logo
I'm a CEO who's led teams in the US, Latin America, and Europe. One country's business culture stood out as the most sophisticated.

I'm a CEO who's led teams in the US, Latin America, and Europe. One country's business culture stood out as the most sophisticated.

This as-told-to essay is based on a transcribed conversation with 50-year-old Marco Santos, the Global CEO of GFT Technologies, an IT solutions company headquartered in Germany. The following has been edited for length and clarity.
I've worked in IT my entire career.
In 2011, I joined GFT as a country manager for Brazil.
I focused on growing our presence there, but over time, I assumed more responsibilities. I became the CEO of GFT USA and Latin America, and then CEO of the Americas as a whole, including Canada.
I was honored to become the company's global CEO in 2024, overseeing its strategic direction and over 12,000 employees. In July, I moved to Germany, where we're headquartered.
During my tenure at GFT, I've lived and worked across South America, North America, and Europe.
Here's what the work and business culture were like in each of those areas and how I think leaders can adapt to different environments where they may have to travel.
I joined GFT in Brazil after working for an IT consultancy.
I led a small operation of about 80 people, working for clients in Europe. We didn't have any clients in the local market.
I had to take a startup approach, focusing on growing the business and building a local client base in Brazil.
At that time, business culture in Latin America was very relationship-driven. Delivering on promises to build trust was very important.
I leveraged my IT connections in Brazil to build good relationships and open doors. I tried to meet with people I already knew in the market and had worked with before, talking with them about how GFT could meet their needs.
As we scaled, we were able to grow the business throughout Latin America more broadly. I assumed responsibility over GFT Costa Rica and Mexico, and then I assumed the whole of Latin America.
The US market is super competitive
I became CEO of GFT USA and Latin America in 2020. I couldn't fly to the US because of the COVID-19 pandemic, so I had to manage things remotely until moving to the US in July 2021.
Our US headquarters are in New York, where I'd travel frequently, but I chose to stay in Florida because some of our key clients were moving operations there. Florida was also a more convenient location for flying back and forth from Latin America.
I believe the US has the most sophisticated business environment in the world. I noticed clients are so open to new things. Innovation and transformation come before regulation.
With so much innovation, particularly in IT, there's a lot of competition. I had to come to understand the US market well and articulate the company's competitive advantage.
When we pitched to top banks, we communicated our previous experience in this area, how we solved problems for our clients, and the skills we had that no one else had.
Compared to Brazil, where pitches were more generic and often involved talking about who you are and what you can do, pitches in the US have a heightened focus on the metrics you achieved while solving problems for previous clients, and your key differentiators.
People in the US tend to be more direct and to the point than people in Brazil. They place a stronger emphasis on efficiency, key performance indicators, and return on investment. I learned a lot from my US colleagues and was eager to adapt to this communication style.
In Europe, I'm learning to navigate a longer decision-making process
I moved to Germany in July 2024. The former global CEO and I worked together as co-CEOs until January 2025, when I fully assumed the global CEO role.
Recently, I've noticed a desire to accelerate the pace of change in Europe, but compared to the US, the decision-making process takes longer here, and the culture is more risk-averse. If there's an opportunity to bring something new, there'll be a longer process to evaluate that new thing.
Across our clients, teams, and partners, there's a focus on planning strategically before implementing ideas. The culture requires you to look at all the options and scenarios, produce a comprehensive analysis of where you are and where you want to be, and create an operational plan. People will expect you to understand all the variables at play.
As GFT's CEO, I have to learn from this culture to ensure that I'm planning more and assessing all the scenarios before we execute something.
I've noticed that in Europe, once you do this comprehensive planning and come to an agreement, you can really start to execute, and things don't change.
Meanwhile, in the US, things accelerate very quickly, but they can also change very quickly due to the competitive environment. Even if you're doing a good job with a project, a competitor might come along and start outpacing you, so you may have to make rapid changes.
Leaders need to be adaptable to lead globally
As an executive, I have found it very enriching to travel to different continents and cultural contexts.
Coming to Europe is like experiencing a new world. It's multicultural, and it's relatively easy to visit different countries on the continent, so the diversity I'm experiencing is fantastic.
Living in different countries has developed my skills. Being a fast learner and an adaptable person are essential for strong leaders, especially in IT.
When changes happen in business, leaders with these skills should think about how to adapt and keep moving toward their long-term goals.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GoPro Stock Is on the Move After Earnings. Here's Why.
GoPro Stock Is on the Move After Earnings. Here's Why.

