Ferguson names three to Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission
Apr. 8—Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson named three people to the state Fish and Wildlife Commission late Monday afternoon, reappointing two commissioners and bringing on one newcomer.
In a news release, Ferguson's office announced it had reappointed commissioners Jim Anderson of Pierce County and Molly Linville of Douglas County, both of whom had terms that expired on Jan. 1.
The third appointment went to Victor Garcia of Skagit County, who will replace former commissioner Tim Ragen.
The decision came about two months after Ferguson rescinded two January appointments by his predecessor, then-Gov. Jay Inslee — the reappointment of Ragen and the appointment of a Ferry County woman to replace Linville.
In pulling back the appointments, Ferguson cited a report from the William D. Ruckelshaus Center, in which people interviewed described the commission as "dysfunctional" and raised concerns about the appointments process.
Ferguson said in a statement Monday that the report "raised serious concerns," and that his office believes the appointees announced this week will help address them.
"Molly, Jim and Victor offer deep and varied experience, as well as unique perspectives to the Fish and Wildlife Commission," Ferguson said.
Barbara Baker, the chair of the commission, said in a statement that she was pleased with the appointments.
"I look forward to the work we'll be able to accomplish together on behalf of fish and wildlife conservation in Washington state," Baker said.
The news was welcomed by many hunters and anglers who saw Anderson and Linville as more friendly to their interests than other commissioners.
Dan Wilson, co-chair of the Washington chapter of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, said in a statement that Anderson and Linville "consistently demonstrated broad, thoughtful engagement on wildlife issues," and that the group is excited to work with Garcia.
"With deep respect for our wildlife and the many communities who care about it, we believe these appointments bring critical experience and balance to a body tasked with making complex, and often contentious, decisions," Wilson said.
Others were disappointed in Ferguson's appointments. Claire Loebs Davis, of Washington Wildlife First, said in a statement that her group was disappointed that Ferguson didn't select Ragen for one of the seats, and that they felt it was a betrayal of their trust.
Davis said the governor's decision moves the commission "away from the interests and values of Washingtonians, and toward the powerful special interests that have long controlled state fish and wildlife policy."
All three of the newly appointed commissioners will begin their six-year terms immediately while they await Senate confirmation.
That puts the nine-member body that oversees the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife at full strength for the first time since Ferguson rescinded the appointments in early February.
Anderson had been serving on the commission in the months since his term ended, but Linville had not — because Inslee had named someone else to her seat, she was sidelined. Ragen, whose term also expired in January, was removed after Ferguson rescinded his reappointment.
At the three meetings since, the commission moved forward with seven members.
In the meantime, Ferguson's office was interviewing candidates for the three open seats. In the release, Ferguson's office wrote that Linville, Anderson and Garcia were chosen "after an extensive interview process" conducted to evaluate 14 people who applied for the seats over the past year.
Anderson has been on the commission since 2019. He lives near Buckley, in Pierce County, and worked for 35 years in natural resource management, including 20 years as executive director of the Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission.
Linville was also originally appointed to the commission in 2019. She grew up near Reardan on a wheat and barley farm. Now, she and her husband manage a 6,000-acre cattle ranch near Wenatchee.
Garcia taught biology and other science courses at schools in Anacortes, Mount Vernon and Ocosta. He's also worked as a commercial fisherman in Alaska and as a field biologist.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Washington governor wants agencies to look for deeper cuts
The Washington state Capitol on April 18, 2025. (Photo by Jacquelyn Jimenez Romero/Washington State Standard) Just weeks after signing a budget that relied on spending cuts and new taxes to balance, Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson is telling state agencies to tighten their fiscal belts even more. The warning from the Democratic governor comes amid an increasingly gloomy budget outlook and underscores that the state's financial difficulties are not over. 'We will very likely continue to face a challenging state budget environment in the coming year and anticipate increasing caseloads and ongoing uncertainty in the economy and federal funding,' reads a June 4 memo from Ferguson's budget director to agency leaders and presidents of higher education institutions. The letter penned by K.D. Chapman-See, director of the Office of Financial Management, precedes departments and colleges submitting funding requests that they hope Ferguson will support heading into next year. Those submissions are due by Sept. 15. Ferguson will release his proposed spending plans in December and the Legislature will consider them in the 2026 session. The letter says requests should only be for 'critical and emergent costs' that cannot be covered within their existing budgets. It urges them to look for 'additional options for efficiencies, reform, administrative savings, or reductions in non-essential services and programs.' The tone of Chapman-See's memo echoes a directive issued a year ago by her predecessor in which agency directors were told to focus on maintaining current programs, while not seeking money for new ones or expansions. Five months later came the November memo that, for the first time, identified a projected budget shortfall between $10 billion and $12 billion over the next four years. Once Ferguson settled into office, he started saying the chasm had widened to $16 billion. Democrats used their majorities in the House and Senate to pass a two-year $78 billion budget that was balanced with spending cuts and billions of dollars in new and higher taxes. The tax package Democrats assembled totals around $9.4 billion over four years to fully cover the gap. Ferguson, whose vetoes left the state with a little less savings, warned the fiscal situation could worsen when the next forecast of state tax collections is released on June 24. On Tuesday, Washington chief economist David Reich offered a sense of what to expect when he delivered his quarterly review of the economy to the Economic and Revenue Forecast Council, a bipartisan panel of state lawmakers and agency executives, including Chapman-See. It didn't sound good. Tax collections are coming in lower than predicted in March. Uncertainty surrounding tariffs, trade and federal policies are having a chilling effect on exports, consumer spending, and general activity across many sectors. While there was an uptick in sales of new vehicles, Reich said, it might have been folks rushing to beat new or higher tariffs. Sales of expensive properties generated a few more dollars than anticipated, he said. But new housing starts are behind March projections. Prior to his presentation, the council adopted a new four-year outlook showing Washington will have less money on hand at the end of the next budget cycle than previously estimated. The state will have an ending balance of $80 million in its main operating account at the end of the 2025-27 biennium, down from the $225 million penciled in before lawmakers approved the budget in April. Projections show the operating account will be in the red to the tune of $56 million in the 2028 fiscal year before rebounding to a positive sum by July 1, 2029. Washington isn't in any immediate budget danger and has more than $2 billion in emergency reserves. Still, Chapman-See said the financial situation is why agencies are being pressed to further reduce spending. And, she said, it is anticipated that travel, hiring and contracting freezes imposed this fall will remain in place. Democratic budget writers from the House and Senate who serve on the council said there's nothing for lawmakers to do, yet. 'I'm not sure what we can do before January,' said Sen. June Robinson, D-Everett, the lead budget writer in the Senate. 'There are a lot of pieces of information that will be collected and considered, including what the federal government might do between now and then.'
