Billions of dollars of life-saving climate funds at risk of being stolen or misused, experts warn
Corruption is eating into climate funds in the world's most vulnerable countries, experts warn.
For 30 years, Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) has tracked abuses of power across the world, giving nations a rating out of 100.
Many climate-vulnerable nations and recent UN climate summit hosts score poorly in the new 2024 CPI. The findings have worrying implications for projects intended to protect people.
"We must urgently root out corruption before it fully derails meaningful climate action,' says CEO of Transparency International Maíra Martini.
'Today, corrupt forces not only shape but often dictate policies and dismantle checks and balances - silencing journalists, activists and anyone fighting for equality and sustainability.'
Where are climate funds at risk from corruption?
More than two-thirds of countries score below 50 out of 100, according to the report, which ranks 180 places on a scale of zero (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean).
It draws on data from the World Bank, World Economic Forum, private risk and consulting companies, think tanks and other sources. It also reflects the views of experts and business people.
The global average rating has remained unchanged at 43, highlighting the need to root out this 'evolving global threat,' in the words of François Valérian, Transparency International's chair.
In the context of the climate crisis, it means that billions of dollars of climate funds are at risk of being stolen or misused.
Corruption in South Africa (41), Vietnam (40) and Indonesia (37), for example, is endangering the delivery of Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JETPs), the researchers say.
These partnerships are designed to help coal-dependent countries embrace a greener future, but Transparency International has found that insufficient safeguards create opportunities for unscrupulous actors to muscle in.
In South Africa, around a billion rand (more than €52 million) is stolen each month from Eskom, the state-owned energy provider, according to its former chief executive.
Countries suffering the worst impacts of the climate crisis have the lowest scores - including South Sudan (8), Somalia (9) and Venezuela (10).
Climate corruption is creeping up in developing countries too
Corruption can obstruct climate policies in countries with both high and low ratings, Transparency International says.
But it is in wealthy, developed countries that this interference has the most serious impact because it undermines their work to agree on ambitious goals, reduce emissions and support developing countries.
The US, for example, fell from 69 to 65 points last year. Mads Christensen, executive director of Greenpeace International, comments that fossil fuel corruption is undermining climate efforts in the country.
The organisation is currently being sued by pipeline giant Energy Transfer, which 'is trying to wipe us off the map in the US with a massive, specious lawsuit,' he says. 'It's up to all of us who care about the future to stand up to these corporate bullies, no matter the cost."
In Europe, Denmark has obtained the highest score on the index (90) for the seventh year running, closely followed by Finland (88).
Kosovo (44) and Moldova (43) have taken significant steps to rise up the rankings in recent years, while France (67), Germany (75), Hungary (41) and Switzerland (81) dropped to their lowest levels yet in 2024.
Is corruption holding back climate summits?
The report found that transparency from the host countries of recent UN climate summits was also seriously lacking.
Azerbaijan, host of last year's COP29 - which granted access to at least 1,773 fossil fuel lobbyists - scored just 22 on the scale.
Eyes are turning to COP30 hosts Brazil, which will be responsible for securing last year's finance deal and deciding on a key pledge to transition away from fossil fuels. But in this year's CPI it received an all-time low score of 34.
