the rand weakened by 2.8% against the US dollar, weighed down by broad dollar strength and South Africa's failure to secure a more favourable trade deal with the US, which likely added to negative sentiment. Bianca Botes, director at Citadel Global, points out that for most of July, the rand rallied, supported by a strong performance in local equities and commodities, as well as renewed risk appetite among international investors. 'However, this week, the rand felt the pressure as the dollar pushed higher against most major currencies, and its value will continue to be driven by the major global themes.' Busisiwe Nkonki and Isaac Matshego, economists at the Nedbank Group Economic Unit, say the rand came under renewed pressure after US President Donald Trump announced he would impose a further 10% import tariff on the Brics countries and any other economy aligned with the grouping. ALSO READ: Tau launches urgent support measures for exporters affected by US tariffs Sudden direct consequences of US tariffs Botes says Trump's trade policy, which has been an ambient concern for global markets, suddenly had direct consequences for economies with the arrival of the tariff deadline. 'A new tranche of tariffs, sharp and hastily framed, landed. 'Trump categorised US trading partners into three groups, depending on their trade relationships. The hardest hit include Laos and Myanmar (40% each), Canada (35%), Switzerland (39%), South Africa (30%) and Taiwan and Sri Lanka (20% each). The Southeast Asian economies Cambodia, Malaysia and Thailand were hit with a 19% rate, while Israel and Venezuela got away with 15%.' She says while Trump's rationale may be vaguely strategic, the rollout was conspicuously performative. 'Now, portfolio managers are no longer modelling probability – they are modelling responses to this policy. Boards now must revisit hedges, and corporates are reconfiguring cost assumptions. 'For exporters, the margins that existed yesterday already narrowed. In currency markets, the reaction was measured but unmistakable: there was pressure on the most exposed currencies, while the least entangled gained some strength.' ALSO READ: Economists question if SA has a plan for US tariffs, Tau says here it is SA economy must brace for less access to US markets due to US tariffs Professor Raymond's Parsons, economist at the NWU Business School, says the South African economy must inevitably brace itself for less access to US markets in the future. 'Although agriculture and the motor industry are mainly affected, there are wider macroeconomic effects, such as on the overall level of unemployment and the volatile rand, to be expected.' Therefore, he says, the inflation and growth outlooks are likely to be influenced by the net impact of higher US tariffs on South Africa. 'In a worst-case scenario, the cut in South Africa's gross domestic product (GDP) growth could be between 0.4% and 0.7%, at a time when the expected growth rate in 2025 is now probably about 0.9%. 'The challenge is now for government and the private sector to identify both short and long-term shock-absorbing measures that will help to manage the new risks emerging from a changed global trading order. Diversification of export markets is now also the highest priority to seek out new opportunities in Africa and elsewhere.'