Axios
17 hours ago
- Axios
Divorcing in Trump's Washington? Good luck
When Washington couples split up today, they're facing a super volatile party in the courtroom. No, not their ex — it's President Trump's policies. The big picture: Divorce is already stressful. But add federal layoffs, a saturated job market, an uncertain real estate landscape and a possible recession? Buckle up, divorce lawyers tell Axios. Zoom in: Trump's fast-paced decision making is particularly impacting Washingtonians' finances — and money is a big sticking point for couples who are splitting. "When the income takes a dip, how do you calculate alimony? How do you calculate child support? How long is the decrease in income going to last? Nobody knows," says lawyer Jessica Markham, whose client list includes many former and current federal employees. "When the economy is not doing well, you have less options on how to problem-solve untangling two people's financial lives." What they're saying: Some of Markham's clients who've been fired from the federal government, forced to retire early, or are scared of layoffs are now requesting short- or long-term alimony from their exes — something she says wouldn't have happened a year ago. "It's such a new dynamic to their relationship," she says. "They were previously in a very secure position, and in those cases, it's harder to settle, because it's so shocking." Other wannabe-divorcés are delaying the process because they want more security about their employment status before they put themselves on the hook for something they can't afford. Housing is another issue. Some divorcing feds are worried about buying a new single-person pad because they're unsure of their future. One of Markham's federal clients initially had trouble getting a mortgage because the lender was worried they wouldn't be a safe borrower — their agency employer was doing layoffs, Markham says. Others are holding onto homes to see if Washington's real estate market dips, making it cheaper to buy their former spouse out, says lawyer Maria Simon. Also a problem: Child care. Now that feds are back in the office full time, some are asking the ex for help with day care or a nanny and getting pushback, says Simon. "[The partner is saying,] 'Well you never needed it before. Why do I have to pay for it now?'" Zoom out: There's no tax bracket that isn't affected. Lawyer Cheryl New says her Washington power-player clients are worried about how Trump's policies are affecting the valuation of their assets, businesses and investments, and how that will affect their divorce settlements. "[They're thinking,] 'Am I going to be able to pay my employees? Am I going to be able to afford the four homes that I bought and the three kids in the private school?'" New says. The intrigue: New's client list includes some divorcing politicos in Trump's orbit, she tells Axios — who are equally freaked by the effects of his policies on their own breakups. "What you see in the press and what you see on television is not precisely what I'm seeing behind closed doors," she says. "[They're] just as worried, if not more, because there's some insider information there." New says she also represents lawyers who left their jobs at some of the white-collar law firms working pro bono with Trump — and who are now worried about how their lack of income will affect their divorce proceedings. What we're watching: Simon anticipates that custody battles will begin to feature former feds who have to leave the DMV to find work in a less saturated market — and want to take the kids with them, she says.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
NAACP voices concerns as Ferguson votes to cut funding for consent decree
FERGUSON, Mo. – The NAACP of St. Louis County is raising concerns after the Ferguson City Council voted to cut funding for a 2016 federal consent decree, which mandated sweeping reforms to the city's police and municipal courts after the death of Michael Brown. The decree took effect after years of protests following Brown's death, who was shot and killed by a Ferguson police officer in August 2014. According to FOX 2's news partners at the St. Louis Post Dispatch, earlier this week, the Ferguson City Council voted 4-3 to reduce the amount the city spends on the decree. The move aims to cut some decree-related spending for the next fiscal year, starting July 1, from $412,700 to $206,350. NAACP St. Louis County President John Bowman released a statement on Saturday to FOX 2, which reads, in part: 'While we can acknowledge the efforts made over the last nine years by all parties, particularly the community in learning to trust Ferguson's law enforcement officers, elected officials, and community leaders, there is still a long way to go. Trying to escape the federal consent decree too soon by cutting the budget and rushing remaining mandatory reforms says that you prioritize checking off boxes over achieving the necessary results to make Ferguson safer and more united.' He added that cutting funding says the council prioritizes 'checking off boxes' over achieving results. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
