Ukraine fears fresh offensive to coincide with US-Russia summit
Volodymyr Zelenskiy
has warned that Russian troops seem to be preparing for a new offensive rather than ceasefire and said his country must be involved in talks on its future, in advance of Friday's
US-Russia summit in Alaska
.
Mr Zelenskiy is expected to join online talks hosted by Germany on Wednesday with several European leaders, top European Union and Nato officials and US president
Donald Trump
, as Kyiv's military tries to shore up leaky defences in the eastern Donetsk region.
'We all support President Trump's determination, and together we must ... not allow Russia to deceive the world once again,' said Mr Zelenskiy on Tuesday. 'We see that the Russian army is not preparing to end the war. On the contrary, they are making movements that indicate preparations for new offensive operations.'
Ukrainian and western analysts who monitor the battlefield say Russian troops have advanced about 10km in recent days near the eastern mining town of Dobropillia, as they try to surround the nearby small cities of Pokrovsk and Kostyantynivka.
READ MORE
If they were to fall, it would exert further pressure on Kyiv's two main remaining strongholds in Donetsk region – the cities of Slovyansk and Kramatorsk.
'The situation is quite chaotic, as the enemy, having found gaps in the defence, is infiltrating deeper, trying to quickly consolidate and accumulate forces for further advancement,' said Ukrainian analyst
DeepState
, which maps the ever-changing battlefield.
The Ukrainian military acknowledged but downplayed the development, claiming that only small groups of Russian troops were sneaking through the front line and were being destroyed before establishing a foothold in the rear and bringing up reinforcements.
The first
Azov corps
of Ukraine's national guard said it had deployed to the area in recent days: 'The situation remains complex ... Units of the corps have planned and taken measures to block enemy forces in a designated area.'
A Russian strike on a bus station in Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine, at the weekend. Photograph: EPA
A respected military analyst and former Ukrainian soldier who uses the name Tatarigami_UA on social media noted that Russia had also launched big offensives before peace talks in 2014 and 2015, when fighting was confined to eastern Ukraine. Moscow has claimed this week to have made a significant breakthrough near Dobropillia.
'The current situation is serious, but far from the collapse some suggest,' he said. 'A collapse ... means a loss of command and control, a breakdown in battlefield awareness, and an inability to regroup, withdraw in an organised fashion, or co-ordinate with units. To the best of my knowledge, none of these conditions are currently present.'
News from the battlefield deepened Ukrainian anxiety in advance of talks between Mr Trump and
Russian president Vladimir Putin
.
Kyiv and European capitals fear they want to clinch a quick, sweeping agreement to end the war and present it to Ukraine and the world as a done deal.
'As for the negotiations ... they are important at the level of leaders, but it is impossible to talk about Ukraine without Ukraine and no one will accept it,' said Mr Zelenskiy.
'Therefore, the conversation between Putin and Trump may be important for their bilateral track. But they cannot agree anything about Ukraine without us. I really believe and hope that the US president understands and recognises this.'
On Monday evening, all EU leaders except Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orban agreed on a statement that 'the path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine ... The European Union underlines the inherent right of Ukraine to choose its own destiny and will continue supporting Ukraine on its path towards EU membership.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
17 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Why the Trump-Putin meeting worries Europe
Confirmation last week that US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin would hold a summit in Alaska raised a red flag for Europe and Ukraine. With no Ukrainian or European involvement, and the expiry of a US deadline to impose sanctions on Moscow coming to nothing, it looked like Russia was getting it all its own way. Ukraine and Europe's chief concern for most of the past week has been that Mr Trump and Mr Putin could strike a deal in Alaska that would force Ukraine to cede about one-fifth of its territory to Russia - regions in eastern and southern Ukraine currently occupied by Russian forces. There would be some "land swapping", Mr Trump told reporters in the White House earlier this week. It was beginning to sound like another Yalta, the conference held in Crimea in February 1945 between Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin where the two Western allies gave in to the Soviet leader's demands to redraw the map of Eastern Europe and control it. Of course, Russia's leader wants more Ukrainian land than the 19% currently occupied by his forces. He wants Ukraine to withdraw entirely from the four regions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia and to have