logo
This tennis star almost gave up hope of becoming an Australian. Then came a ‘fairytale'

This tennis star almost gave up hope of becoming an Australian. Then came a ‘fairytale'

It took a second secret meeting to kickstart Kasatkina's move. Morris made another attempt during this year's Australian Open in January. This time, there was nothing casual about it.
After the second approach from Kasatkina's management, Tiley and co. agreed to help make the switch happen, and to do the heavy lifting with the Department of Home Affairs. They supplied her with a letter supporting her application 'for people who have an internationally recognised record of exceptional and outstanding achievement in an eligible area', which includes sport.
It's not unusual for athletes to switch allegiances and play for Australia. Kasatkina is not the first athlete, nor even the first tennis player, to do so. But TA remains tight-lipped about the specifics of its involvement in her case, and the Department of Home Affairs does not comment on individual cases. However, a spokesperson told this masthead in April that there was 'no general power to waive or vary the eligibility requirements for Australian citizenship'.
Even as the wheels clicked into motion this January, Kasatkina did not find out that TA would support her application until after her tight fourth-round defeat to Emma Navarro, to avoid distraction.
'Australia is one of the best places I've been, honestly,' Kasatkina told this masthead as she prepares to compete at Wimbledon for the first time as an Australian.
Loading
'I was going there only for the Aussie swing, but I was always amazed by the level of happiness there, and I was jealous of the people who live there because I have, let's say, [contrasting] examples to compare. This is a fairytale, for sure.'
Everything went at warp speed from there. In March, Kasatkina announced that she had gained permanent residency in Australia and would represent her new country from then on.
Kasatkina plans to call Melbourne home, and will make the almost 24-hour trip from London to her new city after Wimbledon to, in her words, 'activate' her residency and get the wheels in motion to become a citizen.
Of most interest now is when the world No.16 and 2022 Roland-Garros semi-finalist, who has won eight WTA singles titles and $US13.6 million prizemoney, will be able to compete for Australia in the Billie Jean King Cup.
A source familiar with the situation, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told this masthead there was an outside chance that Kasatkina could make her debut for Australia in the BJK Cup playoff in Hobart in November – but there is still great uncertainty.
The International Tennis Federation, which does not comment on individual cases, changed the rules from January 1, 2015 to stop players from representing more than one country in the BJK Cup or Davis Cup, but players and/or federations can request an exemption.
In Kasatkina's favour is that Russian athletes remain 'stateless' due to the ongoing war in Ukraine. She represented Russia as a junior and won the BJK Cup title as a professional in 2021.
Ajla Tomljanovic, who switched allegiances from Croatia to Australia, successfully appealed the rule change on the basis she applied for an Australian passport before it was implemented.
However, five years passed between her gaining residency in 2014 and the ITF letting her represent Australia in the BJK Cup. She became a citizen in 2018.
Kasatkina has not set foot in Russia since the interview in which she announced her sexuality and revealed that she was in a relationship with champion figure skater Zabiiako, who travels everywhere with her. The pair recently announced their engagement.
She is hopeful of being allowed to represent Australia in November.
'But you never know. We cannot say yes, or no. We're in the process, and let's see how it's going to turn out, if it's going to be that quick. I mean, it's sort of a miracle, but I'm a kid [at heart], so I believe in miracles.'
If that does not eventuate, Kasatkina's first chance to compete in front of her new fans will be at next year's Australian Open, a prospect she has already thought about.
'It's a bit stressful. Honestly, I never experienced that amount of support for me,' she said.
'Coming to the slams and seeing how they treat the locals, in terms of support, I always wondered how I would feel to have a home slam and a home crowd. I never thought it was going to happen … but it's going to be big – a huge, massive motivation, and it can only bring you up.'
Loading
Being Australian marks a new beginning and has already brought experiences she never had before, from increased media attention to a fresh legion of fans and importantly, freedom to be open about her relationship.
At the same time, Kasatkina conceded it was heartbreaking to officially break ties with Russia.
Last year, she told CBS News that she worried about her parents, who decided to stay in Russia. Three of her brothers have left the country. She said she hoped they would not suffer reprisals over her actions.
Aside from worry for her family, it's also difficult for her to leave the land of her birth.
'Growing up there, and now saying bye to this part, it's very difficult,' Kasatkina said.
'But life gives you challenges, and here I am. I found my family on my own, and I found my place on my own. I'm just happy this place [Australia] is accepting others and in harmony with everyone.
'I think that's actually what amazed me the most in Australia – the Australian mentality that everyone is accepted, and everyone knows how to communicate with each other. Of course, it's tough, but after a night, there's always a sunrise.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New $2 billion plan to shift kids with autism or development delays off NDIS could be ‘generational reform'
New $2 billion plan to shift kids with autism or development delays off NDIS could be ‘generational reform'

