Tasmanian state budget flags big challenges, with major savings that must be found
A self-described "ambitious reform agenda" that relies on cutting the public service and selling state-owned assets underlies Tasmanian Treasurer Guy Barnett's budget.
The 2025-26 budget makes it clear that debt is ballooning, and puts it down to a number of things including increased demand on the health system, implementing recommendations from the child sexual abuse inquiry and the ongoing financial impact of the pandemic.
With little new revenue on the horizon, the government is looking to sell off government businesses and find efficiencies in the public service.
The recently announced Efficiency and Productivity Unit (EPU) will play a large role in that.
It is in charge of finding at least $150 million in ongoing savings from the 2027-28 financial year.
But while the government is determined to speed up its pathway to surplus, that plan is largely reliant on future unknowns.
The government continues to have the same problem — spending more than it is earning.
This financial year, Tasmania is predicted to make about $9.5 billion in revenue, and spend $10.5 billion.
This means the net operating deficit is about $1 billion.
Remove the Australian government's one-off contributions to infrastructure projects and the figure is worse, with a fiscal deficit of $1.3 billion.
The state's net debt is expected to reach $7.3 billion in the upcoming financial year. In four years' time, it is projected to balloon to almost $10.8 billion.
The interest repayments on that debt are growing and expected to rise to almost $650 million a year by 2028-29.
GST remains the largest source of income for Tasmania, representing 40 per cent of government revenue in 2025-26.
Tasmania currently gets a 3.84 per cent share of Australia's GST pie. But that is shrinking slightly over the next four years to 3.62 per cent, partly due to a lower population growth forecast.
However, in dollar terms, the amount of money Tasmania receives will continue to grow, with the general GST pool expected to rise.
The state will still receive the no-worse-off guarantee payments of $384.4 million. That is not due to expire until 2029-30.
Around a third of the revenue comes from the government's own sources, like taxes and dividends from government-owned businesses.
The government has kept its promise not to introduce any new taxes.
As to where it is going, once again health sucks up the largest amount of money, representing 34 per cent of expenditure. Education represents about a quarter.
There is $3.5 billion in infrastructure spending budgeted over 2025-26 and the forward estimates.
About $1.6 billion of that is for roads and bridges, but the state generally underspends on this figure.
And, yes, there is money in there for the Macquarie Point stadium.
In his speech, Mr Barnett makes it clear the "divestment of some government businesses and surplus crown land" will be used to prop up the budget.
The government does not yet know which state-owned companies will be sold; however, it has ruled a number out based on two independent reports.
Independent economist Saul Eslake's report into the possibility of selling some publicly owned companies rules out a number of government business enterprises (GBEs).
The government has taken advice from Mr Eslake's report, ruling out the sale of:
The government has reversed its previous decision to privatise parts of the Public Trustee.
Meanwhile, Deloitte's examination of a mega merger between TasRail, TasPorts and TT-Line found merging either two or three of the entities would be "unfeasible" and present complexities around "misaligned objectives and minimal operational synergies".
As a result, Mr Barnett has not only ruled out the merger, but also the sale of Spirit of Tasmania ferry operator, TT-Line.
The government maintains it will not sell Hydro Tasmania.
Mr Barnett said the sale of the following state-owned companies "will continue to be thoroughly assessed":
Mr Eslake will hand the second part of his report to the government by the end of June. In it he assesses whether each GBE or state-owned company could be sold.
Deloitte also suggested that the government explore the potential sale of Devonport Airport and the Bass Island Line shipping service.
The budget and Mr Barnett's speech are peppered with words like "right shape", "right size", "right place" and "right tool" — many of them in reference to the public service.
They flag potentially major changes and losing about 2,500 jobs by 2032-33. But the government has not outlined how it will achieve them.
The Efficiency and Productivity Unit (EPU) which will help government agencies find areas for "improvement" either through programs, staff cuts and digitalisation.
Meanwhile, the productivity and efficiency measure — that replaces the efficiency dividend in 2027-28 — is still aiming to save $150 million.
Rather than each department having to find a set amount of savings, it will look at the public service as a whole, meaning more efficiencies might be found in some departments than others.
Given it doesn't know what savings can be found yet, the government is hoping to save even more than $150 million.
The Department of Treasury and Finance has also been allocated $3.3 million to help agencies identify savings strategies.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
29 minutes ago
- ABC News
Trump's steel and aluminium tariffs now in effect
US President Donald Trump's 50 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium have come into effect, with the White House now calling for major trading partners to argue why they should not be hit with other tariffs.

News.com.au
39 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff is facing a no-confidence vote on Thursday
Tasmanian parliament will resume its debate on the no-confidence motion against Premier Jeremy Rockliff, which could see him toppled or a snap election called. Opposition Leader Dean Winter tabled the motion, citing the Premier's handling of the state's ailing economy, the handing of the Spirit of Tasmania replacement ferries and the AFL stadium project. MPs debated the motion for about 10 hours before parliament was suspended and Wednesday and will resume on Thursday at 10am. A majority of the 35-seat House of Assembly have indicated they will vote in favour of the motion. This would weaken the minority Liberal government which has 14 MPs compared to Labor's 10. Mr Rockliff flagged he was willing to force a snap election, just 15 months after the state went to an early election. The Premier on Wednesday made an impassioned speech in his allocated 30 minutes, calling on crossbenchers to seriously consider the consequences if he was defeated. 'Do they really want to follow a wrecker who has come in day in day out and targeted individual members with disdain who did nothing more than to have the courage to put their hand up to make a difference to the Tasmanian people,' Mr Rockliff said. 'Whatever the outcome is, I implore this parliament to put Tasmanians first. 'They do not want an election. Dean Winter wants an election. 'What the Tasmania people want is stability, certainty and strong leadership.' In introducing the motion, Mr Winter said it gave him 'no pleasure to move this motion'. 'But under our system of government, if the Premier does not have the support of the majority of the House, then they cannot continue,' the Opposition Leader said. 'I don't believe I can in good conscience allow this Premier to continue. Tasmania needs change, not more of the same.' The Greens have indicated they are willing to form a minority government with Labor should Tasmanians head back to the polls just 15 months after the last state election.

