Smart Traveller issues fresh travel warning for Thailand on security fears
Smart Traveller, the government's travel advisory body, said Thai authorities had discovered the explosive device this week.
'There's an ongoing risk of terrorism in Thailand,' the advisory, released on Saturday morning, reads.
'Popular tourist areas may be the target of terrorist attacks anywhere across Thailand, including Bangkok and Phuket. 'Phuket International Airport has increased security measures from June 26 and advised passengers to arrive well ahead of flights.
'This follows discovery of an explosive device near the airport this week.
'Thai authorities defused devices in Phuket, Krabi and Phang Nga this week and have made related arrests in recent days.'
Phuket, renowned for its gorgeous beaches and vibrant night-life, is a major destination for Australian travellers.
The government recommends Australian travellers exercise a 'high degree of caution' in Thailand overall due to security and safety risks.
A 'reconsider your need to travel' warning is in place for the country's Yala, Pattani and Narathiwat provinces in the far-south.
'Co-ordinated attacks have occurred in the southern provinces,' the advisory reads.
'The ongoing conflict in the Middle East could lead to an increased threat of attacks against Israeli interests in other regions. Be alert to possible threats. Take official warnings seriously and follow the advice of local authorities.'
The government also advises travellers to be alert to political protests and drink and food spiking.
'Don't leave food or drinks unattended,' the advisory states.
'Stay with people you trust at bars, nightclubs and in taxis.'
Thailand is also tightening its drug laws, travellers have been warned.
The country has recriminalised cannabis three years after decriminalising the drug.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
13 hours ago
- ABC News
Short-term rental advocates say restrictions hurt tourism, not help housing
Advocates of short-term rentals say regulations in the sector are shifting the blame away from governments and towards property owners. Short-stay rentals, typically associated with websites like Airbnb and Stayz, have drawn criticism for taking properties away from the long-term rental market. In other parts of the world, jurisdictions are putting restrictions on short-stay accommodation, including in New York City and Barcelona, amid housing shortages. But research from the University of South Australia has claimed restrictions and bans have done little to help housing stocks. Tourism expert and study author Peter O'Connor said jurisdictions that had banned short-stay accommodation failed to see any meaningful growth in housing access. He said the main consequence was limiting tourism accommodation, in turn increasing prices. "If you reduce the number of short-term rentals which are available, one of the things you do is make it more difficult for tourists to find accommodation," Professor O'Connor said. "Here in Australia, tourism is our number one service export and it has a lot of knock-on effects in terms of the local community and spending in bars, restaurants and shops." A South Australian parliamentary committee is looking into the short-stay accommodation sector, including possible regulations on short-stay rentals. Wendy Roeters owns two homes in Mount Gambier which she rents out for short stays. She said the sector was needed in regional areas where workers travel and stay for extended periods and where there were fewer large hotels. "For companies, the short-term stays are the better option," she said. "You get a lot of people for the hospital, like doctors and nurses. I've just had a nurse stay for three weeks. "You'll have work crews who might be working on construction who might be doing it for a period of six months." Ms Roeters added it was unfair to penalise short-stay property owners for there being a wider shortage of housing. "I can understand that the government wants housing, but that's not the responsibility of people that have a property, that's the government's responsibility," she said. Property reform advocacy group Grounded produced its own report into the short-stay sector in Australia, released in June. It found the profits on short-term rentals were 81 per cent more than if the property was placed on the long-term market in 13 of Australia's busiest tourism towns. Grounded managing director Karl Fitzgerald said it was clear short-stay accommodation was impacting local housing supply. "It's more supply coming out of the long-term rental market and out of the ownership market," he said. "When government is talking about supply on every front, it's strange that Airbnb is not considered as a factor. Mr Fitzgerald said a plan to limit the growth of short-stay accommodation would be more effective, such as a "cap and trade" scheme, which would give licenses to property owners. "That's where having at least a licensing system that regulates the growth and the supply and perhaps caps it and reduces it over time until there's enough funding to channel some of the profits away from Airbnb," he said. "Use that money to fund long-term affordable housing under a community land trust model." Professor O'Connor argued short-stay accommodation had become a "quick fix" for governments in favour of more complicated plans to ease the housing crisis. "It's a lot easier for a state government or a council to introduce a regulation that limits the number of short-term rentals than it is to introduce some way of encouraging the building of new houses," he said. South Australian Greens MLC Robert Simms is leading the state's parliamentary committee into short-stay accommodation. He agreed the sector was not solely to blame for the state's housing crisis, but said it still needed regulation. "I think there's no doubt that short stay is here to stay, but the question is whether or not we've got the balance right," he said. "It is concerning that people might be running a property that is, in effect, a business, and yet they might be paying at the same rates as their neighbour who is living in a private residence. "That doesn't really seem fair, and that's why I think there's a level of community interest in the idea of regulation of the sector."
