Does RJD have a Dalit problem? As Lalu Prasad faces fire, why his party has so few SC faces
In 1969, a young Lalu Prasad, then a student at Patna University, participated in his first political rally led by socialist leader Shivanand Tiwari to protest against the Shankaracharya's alleged derogatory remarks about Dalits, effectively starting his political career by taking up the cause of the community.
Over five-and-a-half decades later, the RJD chief and former Bihar Chief Minister finds himself at the centre of a controversy for allegedly 'insulting' Dr B R Ambedkar by placing his portrait on the floor during his birthday celebrations on June 11.
Lalu, during his almost six-decade political career, has traversed from being an OBC (Other Backward Classes) voice against the Congress's dominant upper-caste politics to a socialist leader in 1990, when he championed the cause of the 'garib gurba (poor people)' during his first term as CM between 1990 and 1995. 'He began his politics by taking up the Dalit cause. Since then, he has risen in politics and cultivated his support base. Years later, he still remains a big force in the state's politics,' Tiwari told The Indian Express, adding that the BJP's love for Ambedkar was 'newfound and purely driven by politics'.
Lalu's politics saw a marked shift after the 1995 Assembly polls, as he began cultivating an exclusive Muslim-Yadav support base. After he stepped down as CM over his alleged involvement in the fodder scam and his wife Rabri Devi took over in 1997, the RJD began sporting a more Muslim-Yadav look with the presence of some upper-caste leaders such as former MPs Raghuvansh Prasad Singh, Jagdanand Singh (who recently stepped down as RJD state president), and Prabhunath Singh.
By the time the Assembly polls of 2000 approached, Lalu's politics had completed its three-tier shift from 'Mandalisation' to 'secularisation' to 'Yadavaisation'.
The RJD chief also tried to cultivate the support of Dalits, who form 19.65% of the state's population, by making Ramai Ram, a Dalit leader from Muzaffarpur who had joined the RJD in 2000, the party's state president. 'It (Ram's appointment) was mere tokenism as Muslims and Yadavs continued to be the core voter base of the RJD after the 2000 Assembly polls, which saw the party field many candidates from the two communities. It was difficult for Lalu to consolidate Dalit voters as by that time (LJP founder) Ram Vilas Paswan emerged as the main stakeholder of the Paswan community while the Ravidas community was firmly behind the Congress and continues to be,' said political analyst Sanjay Kumar.
Though Lalu's son and former Deputy CM Tejashwi Prasad Yadav has renewed the party's push to consolidate Dalit votes with this 'inclusive politics' pitch since taking over ahead of the 2020 Assembly polls, prominent RJD leaders from the community have either quit the party or have been lying low. For instance, former Speaker Uday Narayan Choudary has been out of the spotlight while former minister Shyam Rajak left the RJD last August. Of the 76 RJD MLAs, only six are from Scheduled Caste (SC) communities.
As the video of the alleged insult went viral, the NDA lapped up the opportunity to target the RJD chief, who was issued a notice by the Bihar State Commission for Scheduled Castes on June 13. A day later, Deputy CM Samrat Choudhary criticised Lalu, as did Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan on June 16. The National Commission for Scheduled Castes issued a notice to the former CM on June 19.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi, during his address in Siwan on Friday, targeted the RJD chief. 'The RJD has no respect for Dalits and OBCs. They insult Baba Saheb … I know these people will never apologise, because they have no respect for Dalits and the backward classes in their hearts. The RJD and Congress put Baba Saheb's picture at their feet, Modi keeps him in his heart … The people of Bihar will never forget this insult,' he said.
