
U.S. researchers seek to legitimize AI mental health care
By Thomas URBAIN
Researchers at Dartmouth College believe artificial intelligence can deliver reliable psychotherapy, distinguishing their work from the unproven and sometimes dubious mental health apps flooding today's market.
Their application, Therabot, addresses the critical shortage of mental health professionals.
According to Nick Jacobson, an assistant professor of data science and psychiatry at Dartmouth, even multiplying the current number of therapists tenfold would leave too few to meet demand.
"We need something different to meet this large need," Jacobson told AFP.
The Dartmouth team recently published a clinical study demonstrating Therabot's effectiveness in helping people with anxiety, depression and eating disorders.
A new trial is planned to compare Therabot's results with conventional therapies.
The medical establishment appears receptive to such innovation.
Vaile Wright, senior director of health care innovation at the American Psychological Association (APA), described "a future where you will have an AI-generated chatbot rooted in science that is co-created by experts and developed for the purpose of addressing mental health."
Wright noted these applications "have a lot of promise, particularly if they are done responsibly and ethically," though she expressed concerns about potential harm to younger users.
Jacobson's team has so far dedicated close to six years to developing Therabot, with safety and effectiveness as primary goals.
Michael Heinz, psychiatrist and project co-leader, believes rushing for profit would compromise safety.
The Dartmouth team is prioritizing understanding how their digital therapist works and establishing trust.
They are also contemplating the creation of a nonprofit entity linked to Therabot to make digital therapy accessible to those who cannot afford conventional in-person help.
With the cautious approach of its developers, Therabot could potentially be a standout in a marketplace of untested apps that claim to address loneliness, sadness and other issues.
According to Wright, many apps appear designed more to capture attention and generate revenue than improve mental health.
Such models keep people engaged by telling them what they want to hear, but young users often lack the savvy to realize they are being manipulated.
Darlene King, chair of the American Psychiatric Association's committee on mental health technology, acknowledged AI's potential for addressing mental health challenges but emphasizes the need for more information before determining true benefits and risks.
"There are still a lot of questions," King noted.
To minimize unexpected outcomes, the Therabot team went beyond mining therapy transcripts and training videos to fuel its AI app by manually creating simulated patient-caregiver conversations.
While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration theoretically is responsible for regulating online mental health treatment, it does not certify medical devices or AI apps.
Instead, "the FDA may authorize their marketing after reviewing the appropriate pre-market submission," according to an agency spokesperson.
The FDA acknowledged that "digital mental health therapies have the potential to improve patient access to behavioral therapies."
Herbert Bay, CEO of Earkick, defends his startup's AI therapist Panda as "super safe."
Bay says Earkick is conducting a clinical study of its digital therapist, which detects emotional crisis signs or suicidal ideation and sends help alerts.
"What happened with Character.AI couldn't happen with us," said Bay, referring to a Florida case in which a mother claims a chatbot relationship contributed to her 14-year-old son's death by suicide.
AI, for now, is suited more for day-to-day mental health support than life-shaking breakdowns, according to Bay.
"Calling your therapist at two in the morning is just not possible," but a therapy chatbot remains always available, Bay noted.
One user named Darren, who declined to provide his last name, found ChatGPT helpful in managing his traumatic stress disorder, despite the OpenAI assistant not being designed specifically for mental health.
"I feel like it's working for me," he said. "I would recommend it to people who suffer from anxiety and are in distress."
