Why didn't Ireland stand up for Palestine at the ICJ?
International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague
held five days of hearings for yet another case against
Israel
and its
campaign in Gaza
.
This time, the fate of the Palestinians and the sanctity of the
United Nations (UN)
were at stake. Forty-one states and four international organisations presented arguments to determine whether Israel has violated its obligations regarding its treatment of UN agencies and their representatives and the rights of the Palestinian people in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.
While Ireland submitted a strongly worded statement to the court denouncing Israel's multiple violations of international law, it is one of only six states that have made submissions but did not also present oral arguments.
Whether or not this is part of a carefully balanced political strategy designed not to strain further the increasingly fraught relationship with the United States, failure to appear in the Peace Palace gives the impression of lacklustre support for the Palestinian people and undercuts our stated position of solidarity.
READ MORE
The request for an advisory opinion on the obligations of Israel in relation to the UN and its agencies, including the provision of aid to the Palestinian population in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, arises from the General Assembly.
Led by
Norway
, a resolution to send this question to the ICJ was passed by 137 votes in December. The death of 291 UN personnel, many of whom worked in Gaza as part of United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (Unrwa) – along with allegations that UN workers and facilities have been deliberately targeted by the Israeli military – has put the organisation at the centre of this case.
The situation was exacerbated by Israel's defiance of the court's previous orders to halt the military campaign and supply humanitarian assistance. The result has been the further devastation of the Palestinian people.
Opening the proceedings, the UN legal counsel Elinor Hammarskjöld, a relative of the former UN secretary-general Dag Hammarskjöld who was killed in Congo in 1961, pointed out that no aid has entered Gaza since March 2nd.
In effect, as argued by the Palestinian representatives, Israel is using starvation as a weapon of war with catastrophic effects. Already devastated by the military campaign (more than 52,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since the onslaught began, according to Palestinian health officials), with Israel's blocking of
humanitarian supplies
, the Palestinians who remain are slowly starving to death.
[
Gaza: At least 57 Palestinians have starved to death under Israeli blockade, say aid agencies
Opens in new window
]
A sizeable majority of submissions to the court condemned Israel's actions. Among the states who did so were Norway and
Spain
, who have been increasingly vocal in their support for Palestine. They are also Ireland's leading European allies on this question since they
recognised Palestinian statehood at the same time as Ireland in 2024
. Spain has worked closely with Ireland to push the EU to do more on this issue. So why did Ireland not join our European allies and stand up for Palestine at the ICJ?
It may have something to do with the increasingly tempestuous transatlantic relationship.
The US president
Donald Trump
has been resolute in his support of Israel in its actions against the Palestinians. Recently he stated that he 'fully supports' the resumption of
Israel Defense Forces
(IDF) military activities in Gaza and has warned Hamas that there 'would be all hell to pay' if the remaining hostages are not released.
For Ireland, the shifting sands of the transatlantic relationship, formerly one of the buttresses of Irish foreign policy, has been threatened by a mercurial Trump. As he is highly critical of our trade surplus and has a trigger-happy approach to tariffs that would severely affect our economy, maintaining the 'special relationship' with the US has become a central focus for the Government.
Ireland's outspoken position on Palestine is a pressure point with the US, particularly among Republicans. During US senate hearings last week for Edward Walsh, President Trump's nominee as ambassador to Ireland, Republican senator for Idaho Jim Risch declared that by recognising Palestinian statehood, Ireland was '
much out of step
' with the US on Israel.
The comment would have done little to assuage Government fears of a growing tension with the US. Such a perception in Washington would certainly have been exacerbated by a public argument in support of Palestine at the UN's highest court. It seems that even defining issues such as Palestine are secondary to the desire not to aggravate the untethered occupant of the White House.
For its part, Israel has become even more intransigent. It did not appear at the ICJ last week. Even before proceedings began, Israel violated the ceasefire conditions by continuing to bomb Gaza, saying it would do so until
Hamas
releases all remaining hostages. Israel has couched its actions in the tacit legality of the Knesset, which passed two laws in 2024 demanding the cessation of Unrwa activities, the implementation of which represents a violation of Israel's obligations under the UN charter. This has raised the criticism that no matter how many advisory opinions and judgments the court declares, and regardless of how many resolutions the UN passes, Israel will continue to violate international law, rendering the UN essentially hamstrung.
However, it is precisely when such grievous violations of international law and human rights take place that institutions such as those of the UN are most needed. Most states that argued before the court reiterated the importance of protecting both the Palestinians and the immunity and privileges of the UN.
Ireland's absence from the Peace Palace last week is a missed opportunity to show that we stand beside the Palestinian people on the grounds of international law – not just in the face of public opinion.