7NEWS

time2 hours ago

  • 7NEWS

New $2 billion plan to shift kids with autism or development delays off NDIS could be ‘generational reform'

Children with autism who rely on the NDIS for support will be diverted to a new program, touted by disability groups as a 'once-in-a-generation' reform. Disability Minister Mark Butler used a speech at the National Press Club on Wednesday to say the NDIS was not the right fit for the growing number of children on the autism spectrum or with developmental delays. WATCH THE VIDEO ABOVE: Government plans to shake up disability support for children. A separate program called Thriving Kids will be set up to focus on those children previously covered by the NDIS. It will begin rolling out from July 2026 and be fully implemented by July 2027. Children with autism on the NDIS would not be steered from the scheme until supports were fully rolled out, the minister said. 'I know this will be hard for some parents to hear and I don't say it lightly,' Butler said in the speech. 'We need as a matter of some urgency to create a better system that will enable our children to thrive. 'Diverting this group of kids over time from the NDIS is an important element of making the scheme sustainable and returning it to its original intent.' 'Once-in-a-generation change' Medicare items for occupational therapy, speech pathology and psychosocial therapy would be considered for the program, including a bulk-billed check-up for three-year-olds, Butler said. The federal government would start by making a $2 billion contribution, matched by states and territories. Early intervention strategies were key for ensuring children received the right support, Autism Awareness chief executive Nicole Rogerson said. '(Thriving Kids) potentially has the opportunity to be a once-in-a-generation change in how we look at developmental pediatrics,' she said. She said what Butler was doing was 'pretty rare for a politician' because he was 'owning what the problem is'. Rogerson told 7NEWS: 'The structural problem has become so big that children with any kind of developmental delay are now getting a label of autism, in order to get assistance from the NDIS and that's inflated the numbers.' Ensuring the program was in place before children were moved from the scheme was reassuring, People with Disability acting chief executive Megan Spindler-Smith said. 'That terrifies me' Since the announcement, many families have shared their concern. Australian mum Kaili Metani's daughters live with autism and she said the NDIS saved their lives. 'My youngest daughter was told when she was diagnosed that she would never walk or talk and it's only because of therapy that she is able to,' she told 7NEWS. She feared the new program, if not implemented correctly, would lead to a 'generation who are unsupported, and that terrifies me'. The minister said while one in 50 people had a significant disability which would be covered by the NDIS, one in five young children were on the autism spectrum or had a developmental delay. Parents had little choice but to put their children with autism on a scheme designed for permanent disability, Butler said. 'Families who were looking for additional supports in mainstream services can't find them because they largely don't exist anymore and in that, all governments have failed them,' he said. Butler said the changes would help to bring down the cost of the NDIS, with taxpayers set to fork out more than $52 billion for the scheme in 2025/26. Laws passed in 2024 put in place a cap on spending growth of eight per cent per year. 'Even under that scenario, the NDIS is still forecast to cost $105 billion and will increase its share of GDP by 0.5 per cent over the coming decade,' Butler said. 'That's the equivalent of growth in Medicare, defence and aged care spending combined — measured as a share of GDP.' The minister said the existing level of growth was unsustainable and a cap of between five and six per cent would be more effective. 'After we achieve our current target, a further wave of reform will be needed to get growth down to a more sustainable position,' he said. 'There's no significant change in disability prevalence in the community and the scheme is now fully rolled out. So growth should really reflect unit price inflation plus growth in Australia's population.' Autism peak body Aspect said families needed the right level of support. 'Given the number of autistic children we support through our schools and therapy programs, families must have confidence there will be continuity of supports, real choice and control, and no gaps during the transition,' chief executive Jacqui Borland said