The RJD said the allegations had been 'stretched beyond imagination'. 'The PM tried to take a dig at our national president but forgot that last December, the Union Home Minister (Amit Shah) made a very indecent comment on Ambedkar during his Rajya Sabha address. Don't Shah's comments amount to trivialising and disrespecting Ambedkar? The PM's silence speaks volumes about his insincerity towards the principles and values Baba Saheb stood for,' RJD Rajya Sabha MP Manoj Kumar Jha told The Indian Express.¯
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
42 minutes ago
- Mint
Britain's Labour Party Needs to Listen to Its Social Conscience
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Progressives on both sides of the English-speaking Atlantic have focused much of their energy and attention on championing minority rights and indulging in identity politics. Standing up for groups who've suffered historic discrimination is laudable; removing barriers to Black employment and giving gay people the right to marry are hard-fought achievements. Transgender people deserve protections too, with trade-offs necessary given the clashes of biological sex and gender ideology. But whether by preference or distracted by such concerns, social evils which used to fire up the liberal-left conscience — class inequality, lack of economic opportunity and cohesive societies — have been in danger of being overlooked or even downgraded. In the UK, a horrific, decades-long scandal of grooming and rape gangs of mainly Pakistani Muslim men who preyed on young white women has revealed the pitfalls of this lopsided approach. The story is distressing enough in itself, but it has wider resonance for Britain's governing Labour Party, which prides itself on caring for the less fortunate in society but has failed them — both under Tony Blair's administration when the crimes first became apparent, and due to a sluggish response under Keir Starmer. This doesn't absolve the previous Conservative governments from carrying a large share of the blame. As the cross-party peer Baroness Louise Casey pointed out in an audit published this week, one of the main reasons for ducking the issue was oversensitivity about ethnic and religious groups from a Muslim background. Starmer, an alumnus of London's top human rights legal chambers, is an exemplar of the progressive mindset. He also successfully prosecuted grooming gangs in his former role as head of the crown prosecution service. So the appalling detail isn't unknown to him. And yet, in January, the prime minister accused opposition figures calling for a national inquiry into gangs who preyed on underage girls of 'jumping on the bandwagon of the far right,' Elon Musk had wrongly tweeted that millions of young women were being targeted by Asian gangs; in the social media echo chamber, the populists of Reform UK were taking up the cry. But that didn't invalidate the fact that the matter had been buried too quickly and with insufficient attention to the causes. The PM's words have returned to haunt him – but the underlying omission is far more important. Across the country and in the areas where the gangs operated for years with impunity under the noses of Labour councils and indolent police forces, men of Pakistani descent have been vastly overrepresented among the gangs. This mix undoubtedly requires sensitive handling — but not downright evasion. On Monday, however, the PM was forced to give way after Casey found that the authorities had 'shied away' from investigating the horrific crimes and avoided its ethnic and cultural character. The government finally agreed that a national inquiry was urgently required. The trouble is, it was urgently required a very long time ago. Even Starmer's U-turn was couched in flat, emotionless language; he would 'accept' Casey's recommendation. His Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was more forthcoming: These rapes were 'a stain on our society' and she would initiate a new round of criminal investigations. But, in truth, none of this would have happened if it wasn't for pressure from those on the right of the political spectrum — and in some case the far-right — on a center-left government. Many of the most notorious gangs operated in Labour-held areas, and the councils who 'shied away' were Labour too. Alarmed by the potential threat to a fragile social peace in areas where large groups of incomers are often living lives wholly separate to the White communities around them, Labour had another reason to downplay the matter — concern about the reaction of a substantial Muslim voting bloc. Local councils urged the police to play down the systematic nature of the abuse. Overindulging group rights has also cornered the PM in the fierce debate over the rights of trans people and protections for women's spaces. When the Supreme Court ruled this year that 'sex' in Britain's Equality Act unequivocally meant 'biological sex,' Starmer's bloodless response was to welcome 'the clarity' of the judgment. We are none the wiser about what he really thinks about the issue. I have firsthand experience as a journalist of this reluctance of a liberal mindset to face inconvenient truths. At the Sunday Times, we published a magazine article in 2007 by a feminist writer Julie Bindel, exclusively detailing the abuse of girls by groups of Pakistani-origin men in the northern counties of Lancashire and Yorkshire. The article had been offered first to the liberal-leaning Guardian newspaper, which turned it down. Andrew Norfolk, a journalist on our sister paper the Times, was also subsequently accused of racism when he investigated the ethnic gang phenomenon. A few brave Labour MPs, mostly women, also tried to bring the problem to the attention of a wider audience but initially found little support from male colleagues in Parliament and local parties. And while a degree of discipline is necessary in politics, lack of curiosity about opposing or challenging views leads to problems getting parked and evils left to fester. On the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington more than 60 years ago, Martin Luther King spoke of his dream that his children would 'one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.' There's an enduring lesson here for all: The implication of the declaration is that wise progressives should not be blind to good and evil among Whites, Blacks and Asians, and steadfast in their willingness to confront the consequences. The price of ignoring wrongdoing, whoever the culprit, is much higher — and more painful for all concerned. More from Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Martin Ivens is the editor of the Times Literary Supplement. Previously, he was editor of the Sunday Times of London and its chief political commentator. More stories like this are available on
