
US Senate Republicans propose eliminating fuel economy fines for automakers
U.S.
Senate Republicans
on Thursday proposed eliminating fines for failures to meet
Corporate Average Fuel Economy rules
as part of a wide-ranging tax bill - the latest move aimed at making it easier for
automakers
to build
gas-powered vehicles
.
Last year, Chrysler-parent Stellantis paid $190.7 million in civil penalties for failing to meet U.S. fuel economy requirements for 2019 and 2020 after paying nearly $400 million for penalties from 2016 through 2019. GM previously paid $128.2 million in penalties for 2016 and 2017.
Thursday's proposal also makes emissions credits sold by Tesla less valuable as rivals won't have to pay Tesla to meet requirements. The lawmakers estimated it would save automakers $200 million. GM and Chrysler did not immediately comment.
U.S. House Republicans are pursuing similar aims but with a different approach. Last month they proposed repealing planned hikes in fuel economy requirements as well as vehicle emissions rules adopted under the
Biden administration
.
The House bill would also kill a $7,500 tax credit for new
electric vehicles
, impose a new $250 annual fee on EVs for road repair costs and would phase out EV battery production tax credits in 2028.
The two chambers have also voted to bar California's landmark plan to end the sale of gasoline-only vehicles by 2035 which has been adopted by 11 other states representing a third of the U.S. auto market. That bill is currently awaiting U.S. President Donald Trump's signature.
The Transportation Department is expected to declare that fuel economy rules issued under Biden exceeded the government's legal authority by including EVs.
Last year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said it would hike fuel economy rules to an average of 50.4 miles per gallon (4.67 liters per 100 km) by 2031 - up from 39.1 mpg for light-duty vehicles. It warned the auto industry collectively was expected to face a total of $1.83 billion in fines through 2031.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
37 minutes ago
- Mint
Donald Trump has many ways to hurt Elon Musk
THERE WAS a time, not long ago, when an important skill for journalists was translating the code in which powerful people spoke about each other. Carefully prepared speeches and other public remarks would be dissected for hints about the arguments happening in private. Among Donald Trump's many achievements is upending this system. In his administration people seem to say exactly what they think at any given moment. Wild threats are made—to end habeas corpus; to take Greenland by force—without any follow-through. Journalists must now try to guess what is real and what is for show. So it is with the break-up between Mr Trump and Elon Musk, the world's richest man and until last week a 'special government employee". A few months ago Mr Musk posted on X, his social-media platform, that he loved the president 'as much as a straight man can love another man". On May 30th, at a joint press conference in the Oval Office to announce Mr Musk's departure from government, Mr Trump called him 'an incredible patriot" and praised his work with the Department of Government Efficiency (known as DOGE). Yet by June 5th it had all broken down. On his Truth Social media platform the president posted that the billionaire was 'wearing thin" and 'went CRAZY". Mr Trump then threatened to 'terminate" his government contracts. Mr Musk responded on X, claiming that Mr Trump's name appears in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein, the late financier who was convicted of trafficking and having sex with underage girls. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public," wrote Mr Musk. Later he agreed with a post saying that Mr Trump should be impeached. He also said he would begin decommissioning his Dragon spacecraft, which transports astronauts to the International Space Station. If carried out, the threats could be disastrous for both men. Mr Trump could lose a valuable donor and the supportive sway of X; Mr Musk's business interests could suffer enormously. But in response to a comment advising him to 'cool off", Mr Musk wrote 'good advice" and backtracked on his call to decommission the Dragon. Where things go from here is anyone's guess. The initial cause of the falling out between Mr Trump and his 'first buddy" was the president's so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill". Mr Musk was incensed that the measure would add enormously to the deficit, and so undermine the work of DOGE. On June 3rd he escalated his criticism, calling the bill a 'disgusting abomination". On June 5th he added another complaint, saying that Mr Trump's tariffs are going to bring about