
BP at risk of takeover without renewed oil and gas focus success
It is nearly five years to the day since Bernard Looney, the then new chief executive of BP, set out a radical strategy for the oil major to go net zero by 2050.
Under that strategy, BP would invest more in low carbon energy sources and less in oil and gas, even to the extent of leaving in the ground some of the oil and gas it had originally planned to extract.
Investors were initially sceptical but prepared to give Mr Looney the benefit of the doubt and particularly when, a year later, he was able to argue that things were turning BP's way with, for example, the US rejoining the Paris climate agreement.
Today, though, it feels as if BP is repudiating all of that as the company promised to "fundamentally reset" its strategy.
A capital markets day, due to take place on 26 February, is expected to announce that BP is reducing its low carbon investments in order to focus on its core oil and gas assets.
Murray Auchincloss, who succeeded Mr Looney at the end of 2023 after the latter failed to disclose relationships with colleagues to the board, said this morning: "We have been reshaping our portfolio - sanctioning new major projects, and focusing our low-carbon investment - and we have made strong progress in reducing costs.
"Building on the actions taken in the last 12 months, we now plan to fundamentally reset our strategy and drive further improvements in performance, all in service of growing cash flow and returns. It will be a new direction for BP and we look forward to sharing it at our capital markets update on 26 February."
That reset is expected to see BP abandon plans to reduce its oil and gas production over time.
The company had already reduced its renewables investment and spun off its offshore wind assets into a separate joint venture with Japanese partner Jera. The reset may even see BP abandon a pledge made by Mr Looney to reduce its oil production by 2030 to 70% of its level in 2019.
The company has already scaled back a pledge to reduce its carbon emissions by the end of the decade from 35-40% of 2019 levels to between 20-30%.
The news, while it will dismay climate activists, points to a new-found pragmatism at BP.
The company's share price has underperformed that of its rivals, particularly US players such as Exxon and Chevron, who have remained focused throughout on their core fossil fuel activities.
Meanwhile, it emerged over the weekend that Elliott Management, the feared activist investor famous for its campaigns at some of the world's biggest companies, had taken an undisclosed stake in BP, placing further pressure on management. Mr Auchincloss last month announced plans to cut BP's workforce by 5% - reducing the headcount by 4,700 - as he seeks to achieve $2bn worth of cost savings.
It is unclear what actions Elliott hopes BP will take but it would not be a surprise were it, for example, to demand BP demerges its renewables assets from its traditional fossil fuel assets to become a focused oil and gas company again.
Analysts have also speculated that Elliott may agitate for the removal of Helge Lund, BP's chairman, who was a key driver of the strategy previously put in place under Mr Looney.
Adding to pressure for change is the fact that the world has changed since Mr Looney's big announcement. Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 highlighted the importance of oil and gas while Donald Trump is back in the White House and is promising to "drill, baby, drill", having already taken the US out of the Paris agreement again.
Ironically, given the revived emphasis on oil and gas, it was these activities which proved a drag on BP's earnings during the final three months of 2024.
Underlying replacement cost profit, the accepted industry reporting standard, fell to $1.17bn from $2.99bn during the same period in 2023 due, among other things, to weaker refining margins. For the year as a whole, underlying replacement cost profit fell to $8.92bn from $13.84bn in 2023.