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
The iron ore and steel market moves with the times as Pilbara mines degrade
Aussie iron ore grades have been declining for years Steel mills in China have been adapting to lower grades and higher impurities from Pilbara ores Fastmarkets launches new 61% Fe Index to reflect shifting sands of iron ore and steel market For several years the calling cry of the iron ore market was that grades would need to push higher, products become cleaner and quality control tighter to meet the demands of a Chinese steel sector seeking to reduce the emissions of its heavily polluting industry. In reality the opposite has happened. And the market has shown its inexhaustible adaptability in the face of changes thrust on it by macroeconomic pressures. This week just gone Chinese rebar futures tumbled to an eight-year low amid a property sector bust that has torpedoed the profitability of China's steel mills. Yet Chinese steel production remains on track to settle around the billion tonne mark for a sixth straight year. The response from mill operators has been to use lower grade material that costs less, aided by lower coking coal prices. It also measures up with what the Pilbara's majors have been shipping. Grades from BHP (ASX:BHP) and Rio Tinto's (ASX:RIO) Pilbara mines have been sliding for years. Rio, notably, recently told customers its Pilbara Blend fines would drop from long term grades of 61.6% Fe to 60.8% Fe from July to September this year. BHP downgraded its Mining Area C and Newman High Grade Fines products last year. It reflects a trend that will continue until the majors invest in replacement mines that can arrest the decline, now seemingly baked into their operations, with BHP and RIO regularly reporting price realisations at a discount to the Platts 62% IODEX. In response another price setter, Fastmarkets, has delivered one of the biggest changes to its indices in years, with the launch of a 61% Fe index. Its first trading day on Monday June 2 reported that price a US$92.09/t, below the 62% Fe benchmark of US$93.65/t. In many ways, it will likely give investors, and bean counters at the WA and Federal Governments, a more accurate picture of how much Rio and BHP's iron ore is actually pulling in. "I think there's a lot of interest over the 61% index as it now starts to represent the major mid-grade iron ore segment, especially for Australian ores," Fastmarkets regional managing editor Paul Lim said. "So I think miners and investors all around the world will be looking at the 61% Fe Index as a key barometer of how the Australian mining sector as well as how the Chinese economy is doing as a whole." Both sides of the belt The relationship between Australia's iron ore mines and China's steel market is often described as a conveyor belt which runs over the ocean. So smooth is the network from mine to port in the Pilbara to factory door in Hebei, that it has enabled BHP, Rio, Roy Hill and Fortescue (ASX:FMG) to run at costs that make them the most profitable in the mining sector globally. Even at record prices, gold producers are only now pulling in sales revenues at levels approaching double their cost base. Iron ore miners, on the other hand, receive sales prices that are roughly four times their per tonne cash costs, and that's in a bearish market. With grades slipping from the iron ore majors, Chinese steel mills have adapted to cope, in ways that also help them stem losses caused by weak domestic steel demand. The 61% Fe Index incorporates material that not only has lower Fe grades than the 62% Fe benchmark but also higher impurities – partly a function of grade. Steel mills are becoming more accepting of ore with higher silica and alumina (4.3% and 2.5% for the 61% index vs 4% and 2.3% for the 62% index), adapting their blast furnaces to refined discounted product. "It depends on many factors, right? So, number one, the typical Chinese steelmaker is quite different now from the past, so now China is very skilled at blending ores and even with the weak steel margins they are willing to take on ores with higher impurities," Lim said. Those ores are blended with domestic magnetite concentrates or pellet feed to get specs right in the blast furnace. "The main driver is always profitability, they are looking for economical blends, so they are willing to take ores which are priced lower but have higher contaminant levels," Lim said. "Coal is also cheap so it's easy for them to buy the cheap fuel to just burn through the lower grade iron ores. " This produces a higher amount of slag, but they're OK with this. They will just remove the slag, and there's no need for increased productivity." What does this mean for high grade? Does this mean margin squeeze will squeeze high grade iron ore just as majors complete investments into new sources – Fortescue at its Iron Bridge magnetite project in the Pilbara and Rio/China at the Simandou project in Guinea, West Africa. Maybe not. As Lim stated, China's steelmakers have become adept at blending ores. "The increase in contaminant levels as well as low Fe will have implications for other ores around the world – it will support high grade iron ore prices, it's just at this moment China may not be seeking as much high grade iron ore," he said. " So this change is actually good for high grade producers around the world." Industry participants have made similar comments, with the volume of iron ore suitable for use in lower emissions steelmaking technologies like direct reduced iron restricted by deposit grades and purity specifications. That means most high grade iron ores will have value in blending with low grade ores to reduce emissions in blast furnaces. "The best way to (reduce emissions), if you wanted to have an immediate impact, would be basically just to put cleaner ores in your blast furnaces," Cyclone Metals (ASX:CLE) CEO Paul Berend, whose firm is working with Brazil's Vale to develop the Iron Bear magnetite project in Canada, said. "If you've got cleaner ores, you use less energy, less energy means less pollution, less CO2." With the quality of hematite DSO ores degrading, Berend said WA miners had been slower than international producers like Vale to develop resources with potential to supply higher grade from magnetites.