Sweden stunned by new deadly gun attack
Gunfire erupted in the center of Uppsala a day before a spring festival which draws more than 100,000 people to the city some 60 kilometers north of Stockholm.
Police, who confirmed three dead, said the attack was staged by a masked gunman. Media reports said at least one suspect escaped on an electric scooter after the early evening shootout.
Justice Minister Gunnar Strommer called the killings "extremely serious" but police would not say if it was the latest episode in a long running gang war. Sweden is also recovering from its worst mass shooting in February.
"We have three people confirmed dead, but we have not confirmed their identities," police spokesman Magnus Jansson Klarin said.
"We received reports of a masked person on an electric scooter, we are looking into those reports," he said, adding that door-to-door inquiries were being carried out around the scene of the shooting.
Swedish media said witnesses heard several shots at a hair salon in the center of the city.
The SVT public broadcaster said one of the dead had been a suspect in an investigation into a planned attack against a relative of a gang leader, Ismail Abdo.
"It's normally a quiet neighborhood, I do my shopping here every day," said Elias Sundgren, a student at the local university.
Uppsala's mayor Erik Pelling said he was "shocked and dismayed" by events.
"I am also angry that it could happen," he added.
"We are forced to live with these crimes. I am frustrated that we have not been able to tackle this problem more effectively," Pelling said.
The shooting came a day before Uppsala holds the Valborg festival to mark the start of spring. While police sealed off the streets around the hair salon — and a drone flew overhead — they sought to reassure the huge number of visitors expected.
"People should not be afraid to come tomorrow," Klarin said.
"There are 100,000 to 150,000 people expected in Uppsala for Valborg tomorrow, and there are already a whole lot here today."
On Feb. 4, the country was rocked by its worst mass shooting when 35-year-old Rickard Andersson entered the Campus Risbergska adult education center in the city of Orebro and shot dead 10 people before turning the gun on himself.
Sweden has struggled for years to rein in shootings and bombings between rival gangs. Earlier this month, two people were killed in a suspected gang fight in Gothenburg. A renowned rapper was shot dead in a gang battle in Gothenburg last year.
Perpetrators are often young teens who are hired as contract killers because they are under 15, the age of criminal responsibility in Sweden. The number of reported gang deaths fell in 2024 however.
In the country of 10.6 million people, 92 cases of deadly violence were recorded in 2024, 29 fewer than 2023, and the lowest level since 2014, according to official data.
There were 296 reported shooting cases in 2024, a 20% decrease from the year before, according to the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (Bra).
Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson's center-right minority government, which is backed in parliament by the anti-immigration Sweden Democrats, came to power in 2022 with a vow to get tough on crime.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
2 hours ago
- The Diplomat
How a Thai Influencer is Profiting From the Border Conflict With Thailand
In an age in which social media has become a primary political battleground, a disturbing phenomenon has taken root: the transformation of a political conflict into a commodity. The case of Thai social media influencer Praiwan Wannabut, who has 4.4 million followers on Facebook, serves as a particularly salient and deeply troubling example of this trend. Recent Facebook posts include one on July 24, the day that fighting broke out between Thai and Cambodian troops along the border, in which he posted a photo of a Swedish Gripen jet fighter, with the caption, 'Until Cambodia is defeated and begs to return to negotiation table.' Another post from that day featured a similar photo with the caption, 'Can we target 6 bombs on Hun Sen's house?', referring to Cambodia's former prime minister, who has played a prominent role in the recent border dispute. The following day, he posted, 'our canons already killed more than 100 Khmer soldiers.' These recent posts reveal a cynical exploitation of genuine geopolitical tension for personal gain. This phenomenon raises serious questions about the nature of modern nationalism and the ethical decay that occurs when engagement metrics take precedence over human lives. This issue is particularly pressing given Praiwan's religious and academic background. Prior to becoming an internet personality, he served for 18 years as a monk, rising to become a celebrated scholar who completed the highest level of Pali studies in Thailand and earned a Master's degree in both Buddhist studies and law. At one point, he enrolled in a doctorate program in Peace Studies. Ironically, this academic journey, which should have cultivated a deep understanding of non-violence, conflict resolution, and the historical roots of discord, stands in stark contrast to his actions. The current tension between Thailand and Cambodia is rooted in a history of shifting borders, competing national narratives, and judicial rulings that both sides interpret to their advantage. A true scholar of peace would understand these complexities and use their platform to advocate for diplomacy and reconciliation rather than to amplify calls for confrontation. Praiwan is sadly not an isolated case. He is but one figure in a broader landscape where influencers, driven by hidden agendas, have turned the ongoing border dispute into a digital battleground. On both sides of the border, social media personalities and content creators have seized on the heightened tensions. Reports have documented how Thai celebrities and online personalities have been pressured to choose between patriotism and neutrality, with some using nationalist rhetoric to gain followers, while others have been criticized for advocating for peace. Concurrently, Cambodian influencers have been accused of spreading fabricated videos and stories aimed at stoking public outrage against Thailand. The monetization of conflict is not the work of a single individual, but a systemic problem where a network of influencers on both sides profits from and perpetuates a cycle of hostility, all under the guise of patriotic duty. Instead of using his platform to question the military's role or to advocate for diplomatic solutions, Praiwan chose to align himself with the nationalist narrative, becoming an echo chamber for pro-military sentiment. This shift was a calculated choice to remain within the safe confines of mainstream patriotic discourse, thereby preserving his influence and avoiding