Investors were less focused on those numbers today. For them, all eyes are now on 26 February. Longer term, unless Mr Auchincloss can get the share price higher, BP looks to be a sitting duck for a possible takeover.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Shell-BP merger's key ingredient is time
LONDON, June 3 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Wael Sawan must feel like it's Groundhog Day. In recent weeks Shell's (SHEL.L), opens new tab chief executive has been fielding one question over and over again: whether he's considering merging his $198 billion group with struggling UK rival BP (BP.L), opens new tab. Drill down into whether a swoop for the $77 billion oil major makes any sense, and Sawan's lack of enthusiasm is understandable. Yet a year from now, conditions could look more favourable. Shell-BP would be a seriously big beast. At around 5.4 million of daily barrels of oil equivalent output, it would create a European giant that dwarfs even U.S. peer Exxon Mobil (XOM.N), opens new tab, the biggest Western oil major. The same would apply to its 3.1 million barrels of daily refining capacity, putting it second behind Exxon. Extensive overlap of oil fields, especially in the United States, implies scope for big cost savings. Even so, the market likes the cost cuts and deleveraging Sawan has managed since joining in January 2023. Shell has outperformed even U.S. giants like Exxon and Chevron (CVX.N), opens new tab, and BP's market capitalisation now lies below 40% of its domestic rival's – the level at which managers internally start to feel it's worth seriously considering a merger, according to a person familiar with the matter. Even so, the M&A math still has to be convincing. Right now, it isn't. Assume Shell offered a typical 30% premium, valuing BP's equity at $100 billion. Add in BP's $27 billion of net debt, $13 billion of leases and $17 billion of hybrid bonds, and BP's enterprise value would be $157 billion. Going forward, Goldman Sachs analysts expect BP to make less than $17 billion of operating profit in 2026, which factors in expected hits from lower oil prices. Taxed at the 40% tax rate BP guides to, that's a 6% return on invested capital – less than BP's cost of capital of around 8%, as estimated by Morningstar. That number admittedly doesn't include the synergies. Cost savings of anything between 25% and 50% of the target's distribution and administrative expenses – which include rents and other overheads – are possible on big fossil fuel mergers, according to a person familiar with deals in the industry. Assume that Shell can strip out 25% of BP's $16 billion of such costs in 2024 – roughly in line with synergies from Exxon's landmark Mobil swoop in 1999 and Chevron's 2023 offer to buy Hess – and BP's operating profit would expand to the tune of $4 billion. Even then the overall return would still be less than 8%. Given the execution and antitrust risks inherent in such a deal, plus chunky one-off transaction costs, that's not a juicy enough return. Sawan is gaining plaudits simply by buying back $3.5 billion of his shares each quarter, and reckons Shell's free cash flow per share will grow 10% or more annually out to 2030. An all-share swoop for BP – which is probably the main option given the sums involved – would inflate Shell's share count by 50% and might imperil this cash gusher. Even so, by the second half of 2026 things may look different. For one thing, Shell's shares may continue to rise. Bank of America estimates for 2026 suggest the group is trading on a 12% free cash flow yield, way above the 8% European oil sector average – implying the group is undervalued. For another, in a year's time Sawan might be keener on a fresh growth story. While he has already hit 'first sprint' ten-quarter efficiency targets launched in June 2023, and promised further self-help by 2028, mega-M&A that takes 18 months to bed down could provide it. BP, meanwhile, could look worse. It may take too long to replace a management team and chair that have become associated with previous strategic missteps, or stumble into another crisis. Oil prices upended by excess supply and the shock from U.S. tariffs could also hit BP relatively harder, given 90% of its 2024 operating profit came from exploration and production and it has a more leveraged balance sheet. If oil prices languish at $60 a barrel, BP is expected to cut annual buybacks by 70% in 2026 compared to 2024 levels, per JPMorgan analysts. In contrast, Shell can maintain its dividend and buybacks in such a scenario, Bernstein analysts reckon. Imagine that Shell's shares rise another 10% from their current level so the company is worth $220 billion, while BP's slump 10% to $69 billion. In a year's time BP's divestment push to cut net debt to between $14 billion and $18 billion by end-2027 should be well underway, given progress in a potential sale of Castrol, which could be valued at $10 billion. If the $18 billion of BP operating profit estimated for 2027 by Goldman transpires, and BP's net debt is trimmed by $10 billion, Shell could achieve a 10% return in that year even if it only extracted the same $4 billion of synergies. These synergies, meanwhile, are a movable feast. While analysis by McKinsey found, opens new tab that 50% of fossil fuel deals in the exploration and production segment of the sector destroyed value, Exxon's Mobil merger captured $10 billion in synergies within five years, far outpacing the $2.8 billion flagged by the acquirer at the time. Shell itself upgraded its synergy estimate from buying BG Group in 2016 from $2.5 billion to $4.5 billion. If Sawan thought he could strip out 50% of BP's D&A costs, his return would rise to 12%. Shell's boss may still resist the bother of a major deal. And BP may end up getting a new management team in double quick time, egged on by 5% activist shareholder Elliott Investment Management. That might prompt it to re-rate, messing up the favourable deal math. Still, many of Shell's shareholders are also BP investors. If they start to think BP-Shell is the new Exxon-Mobil, then they will likely make that clear. Follow Yawen Chen on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.


