For Tennessee's Transgender Families, the Court Ruling Was Bitter, but Expected
There had been cause for joy this June. There were events timed with Pride Month, when families and friends gathered with rainbow tattoos and flags for the annual celebration of L.G.B.T.Q. life. And there was an unexpected legal victory when a federal judge extended a temporary injunction on a federal policy requiring passports to reflect the sex on a person's original birth certificate.
Then on Wednesday, the Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's ban on transition treatment for transgender youth, dealing a bitter setback to their families and reviving fear about other limits that may come for L.G.B.T.Q. people in the state.
For many transgender people, children and their families in Tennessee, it was not necessarily an unexpected outcome given the vitriol they have faced in recent years.
The state has been at the forefront of a rollback on L.G.B.T.Q. rights as its General Assembly, with an entrenched Republican supermajority, has barred changes to gender identification on driver's licenses, limited where drag shows can take place and prevented transgender students from using public school bathrooms that fit their identities.
'I'm not surprised' at the ruling, said Eli Givens, who at 18 had testified against the ban. 'I really want to be. Ever since I started all of this in 2023, it's been whiplash every single day. There's just always a new decision, someone saying something about the community.'
Receiving treatment as a teenager 'was a new chance at life for me,' Mx. Givens, 20, added. 'I could savor things in a way I never could before. Everything kind of made sense and fell into place.'
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
38 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Fahmy: Need Forceful Diplomacy, Not Force
Bloomberg sources say Senior US officials are preparing for the possibility of a strike on Iran in coming days, as Israel and the Islamic Republic continue to exchange fire. Egypt's former Foreign Minister Nabil Fahmy told Bloomberg's Joumanna Bercetche that it could be very dangerous if the US gets involved, and now is the time for forceful diplomacy over force. (Source: Bloomberg)
CBS News
40 minutes ago
- CBS News
Millions made available for Florida universities to pay student-athletes
Pointing to a need to avoid a disadvantage in recruiting athletes, Florida university-system leaders Wednesday made up to $22.5 million available for each state university to share revenues with athletes. The system's Board of Governors approved the funding, which will be available annually at that level as a loan or transfer for the next three years. It is designed to help carry out a new revenue-sharing model with athletes under a national legal settlement in a case known as House v. NCAA. Will help put universities into a position to compete for talent It comes amid massive change in college sports, in part because of athletes now being able to cash in through "name, image and likeness" deals. Traditionally, college athletes could not be paid. Board of Governors member Alan Levine said the money approved Wednesday "takes some of the pressure off the donors" now funding name, image and likeness deals and ensures "we put our universities in as advantageous a position as possible to compete." The settlement, approved June 6 by U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken of the Northern District of California, in part establishes a 10-year model for NCAA Division I schools to expand rosters and directly pay athletes for their names, images and likenesses. "They're already out there trying to sign contracts with these athletes," Levine said. "And if we don't act, there's a really good chance that our institutions will be severely disadvantaged. I don't think anybody wants that." Spending is capped per school Payments, expected to go primarily to students who play football and men's basketball, would be in addition to currently allowed individual name, image and likeness deals, where money is often raised and distributed through what are known as "collectives" and other organizations tied to schools. Under the settlement, schools that opt in to the plan could spend up to a capped amount on direct payments and roster-expanding scholarships. For the 2025-2026 school year, the cap would be set at $20.5 million per school. Peter Collins, chairman of the Florida State University Board of Trustees, said not every Florida school will reach the cap. "I don't know for sure everybody else around the table, but I know we will, because everybody that we play is spending in the cap," Collins said. The cap is based on calculations involving media, ticket and sponsorship revenue at schools in what are known as the "Power 5" conferences --- the Atlantic Coast Conference, Big Ten, Big 12, Southeastern Conference and Pac-12 --- and at Notre Dame. The additional $2 million being offered to schools would cover back-pay of certain athletes who played before name, image and likeness deals became legal in 2021.
