
Reform UK's new justice adviser calls for bolstered ‘rehabilitation' in prisons
Speaking on Times Radio, Ms Frake said: 'I read every week negative press about our prison service and drugs, mobiles, violence, suicide, self-harm, etcetera, etcetera.
'And you know, the time is now for somebody to do something about it. Successive governments have failed and failed miserably and, you know, that's why our prison service now is on its knees.'
The former prison governor said: 'I'm not naive in the fact that people don't want to spend money on prisons – they'd rather it went to the NHS, to education – I'm not naive at all about that.
'But actually, if you think about the whole picture, at the moment we're warehousing prisoners and we're turning out better criminals into our society.
'I'd like to see it where we actually do some rehabilitation and make our society safer for our children, and that is going to cost money but at least somebody is listening to others.'
Ms Frake, who wrote about her previous work in her book The Governor, also referred to a Government scheme which cut temporarily the proportion of sentences certain inmates must serve behind bars from 50% to 40%.
'In a prison, now they do 40% of a sentence,' she said.
'There's very little you can do with somebody who is addicted to drugs, alcohol, has mental health issues. There is very little you can do within a prison at that time.
'And when people are sentenced to short sentences, they lose their support systems on the outside.
'They lose their home if they had one, they lose family support and we let them out with nothing so their only alternative is to commit crime and get on that crime ladder, and that needs to be addressed.
'What I would like to see is much better community services, much better community and substance misuse services outside of prisons, and much better management of prisoners on the outside.'
Asked whether she was willing to have a 'difficult conversation' with party leader Nigel Farage, Ms Frake replied: 'He might have his own views but he will listen far more than any other party has listened in the past.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Statesman
40 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Britons increasingly fear future political violence
Photo byA large majority of the British public are concerned about the potential for political violence according to new polling conducted by Looking for Growth and Merlin Strategy. A survey of 2000 adults between 25 and 27 July found that 7 in 10 (70 per cent) are concerned about the potential for political violence. A further 1 in 5 (21 per cent) say that political violence in the UK is acceptable in some conditions. A similar number (18 per cent) say they would consider participating in violent protests as the state of Britain declines. Broken down by party affilation, the survey found that 1 in 3 (32 per cent) of Reform UK voters say political violence is acceptable in some conditions. The Green Party had the second highest number saying violence was acceptable in some conditions (24 per cent). The findings come a year after the murder of Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, and Bebe King, six, at a Taylor Swift dance class in Southport sparked days of violent rioting across England and Northern Ireland. Riots in Aldershot, Tamworth and Rotherham targeted so-called 'asylum hotels'. The hotels have become a flashpoint once again this summer. Protests around so-called asylum hotels have taken place in Epping, Diss and Canary Wharf in recent weeks. On Saturday clashes took place between anti-racism demonstrators and anti-asylum hotel protestors outside the Thistle Hotel in central London. The Home Office says fewer than 210 hotels are now being used to house asylum seekers, down from more than 400 in the summer of 2023. Meanwhile the number of asylum seekers crossing the Channel has surpassed 25,000 this year, the earliest the figure has been reached. Britons are split on whether it is acceptable to protest outside an asylum hotel, with 47 per cent saying it is acceptable, and 44 per cent saying it is unacceptable. Only 14 per cent say it is acceptable to riot outside an asylum hotel, and only 1 in 5 (19 per cent) of Reform UK voters say it is acceptable to riot outside an asylum hotel. [See also: One year on, tensions still circle Britain's asylum-seeker hotels] Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Related


Telegraph
40 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour wrong to give 16-year-olds the vote, says former supreme court judge