the risks that a true critical stance would entail. His newfound militaristic fervor is a testament to the idea that, for some influencers, social justice is a brand to be worn, but which is immediately jettisoned the moment it challenges the fundamental pillars of state power. The most insidious aspect of this phenomenon is its economic engine. Social media platforms are driven by algorithms that are hard-wired to promote content that elicits strong emotional reactions. Hate, anger, and national pride are among the most potent of these emotions, guaranteeing high engagement rates through likes, shares, and comments. This, in turn, leads to increased ad revenue. Praiwan's public bragging about his Facebook income is a chilling demonstration of how social media has created a direct, financial incentive to incite hatred. For the influencer, war and conflict, far from being matters of human suffering and death, serve as content generators. This system creates a self-perpetuating cycle where the more hateful the content, the more profitable it becomes, all while dehumanizing the 'other' and normalizing the idea of violence as a solution. This brand of nationalism, fueled by social media, is particularly dangerous because it is inorganic. It is a manufactured sentiment, a product sold to the public that benefits only a few. This commercialization of patriotism warps the very meaning of national identity, transforming it from a source of shared heritage and pride into a tool for profit. The dangers of this trend are far-reaching. It corrupts public discourse by replacing thoughtful analysis with emotional rhetoric. It makes a mockery of education and intellectualism by showing that even the most rigorous academic training is no match for the lure of social media profit. Most critically, it erodes the very foundations of democracy and international relations by turning citizens into passive consumers of a conflict they are actively encouraged to participate in from behind a screen. To combat this, we need a multi-pronged approach. First, there must be a greater push for media literacy education, teaching the public to be skeptical of emotionally charged content and to recognize the difference between genuine information and performative outrage. Second, social media platforms must be held accountable for the content they promote. They need to reform their algorithms to de-prioritize hate and misinformation and be transparent about their monetization policies. Finally, influencers themselves must be called to a higher ethical standard. As public figures with immense reach, they have a responsibility to use their platforms to build bridges, not to burn them down for a paycheck. The ultimate goal is to create a digital landscape where peace and cooperation are more profitable than conflict and hate, ensuring that the 'angels of history' are not silenced by the deafening clang of the cash register.
Japan Today
6 days ago
- Japan Today
Trump told Norwegian minister he wants Nobel Prize, newspaper says
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump takes a question from the press during a visit to the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 13, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo When U.S. President Donald Trump called Norway's finance minister last month to discuss tariffs, he also told him he wanted the Nobel Peace Prize, Norwegian business daily Dagens Naeringsliv reported on Thursday. Several countries including Israel, Pakistan and Cambodia have nominated Trump for brokering peace agreements or ceasefires, and he has said he deserves the Norwegian-bestowed accolade that four White House predecessors received. "Out of the blue, while Finance Minister Jens Stoltenberg was walking down the street in Oslo, Donald Trump called," Dagens Naeringsliv reported, citing unnamed sources. "He wanted the Nobel Prize - and to discuss tariffs." In a comment to Reuters, Stoltenberg said the call was to discuss tariffs and economic cooperation ahead of Trump's call with Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Stoere. "I will not go into further detail about the content of the conversation," he added. Several White House officials, including U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer were on the call, Stoltenberg added. The White House and the Norwegian Nobel Committee did not reply to requests for comment. With hundreds of candidates nominated each year, laureates are chosen by the Norwegian Nobel Committee, whose five members are appointed by Norway's parliament according to the will of Swedish 19th-century industrialist Alfred Nobel. The announcement comes in October in Oslo. The Norwegian newspaper said it was not the first time Trump had brought up the prize in conversation with Stoltenberg, a former secretary general of the NATO military alliance. The White House on July 31 announced a 15% tariff on imports from Norway, the same as the European Union. Stoltenberg said on Wednesday that Norway and the United States were still in talks regarding the tariffs. © Thomson Reuters 2025.
The Mainichi
05-08-2025
- The Mainichi
News in Easy English: Japan's governors ask for better support for foreigners
TOKYO -- The National Governors' Association in Japan has made new suggestions to help foreigners and create a multicultural society. Shizuoka Gov. Yasutomo Suzuki gave these ideas to Justice Minister Keisuke Suzuki on July 30. The national government often sees foreigners as "workers." But local governments see them as people living in the community, just like Japanese citizens. The governors want a new organization to manage multicultural policies in Japan. The governors say that as more foreigners come to Japan, help with Japanese language and daily life is often left to municipalities. They say this is not just a problem for some areas, but "will clearly become a major national issue" in the future. The governors want a new central group, different from the Immigration Services Agency, to manage these issues. They also want a new law to support both national and local multicultural policies. The governors say the national government should give more money to help local areas and share important information with foreign residents. Japan has a shortage of workers, especially in the countryside. The governors say the new system for training and hiring foreign workers should help bring and keep more workers in these areas. (Japanese original by Kentaro Mikami, Tokyo City News Department) Vocabulary governor: the leader of a prefecture in Japan multicultural: including people from many countries and cultures policy: a plan or rule made by leaders municipality: a city, town or village with its own local government Immigration Services Agency: a government office that manages people coming to live or work in Japan