ABC News
a day ago
- ABC News
Retired couple reopen Beltana's Royal Victoria Hotel pub in SA after decades
Wander around the remote Flinders Ranges township of Beltana in the early hours and "ghost town" comes to mind. But when Jan Ferguson walks out of the 1870s Royal Victoria Hotel with an "open" sign, it's clear this town isn't ready to be consigned to history. "There are 30 people who live here. If everybody was here in their holiday houses, that would grow to 65. "It's managed to survive, you know, where a lot of towns like this haven't." Jan and her husband Chris Ferguson are at the centre of Beltana's latest revival story, the South Australian town which lies 540 kilometres north of Adelaide. More than 65 years after the Royal Victoria Hotel served last drinks, it's reopened its doors after the retired couple, who met in Beltana in the 1970s, bought and revived the pub with the help of family. "We've always had a passion for the hotel," Ms Ferguson said. While the hotel was used as a home in the 1990s, it still took two and a half years to bring the main rooms back to their former glory and install modern amenities. "We've done seven of the 17 rooms, so there's a lot to go, and we had to open it up as a hotel to bring some money back in," Ms Ferguson said. While being behind the bar is a change for Ms Ferguson, who has worked as a public servant and union employee, it's certainly not her first renovation job. Ms Ferguson's worked on eight Beltana buildings, including the police station, which was her first home after she was married and includes a unique backyard shed. "It's the cells of the police station. We stored things in them because it was the only shed," she said. Long before the township was established in 1873, the land was home to the Adnyamathanha people for centuries, and still is. Like her grandfather, Kuyani-Adnyamathanha elder Beverley Patterson grew up here. "When we were away from here, it felt like a loneliness living in the towns, and I think the children felt it too, and my grandchildren," Ms Patterson said. While European settlers changed many things for traditional owners, the town holds mostly good memories for Ms Patterson. She remembers attending the tiny primary school, which had one teacher for all the different year levels. "This little school up there was full of kids," Ms Patterson said. "I can picture everything in this place. Everybody lived together. There was no separation, you know, we were all friends." Beltana was established to service the pastoral and mining industries, with its population peaking at about 400. At one stage, it was at the end of the railway that opened up the north of the state. When the rail line was shifted away from Beltana, the station became a bustling general store and gathering spot. "Friday nights were big," said railway station owner Ron Tarr. Mr Tarr and his wife Jan, moved to Beltana from Adelaide in the early 1980s to run and live in the general store. When a new road bypassed Beltana, the Tarrs built the roadhouse, setting up a new gathering spot, which they ran until they retired in 2013. But their passion for the railway station and preserving the state-heritage-listed town continues. "We've got it up to a reasonable standard and probably got another 100 years in it." With the reopening of the pub, Beltana people have a place to gather once again. "And unless you have a business and a meeting point, you don't have a place to actually meet and share all of that history." And to the surprise and delight of the new publicans, it's not just visitors popping in, with locals from surrounding properties starting a Friday afternoon get-together at the Royal Victoria Hotel. The sessions are unlikely to get too out of hand, though, with the hotel's owners sticking to the traditional early closing time. "It's quite fun to say 'six o'clock closing, we're not serving anymore,'" Ms Ferguson said. "I don't reckon it would have ever closed at six; however, that was the law at the time," she said. Watch ABC TV's Landline at 12:30pm AEST on Sunday or stream anytime on ABC iview.
