Starmer has run out of road on Palestinian statehood
The devastation of Gaza is something that obviously transcends politics – or at least it should. Yet, as the objective reality of the Palestinians' suffering is broadcast daily on television sets across the UK, Mr Starmer's political response to Israel's war could not be more exposed.
In the 22 months since the outbreak of the conflict, Mr Starmer has been entirely consistent to the extent that he has steadily lost almost the entirety of his supporters for his position. A letter late last week exposed how the Prime Minister had been reduced to playing for time. More than 200 MPs signed a letter calling on the UK to recognise Palestine statehood, as almost 150 nation states have done.
French President Emmanuel Macron has committed his country to declaring its recognition in September at the UN General Assembly annual meeting in New York. A conference this week co-hosted with Saudi Arabia at the UN sees Paris promote the two-state solution with recognition at its heart.
UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy is expected to attend. Yet Mr Starmer has so far withheld the decision to join the French in the new drive to make real recognition for Palestine among the most powerful countries of the G7 bloc.
For weeks, London's political calculation has been that pressure from the Knesset presented Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with an opportunity to change course. There was also the arrival to Britain of US President Donald Trump, who is holding court on his Scottish golf courses.
These ultra-luxury venues have not only been a sporting paradise for Mr Trump, but also a diplomatic platform for him. On Sunday, he secured a trade deal with EU, which he called the biggest yet. On Monday, Mr Starmer spent the day with him. There, aides said Mr Starmer would use his good standing with the American leader to press his point on Gaza.
The British leader said he was working with Mr Trump to find a way to address the starvation of Gazans. Mr Trump said, for the first time, that the hunger in the Strip was real and couldn't be faked. 'We can work not just on the pressing issues of the ceasefire, but also on this issue of getting humanitarian aid in at volume, at speed,' Mr Starmer said.
The US President said he was pressing Mr Netanyahu to find a different way to bring the plight of the hostages to a resolution. 'I'm going to say it's a very difficult situation,' Mr Trump said. 'If they didn't have the hostages, things would go very quickly, but they do, and we know where they have them, in some cases, and you don't want to go riding roughshod over that area, because that means those hostages will be killed.'
The reckoning, as the UK House of Commons' Foreign Affairs Committee put it, was that Mr Netanyahu listens to only one foreign leader: Mr Trump. Even then the Israeli Prime Minister defies Washington, so only a big pep talk from Mr Starmer could get the US leader into a frame of mind to intervene meaningfully.
All that was a calculation rather than a guaranteed outcome. Mr Starmer's team did not want to alienate Mr Trump by announcing the UK's recognition in advance of their meeting. Alienating the US President would provide some poor dynamics for the Scotland meetings, something Mr Starmer was not prepared to countenance.
UK Secretary of State for Business and Trade Jonathan Reynolds – the cabinet minister among the closest to Mr Starmer – echoed the judgment that only the US has leverage in the current situation. He pointed out that two temporary ceasefires were brought about by US involvement. Downing Street has said the same thing, although it appears to be ignoring the fact that US envoy Steve Witkoff withdrew from the process last week.
Mr Reynolds was asked repeatedly about the prospect of the Prime Minister caving into political pressure this week. Despite the recess, the cabinet is set to meet for a discussion on Palestine, setting speculation off that a U-turn was coming. In advance of any new approach emerging, Mr Reynolds raised the standing concern from Mr Starmer's camp that recognition must not be a 'tokenistic' exercise. Deploying the decision once should have a tangible impact.
'It is a case of when, not if,' he said. 'It's about how we use this moment, because you can only do it once to have a meaningful breakthrough.'
That line has held sway at Westminster for quite some time. However, not only has the number of MPs in the Labour party rejecting it openly now into the hundreds, but up to half the cabinet are now holding private briefings that this cannot stand.
For most, there is a moral and humanitarian imperative that cannot wait. History, too, is powerful here. As the country that intervened through the Balfour Declaration to endorse Zionism's project to settle in Palestine, there are many in London who believe that Britain has a historic responsibility to promote equal rights for Palestinians and Israelis.
The Labour government that took power last year was overtly committed to 'leading on international law issues', something that suggested a spirit of rebalancing how the UK developed its policies.
Most remarkably, however, Attorney General Richard Hermer has not developed a response to the International Court of Justice's provisional measures on the Gaza conflict. Mr Starmer is a distinguished lawyer in this field and if his political skills have come under scrutiny on this issue, then it is a double indictment that his legal expertise appears to have disappeared as well.