Russia's annexation of those regions, along with Crimea, internationally recognised as the main price for stopping the war. Official recognition of Russian control of any seized territory is unacceptable for Europe, and naturally for Ukraine. Problematically for Europe, in April the Trump administration offered the Kremlin a very generous deal to stop the war that reportedly included official US recognition of Russia's control of Crimea and de facto recognition of Russian-occupied territory in eastern and southern Ukraine. US recognition of Crimea still on table Though Russia rejected the offer at the time, the US position had not changed. That would mean that official US recognition of Crimea as part of Russia is still on the table. In the eyes of European governments, allowing Russia to change international borders through force would simply embolden Mr Putin to rearm and invade Ukraine again in the coming years, and next time take it all. Or Russia could threaten the security of a NATO member state in Eastern Europe. Either scenario threatens the future of European security. It explains why this week there was a flurry of diplomatic activity in European capitals to impress upon Mr Trump the need to distrust the Russian leader's assurances. On Tuesday, the leaders of all EU member states except Hungary endorsed a letter supporting Ukraine's right to decide its own future and also that any diplomatic solution to the war in Ukraine must protect the security interests of Ukrainians and Europeans - which brings Ukraine's future security needs a step closer to Europe's. Then followed a meeting called by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz between Mr Trump, other European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Trump now reading territorial issue European lobbying seems to have had an effect on how Mr Trump is now reading the territorial issue. According to sources familiar with the meeting, the US president told the other leaders during Wednesday's call that he would not negotiate a division of Ukrainian territory. That assurance bodes well for Ukraine and Europe. It was also reported by US media that Mr Trump told the other attendees that the US could play a role in offering a security guarantee to Ukraine, though no details have emerged of what level of engagement that might be. If that is the case, then it would be the first time that Mr Trump has committed to protecting Ukraine's post-war security alongside the Europeans. There is also a strong possibility that during the Alaska meeting Mr Putin will bring up Russia's original list of demands given to the Biden administration in December 2021 just two months before Russia invaded Ukraine. Presented by Russian officials at the time as a formula for decreasing geopolitical tension in Europe, one of the demands required the West to give security guarantees to Russia. In reality, the demands looked like a Russian attempt to regain its former sphere of influence over all of Eastern Europe. The most notable demand was for NATO to withdraw its troops and weapons from countries in Eastern Europe that joined the alliance from the late 1990s onwards. Doing so would leave countries like Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia particularly exposed to the threat of Russian aggression. For almost 80 years, the US has provided Europe (first Western Europe and then Eastern Europe from the late 1990s onwards) with a security guarantee, and American and European leaders have always worked in lockstep when it comes to the continent's security. Mr Trump is the first post-war US president to cast doubts about the future of that ironclad security guarantee, leading to commitments earlier this year from European governments to ramp up spending on their national defence budgets. Another point of concern for Europe is that some kind of economic deal between the US and Russia could come from the Alaska meeting. This scenario would be to the detriment of US-Europe relations given that the Europe is already hitting Russia with heavy sanctions. Back in March when the Trump-Putin relationship had briefly blossomed, the White House spoke about the "enormous economic deals" that could arise from better US-Russia relations. At the same time, Mr Putin spoke about the possibility of energy sector cooperation. Not surprisingly, the Kremlin returned to the theme of US-Russia economic cooperation this week. Yesterday, a senior member of the Russian delegation was talking about the "huge untapped potential" of trade cooperation between the two countries. That kind of talk will make Europe feel nervous that Mr Trump could preference business over decades-old alliances. Mr Putin is bringing both Russia's finance minister and the head of Russia's direct investment fund as part of his delegation which indicates that Russia is going to lay out business opportunities for the US. Mr Trump is a businessman and may be won over. But just as Mr Trump is unpredictable, so too is the outcome of the meeting later today at the Elmendorf-Richardson Joint Base outside Anchorage. European leaders, like the rest of us, will have to wait and see what Mr Trump and Mr Putin agree upon and what it will mean for Ukraine.