ABC News
2 days ago
- ABC News
What the stories of Robert Bogucki and Christopher McCandless reveal about our cultural obsession with survival
How would you cope if you got lost in the bush? How long could you survive if you had to rely on your own skills? Would you drink your own wee if it was the only option? They're questions few of us will ever answer. Most of us are too busy watching survival TV shows and scrolling wilderness content on social media, all from the safety of the suburbs. However, every year there are people who risk death to prove they can live off the land and endure the elements. People like Robert Bogucki, who danced with death during his 1999 pilgrimage into the Great Sandy Desert, and captivated strangers all over the world. Decades later, we're still hooked on watching folks more brazen than us grapple with their mortality. Survivor, about to embark on its 49th season, is one of the longest-running reality TV shows of all time, while Alone Australia remains SBS's most successful franchise, with its latest season pulling in 3.5 million viewers. But at a time when Australians are more buffered from risk than ever before, the pop culture obsession with outback survival is a strange phenomenon. It hints at a craving for hardship and a desire for meaning that many feel is lacking in their lives. For thousands of years — and to this day, in many parts of the world — humans struggled to locate enough water, food, and shelter to survive. These days it's typically people from privileged backgrounds who test their mettle in outback survival quests — flexing their practical skills to achieve a sense of strength and psychological wellbeing by enduring discomfort and overcoming adversity. Others opt for a safer, entry-level option — booking into the growing number of commercially run outback survival retreats. But most people only watch survival challenges vicariously online. Mike Atkinson, who's trained in outback survival in the Australian military and showcased his skills on the reality TV show Alone, has noticed interest growing in recent years. "Most of us in our current lifestyles probably don't get out into the wilderness, but there's definitely a growing trend in recent years for people wanting to explore that kind of area," he says. Atkinson now creates content about his wilderness adventures full time, and goes by "Outback Mike". He believes people are drawn to the genre because they feel disconnected from nature. "Modern life is pretty devoid of real challenges and outback survival gives you that real challenge," Atkinson says. "It's a connection to our evolutionary past, and they want to experience it. "But I reckon less than half of people watching this material will ever actually use the skills, whether it's on camping trips or overnight hikes, or trying more challenging outdoor activities." Reality TV shows create an illusion of risk, with paramedics and evacuation teams waiting on standby to snatch contestants away from danger if needed. But a small number of people risk their lives in search of solitude and spiritual growth, drawing on an age-old belief that romanticises nature as "authentic", and capable of revealing fundamental human truths. This yearning for spiritual connection is what sent Robert Bogucki out into the Great Sandy Desert in 1999. His remarkable story of survival, as told in the ABC's Expanse: Nowhere Man podcast, inspired visceral reactions among the public. Some were envious of his chance to seek solitude and challenge away from the shackles of daily life, while others were angry about the resources that went into large-scale search efforts to find him. Many were simply baffled by an impulse to disappear alone that they couldn't understand. While Bogucki and his long-time partner Janet North received letters of support and celebration of his survival from around the world, there was also significant backlash. The WA Premier at the time described Bogucki's actions as reckless, while letters to the editor scolded him as a "'selfish ignorant rich kid" who "needed a good smack in the mouth". Ben Martin, a former reporter for The West Australian who joined the search for Bogucki in 1999, believes the public response is revealing. "There's a fine line between celebrating some sort of frontier spirit, versus someone regarded as doing something a bit weird," he reflects. "People judged Robert so harshly … but people are paying thousands of dollars to go to yoga retreats to disconnect and just think, which is not that different to what Robert was seeking. "So I think the depth of thought that Robert was seeking was lost on a lot of people." The saga revealed a double-standard in how we respond to people who undertake risky endeavours. An attempt to break a world record is considered brave and bold, and extreme sports like base-jumping are deadly but tolerated. But dangerous journeys to achieve a spiritual, psychological or religious objective tend to puzzle and even offend the general public. The fall-out from Bogucki's odyssey revealed a deeper tension between the desire of the state to keep people safe, and the freedom of the individual to live and die as they wish. There are similarities with the much more famous case of Christopher McCandless, who starved to death in remote interior Alaska in 1992. McCandless — whose story was immortalised in the 1996 book Into The Wild, and later adapted for film — was determined to prove he could live off the land, but misjudged