Bigger properties occupied by smaller households in major housing mismatch, Cotality finds
Bigger properties occupied by smaller households in major housing mismatch, Cotality finds

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

Bigger properties occupied by smaller households in major housing mismatch, Cotality finds

In a reminder of how broken housing affordability and access is, new analysis highlights a major mismatch between the size of Australian homes and the number of people living in them. While the vast bulk of Australian housing is built for larger families, property research firm Cotality has found more than 60 per cent of households are made up of just one or two people. It reveals a misalignment between "who lives in our homes and the kinds of homes we're building", Cotality's head of head of Australian research Eliza Owen said in the report. "Of the lone-person households in Australia, the data suggests around 40 per cent are aged 65 and over," Ms Owen said. "The highest share of households is two people, but the highest share of housing has three bedrooms. "While there's nothing wrong with more bedrooms than people in a dwelling, there could be some inefficiencies in the way housing is being allocated," Ms Owen said. "After all, a 'traditional' family of four may have more need for a three-bedroom dwelling than a household of two people." The report cited data from the 2021 Census, which showed there were more two-person family households in three-bedroom dwellings (about 1.3 million), than three or four-person family households (about 1.1 million). Ms Owen has suggested a way to fix the "efficiency question", which she knows is not politically appealing — send a price signal. "Governments could make it more expensive to have more housing than you need, and cheaper to live in smaller housing," she wrote in her research note. She said that logic often leads to calls for tax reform including abolishing stamp duty to cheaper to move between housing, replacing it with a broad-based land tax (which raises costs the more land you own). "These options are both politically difficult as it would involve moving from a tax that applies to a small amount of voters each year who purchase property to one that will tax two thirds of voters (property owners)," she noted. Independent housing researcher Cameron Kusher, speaking to The Business in July, argued high transaction costs, namely stamp duty, discourage moving to a "better sized property" and can lead to people purchasing larger homes than they need to begin with. "People just feel like if I can get a better and bigger home sooner, that's a better outcome," he said. "If we look at what is being built, it's usually very large houses, four or five bedrooms, taking up most of the land on these new housing sites," Mr Kusher said. "A lot of it comes down to how much a piece of a property, [and] how much the land and the house, costs. "I think a lot of people are building bigger homes, thinking 'I'll spend a little bit more up-front and my family will grow into this home'. "It might just be a couple grandkids, or they're planning to have a couple of kids." He noted the effects of rapidly increasing property prices, which can leave people priced out of re-entering the market, and the fact that larger properties can be more likely to appreciate in value at a faster pace. Cotality's Ms Owen said other policy options to encourage people to move into appropriately sized homes could include reforming pension asset tests to include the value of the family home. "Strides are already being taken on the supply side to establish well-located apartments in our larger cities, that can accommodate smaller households. "But shifting demand through tax reform could help the take-up of these new homes." The government has accepted it is not on track to meet the target to build 1.2 million homes in five years, but Treasurer Jim Chalmers has stood by the ambition, despite Treasury advice it would not be met. In another recent note, Ms Owen questioned the focus of state and federal governments on speeding up building approvals to boost housing supply, warning that the construction industry simply cannot keep pace. "With completion times already above average and construction costs elevated, it seems an odd time to be incentivising more dwelling approvals and commencements," she said. Cameron Kusher argued past experience could be a guide on how to approach today's housing problems and ease the construction crunch. "Maybe we need to go back to how things were 30 or 40 years ago, where you have smaller homes and you make them easy to renovate," he told The Business. "Over time, people can actually add bedrooms, bathrooms, car parks, verandahs and all these sorts of things to add value to the home.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store