There is ultimately no riddle here. Mr Starmer has played for time for so long on this issue that he has utterly run out of road for his position on Palestine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
23 minutes ago
- Khaleej Times
UK plans to recognise Palestinian state in September unless Israel meets conditions
Britain will recognise the state of Palestine in September unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the "appalling situation" in Gaza and meets other conditions, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer told his cabinet on Tuesday (July 29) according to a government statement. "He said that the UK will recognise the state of Palestine in September, before UNGA (United Nations General Assembly), unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, reaches a ceasefire, makes clear there will be no annexation in the West Bank, and commits to a long-term peace process that delivers a Two State Solution," the statement said. "He reiterated that there is no equivalence between Israel and Hamas and that our demands on Hamas remain, that they must release all the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, accept that they will play no role in the government of Gaza, and disarm." Starmer took the decision after recalling his cabinet during the summer holidays on Tuesday to discuss a new proposed peace plan being worked on with other European leaders and how to deliver more humanitarian aid to Gaza. Successive British governments have said they will formally recognise a Palestinian state when the time is right, without ever setting a timetable or specifying the necessary conditions. With warnings people in Gaza are facing starvation, a growing numbers of lawmakers in Starmer's Labour Party have asking him to recognise a Palestinian state to put pressure on Israel.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Israeli settlers repeat attack on Palestinian Christian village in occupied West Bank
Israeli settlers have launched an attack on the Christian village of Taybeh, east of Ramallah, in the occupied West Bank. The incursion began at dawn on Monday. They set fire to two cars owned by Palestinian residents and spray painted racist graffiti on walls in the village. 'You'll regret it later,' read one message, not clarifying what the villagers had done to earn the settlers' wrath. Once the settlers left, the Israeli military raided the village spreading further panic among residents. The campaign of settler intimidation, with Israeli army backing, coincides with the establishment of a new Israeli settlement near Taybeh in June. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Monday's attack is the second on this small Palestinian village in as many weeks. Just a fortnight earlier on 14 July, settlers set the village's historic Church of Saint George alight, along with its adjoining graveyard. That attack was severe enough to prompt rare condemnation of Israeli settlers by the American ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee. 'It's my desire to do everything possible to let the people of this peaceful village know that we will certainly insist that those who carry out acts of terror and violence in Taybeh - or anywhere - be found and be prosecuted,' he said. Living in danger 'When I saw them, I started screaming loudly,' said Taybeh resident Farid Kawneh about the latest settler attack. He told Middle East Eye that his neighbour called him just after 2am to tell him that his car was on fire. His initial thought was that the cause was a technical fault with the car but as Kawneh rushed towards it, he found a group of settlers speaking to each other in Hebrew. "They were surprised by me and ran towards the Khalleh area,' he said. 'At the sound of my shouting, a number of villagers arrived at the scene.' The earlier attack on the Church of Saint George had drawn international condemnation and visits to the village by senior Christian figures, as well as Huckabee. Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem Pierbattista Pizzaballa and Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem Theophilos III during a visit of solidarity to Taybeh on 14 July (AFP/Zain Jaafar) Harsh condemnation, even by a normally committed Christian Zionist like Huckabee, was not enough to deter further settler violence. Taybeh resident Kamal Taye also had his car set alight by the settlers. He told Middle East Eye that the village's residents felt a sense of abandonment and were living without a sense of safety. 'No one is capable of protecting us in our homeland' - Kamal Taye, resident of Taybeh "My family and I were scared because our lives were in danger," he said. He added: "My elderly mother lives with me in the house, and she was terrified. There are no elements of safety in this country under the current circumstances." Taye explained that the psychological impact of the attacks far outweighed the immediate material damage to their homes and property, as they had no idea what the settlers would do next. "No one is capable of protecting us in our homeland. We are forced to protect ourselves," Taye said. "I demand that state officials assume their responsibility to protect us and make us feel safe in our homes." Settler intimidation Taybeh is an ancient village, believed to have its origins during the Canaanite period more than 3,000 years ago. It has a predominantly Christian population of 1,340, according to the 2017 census conducted by the Palestine Central Bureau of Statistics. The area boasts abundant pastoral land and the village's residents primarily make their living raising sheep. But that abdundance has drawn the attention of settlers who have encroached on the village's territory with the backing of the Israeli military. Israeli settlers beat Palestinian-American to death, fatally shoot another Read More » Israel initially appropriated huge tracts of land surrounding the village for the construction of roads and the settlers soon followed. Small bands of settlers, known as the "Youths of the Hills" have set up outposts in the land surrounding Taybeh. These outposts include "agricultural barracks", which Palestinians cannot approach, restricting their ability to graze their animals freely. Through a mixture of intimidation of Palestinian shepherds and protection by the Israeli military, the settlers then use Taybeh's land to graze their own animals. Palestinian farmers and shepherds are subjected to other forms of routine harassment, including the burning of trees, the theft of tools, the demolition of homes and pastures, the arrest of shepherds, and the imposition of heavy fines by the Israeli authorities. The Israeli humans rights group B'Tselem and the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) have documented more than 1,200 incidents of violence by Israeli settlers against Palestinians in 2024 alone, an average of three attacks per day, according to an OCHA report issued in December 2024.