a recession. Mr Trump has his own explanation for Mr Musk's sudden disloyalty. He says the Tesla CEO is unhappy because his bill would cancel a government subsidy for electric cars created by Joe Biden. If Mr Trump does decide to retaliate, the risks to Mr Musk and his businesses are extensive. The threats the president has already made, however, are the least credible. Cancelling the contracts of SpaceX, Mr Musk's space company, would be profoundly disruptive to the government. Without SpaceX rockets, it would struggle to put anything into space, including spy satellites. The Pentagon relies heavily on the firm's Starlink satellites. SpaceX itself could probably weather such moves. Though it has benefited greatly from government contracts, the firm's commercial revenues soared nearly three-fold last year, according to estimates by Quilty Space, a business-intelligence firm. Mr Musk has also wanted to cancel the Dragon spacecraft for some time. Steve Bannon, a former adviser to Mr Trump who is no fan of Mr Musk, has proposed even bigger penalties. He wants the South African-born billionaire to be stripped of his American citizenship—he says Mr Musk is an 'illegal alien"—and his companies nationalised under the Defence Production Act. Such actions also seem unrealistic. Stripping Mr Musk's citizenship would require a judge to rule he committed fraud. The Defence Production Act almost certainly does not permit sudden nationalisation, even if the country is at war. That does not mean Mr Musk can breathe easy, though. His interests are vulnerable to more routine measures. At the time he entered government in January, he and his companies were subject to 65 potential or actual regulatory actions by 11 federal agencies, according to the minority staff of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, an arm of the Senate. These include accusations that Tesla, Mr Musk's car company, lied about its self-driving technology; that Neuralink, his brain-implant company, violated the Animal Welfare Act with its experiments on monkeys; and that SpaceX repeatedly failed to follow the law when launching rockets. (As head of DOGE, Mr Musk was able to dismantle some of the agencies within the government investigating him, such as the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau.) One of the reasons why Silicon Valley magnates like Mr Musk rallied around Mr Trump last year was that he promised a more favourable regulatory environment. But 'there was always the risk that what they were buying instead were the conditions of oligarchy", says Donald Moynihan of the Gerald Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan. That is, business leaders who are loyal to the president get to operate as they like, while those who are critical get the full force of the law. Mr Musk may be about to discover what life is like outside the tent. Perhaps on feeling the cold he will find a way back inside. © 2025, The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved. From The Economist, published under licence. The original content can be found on


News18
38 minutes ago
- News18
Vivek Ramaswamy's Photo Met With Racial Remarks Again. This Time Netizens Shut Trolls
Last Updated: Despite the hate, several users called out the unnecessary attacks directed towards Vivek Ramaswamy and questioned the racial double standards. The ongoing public fallout between Tesla co-founder Elon Musk and US President Donald Trump has taken an unexpected turn. It has now dragged Indian-origin Republican leader Vivek Ramaswamy into the spotlight. While the two heavyweights were engaged in a full-blown feud, Ramaswamy quietly posted a family photo which was met with a fresh wave of vicious trolling. The post in question showed Ramaswamy carrying his two children, Karthik and Arjun, with a caption that read, 'It's why we do it." But instead of being seen as a heartwarming moment, the picture sparked backlash online with users interpreting it as a sign of him distancing himself from the Musk-Trump standoff which is something that didn't sit well with many Americans. One user commented, 'Go fix India, anchor baby." 'Is there a scientific reason as to why I find this photo repulsive?" someone wrote. Some stood by Ramaswamy, expressing support and condemning the racist slurs being posted by users even using Grok for abuse. @grok change the background of this photo to a American White House— ThatuVadaiSettu (@ThatuVadaiSettu) June 6, 2025 @grok change the background of this photo to a garbage-filled street in India— Trevor Sutcliffe (@TrevorSutcliffe) June 6, 2025 An individual simply advised, 'Take care of your family. Protect your family. The rest is noise." Take care of your family. Protect your family. The rest is noise.