Labour should not give 16-year-olds the vote while it blocks them from accessing adult content online, one of Britain's most senior former judges has warned. Lord Sumption, a former justice of the Supreme Court, criticised Sir Keir Starmer's decision to extend the franchise to 1.5 million 16 and 17-year-olds at the next general election and said the limit should have remained at 21. He accused the Government of a 'crude' attempt to increase the number of Labour voters, although said much of the new electorate will vote for Nigel Farage's Reform UK. Lord Sumption is a retired judge and was considered one of Britain's most important barristers. He is now a notable historian of the mediaeval period. 'I think that it is a mistake to lower the voting age to 16,' he told the Policy Unstuck newsletter. 'I would actually not have reduced the voting age below the age of 21. I think it's a fairly crude attempt to change the electorate so as to introduce a large number of people whom Mr Starmer thinks will vote Labour. 'He may be wrong about that. The polls suggest that quite a lot of them will vote Reform. 'And quite a lot of those who might, last year have voted Labour will vote for Jeremy Corbyn's party. So, he may end up stabbing himself in the back.' He added that there was a tension between the Government's policy and the newly-enforced Online Safety Act, which bans under-18s from accessing adult content online. Tech firms, which have been threatened with huge fines for breaching the rules, have begun to enforce them by stopping underage people from listening to explicit music online or reading some innocuous social media posts. 'The reality is that there are many things that we do not allow 16-year-olds to do,' Lord Sumption said. 'For example, under the Online Safety Act, they can't access significant parts of the internet. I don't have an objection to that in itself. 'But that's some indication of where we think that the boundary lies between responsible adulthood and childhood.' New polling by the research firm More in Common finds that a majority of parents of 16 and 17-year-olds say they should not be able to vote. Fourteen per cent of the parents polled said their child would vote for Labour, while the same proportion said they would vote for Reform. One percentage point less – 13 per cent – think their child would vote for the Green Party. Sir Keir pledged to lower the voting age to 16 when he ran to be Labour leader in 2020, allowing children to cast a ballot in general elections for the first time ever. Sixteen and 17-year-olds are already allowed to vote in elections for the devolved administrations in Scotland and Wales. Among the population more generally, 70 per cent of people think that teenagers are too immature to vote. That view is especially popular among people who voted for Reform last year and the over-75s.


Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
Reform's motherland, Meloni's Italian renaissance & the adults learning to swim
First: Nigel Farage is winning over women Does – or did – Nigel Farage have a woman problem? 'Around me there's always been a perception of a laddish culture,' he tells political editor Tim Shipman. In last year's election, 58 per cent of Reform voters were men. But, Shipman argues, 'that has begun to change'. According to More in Common, Reform has gained 14% among women, while Labour has lost 12%. 'Women are 'more likely than men… to worry that the country is broken.' Many of Reform's most recent victories have been by women: Andrea Jenkyns in the mayoral elections, Sarah Pochin to Parliament; plus, there most recent high profile defections include a former Tory Welsh Assembly member and a former Labour London councillor. What makes Reform's success with women all the more remarkable is that it appears organic; 'we haven't forced this' says Farage. So why are women turning to Reform UK? Tim Shipman and Sarah Pochin MP join the podcast to discuss. Next: is Italy experiencing a renaissance? From Italy, Owen Matthews argues that Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has revived her nation. While he says that Italy has been 'suffering from the same economic malaise' as the rest of Europe, the macroeconomics covers up the true affordability of the country. Espressos cost €1.20, pizzas are no more than €10, and rents in even the swankiest areas are 'laughably' cheap compared to Britain. Plus, Owen sees none of the 'media catastrophisation' over issues like immigration, social cohesion and militant Islam that appears to grip the UK. So how has Meloni done it? To discuss, Owen joined the podcast alongside Antonello Guerrera, UK & Westminster correspondent for the Italian newspaper Repubblica. And finally: one in three British adults cannot swim This week, Iram Ramzan provides her 'notes on' learning to swim saying, 'it's humiliating to admit that at 37' she can't. She's not alone though – one third of British adults cannot swim, and the proportion appears to be rising. Iram highlights the disparities between different communities; 76 percent of South Asian women for example cannot swim 25 metres. Iram joined the podcast to discuss further, alongside fitness professional and entrepreneur Elle Linton who also learnt to swim in her thirties. Plus: what small error led Rachel Johnson to get a telling off from Noel Gallagher? And Max Jeffery reports from court, where the Spectator and Douglas Murray have won a defamation claim brought against them by Mohammed Hijab. Hosted by William Moore and Lara Prendergast. Produced by Patrick Gibbons.