© 2025 AFP

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Japan Today
2 hours ago
- Japan Today
German firm gives 'second life' to used EV batteries
'We want to ensure European sovereignty in energy supply,' says Voltfang chief David Oudsandji By Léa PERNELLE A German company is putting used electric vehicle batteries to new use by stacking them into fridge-size units that homes and businesses can use to store their excess solar and wind energy. This week, the company Voltfang -- which means "catching volts" -- opened its first industrial site in Aachen, near the Belgian and Dutch borders. With around 100 staff, Voltfang says it is the biggest facility of its kind in Europe in the budding sector of refurbishing lithium-ion batteries. Its CEO David Oudsandji hopes it will help Europe's biggest economy ween itself off fossil fuels and increasingly rely on climate-friendly renewables. While wind turbines now dot Germany's countryside and photovoltaic panels are found on many rooftops, he says the country still needs to build up battery storage capacity. "We want to ensure European sovereignty in energy supply by enabling renewable energy production through storage," Oudsandji, 29, told AFP. "We can generate enormous amounts of electricity from solar and wind energy, then store it in a decentralized way all across Germany and distribute it," he said. "This means that the more renewable energy we use, the more storage capacity we deploy, the less we need fossil gas or oil." Inside the site, technicians receive used EV batteries and test them to determine their remaining lifespans. Those still found to be in good condition are reconditioned for their "second life" and fitted inside cabinets the size of large refrigerators -- effectively huge power banks for excess electricity. Among the first customers is the discount supermarket chain Aldi Nord, which wants to store power from its rooftop solar panels for later use. Clean energy push Voltfang, founded in 2020 by three university engineering students, aims to produce enough systems by 2030 to store a capacity of one gigawatt-hour (GWh) of electricity per year, enough for 300 homes. It is one of many small steps meant to help Germany's decades-old "Energiewende", or energy transition. Last year, renewables covered nearly 60 percent of electricity produced in Germany, and the target is 80 percent by 2030. One problem for solar and wind is what to do on days when the sun doesn't shine and the wind doesn't blow. Such "dark lulls", most common in winter, have at times forced Germany to temporarily import power produced by French nuclear reactors or Polish coal plants. To guarantee a secure supply, conservative Chancellor Friedrich Merz's government plans to build around 20 new gas-fired power plants by 2030. The Greens and environmental groups have denounced this as a step backwards in German climate policy and fear the country will not meets its goal of carbon neutrality by 2045. Europe's battery sector is still nascent but expected to grow fast. "In our opinion, small-scale distributed energy assets such as battery storage will play a major role to create efficient energy systems," said Marc Sauthoff of the business consultancy Roland Berger. The stationary storage market is growing exponentially in Germany: about six GWh of capacity were installed at end-2024, up from 2.5 GWh in 2022, he said. Voltfang hopes to be profitable by next year, Oudsandji said, though he conceded there are hurdles. For one thing, the supply of used EV batteries is still small, given that most vehicles have been on the road for only a few years. Also, new batteries, produced mainly in China, are becoming more efficient and less expensive, making it harder to compete against them with refurbished models. Oudsandji acknowledged that testing and refurbishing old batteries "is more complex" than simply buying new ones. "But the big advantage is that it is more sustainable," he said. "It is cheaper and allows us to create a circular economy, thus ensuring Europe's independence in resource supply." © 2025 AFP


Japan Times
14 hours ago
- Japan Times
Ads ruined social media. Now they're coming to AI.
Chatbots might hallucinate and sprinkle too much flattery on their users — "That's a fascinating question!' one recently told me — but at least the subscription model that underpins them is healthy for our wellbeing. Many Americans pay about $20 a month to use the premium versions of OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini Pro or Anthropic's Claude, and the result is that the products are designed to provide maximum utility. Don't expect this status quo to last. Subscription revenue has a limit and Anthropic's $200-a-month "Max' tier suggests even the most popular models are under pressure to find new revenue streams. Unfortunately, the most obvious one is advertising — the web's most successful business model. AI builders are already exploring ways to plug more ads into their products, and while that's good for their bottom lines, it also means we're about to see a new chapter in the attention economy that fueled the internet. If social media's descent into engagement-bait is any guide, the consequences will be profound. One cost is addiction. Young office workers are becoming dependent on AI tools to help them write emails and digest long documents, according to a recent study, and OpenAI says a cohort of "problematic' ChatGPT users are hooked on the tool. Putting ads into ChatGPT, which now has more than 500 million active users, won't spur the company to help those people reduce their use of the product. Quite the opposite. Advertising was the