Alanna O'Malley is associate professor at the Leiden University Institute for History
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Syrian and Israeli diplomats reportedly hold rare meeting in Paris to discuss 'de-escalation'
SYRIA'S FOREIGN MINISTER has held a rare meeting with an Israeli delegation in Paris, the Syrian state-run news agency said. The talks were brokered by the United States, which has been pushing for Syria and Israel to normalise relations, the report said. Foreign minister Asaad al-Shibani met Israeli officials today to discuss de-escalating tensions and restoring a 1974 ceasefire agreement, the SANA news agency said. Syrian officials have acknowledged holding indirect talks with Israel to defuse tensions. There was no immediate confirmation of such a meeting from Israel. Tensions have soared between the two neighbouring countries following the overthrow of Syrian president Bashar Assad in December. Israeli forces seized control of a UN-patrolled buffer zone in Syria shortly after Assad's overthrow and carried out airstrikes on military sites in what officials said was aimed at creating a demilitarised zone south of Damascus. Advertisement Israel has said it will not allow hostile forces to establish themselves along the frontier, as Iranian-backed groups did during Assad's rule. It distrusts Syria's new government, which is led by former Islamist insurgents. Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa, a former al-Qaida commander who severed ties with the militant group years ago, has pledged to build a new country that respects the rights of minorities, but sectarian violence has erupted on a number of occasions, raising concerns about the country's fragile transition. Israel stepped up its intervention when violence erupted in Syria's Sweida province last month between Bedouin clans and government forces on one side and armed groups from the Druze religious minority on the other. Israel said it was acting to protect the Druze, who are seen as a loyal minority in Israel and often serve in the military. Israel launched dozens of airstrikes on convoys of Syrian forces around Sweida and struck the headquarters of the Syrian ministry of defence in the heart of Damascus, Syria's capital. Israel seized the Golan Heights from Syria in the 1967 Middle East war and later annexed the strategic plateau in a move that has only been recognised by the US. The rest of the international community views the Golan as occupied Syrian territory.
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Met Police issues warning to protesters ahead of Kneecap member's court appearance in London
THE METROPOLITAN POLICE has issued a warning to anyone planning on protesting outside Westminster Magistrates' Court tomorrow in support of Kneecap's Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh. The 27-year-old rapper, whose stage name is Mo Chara, appeared in the court in June charged with displaying a flag in support of Hezbollah, a proscribed organisation in Britain, during a gig in the O2 Forum, Kentish Town last November. Ó hAnnaidh was released on unconditional bail until his next hearing , which will take place tomorrow, when legal argument will be dealt with. Ó hAnnaidh and his fellow bandmates Naoise Ó Cairealláin and J J Ó Dochartaigh left the court in June to loud cheers and chants of 'Free Palestine' from hundreds of their supporters who remained outside during the hearing. Before they emerged, supporters gave speeches about Palestine and Ireland. Advertisement Throughout the morning, supporters of the group held placards saying 'Free Mo Chara' and 'Defend Kneecap' along with tricolours, Palestinian flags and Kneecap flags, with musicians also performing. The UK's Stop The War Coalition was among those organising the protest, calling on people to 'picket' the court building. In a statement this evening, the Met Police said it has imposed 'Public Order Act conditions to prevent serious disruption being caused by a protest outside Westminster Magistrates' Court tomorrow'. These conditions can be imposed when police deem it necessary to prevent public disorder such as damage to property, disruption to the community or excessive noise. The Met has set out an area in which protests in support of Ó hAnnaidh and 'aligned causes must remain'. In response to this on social media, Kneecap said that it 'massively appreciates the support of what we know are the majority of the public, who can see this farce for what it is'. 'It is a distraction from war crimes that the British state support,' added the statement. Related Reads Opinion: The British political class has it in for Kneecap - they just don't get it Kneecap complain of 'political policing' after this gig ad was blocked on London Tube Inside and outside the Kneecap courtroom: Film directors, The Fields of Athenry, and a few police We massively appreciate the support of what we know are the majority of the public, who can see this farce for what it is. It is distraction from war crimes that the British state support. In our view this police action is designed to try and portray support for kneecap as… — KNEECAP (@KNEECAPCEOL) August 19, 2025 'In our view this police action is designed to try and portray support for Kneecap as somehow troublesome. 'It is a calculated political decision the night before Mo Chara's court appearance. 'There is no basis for this, our last hearing was entirely peaceful and a loving show of solidarity, with the most disruptive attendees the right wing media. 'We know all of our supporters will be, but please go out of your way to be compliant with all instructions issued, irrespective of how pitiful.' Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Agriland
2 hours ago
- Agriland
Northern Ireland's NAP forum will not meet until September
Farmers for Action (FFA) is indicating that Northern Ireland's Nitrates Acton Plan (NAP) forum will not meet until September. The organisation's spokesperson, William Taylor told Agriland: 'Nothing will happen until the politicians at Stormont come back from their summer recess. 'FFA plans to actively participate in the discussions involving the members of the forum.' 'The appointment of an independent chair is extremely important. Agriculture Minister Andrew Muir has it within his gift to suggest an appointee. 'But the person stepping into the position must be fully ratified by the organisations that make up the stakeholder forum.' Regarding the issue of inheritance tax, and the decision taken by the chancellor last autumn to extend the scope of the levy to include production agriculture, Taylor believes that a legal precedent can be established that derogates Northern Ireland from this measure. He explained: 'The issue centres on Northern Ireland's unique, post-Brexit status and the continuing influence of certain European statutes. 'We are currently working with Fairness for Farmers in Europe on this issue.' Meanwhile, FFA is criticising what it regards as the unsustainable trends in farmgate prices currently impacting across the dairy, beef, and grain sectors. 'Dairy farmers should be getting at least 60p/L for their milk. And in the case of cattle sector, beef prices should be at least £8/kg," Taylor said. 'Dairy farmers across the UK are being driven out of business. And the same scenario is unfolding in the suckler sector.' The last 12 months have seen grain prices plateau at levels well below those recorded when Russia invaded Ukraine back in 2022. Taylor believes that corporate organisations operating within the grains and oilseeds sector have the influence to control markets in ways that suit their specific needs, and not those of farmers. 'The current Stormont Executive has the chance in what little time remains in this mandate to sort this problem out by introducing the Northern Ireland Farm Welfare Bill," the FFA spokesperson said. 'This measure would return farmers a true cost of production inflation linked plus a margin for their produce. 'Significantly, the Bill is now being looked at as a UK-wide initiative." 'Progress at either Stormont or Westminster couldn't come soon enough to help protect family farmers from inheritance tax and poor farm gate prices.'