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Mehbooba Mufti Takes Swipe At Pakistan Over Trump's Nobel Recommendation Amid US-Iran Tensions
Former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister and Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) President Mehbooba Mufti has taken a sharp swipe at Pakistan following a recent escalation in tensions between the United States and Iran. In a post on social media platform X, Mufti said, "The OIC as expected has once again limited its response to mere lip service in the wake of the attack on Iran." Further, Mufti criticized Pakistan for having earlier backed a Nobel Peace Prize recommendation for former US President Donald Trump, a move that has drawn renewed scrutiny in the wake of fresh US military strikes on Iranian targets. "Country that rushed to recommend Donald Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize now finds itself with egg on its face after he attacked Iran," Mufti said in the post, indirectly referring to Pakistan's reported support for Trump's nomination during his tenure. The comment comes just hours after the U.S. launched targeted strikes in Iran, escalating fears of renewed conflict in the region. The timing of Mufti's statement appears to underscore what she views as the irony and misjudgment in advocating peace accolades for a leader now associated with aggressive military actions. While Mufti did not name Pakistan directly, the context of her remark left little ambiguity, triggering a range of reactions online, some supporting her stance, others accusing her of politicizing a sensitive international issue. She further wrote, "By launching this attack on Iran Trump has dangerously escalated tensions plunging the region into a new wave of violence and edging the world closer to the brink of a global conflict. Regrettably, India long seen as a nation with a historic and principled role in international affairs is not only remaining silent but appears to be aligning itself with the aggressor. This is not the first time Mehbooba Mufti has used social media to comment on global diplomatic developments, often tying them back to regional geopolitics and the broader discourse on peace and stability in South Asia. While Farooq Abdullah, former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister and National Conference president, criticized the US strikes on Iran, expressing disappointment over the silence of Muslim countries. He warned that their inaction could lead to similar consequences for them, stating, 'Today, Iran is in this condition, but tomorrow, it will be them who will be destroyed by the US. If they won't wake up today, they must wait for their turn.' Abdullah asserted Iran's resilience, comparing its stance to the historical event of Karbala, saying, 'If they think that Iran will abandon its ambition, they are in a misconception. Iran remembers Karbala, and it thinks that it is the second Karbala. They will get their necks chopped off, but they won't bow down.' He also questioned the effectiveness of the US and Israel's push for regime change in Iran, doubting it would halt Iran's nuclear ambitions.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
EC Cites Privacy, Legal Concerns After Congress Demands Polling Booth CCTV Footage
Last Updated: The Election Commission cited privacy and legal issues in response to Rahul Gandhi's demand for CCTV footage of polling stations. Gandhi urged publishing digital voter rolls. Following a demand made by Congress MP and Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi, the Election Commission on Saturday cited privacy and legal hurdles while sharing the CCTV footage of webcasting of the polling stations. This comes after Rahul Gandhi has called upon the Election Commission to publish consolidated, digital, machine-readable voter rolls for the most recent elections to the Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabhas of all states, including Maharashtra, saying that 'telling the truth" will protect the poll panel's credibility. ECI said that the seemingly legitimate appeal of releasing the videos or CCTV footage from polling stations on election day undermines voter privacy and security, contradicting the Representation of the People Act and Supreme Court guidelines. 'What is veiled as a very logical demand is actually entirely contrary to the privacy and security concerns of the voters, legal position laid down in the Representation of the People Act, 1950/1951 and the directions of the Supreme Court of India," it said. 'Sharing of the footage, which would enable easy identification of the electors by any group or an individual, would leave both the elector who has voted as well as the elector who has not voted vulnerable to pressure, discrimination and intimidation by anti-social elements," the poll body added. It said that if a particular political party gets a lesser number of votes in a particular booth, it would easily be able to identify, through the CCTV footage, which elector has voted and which elector has not, and thereafter, may harass or intimidate the electors. The Election Commission further issued a point-by-point rebuttal to the Congress MP. . In any election, there may be electors who decide not to vote. Sharing of video footage of the poll day may result in the identification of such electors. This can also lead to profiling of the voters who voted as well as those who did not vote, which may become the basis for discrimination, denial of services, intimidation or inducement. Supreme Court order: The Supreme Court held that the right to vote includes the right not to vote, and the right of secrecy is accorded to even those persons who have decided not to vote. Video footage: Polling day videography records the sequence of voters entering the polling station and their identities, similar to Form 17A, which contains sensitive information about voters, including their ID details and signatures. Both pose a risk to voting secrecy. Violation of secrecy of voting is a punishable offence under Section 128 of RP Act, 1951 for – Any person who contravenes the provisions of this section is punishable with imprisonment for a term expending up to 3 months or fine or both.