reason companies like Mark Zuckerberg's Meta Platforms designed algorithms to promote engagement, keeping users scrolling so they saw more ads and drove more revenue. It's the reason behind the so-called enshittification of the web, a place now filled with clickbait and social media posts that spark outrage. Baking such incentives into AI will almost certainly lead its designers to find ways to trigger more dopamine spikes, perhaps by complimenting users even more, asking personal questions to get them talking for longer or even cultivating emotional attachments. Millions of people in the Western world already view chatbots in apps like Chai, Talkie, Replika and Botify as friends or romantic partners. Imagine how persuasive such software could be when its users are beguiled. Imagine a person telling their AI they're feeling depressed and the system recommending some affordable holiday destinations or medication to address the problem. Is that how ads would work in chatbots? The answer is subject to much experimentation — and companies are indeed experimenting. Google's ad network, for instance, not too long ago started putting advertisements in third-party chatbots. Chai, a romance and friendship chatbot, on which users spent 72 minutes a day, on average, in September 2024, serves pop-up ads. And AI answer engine Perplexity displays sponsored questions. After an answer to a question about job hunting, for instance, it might include a list of suggested follow ups including, at the top, "How can I use Indeed to enhance my job search?' Perplexity's Chief Executive Officer Aravind Srinivas told a podcast in April that the company was looking to go further by building a browser to "get data even outside the app' to track "which hotels are you going (to); which restaurants are you going to,' to enable what he called "hyperpersonalized' ads. For some apps, that might mean weaving ads directly into conversations, using the intimate details shared by users to predict and potentially even manipulate them into wanting something, then selling those intentions to the highest bidder. Researchers at Cambridge University referred to this as the forthcoming "intention economy' in a recent paper, with chatbots steering conversations toward a brand or even a direct sale. As evidence, they pointed to a 2023 blog post from OpenAI calling for "data that expresses human intention' to help train its models, a similar effort from Meta and Apple's 2024 developer framework that helps apps work with Siri to "predict actions someone might take in the future.' As for OpenAI's Sam Altman, nothing says "we're building an ad business' like hiring the person who built delivery app Instacart into an advertising powerhouse. Altman recently poached CEO Fidji Simo to help OpenAI "scale as we enter a next phase of growth.' In Silicon Valley parlance, to "scale' often means to quickly expand your user base by offering a service for free, with ads. Tech companies will inevitably claim that advertising is a necessary part of democratizing AI. But we've seen how "free' services cost people their privacy and autonomy — even their mental health. And AI knows more about us than Google or Facebook ever did — details about our health concerns, relationship issues and work. In two years, they have also built a reputation as trustworthy companions and arbiters of truth. On X, for instance, users frequently bring AI models Grok and Perplexity into conversations to flag if a post is fake. When people trust AI that much, they're more vulnerable to targeted manipulation. AI advertising should be regulated before it becomes too entrenched or we'll repeat the mistakes made with social media — scrutinizing the fallout of a lucrative business model only after the damage is done. Parmy Olson is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology. She is author of "Supremacy: AI, ChatGPT and the Race That Will Change the World.'


Japan Times
14 hours ago
- Japan Times
Honda taps Silicon Valley startup in self-driving software deal
Honda Motor has signed a multiyear agreement to work with a U.S. AI startup in which it has an equity stake to develop self driving capabilities, tapping into Silicon Valley know-how for next generation automated technologies. The Japanese carmaker and Redwood City, California-based will collaborate on producing advanced driver assistance systems for Honda's mass market vehicles by 2027, the two said Wednesday in a statement. No value or duration of the contract was disclosed. Honda's bid to join the race to develop so-called end-to-end driving technology aims for partially automated acceleration and steering on both regular roads and highways. It follows early movers in driver assistance software systems such as General Motors' SuperCruise, Tesla's Autopilot and BYD's God's Eye. "This joint development supports Honda's goal of realizing safe and affordable automated driving technologies for our global customers,' said Mahito Shikama, the head of the carmaker's software defined vehicle business. Honda has been investing in since 2021, including at least $30 million in early stage financing. The closely held startup, which specializes in camera-based computerized perception and simulation software, was founded in 2016 and has raised more than $100 million. In addition to Honda, the company has worked with a number of other automakers and auto parts suppliers. "We look forward to entering the next phase of production development with Honda, as they expand their in-house efforts to deploy cutting edge autonomous driving technologies in mass market vehicles,' Vladislav Voroninski, chief executive officer, said.