'Governments and multilateral organisations must embed anti-corruption measures into climate efforts to safeguard finance, rebuild trust and maximise impact,' Martini urges.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Brazil and France launch push to put oceans at heart of climate plans
Brazil and France have just launched a new challenge to countries to put oceans at the centre of climate action. On Monday, at the UN Ocean Conference, the two countries called on all nations to place ocean-focused action at the heart of their national climate plans - also known as Nationally Determined Contributions or NDCs - ahead of the UN climate summit COP30 it is hosting in November. Alongside Brazil and France, an inaugural group of eight countries, including Australia, Fiji, Kenya, Mexico, Palau, and the Republic of Seychelles, has joined the initiative. 'For Brazil, the Blue NDC Challenge represents a key opportunity to strengthen ocean-related climate action and to emphasise the essential role of ocean-based solutions in achieving emission reduction targets,' says Marina Silva, Brazil's Minister for the Environment and Climate Change. 'Through this initiative, Brazil seeks to advance international cooperation on ocean climate action in the lead-up to COP30, and to underscore the need for all countries to fully integrate the ocean into their national climate strategies.' Silva added that in its most recently submitted NDC, Brazil had explicitly included ocean-based climate actions for the first time. That includes commitments like establishing programmes for the conservation and restoration of vital marine ecosystems such as mangroves and coral reefs. 40 per cent of Brazil's territory is located at sea, and it hosts marine ecosystems of global significance - including the only coral reefs in the South Atlantic and the world's largest contiguous mangrove belt along the Amazon coast. NDCs are the centrepiece of countries' efforts to reduce emissions and limit warming to 1.5°C under the Paris Agreement. Countries remain largely off track for meeting the Paris goals, according to the most recent UN emissions gap report, with the next round of climate pledges needing to deliver a 'quantum leap in ambition' to give the world a chance of limiting global warming to 1.5°C. Nations were due to submit updated plans in February, but only 11 of the 195 Paris Agreement signatories made the formal deadline. As of early June, just 22 countries have so far delivered their enhanced NDCs. Brazil is one of only five G20 countries that have submitted updated plans alongside the US under the Biden administration, the UK, Japan and Canada. The real deadline is now September, when the plans will be tallied up before COP30. As the world prepares to celebrate the 10th anniversary of the Paris Agreement this year, the Blue NDC challenge is aimed at highlighting the role oceans can play in enhancing these plans. 'Ocean-based climate solutions can deliver up to 35 per cent of the emissions reductions needed to keep 1.5°C within reach,' says Tom Pickerell, global director of the ocean programme at the World Resources Institute and Head of the Secretariat for the High Level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy. 'But we are running out of time to maximise the ocean's potential. That's why countries must place the ocean at the heart of their climate strategies.' Industrial marine sectors and natural ecosystems are 'underused tools' in addressing climate change, Wavel Ramkalawan, President of the Republic of Seychelles, one of the eight inaugural countries that joined the initiative, added.
France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
Activists to be deported after aid boat destined for Gaza was intercepted by Israel
01:59 09/06/2025 Paris Peace Forum seeks to create new momentum for two-state solution ahead of high-stakes UN event Middle East 09/06/2025 Italian conservationists denounce cruise line development in Fiumicino Europe 09/06/2025 UN Ocean Conference in Nice: Stark warnings on ocean conservation Environment 09/06/2025 French Open: Two in a row for Alcaraz after thrilling final France 09/06/2025 Dozens held after Trump-ordered immigration raids in Los Angeles Americas 09/06/2025 French politics: Assessing Macron's difficult year after snap vote France 09/06/2025 Where does French president Emmanuel Macron stand a year after snap vote? France 09/06/2025 'Netanyahu very cynically exploiting the situation: Israeli PM staying in power by sowing division' Middle East 09/06/2025 Exploring France's cutting-edge ocean research ahead of the UN conference Environment
France 24
17 hours ago
- France 24
Sails, batteries and AI: What a green revolution in maritime transport might look like
Over the weekend, it was time for the key players of the maritime industry – ship owners, port authorities and others – to meet in Monaco for the Blue Economy and Finance Forum, one of the many special events held on the sidelines of the June 9-13 United Nations Ocean Conference. The key goal of the meeting was to come up with a plan on how to decarbonise maritime transport. Because while the UN summit focuses on protecting the oceans, the many ships that cross them are also a big part of the problem. Today, the shipping sector accounts for around 3 percent of the world's CO2 emissions – almost the same amount as the aviation industry. In Europe, it is even worse, and accounts for 14.2 percent of transport-related greenhouse gases, and about 4 percent of all emissions. The reason for this is that most ships are powered by heavy fuel oil, a dirty by-product of oil refining and one of the worst offenders when it comes to pollution and greenhouse gases. Although international measures have helped reduce emissions for individual ships in the past few years, the growing number of freight vessels – the biggest polluters – means that total emissions still continue to climb. Net-zero by 2050: a huge challenge To come to terms with this, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has set an ambitious target for the shipping industry of net-zero emissions by 2050. It is a huge challenge. 