Middle East Eye
4 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
British Museum justification for Israel embassy event under scrutiny after FOI response
Revelations from a Freedom of Information (FOI) request have raised questions around the British Museum's claim that it had no say in a decision to host an event for the Israeli embassy, as it 'cannot undermine' UK foreign policy. On 13 May, the museum hosted an event organised by the Israeli embassy celebrating the anniversary of Israel's 77th Independence Day. Amid mounting anger from staff, who previously told Middle East Eye that they had been kept in the dark about the event, the museum issued statements insisting that, as an arms-length body, it cannot 'deviate from or undermine the UK government's foreign policy'. But a response to an FOI request asking for documentation evidencing this requirement reveals that the museum does not hold any legal advice or policy documents to support the claim, indicating that it did have a choice about whether or not to host the event. The response states that: 'As a Public Body, all money spent by the Museum is classified as public money and some of this money is provided by the Government. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters 'In this context it is the responsibility of the Board and the Executive, to which the Board delegates responsibility for running the Museum, to judge how the Museum must fulfil its duty to the public'. 'This duty is not prescribed but the Trustees and the Executive are helped by guidance such as the Cabinet Office Code of Conduct for Board Members of Public Bodies', it stated. The response suggests that the museum was not obliged, or otherwise forced, to hold the Israel embassy event but rather it was a choice made by its management. British Museum set to return ancient Greek statue looted from Libya Read More » A British Museum staff member described the revelations as 'very, very embarrassing'. 'This proves once again that they've been lying to British Museum employees,' the staff member told MEE. 'The museum has to give us an explanation, but also take a clear stand now because this means we don't have to follow the UK government,' they said. 'We can at least take some steps such as refusing to lend objects to Israel or have any cultural interaction with them'. They added that some members of staff are contemplating leaving as a result of management's handling of the event. 'We're all quite disgusted. I think that's the only way to put it. And we're wondering what to expect next - is there something worse?' the staff member said. 'Actively deceived' A spokesperson for the campaign group Energy Embargo for Palestine (EEFP) said that the revelations prove that the museum 'actively deceived' both its staff and the public, and 'purposefully lied about why it chose to host the event'. 'The insight obtained by MEE demonstrates that the museum was not forced to host the event, but that it chose to, and that the interests of the museum directorate are aligned with those celebrating and profiting from genocide - whether it's the Zionist consulate in Britain or BP, which it has a £50m sponsorship deal with,' the spokesperson added. 'We're all quite disgusted' - Member of staff at the British Museum MEE previously revealed that, as of 16 April, the museum had corresponded with the museum's sponsoring department, the Department for Culture, Media and Sports (DCMS). In response to a request for comment by MEE, the British Museum said: 'Fundamentally, this was a commercial event – and as such is different to activities or events the Museum generates or hosts itself.' According to the ex-civil servant who made the FOI request, it is irregular for a non-departmental government body to engage with its sponsoring department concerning private events or anything at the level of day-to-day operational detail. Meanwhile, a separate FOI request to the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology revealed an email from Israeli ambassador Tzipi Hotovely requesting the department's secretary of state, Peter Kyle, attend the event as the 'UK government's representative' delivering the evening's 'keynote speech'. In her email, Hotovely's framing of the event suggests it was not a corporate function but a joint effort by the UK and Israeli governments 'to highlight the strong bilateral links' and to endorse 'the existence, safety and security of the State of Israel'.