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

GoPro Stock Is on the Move After Earnings. Here's Why.

Key Points GoPro posted another decline in revenue, and extended its streak of bottom-line losses. The company is struggling with the "yesterday's news" aspect of its hardware products. 10 stocks we like better than GoPro › GoPro (NASDAQ: GPRO), one of a clutch of 2025-edition meme stocks that surged in price earlier this summer, hasn't been going very far this week. On Monday evening, the company published its latest quarterly earnings report, and this sapped any energy left in that meme rally. The following day, the stock suffered a nearly 4% decline, and in reading that earnings report, we can see why. A fuzzy picture Firstly, in line with several previous quarters, GoPro again reported a significant decrease in revenue. Its top line eroded by 18% year-over-year to land at $153 million. That was due largely to sales of its core product, action cameras, sliding by 23% to roughly 500,000 units. Subscription and service revenue, a relatively small but critical contributor to the top line, went sideways at $26 million. On a brighter note, GoPro managed to trim its net loss under both GAAP and non-GAAP (adjusted) standards. The adjusted net shortfall was $12 million, or $0.08 per share, exactly two-thirds narrower than the $36 million loss in the year-ago period. Yet it remained stubbornly in the red on the bottom line. Despite the rather negative investor reaction, GoPro actually posted a mixed quarter with those headline figures. After all, it beat the consensus analyst estimate for revenue (of just over $146 million), although it slightly missed for adjusted net loss ($0.07). But as any seasoned investor is aware, the law of gravity frequently applies with stocks. What comes up must come down, and for a stock that flies high -- like GoPro did when it was tagged with emotion-driven meme stock status in mid-July -- the fall to earth can be sharp and sudden. GoPro's decline hasn't (yet) been steep and it's still up 20% year to date; likely the revenue beat and only slight bottom-line miss have something to do with that. The trend isn't a friend But since I'm a fundamentals-focused investor and analyst, I think it's important to tease out the dynamics behind GoPro's numbers. It wasn't so long ago that the company's innovative adventure cameras were all the rage, propelling the stock's popularity. Before the COVID pandemic, people were getting out into the world, and social media sites like Meta Platforms' Instagram offered suitable venues for broadcasting footage of mountain bike rides, ski runs, exploratory walks in foreign cities, etc. What happened to reverse that trend? In a word, smartphones. The world is now packed full of these devices, which are affordable to folks of even modest means. Wrap a smartphone in a reasonably tough, weatherproof case -- which isn't a considerable investment these days -- secure it somehow to your person, and instantly you have an action camera to document that cool axe-throwing session or bungee jump. Across its history, GoPro's cameras have won praise for their utility, ruggedness, and the quality of their output. Yet it's hard to justify spending, say, $360 for a HERO13 (without accessories) when that ever-convenient iPhone can deliver results that at least approach what you'd get from the GoPro. Plus, in this cluttered modern life of ours, who needs yet another device or subscription service? Artificial hopes? In my view, management has been doing what it can to get the growth train running. Years ago it did a fine job establishing that subscription and service revenue stream, which is holding steady (and producing plenty of the green stuff with that $26 million quarterly figure). More recently, just after the meme stock rally in the company began, it announced an opt-in artificial intelligence (AI) training program. In it, U.S. subscribers to GoPro services can volunteer to make their content available for AI developers to build and enhance their models. The company said it will share 50% of the license fees generated by such efforts, meaning it's in front of a new revenue source. Yet as exciting and high-potential as AI is, I doubt this and any other valiant revenue-boosting effort will turn around GoPro's fortunes. Dedicated action cameras are looking like the hot technology of the past, and since the company is still centered on this hardware, I think more declines are on the way -- ditto for those red bottom-line numbers. Should you invest $1,000 in GoPro right now? Before you buy stock in GoPro, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and GoPro wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $649,544!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,113,059!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Eric Volkman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. GoPro Stock Is on the Move After Earnings. Here's Why. was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio

US Apartment Building Permits Fall 23 Percent From Pandemic Boom
US Apartment Building Permits Fall 23 Percent From Pandemic Boom

Epoch Times

time6 hours ago

  • Epoch Times

US Apartment Building Permits Fall 23 Percent From Pandemic Boom

Redfin reported on Aug. 15 that building permits for apartment construction in the United States declined by 23.1 percent since the COVID-19 pandemic period, ranging from 2020 to 2023. Using data from the Census Bureau, Redfin's analysis shows that developers across the United States had previously obtained permits to build an average of 12.8 multi-family housing units for every 10,000 people over the past year (between July 2024 and June 2025). That number represents a drop from the average 16.7 units per 10,000 reported during the pandemic period.

FACT FOCUS: No, taxpayers will not receive new stimulus checks this summer
FACT FOCUS: No, taxpayers will not receive new stimulus checks this summer

San Francisco Chronicle​

time13 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

FACT FOCUS: No, taxpayers will not receive new stimulus checks this summer

Don't splurge just yet. Rumors spread online Friday that the U.S. government will soon be issuing stimulus checks to taxpayers in certain income brackets. But Congress has not passed legislation to authorize such payments, and, according to the IRS, no new stimulus checks will be distributed in the coming weeks. Here's a closer look at the facts. CLAIM: The Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department have approved $1,390 stimulus checks that will be distributed to low- and middle-income taxpayers by the end of the summer. THE FACTS: This is false. Taxpayers will not receive new stimulus checks of any amount this summer, an IRS official said. Stimulus checks, also known as economic impact payments, are authorized by Congress through legislation and distributed by the Treasury Department. Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri last month introduced a bill that would send tax rebates to qualified taxpayers using revenue from tariffs instituted by President Donald Trump. Hawley's bill has not passed the Senate or the House. The IRS announced early this year that it would distribute about $2.4 billion to taxpayers who failed to claim on their 2021 tax returns a Recovery Rebate Credit — a refundable credit for individuals who did not receive one or more COVID-19 stimulus checks. The maximum amount was $1,400 per individual. Those who hadn't already filed their 2021 tax return would have needed to file it by April 15 to claim the credit. The IRS official said there is no new credit that taxpayers can claim. Past stimulus checks have been authorized through legislation passed by Congress. For example, payments during the coronavirus pandemic were made by possible by three bills: the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act; the COVID-related Tax Relief Act; and the American Rescue Plan Act. In 2008, stimulus checks were authorized in response to the Great Recession through the Economic Stimulus Act. The Treasury Department, which includes the Internal Revenue Service, distributed stimulus payments during the COVID-19 pandemic and the Great Recession. The Treasury's Bureau of the Fiscal Service, formed in 2012, played a role as well during the former crisis. Hawley in July introduced the American Worker Rebate Act, which would share tariff revenue with qualified Americans through tax rebates. The proposed rebates would amount to at minimum $600 per individual, with additional payments for qualifying children. Rebates could increase if tariff revenue is higher than expected. Taxpayers with an adjusted annual gross income above a certain amount — $75,000 for those filing individually — would receive a reduced rebate. Hawley said Americans 'deserve a tax rebate.' 'Like President Trump proposed, my legislation would allow hard-working Americans to benefit from the wealth that Trump's tariffs are returning to this country,' Hawley said in a press release. Neither the Senate nor the House had passed the American Worker Rebate Act as of Friday. It was read twice by the Senate on July 28, the day it was introduced, and referred to the Committee on Finance. ___

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store