logo
The U.K. says thousands of Afghans have been brought to Britain under a secret resettlement program

The U.K. says thousands of Afghans have been brought to Britain under a secret resettlement program

LONDON — Thousands of Afghans, including many who worked with British forces, have been secretly resettled in the U.K. after a leak of data on their identities raised fears that they could be targeted by the Taliban, the British government revealed Tuesday.
The government now plans to close the route, which the media had been barred by a court order from disclosing.
'I have felt deeply concerned about the lack of transparency to Parliament and the public,' Defense Secretary John Healey said in the House of Commons.
Healey told lawmakers that a spreadsheet containing the personal information of nearly 19,000 Afghans who had applied to come to Britain after the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan was accidentally released in error in 2022 because of a defense official's email error, and extracts were later published online.
The then-Conservative government sought a court order barring disclosure of the leak, in an attempt to prevent the personal information being made public. The High Court issued a strict order known as a super injunction that barred anyone from revealing its existence. The government then set up a secret new program to resettle the Afghans.
The injunction was lifted on Tuesday in conjunction with a decision by Britain's current Labour Party government to make the program public. It said an independent review had found little evidence that the leaked data would expose Afghans to a greater risk of retribution from the country's Taliban rulers.
About 4,500 Afghans – 900 applicants and approximately 3,600 family members — have been brought to Britain under the secret program, and about 6,900 people are expected to be relocated by the time it closes, at a total cost of 850 million pounds ($1.1 billion).
About 36,000 more Afghans have been relocated to the U.K. under other resettlement routes.
Critics say that still leaves thousands more people who helped British troops as interpreters or in other roles at risk of torture, imprisonment or death.
British troops were sent to Afghanistan as part of a deployment against al Qaeda and Taliban forces in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. At the peak of the operation, there were almost 10,000 British troops in the country, mostly in Helmand province in the south.
Britain ended combat operations in 2014, and its remaining troops left Afghanistan in 2021 as the Taliban swept back to power, two decades after they were ousted.
The Taliban's return triggered chaotic scenes at Kabul Airport in August 2021 as Western nations rushed to evacuate citizens and Afghan employees.
Super injunctions are relatively rare, and their use is controversial. Unlike regular court injunctions, super injunctions bar reporting that they were even ordered The handful of cases in which they have come to light involved celebrities trying to prevent disclosures about their private lives.
This is the first known case of a super injunction being sought by the government. Healey said he was not aware of any others in existence.
Judge Martin Chamberlain, who ruled that the injunction should be lifted, said Tuesday at the High Court that the gag order had 'given rise to serious free speech concerns.'
'The super injunction had the effect of completely shutting down the ordinary mechanisms of accountability, which operate in a democracy,' he said. 'This led to what I describe as a 'scrutiny vacuum.''
Lawless writes for the Associated Press.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inside Ghislaine Maxwell's New Texas Minimum-Security Prison
Inside Ghislaine Maxwell's New Texas Minimum-Security Prison

Newsweek

time27 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Inside Ghislaine Maxwell's New Texas Minimum-Security Prison

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Ghislaine Maxwell, the 62-year-old British socialite convicted of trafficking underage girls for Jeffrey Epstein, was moved to Federal Prison Camp Bryan, a minimum-security facility in Texas, earlier this week. Newsweek contacted Maxwell's attorney for comment via email on Saturday outside of regular office hours. Why It Matters President Donald Trump has been under intense pressure over the Epstein case since July 6 when the Department of Justice and FBI released a joint statement asserting he had "no incriminating 'client list'" and died by suicide. Conspiracy theorists, including a section of Trump's Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement, have long maintained that Epstein was murdered to cover up the involvement of prominent figures in his abuse. The Wall Street Journal later reported Trump had been told his name appeared "multiple times" in the so-called Epstein files by Attorney General Pam Bondi, which the White House dismissed as "fake news." Trump also said he would be "allowed" to pardon Maxwell, though he added that "it's something I have not through about" as the issue continues to cause a rift between the president and some of his supporters. What To Know In 2022, Maxwell was sentenced to 20 years in prison after being found guilty of child sex trafficking, though she continues to maintain her innocence. Prosecutors said the offenses were carried out in cooperation with Epstein, the New York financier and convicted sex offender who committed suicide in a New York federal jail in 2019. Maxwell initially served her sentence at the Federal Correctional Institution in Florida, a low-security prison, but, this week, the Bureau of Prisons told Newsweek that she has been transferred to Bryan. This was confirmed by David Oscar Markus, Maxwell's attorney, though he declined to comment further. In total, 635 inmates are held at Federal Prison Camp Bryan, the vast majority of which are women convicted of nonviolent offenses, according to the facility's official website. Other detainees include Elizabeth Holmes, the billionaire founder of Theranos, who was convicted of fraud; and former Real Housewives of Salt Lake City star Jen Shah. Overall, the site covers 37 acres, with inmates housed in dormitories. A prison handbook for the Bryan prison, seen by the BBC, indicates Maxwell will be required to wear khaki-colored shirts and pants and get up at 6 a.m. each day. File photo: Signage is displayed near the entrance to Federal Prison Camp Bryan on August 1, 2025 in Bryan, Texas. File photo: Signage is displayed near the entrance to Federal Prison Camp Bryan on August 1, 2025 in Bryan, Texas. Brandon Bell/GETTY Prisoners are primarily housed in two person cells in dormitory-style facilities, according to Pink Lady Prison Consultants, an advocacy group led by former prisoners. All prisoners are expected to work, earning between 12 cents and $1.15 per hour. A range of educational programs are also available, including classes on business skills and foreign languages. The handbook says inmates can also play sports, attend religious services and access televisions. Visitors are allowed during the weekend and holidays, though with limited physical contact. Prisoners can be sanctioned if they break a number of rules, including not keeping their cells clean; leaving an area during one of the five-a-day roll calls; and sleeping past the designated wake-up time. For each meal, prisoners are allotted one hour, with the menu compiled by the Federal Bureau of Prisons, including macaroni, tacos, hotdogs and hamburgers. British newspaper The Daily Telegraph reported that facilities available at the Bryan prison include a gym, yoga classes and a 'puppy program,' which involves prisoners training service dogs in collaboration with Canine Companions. What People Are Saying In a statement released on Friday the Bureau of Prisons said: "We can confirm Ghislaine Maxwell is in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons at the Federal Prison Camp (FPC) Bryan in Bryan, Texas." The family of Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein's victims who died by suicide earlier this year, expressed their "horror and disgust" at the move, which they said was made "without any notification to Maxwell's victims." The family added: "This is the justice system failing victims right before our eyes. The American public should be outraged by the special treatment afforded to a pedophile and a criminally charged child sex offender." Speaking to The Daily Telegraph Julie Howell, a Bryan prisoner, said the facility is "nothing like you see on TV or in the movies because it's a camp, which only houses nonviolent offenders." Maxwell's move came after she was interviewed by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on July 25 about Epstein's activities and who else was involved. What Happens Next Trump is likely to continue facing pressure from some of his supporters to release more information about the Epstein case. Maxwell could be offered a pardon or reduced sentence in exchange for giving more details about Epstein's associates, but such a move would almost certainly be highly controversial.