Daily Record
6 hours ago
- Daily Record
Debenhams shoppers rush to grab £78 watch that is 'mistaken for Rolex' before Father's Day
'Excellent looking watch! Great shine, perfect case size and good weight.' With Father's Day just around the corner, a watch can be a quality gift to give your loved ones that is both practical and heartfelt. What's better is that Debenhams is holding a massive sale on many popular timepieces so you won't need to break the bank. One issue that can arise when buying a watch is that the style may be perfect, but your preferred colour is not part of the advertised selection. If this is a common issue shoppers encounter, we have found a watch that has six different colourways available. The STÜHRLING Original Lineage Classic 42mm Quartz Watch normally retails for £720, but shoppers can snatch it up for £78.75 after a massive 89 per cent discount. Designed with a sleek polish and an ultra-thin profile, the Lineage watch is sure to look elegant for a formal event as well as become a go to timepiece for everyday wear. Boasting luminous stick hands and hour markers, these are perfectly framed by a striking fixed coin edge bezel. Powered by a Miyota 2315 Japanese quartz movement, this watch will consistently keep its wearer on time no matter the occasion. Finished off with a 20mm stainless steel link bracelet, this timepiece is said to provide "sharp looks and supreme comfort". As mentioned, this watch is available in six colourways on the Debenhams website. However, shoppers will need to be quick to grab their favourite as some of the designs are noted as having limited stock left. Customers can choose silver, two-tone or a rose gold bracelet and either a white, black or blue dial. STÜHRLING Original Lineage Classic 42mm Quartz Watch. Product Description Another watch available in the sale is the STÜHRLING Original Ascot Quartz 38mm Classic Watch which features a leather strap. Normally retailing for £400, shoppers can now grab this elegant black and rose gold watch for £60 after a 85 per cent reduction. Alternatively, H. Samuel has reduced the price of the Citizen Men's Blue Chronograph Watch. Usually priced at £250, shoppers can now get this stunning silver and blue watch for half the price at £125 just in time of Father's Day. However, many shoppers have been interested in the Lineage Watch, which has an array of positive reviews from delighted shoppers on both the Debenhams and Stuhrling websites. One happy watch lover said: "This a very stylish watch and is great for dress and casual. A dead ringer for that expensive watch that begins with an 'R', but I don't need to mortgage my home to own it!" Another shopper agreed, writing: "The watch looks amazing, the first time wearing it, I had so many compliments and multiple people asking is that a Rolex; it just kept shining on your wrist during the whole meeting. Great purchase." However, a third shopper wasn't pleased with the size of the watch. They said: "The watch is fine but the strap is VERY large. My husband is 6'1" and we had to have a jeweler take a full inch out of it which was a nuisance." Fashion deal of the week In need of new trainers, but don't want to pay Skechers prices. Then these STQ Women's Slip-On Trainers are said to be "much better" than the famed brand. Even better, they are currently priced from just £30.99 on Amazon. With their slip-on style design and ultra-breathable mesh material, these trainers are said to be a fuss-free option for anyone who spends long periods of time on their feet, alongside anyone who suffers from foot pain issues such as plantar fasciitis. The flexible knitted material features an elastic cuff, making them easy to pop on and take off, while the wide fit fabric has been designed to make it feel like you are wearing nothing on your feet. Crafted with over 1,000 ventilation holes, they ensure that feet don't get to sweaty during wear, while the memory foam insole provides good arch support, making it feel "like walking on air". Available to buy in sizes three through to eight, shoppers can select from eight colours including black, grey and pink. However, it's worth noting that the £30.99 price-tag is available on the black colourway. With the STQ Trainers posing the cheapest price-tag, shoppers might be happy to hear that they have earned a 4.4 rating based on over 5,000 Amazon reviews that suggest they are "light as a feather" and "really comfortable". One delighted shopper said: "Super lightweight, comfortable and a fab colour pink. Much better all round than the Skechers I bought at four times the price! Your feet will love these." Whereas, another reviewer wasn't happy with the quality: "It's a nice looking watch but unfortunately it doesn't feel as good as it looks, I'd say it feels like a Seconda" Despite this, a five-star reviewer commented: "Excellent looking watch! Great shine, perfect case size and good weight. Great watch for the price!!!" With a further shopper praising: "I have a Stuhrling watch for many years and love it so I decided to buy one for my husband as a surprise and he loves it. He has worn it since the day he received. I would buy again." Click HERE to buy the STÜHRLING Original Lineage Classic 42mm Quartz Watch. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.