river levels and became trapped as the freezing winter approached. Both Bogucki and McCandless were intelligent, independent-minded young American men from highly educated and well-to-do families. Both embarked on physically and mentally challenging journeys into the wilderness, with an awareness and acceptance of the risks involved. But only one lived to tell the tale, while the other died a preventable death in the prime of life. Looking back now, Robert Bogucki says he can understand the comparison, although their motivations differed. "All I can say about McCandless is that he got what he wanted, to be out there alone in the wilderness," he says. "And I think he had a fulfilling life. He got what he asked for. "Some people would say 'oh, that's terrible because he died', but where do you want to die, in a hospital with a bunch of tubes sticking out of you?" While Robert's quest was primarily spiritual, he endured many of the challenges and discomforts experienced by those undertaking more straight-forward survival quests. Towards the end of the trip, he was so weakened by dehydration and malnutrition that he felt he'd die if he succumbed to the feelings of despair, or stopped moving to sit under a tree for more than a few minutes. On day 36 on his journey, he was so thirsty he considered drinking his own urine, but decided against it, deciding it would be akin to "giving up". Ultimately, Bogucki believes it was his faith in God and positive mindset that allowed him to endure a level of deprivation that the guidebooks suggest no-one could survive. "The simple answer [for how I survived] is by focusing on the good and not the bad — the life aspect, as opposed to the things that sucked energy from me," he says. "It came down to believing in God because of the love of life, as opposed to a fear of dying or hell." Those long, hot days and nights in the desert changed Bogucki, instilling a self-awareness and confidence in his ability to endure hardship that would be difficult to replicate. "It definitely caused me to slow down … it helps you identify your ego, that detrimental part of your self-awareness that I had to learn about, and that's always there," he says. "To be aware of that definitely helps deal with these modern times." Bogucki, now aged 59, lives with his partner Janet in a log cabin in remote central Alaska — not far from where McCandless died. He recognises that many people face adversity and hardship in daily life. "Not everyone's going to go for a walk in the desert, or go to the edge of the abyss, but they'll have their own troubles and trials and tribulations," he says. "I learnt you have a strength you don't know you have … everyone's got their cross to bear." The Bogucki saga exposed deep divisions over whether people should be allowed to undertake risky activities in the outback, or be protected from themselves in what's often characterised as a "nanny state" intervention. Opinion pieces published in the wake of his rescue dissected the ideological tension. One, by Alaskan outdoorsman Charlie Campbell, captured the culture of staunch individualism that's more pervasive in the US than Australia. "[Bogucki's case] raises an interesting question, one with profound moral dilemmas attached," he wrote in the Fairbanks Daily Miner. "What is society's responsibility to rescue people who may not want to be rescued? "We live in an age where more and more a huge safety net is created under most any activity we undertake. The problem with this is it runs counter to a basic human need to exercise free will." He pointed to the installation of boardwalks and handrails across scenic locations and national parks, "excessive" warning signs, and children so buffered from risk they would emerge into adulthood timid and unchallenged by adversity. The column also suggested a legal disclaimer could be considered for those of sound mind who wanted to undertake high-risk endeavours without intervention by authorities. It's an idea supported by Atkinson, who believes society has tipped too far in favour of minimising risk. "People end up so risk-averse that they've lost the ability to actually weigh up the positives and negatives of a risk decision, and they're missing out on a heap of positive experiences in nature because of that," he says. "It's detrimental, especially when parents seem to set this goal that my child shouldn't go through any hardship, whereas really it needs to be: 'What are the suitable risks that they can take, and what are the deliberate hardships that I'm going to allow them to experience in order for them to grow?'" A 2024 study from the Australian Institute of Family Studies showed the amount of time children under five spend indoors has increased in recent years, with researchers warning it could negatively impact wellbeing and development. Atkinson is by no means reckless. His wife and children are forefront in his mind, and he says he assesses the dangers of each journey carefully, whether it's sailing a handmade canoe through tropical waters or surviving alone on a remote beach for weeks. At times, he's carried a satellite communication device, leaving instructions to contact authorities if he doesn't do a digital "check-in" for more than seven days. But the 47-year-old former military pilot believes strongly that individuals should retain the right to risk their lives, so long as they're of sound mind and communicating clearly. "I've thought a lot about the most responsible way for