Top cabinet ministers at risk of losing seats even after Starmer recognises Palestinian state, pollsters warn
Top cabinet ministers at risk of losing seats even after Starmer recognises Palestinian state, pollsters warn

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Top cabinet ministers at risk of losing seats even after Starmer recognises Palestinian state, pollsters warn

Sir Keir Starmer's historic decision to recognise Palestinian statehood later this year will not be enough to stop some of his top cabinet ministers from facing major battles to hang on to their seats, leading pollsters have warned. Health secretary Wes Streeting and justice secretary Shabana Mahmood are among those who could be ousted from parliament at the next general election, the UK's top pollster Sir John Curtice warned, in the face of major challenges from pro-Gaza candidates. Sir Keir lost a key member of his top team, Jonathan Ashworth, to a pro-Palestine independent candidate at the last election. Mr Streeting was among those who held his seat, but saw his majority in his Ilford constituency slashed from 5,198 in 2019 to just 528. But pollsters now warn anger over the issue of Palestine, which Jeremy Corbyn's newly announced political party will attempt to capitalise on, could see Mr Streeting and other high-profile casualties from the cabinet. Labour pledged to recognise a Palestinian state in its manifesto before the last general election, and Sir Keir this week bowed to growing pressure from his own MPs – and some high-profile members of the cabinet – to lay out a plan to recognise the state of Palestine. Asked if the move on Palestinian statehood could help save Mr Streeting and Ms Mahmood next time around, Sir John told the Independent that it 'may not be sufficient given the current condition of the Labour Party'. Luke Tryl, from pollsters More in Common, was more blunt. 'No,' he said. Sir John added that it was clear that Starmer had also 'lost out' on votes in his own constituency last year because of the issue, although the PM's majority is significantly larger than some of his cabinet colleagues. After promising to tackle Labour's antisemitism crisis when he came to power, Sir John summed up the PM's problem: 'Here is somebody who spent a great deal of time and effort trying to reconnect with the Jewish community, and now he's finding himself having to spend a great deal of effort trying to reconnect with the Muslim community. It is very difficult to keep himself on board with both groups at the moment.' Mr Tryl said the war in Gaza had uncovered 'deeper' problems for Labour. 'When we have done focus groups with voters in Muslim areas, particularly some of those who backed or were thinking about backing pro-Gaza independent candidates, I compared it to speaking to voters in the red wall after Brexit,' he said. 'In the sense that Brexit was the thing which caused the split, but it actually brought to the fore much deeper resentments - that they have been taken from granted, ignored, left behind by Labour … I think we're going to see exactly the same thing with Muslim voters.' Mr Corbyn confirmed his party would campaign heavily on Palestine when he launched it last week. Sir John said that the polling suggested that the new party would take the most votes from the Greens, followed by Labour. But he added, when it came to a new party run by their ex-leader: 'Given that Labour, even without Corbyn being put onto the hypothetical ballot, are behind Reform, they don't really want this.' Sir John said the Palestine announcement could be seen, in one way, as an example of Labour's problem connecting with the wider electorate. Asked what the party could do to win back voters across the board, he said: 'Explain to people what you are about. It's the point that everybody's making now. This is a government that has no known direction. And of course, some people are painting (the Palestine move) as yet another example of policy change. 'In terms of substance, (Labour should) turn around the economy and make sure that the health service doesn't have long waiting lists. It's not complicated, just very, very difficult to do.' No 10 has been approached for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store