'Shipping is one of the most difficult sectors to decarbonise,' said Pierre Marty, a maritime transport expert and lecturer at the French engineering school Centrale Nantes. 'For cars, the solution came quickly with the development of electric vehicles and batteries. For planes, the industry immediately went for synthetic kerosene. But it's harder for the shipping sector because there is no one-size-fits-all solution,' he said. From leisure yachts to bulk carriers and container ships, they all have different needs depending on their size, the distance they travel and how many port stops they do. 'What works for one ship might be useless for another,' Marty said, but noted they all have one common challenge: 'to meet high energy demands in the often limited space on board'. To make a real difference, he said, the focus needs to be on larger vessels. Although they only make up 25 percent of the global fleet, container ships, bulk carriers, LNG and chemical tankers account for around 80 percent of maritime CO2 emissions. They also often travel longer distances and use more energy. Electric ships? Among the many solutions that have been studied in recent years, electrification is one of the most promising so far. As with cars, it would involve equipping a ship with a battery that would be recharged when docked in port. 'This solution has already been adopted by some leisure boats and smaller container ships,' Fanny Pointet, head of maritime transport at the NGO Transport and Environment, said. 'But it's not at all adapted to long-distance vessels. You can't recharge batteries in the middle of the ocean,' she said. 'An intermediary and alternative solution would be to use the batteries just for moving in and out of ports,' she suggested. 'This would not only help reduce emissions, but also lower air pollution.' British-owned P&O Ferries is one of the companies that has already announced it is equipping its Dover-Calais ferries with hybrid engines for this purpose. Biofuels, LNG and synthetic fuels Another option is for vessels to switch to alternative fuels like biomethanol. In September, Danish shipping giant Maersk surprised the industry by presenting a 32,000-ton container ship (capable of carrying 2,100 containers) powered by biomethanol from forestry and agricultural waste. 'But again, this isn't scalable in the long term because we don't have enough biomass to meet global demand,' Pointet remarked. Some civilian actors have instead turned to liquefied natural gas (LNG), but that, too, has its consequences. LNG is mostly made up of methane, which is a potent greenhouse gas, and the European Environment Agency and the European Maritime Safety Agency have both warned of the rise in methane emissions because of the sector's increased use of LNG. 'That leaves green hydrogen and synthetic fuels, which are widely seen as the most sustainable solutions,' Pointet said. But, Marty added, 'these [technologies] are in between development and commercialisation at the moment. They are not mature enough yet, and therefore very expensive.' Shapes, speed and AI Aside from turning to greener fuels, another key lever is to make ships more energy efficient in and of themselves. This is where ship design would come in, with designers potentially equipping vessels with sails, propulsion-enhanced propellers and optimising their hull shapes. Artificial Intelligence (AI) can also help make the industry greener. 'With AI, it is possible to plot routes that would require the least energy by taking winds and currents into account,' Pointet said. Another point of discussion is reducing engine power and speed limits. One recent study showed that by just lowering average global speeds by 10 percent, CO2 emissions would be reduced by 13 percent. It would also halve the risk of whale collisions and slash underwater noise by 42 percent. 'In the end, the ship of the future will most likely combine a bit of everything; hybrid engines, better hull designs and alternative fuels – all adapted to the specific needs of each vessel,' Pointet said. And if the ships advance, so will the ports that host them. 'The priority here is electrification in ports,' Pointet said. 'Because even when ships are docked, many of them, like passenger ships, often need to keep their engines running to maintain services onboard.' The massive cost of going green But, both experts concluded, massive investments – to the tune of between $8 billion and $28 billion (€7.5 billion and €26 billion) a year – are needed until 2050 to embark on this green maritime revolution . And that is without counting the infrastructure that would be needed to make and distribute green fuels. To anticipate these massive costs, some 100 delegations brought together by the IMO in April agreed to create a global carbon pricing mechanism. According to the plan, all ships will as of 2028 have to meet CO2 emissions quotas by using cleaner fuels. Those who exceed the limits will be fined hundreds of euros per ton of CO2 emitted. According to researchers working at the shipping and ocean transport department at the University College of London, this measure alone could generate between $30-40 billion in revenues by 2030. But, Pointet warned, exemptions of various kinds could undermine the measure's impact. 'And there are still many other questions pending, especially [regarding] what kind of fuels will qualify as clean energy.' Before going into effect, the carbon pricing mechanism must be approved in a second IMO vote scheduled for October. That means that the industry heavyweights and oil-rich nations opposing the plan still have time to try to sink the deal.