Daily Mirror
9 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'I got £8 Too Good To Go bag from Harrods and couldn't believe what was inside'
Too Good To Go has proven a popular way to reduce food waste, but you can never be sure of what you're going to get – as one woman learned after purchasing a bag from Harrods for £8 Ever since Too Good To Go launched in 2016, millions of hungry Brits have used the app to snap up a bargain deal while also reducing food waste. The app allows users to find local restaurants, supermarkets, and takeaways offering leftover food at a heavily discounted rate as it would otherwise go to waste. The scheme became incredibly popular during the Covid-19 pandemic, with supermarkets and other shops joining in, allowing customers to pick up items nearing their expiry date. Since then, shoppers have been keen to show off their hauls on social media, with many proudly declaring they've picked up a bag that's incredible value for money. If you live in or have spent any time in central London recently, you may have spotted the luxury department store Harrods on the Too Good To Go app. While their bags are very popular – often selling out within minutes – some lucky shoppers have managed to get their hands on discounted items from their food hall. One of these people was 27-year-old Londoner Roshini, who took to TikTok on June 1 to share the contents of the £8 Too Good To Go bag she had bought from the luxury store, and it had saved her over £18 for the products she got. "It was on the App for literally less than 2 mins before it got sold out!" she wrote in the caption of the video. She went on to unpack the bag on camera, revealing the items she'd received and how much they originally retailed for in store. First up were a funfetti vanilla cake slice and a chocolate fudge cake slice, both worth £5.50 each. Next was a Japanese milk bread loaf, worth £6.50, as well as a loaf of brioche – which was also originally priced at £6.50. Happy with what she got, Roshini posted a follow-up video after fans clamoured for her to review the items. In her food review, Roshini started off with the Japanese milk bread, which she scored a six out of 10. She said: "I left it in the fridge so it's a bit stale, but it's really fluffy inside." Tasting it, Roshini explain it wasn't sweet, as she'd expected, but instead said it taste like a really nice bread. Next up was the funfetti vanilla cake slice, with Roshini saying: "Now, I've heard really good reviews about this one so I'm hoping it's just as good as it sounds." After showing off the neat layers of the cake, she took a bite and immediately burst into a smile, saying: "It's good. Oh my god. Even if you don't get the Too Good To Go bag, just getting it for five fifty alone is really good, like I'd definitely get this cake again. This is really good." After scoring it a 10 out of 10, she moved on to the chocolate fudge cake, which she said was also a really nice cake but that she preferred the funfetti one. Because of this, she scored the chocolate fudge cake slice an eight out of 10. Lastly was the brioche loaf, which Roshini revealed she'd had already tasted after wanting to use it for a sandwich earlier that day. "It smells really good. It is very buttery and it has, you can taste the salt but it's not very overpowering," she explained before showing the viewers how fluffy the bread was. Overall, it scored another eight out of 10 in total. People quickly took to the comment sections of Roshini's videos, with many praising the bag for being 'the best' Too Good To Go bag. "Omg I can never get one when I go on the app, I've tried so many times," one person wrote. Another person praised it as ""Best too good to go bag I've seen!!" "I'm surprised, £5.50 for a slice of cake is quite reasonable," a third person said.