Forbes
43 minutes ago
- Forbes
What Employers Should Know As The Immigration Crackdown Escalates
Law enforcement walk with Leonardo Fabian Cando Juntamay as he was detained in the Bronx during ... More ICE-led operations on January 28, 2025, in New York. Employers must navigate a perilous legal landscape if employees lose legal status or encounter Immigration and Customs Enforcement.(Photo by Matt McClain/The Washington Post via Getty Images) Employers must navigate a perilous legal landscape if employees lose legal status or encounter Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The Trump administration ended humanitarian parole for over 500,000 people and has terminated Temporary Protected Status for several hundred thousand individuals. That loss of authorized workers combined with raids on businesses and arresting people at courthouses leaves many employers and employees in legal danger. On June 12, 2025, the Trump administration ended the CHNV humanitarian parole program for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans, removing work authorization for up to 528,000 people. Workers with Temporary Protected Status from Haiti, Venezuela, Afghanistan and other countries are also seeing their employment authorization terminated. Employers may not realize workers previously authorized are now unable to work legally. In guidance to clients, Chris Thomas of Holland & Hart recommends that businesses check their records to know if their employees have lost employment authorization. 'The government's recent publication could be construed as placing employers on notice that employees from the four affected countries, with CHNV parole, may no longer have employment authorization.' He advises employers to meet with employees and inquire if they received a government notice revoking work authorization and, if that's the case, ask for other evidence of the ability to work lawfully. Thomas notes that if an employee in a parole program applied for asylum, they may have an employment authorization document via that route. If an employee does not have an alternative form of work authorization, they should be informed their employment with the company may end on June 23, 2025. 'The approach is to offer 10 days in which to act once an employer has been placed on notice of a problem with an employee's status,' according to Thomas. 'Because the Department of Homeland Security typically allows employers 10 days to resolve issues identified during I-9 audits, applying the same time frame here offers a reasonable and practical approach to addressing this unexpected and sudden development.' If ICE comes to the workplace, a manager may feel a need to respond quickly, which could be a mistake. 'If there is any encounter with ICE or other form of immigration enforcement at a worksite, the employer should immediately reach out to an immigration attorney,' said Allen Orr of the Orr Immigration Law Firm. 'There can be a formal statement, such as 'It is our company policy that only our attorney can speak with federal agents. We will get them on the phone for you right now.'' Orr notes that employers can check employee records to see who will be affected by TPS or parole programs ending. 'Of course, it is unlawful for any employer to knowingly hire or employ any undocumented worker, so any action taken by employers that could reveal, expose or educate them to such knowledge, is a business decision,' he said. Orr recommends businesses have contingency plans that include what happens if ICE shows up at a worksite, if an employee is unexpectedly missing from a work site, recruitment they may need to backfill if a problem presents itself and the proactive steps the company wishes to take on their employment verification process and audit procedures. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller speaks to reporters outside the West Wing of the ... More White House on April 18, 2025. (Photo by) Businesses should be under no illusions that they will be immune to immigration enforcement. After hearing from company executives alarmed at the negative labor market impacts of the administration's immigration policy, Donald Trump announced on social media, 'Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace.' Reuters reported, 'ICE issued guidance that day pausing most immigration enforcement at agricultural, hospitality and food processing businesses.' A few days later, DHS reversed the policy, stating, 'Worksite enforcement remains a cornerstone of our efforts to safeguard public safety, national security and economic stability.' Stephen Miller ordered ICE to arrest 3,000 people a day to achieve one million deportations a year and to go to Home Depot and other businesses rather than focus on criminals. That helped precipitate the ICE arrests in Los Angeles and the protests that followed. The reversal from Trump's statement leaves many believing Stephen Miller is the most powerful person in the administration on immigration policy. When employees lose employment authorization, it places workers and employers in jeopardy. According to Chris Thomas, 'Failure to take affirmative steps to address such a situation could lead to significant legal consequences.'