— MAZE (@mazemoore) June 6, 2025 In the comments, some users even mocked his children for wearing shoes without socks. A person said, 'In America we wear socks," while another added, 'We wear socks under our shoes in America." In America we wear socks.— MongolianBeast (@MongolianBeast1) June 6, 2025 These comments were not random. They were linked to an earlier incident in March when Ramaswamy was trolled for being barefoot in his own home during an old interview. The photos had resurfaced online and many people mocked him for following the common Indian custom of removing shoes indoors. Some even wrote, 'We aren't in India." Another such racial attack on Ramaswamy surfaced just a few days ago. The Indian-origin entrepreneur had shared a post celebrating his 10th wedding anniversary with wife Apoorva. It included before-and-after pictures from 2014 and 2025 taken at the same spot in the Rockies. What should have been a personal and joyful moment also attracted hateful comments. Some users posted discriminatory remarks like – 'The beauty of the whiteness destroyed by brown" and 'Why do you both look 3-4 shades lighter? You didn't bleach your skin, did you?" In the fall of 2011, I met a brilliant medical student named Apoorva & asked her out on a first date – to head west for a weekend & hike Flattop Mountain in the Rockies. She accepted. We got within striking distance of the summit when a blizzard hit. I was foolishly stubborn… — Vivek Ramaswamy (@VivekGRamaswamy) May 26, 2025 The backlash ties into Ramaswamy's past remarks on the H-1B visa programme. Last year, he spoke about the need for more foreign workers but also called for major changes in the system. He said the process should be more merit-based and transparent. But he was slammed for allegedly favouring the replacement of American workers with Indian immigrants. He eventually stepped down from his role as co-chair of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a position he was set to share with Musk. As of now, Vivek Ramaswamy is running for governor in the state of Ohio. About the Author Buzz Staff A team of writers at bring you stories on what's creating the buzz on the Internet while exploring science, cricket, tech, gender, Bollywood, and culture. First Published: June 07, 2025, 10:07 IST


Economic Times
41 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Gold prices fall over 1% as strong US jobs data clouds outlook for rate cuts
Gold prices saw a decline following a robust U.S. jobs report. This dimmed hopes for Federal Reserve rate cuts. Silver prices, however, surged to a multi-year high. The U.S. Labor Department revealed an increase in non-farm payrolls. Platinum and palladium also experienced gains. Trade policy uncertainties continue to influence market dynamics. Investors are closely monitoring economic data and geopolitical developments. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Gold prices slipped more than 1% on Friday after a stronger-than-expected U.S. jobs report dampened hopes for imminent Federal Reserve rate cuts this year, while silver soared to its highest level since gold fell 1.1% to $3,316.13 an ounce, as of 02:28 p.m. ET (1828 GMT), but rose 0.8% for the week so far.U.S. gold futures settled 0.8% lower at $3,346.60.A U.S. Labor Department report showed non-farm payrolls increased 139,000 in May, compared with estimates for a rise of 130,000, according to economists polled by Reuters. The unemployment rate stood at 4.2%, in line with came in line with estimates, which is a negative for gold as the data suggests that the Fed is going to stay on hold for a little while, Marex analyst Edward Meir policymakers are seen as waiting until September to cut rates, with just one more cut in view by December, based on trading in short-term interest-rate futures, which also showed traders backing away from bets that would pay off if the U.S. central bank delivered a third rate cut by the end of the is considered a hedge against inflation and geopolitical uncertainty. But higher rates reduce the appeal of bullion as it yields no the trade policy front there was little clarity after the highly anticipated call between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping on Thursday."These are very difficult negotiations and they're not going to be solved just on the phone. If the tariff headlines become negative, that's bullish for gold," Meir silver fell 0.5% to $35.96, after hitting a more than 13-year high in silver "look like were driven by speculative flows seeing it is way too cheap versus gold, the break above the $35/oz mark amplified the move," said Giovanni Staunovo, UBS rose 2.5% to $1,158.20, highest since March 2022, while palladium was up 3.9% to $1,045.45. Both the metals were on track for weekly gains.