people to do something like what Robert Bogucki did, and I think an indemnity form is the answer," he says. "So you can sign a form saying to the authorities: 'Hey, I'm going out bush, and I'm not going to tell you where, because I don't want you to have to feel responsible for searching for me.' "You should be able to do that as a kind of basic human right, because otherwise it opens up a whole bag of worms about how much risk you're allowed to take in your own life." It's the kind of system that could help authorities navigate cases like that of Thomas Seibold, a German man who disappeared in 2012 during an ambitious adventure in remote interior Alaska. Seibold was an experienced, resilient survival instructor at an outdoor skills school in Wisconsin. The police incident report into his disappearance, obtained by the ABC, states that Seibold had hiked to a remote cabin and planned to stay a couple of months alone to "spend time with nature". He was due to trek the 40 kilometres out to safety at the start of winter, but was never seen again. An inventory of his belongings — found at the cabin — included maps, winter clothing, a 0.22 calibre rifle, a moose carcass and a handful of berries. "Seibold has been presumed deceased … he is officially listed as a missing person," the police report states. Another life likely lost in the pursuit of solitude in the wilderness, in a manifestation of free will that few would choose. In Australia, it's becoming harder and harder to be alone in the wilderness to test your skills and enjoy peace and quiet. Every year, the spiderweb of sealed road spreads across the outback landscape. And mobile phone reception is expanding across the vast interior, making it difficult to avoid the incessant buzz of notifications. It's no doubt a positive for remote residents, for whom the bitumen and bars of reception are a critical link to help in times of crisis. But many, like Bogucki, believe we're less happy because our increasingly safe, suburbanised existence. "It's pretty clear that the answer is to get back to respecting the earth and having a connection with it," he says. "When you're in the city everything's so easy to get … and when you tear away all that modern world stuff, you can feel the benefits. "Your ego drops, you stop looking at yourself in the mirror. Don't take the selfie, don't take your phone out there and take selfies. It's not conducive to the spirit path, and it's not conducive to life." As technology expands to fill almost every facet of our lives, the promise of the wilderness shimmers like a mirage in our minds — a place to disconnect, to be alone, and, in as Bogucki puts it, "strip away the bark to find your essence". This concept of choosing to "go bush" for spiritual enlightenment is, in some ways, a privileged perspective. Aboriginal people continued to "survive" in some of the most challenging wilderness landscapes in Australia until around 50 years ago. Many still rely on age-old hunting and fishing techniques in places where shops are far away and incomes low. They're skills that help people survive when things go pear-shaped out bush. And it's often local Indigenous people who find and help tourists when they become stranded. Jabirr Jabirr and Nyikina man Lindsay Greatorex says older Aboriginal people's knowledge of Australia's remote landscapes is unparalleled and underestimated. "For tens of thousands of years, Aboriginal people built this incredible knowledge of country … they knew where the soak holes were, they knew the weather and the timing of everything," he says. "That's how we survived in those arid locations over the years, and there's still this survival instinct of the mob. Greatorex worked as a police officer across Western Australian for almost 20 years, and was part of the local team that went out in search of Bogucki in 1999. At times throughout his career, he watched in disbelief as men who'd grown up in the desert used their tracking skills to quickly locate missing people in remote areas. But he says the skills are at risk of disappearing, with younger generations largely stuck in towns and unable to learn how to live off the land their ancestors survived in for generations. "It's sad to see, and it's why it's so important we do our best to get our kids out bush," he reflects. "I have a bit of knowledge, but even I get my bush tucker from the supermarket — it's not like the old days, that's for sure." Outback survival makes for riveting viewing because it captures a reality that terrifies most people — being forced to rely on only yourself as imminent death looms. Australians are increasingly buffered from risk, and living longer than ever before. Outback survival offers a glimpse at an earlier existence that few would want to relive, but one that many suspect offered a sense of focus, purpose and wellbeing many now struggle to achieve. As Australian writer Ruth Ostrow observed in an article about Bogucki's disappearance in 1999, the fear of a life unlived haunts those of us fortunate enough to never know how we'd cope in a life -or-death situation. "As I stare into Bogucki's eye, I am afraid. Afraid of letting life pass me by," she wrote in a piece titled In Search of Peace on Earth. "But most of all, I'm afraid that I will never roam barefoot through dusty sand dunes, totally alone with the sound of my heartbeat and the wind, in the wilderness of my soul. "We've grown fat on money, food and possessions. But still we remain empty.
