Arctic sea ice hits lowest peak, says US agency
This year's Arctic sea ice peak is the lowest in the 47-year satellite record, the US National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) said Thursday, as the planet continues to swelter under the mounting effects of human-driven climate change.
The start of this year saw the warmest January on record followed by the third-warmest February, with the polar regions heating several times faster than the global average.
The 2025 maximum sea ice extent was likely reached on March 22, measuring 14.33 million square kilometers (5.53 million square miles) -- below the previous low of 14.41 million square kilometers set in 2017.
"This new record low is yet another indicator of how Arctic sea ice has fundamentally changed from earlier decades," said NSIDC senior research scientist Walt Meier in a statement.
"But even more importantly than the record low is that this year adds yet another data point to the continuing long-term loss of Arctic sea ice in all seasons."
The record-low Arctic maximum extent follows a near-record-low minimum extent of sea ice in the Antarctic, where it is now summer.
The 2025 Antarctic sea ice minimum, achieved on March 1, was 1.98 million square kilometers, tying for the second-lowest annual minimum in the satellite record, alongside 2022 and 2024.
Combined Arctic and Antarctic sea ice cover -- frozen ocean water that floats on the surface -- plunged to a record low in February, according to both the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and Europe's Copernicus Climate Change Service.
While floating sea ice does not directly raise sea levels, its disappearance sets off a cascade of climate consequences, altering weather patterns, disrupting ocean currents, and threatening ecosystems and human communities.
When reflective ice gives way to the dark ocean, the sun's energy, instead of bouncing back into space, is absorbed by the water, warming it and fueling further ice melt and global warming.
Shrinking Arctic ice is also reshaping geopolitics, opening new shipping lanes and drawing geopolitical interest. Since taking office this year, US President Donald Trump has said his country must control Greenland, a Danish autonomous territory rich in mineral resources.
The loss of polar ice spells disaster for numerous species, robbing polar bears, seals, and penguins of crucial habitat used for shelter, hunting, and breeding.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
03-06-2025
- Express Tribune
Trump Proposes $1B for Private Sector to Lead Mars Exploration in NASA Budget
President Donald Trump has laid out an ambitious proposal in his 2026 budget that allocates $1 billion for Mars exploration. Under the initiative, dubbed the Commercial Mars Payload Services Program (CMPS), NASA would collaborate with private companies to develop key technologies for Mars missions. The proposal includes contracts for spacesuits, communication systems, and a human-rated landing vehicle. The plan marks a shift from traditional government-led space exploration, aligning closely with SpaceX's ambitions for Mars, as spearheaded by Elon Musk. The budget suggests a significant reduction in NASA's funding, including cuts to its science portfolio, with Trump emphasizing cost efficiency and the need for taxpayer stewardship. Critics of the plan, including lawmakers and former NASA officials, argue that the proposed cuts could hinder long-term goals. Despite this, the administration remains confident that the private sector can play a crucial role in achieving Mars exploration while reducing costs and risks. This bold proposal sets the stage for a new era of space exploration that blends government oversight with private sector innovation. President Trump said it himself: We're going to lead humanity into space and plant the American flag on MARS! — Rep. Mike Haridopolos (@RepHaridopolos) March 5, 2025
Express Tribune
21-05-2025
- Express Tribune
Trump launches $175 billion Golden Dome defense system, seeks allied support
Listen to article US President Donald Trump on Tuesday unveiled the design of the proposed $175-billion Golden Dome missile defence shield and appointed US Space Force General Michael Guetlein to lead the project. The system, aimed at countering missile threats from China and Russia, will rely on hundreds of satellites to detect, track and potentially intercept enemy launches. Speaking at a White House press conference, Trump described the initiative as essential to "protect our homeland." He also revealed that Canada had expressed interest in joining the effort. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's office confirmed that security and economic ties with the United States were under review and that talks included 'strengthening NORAD and related initiatives such as the Golden Dome.' Trump said he hopes the system will be operational by the end of his term in January 2029. However, analysts have questioned the feasibility of that timeline and the programme's true cost. "This is what Reagan envisioned with 'Star Wars'," Trump said, referencing the 1980s Strategic Defense Initiative. "We finally have the technology to do it." While Republican lawmakers back the idea, the project faces political and financial hurdles. The US Congressional Budget Office recently estimated the full cost could exceed $831 billion over two decades. Some Democrats have voiced concerns about transparency and the selection process for key contractors, with companies like SpaceX, Palantir and Anduril seen as potential frontrunners. "This isn't just about traditional defence anymore," said Senator Kevin Cramer. "It's a new ecosystem driven by software, sensors and private innovation." L3Harris Technologies, Lockheed Martin and RTX Corp were among firms mentioned as possible contributors to the effort. L3Harris has already invested $150 million into a facility in Indiana producing tracking satellites that could support the Golden Dome. Trump's version of the shield takes inspiration from Israel's Iron Dome, but on a much larger, space-based scale, with arrays of surveillance and intercept satellites designed to eliminate threats early in their flight. Initial production is expected to tap into existing Pentagon programmes. Alaska, Florida, Georgia and Indiana were named as states likely to benefit from early deployment and industrial investment. Funding remains uncertain. Republicans have proposed a $25-billion initial outlay as part of a broader $150-billion defence package, but the measure is tied to a contentious reconciliation bill. 'Unless reconciliation passes, the funds for Golden Dome may not materialise,' said one industry executive who requested anonymity. 'This puts the entire project timeline in jeopardy.'