Irish Times
17 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Intel shares jump on possible US government investment
Shares in Intel jumped more than 7 per cent on Thursday after reports that the Trump administration had discussed an unusual move to acquire an ownership stake as part of a plan to revive the troubled US chipmaker. The proposal emerged after President Donald Trump met Intel's chief executive Lip-Bu Tan earlier this week, according to one person familiar with the discussion, who cautioned that details were still being worked out and the talks could fall apart. A possible US acquisition of a stake in a publicly traded company underscores the Trump administration's increasingly interventionist approach to corporate America. The talks around Intel, which were first reported by Bloomberg, come after chips groups Nvidia and AMD struck a deal that would allow them to sell more advanced artificial intelligence chips in China in exchange for offering a share of the sales revenues to the government. READ MORE Earlier this year, the administration also took a so-called golden share in US Steel as a condition to clearing its takeover by Japan's Nippon Steel, giving Washington veto power over critical decisions. Intel declined to comment on the talks but said: 'Intel is deeply committed to supporting President Trump's efforts to strengthen US technology and manufacturing leadership. We look forward to continuing our work with the Trump administration.' White House spokesman Kush Desai said 'discussion about hypothetical deals should be regarded as speculation unless officially announced by the administration'. Mr Tan met Mr Trump alongside commerce secretary Howard Lutnick and treasury secretary Scott Bessent on Monday, after the president last week called on the CEO to resign. [ Donald Trump calls on new Intel chief to resign Opens in new window ] Mr Trump praised Mr Tan after the meeting and said his administration would hold talks to Intel and 'bring suggestions to me during the next week'. Crucial to the decision to get involved with Intel was Mr Trump's desire to revive the company's factory in Ohio, the person said. In 2022, Intel said the site could become the largest semiconductor facility in the world, but the timeline has repeatedly slipped. Mr Tan took over the top role in March from Pat Gelsinger , who had invested heavily in manufacturing and was ousted by Intel's board. A capital injection from Washington could help restart momentum and ease pressure on a company already cutting costs and shedding jobs. Intel's chip manufacturing business has incurred billions of dollars in losses as it struggles to compete with Taiwan's TSMC. The company is undergoing a big restructuring internationally and there have been reports that it plans to cut up to 20 per cent of its global workforce. The Irish operation has been notified of the need for 195 compulsory redundancies, just under 4 per cent of the 5,000 staff based mostly at the Lexilip plant in Co Kildare where it has operated for the past 32 years. Last month, Mr Tan said the company was abandoning already-paused manufacturing projects in Germany and Poland and slowing construction in Ohio to address the losses. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Eight hundred National Guard troops mobilised for DC
All 800 National Guard troops who were ordered to the US capital Washington to aid law enforcement personnel by US President Donald Trump have now been mobilised, the Pentagon said. Mr Trump ordered the deployment - which follows a similar move during protests in Los Angeles in June - as part of what he billed as a crackdown on crime in Washington, where violent offenses are in fact down. "As of today, all 800 Army and Air National Guardsmen are mobilised... as part of Joint Task Force DC, and they are now here in our capital," Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson told journalists. They "will assist the DC Metropolitan Police Department and federal law enforcement partners with monument security, community safety patrols, protecting federal facilities and officers" and traffic control posts, Ms Wilson said. The troops "will remain until law and order has been restored in the District, as determined by the president," she added. The US Army later said the National Guard's initial mission "is to provide a visible presence in key public areas, serving as a visible crime deterrent." "They will not arrest, search, or direct law enforcement," but they "have the authority to temporarily detain individuals to prevent imminent harm," the army said in a statement. The troops will be equipped with protective gear, it added, saying that weapons would be available if needed but would remain in the armory. Mr Trump announced the National Guard deployment - along with a federal takeover of the city's police department - on Monday, vowing "to take our capital back." In a further tightening of control, US Attorney General Pam Bondi signed an order late yesterday granting the head of the federal Drug Enforcement Administration the executive powers of Washington police chief, codifying the federal takeover of the capital's law enforcement. The overwhelmingly Democratic US capital faces allegations from Republican politicians that it is overrun by crime, plagued by homelessness and financially mismanaged. However, data from Washington police shows significant drops in violent crime between 2023 and 2024, although that was coming off the back of a post-pandemic surge. The deployment of troops in Washington comes after Mr Trump dispatched the National Guard and Marines to quell unrest in Los Angeles, California, that was spurred by immigration enforcement raids. It was the first time since 1965 that a US president deployed the National Guard against the wishes of a state governor. Most National Guard forces answer to state governors and have to be 'federalised' to be brought under presidential control, but in Washington these troops already report only to the US president.