Express Tribune
18-05-2025
- Express Tribune
Why America is losing ground
Listen to article Statistics are one part of the changing American story. The other include serious cultural backlash against people of colour and those who follow religious faiths that are different from Christianity. Taken together these factors are changing the American landscape. I will first provide some numbers. For decades America led the world in achieving excellence that made it world leader. In 2024, the year Donald Trump won the second term as US president, Americans spent $1 trillion — about 3.5% of the country's gross domestic product — on research and development. A large proportion of this came from the government and was focused on basic research and its application. This put America on the top of scientific and technological advance. The government's share in total expenditure was 40%. The remaining 60% came from private enterprises that relied on universities and research institutions to supply the knowledge they needed. Even IBM that spent a lot of money on research brought in the best and the brightest to work in its laboratories, gave significant amounts of money to private universities and research institutions. Not only the very best in terms of talent from different parts of the world were attracted to America to learn and acquire skills, a large proportion of them did not return to their home countries. They stayed in the United States working in jobs and opportunities that were not available in the countries of their origin. Social scientists came up with a term that described the type of flow of talent from the rest of the world to the United States. They called it "brain drain". However, the drain began to dry up when Trump won the presidency for the second time in 2024. He brought in Elon Musk, the billionaire reputed to be the richest man in the world to sit by his side. Originally from South Africa, Musk made money by creating a new motor vehicle that ran on electric power. He also did a number of innovative things related to space exploration. His 'Starlink' programme features thousands of satellites in orbits close to Earth which became critical contributors to communication. The GPS system we use to move around in our vehicles in the cities in which we live is the product of Musk's innovations. However, the Trump-Musk team made it difficult for talented people across the globe to get visas to enter the United States for study and training or to stay on in the country once they were done with their studies and training. Denied the opportunity to stay and work in the United States, many returned to their home countries. "This is once-in-a-century brain gain opportunity," the Australian Strategic Policy Institute said in a statement meant to draw the attention of the authorities in his country. The Institute wished the Government of Australia to take advantage of the changing situation in the United States. But Australia was not the only country in the West to move in the direction of "brain gain". In early May, more than a dozen members of the European Union announced that together they would spend an additional $556 million over the next two years to "make Europe a magnet for researchers". This is a small amount compared to what the United States was spending up until now. In France, for instance, a 35-year old researcher could expect to earn around $4,000 a month before taxes. A post-doctoral fellow at Stanford University California can expect to earn nearly $7,000 a month, 75% more than his counterpart would take home in France. But Europe's more generous social safety net can make up for a large part of the salary differential, according to Patrick Lemaire, the president of a think-tank based in Paris. His institution is an arm of an international council that represents about 50,000 academics in France. "There is much less money in Europe, and the salaries are much lower," he said. "But you also have very good social security and health care, which is free; school and tuition are free." On top of this America was seen as less-welcoming compared to the situation prior to Trump-Musk. There are good reasons why we are seeing "brain gain" rather than "brain drain". What the academics are finding it difficult to understand is why Trump and his associates have come down so hard on institutions such as Harvard, Stanford and Columbia. Some of this is being done to appease the Jewish lobby in the United States which is upset at what it sees as open anti-Semitism among student bodies in these and other institutions. Even a well-endowed institution such as Harvard is suffering because of the massive reduction in the flow of funds from the Government to the University. Trump has threatened to withdraw tax exemption for the university from its earnings from its large endowment. There is budding consensus among experts and academics that various Trump policies would hurt America, especially its future and leadership in the world. America is also being hurt by the demographic transition that has begun to affect the size of its population along with that of other nations in the West. China is also experiencing the same phenomenon. This is happening because the rate of human fertility has fallen below 2.1 per woman, called the "replacement rate" demographers. Above the rate, population continues to increase; below it declines in size. Pakistan is an example of a country where the fertility is well above the replacement rate. Decline in the size of the population means that it is ageing. The proportion of the youth in the population is declining. But young people are needed to keep economic and social dynamism. This can happen if immigrants are allowed. The countries that have high replacement rates have people of colour; most of them are non-Christians. Large migrations would change the colour of its population and bring non-Christians into the country. This is not acceptable to the majority of the country's population.
