Datacenter M&A Deals Break Records In 2024
Data from Synergy Research Group shows that after a relative lull in 2023, the value of data center-oriented M&A deals that closed in 2024 blew past the $70 billion milestone and finally reached $73 billion. 2024 was already in record-breaking territory, before a Blackstone-led acquisition of AirTrunk closed at the end of December. At almost $16 billion, that acquisition set a new benchmark for the biggest deal ever closed.
Previously, 2022 had been the peak in terms of the aggregate value of all deals formally closed, at $52 billion. In 2023 there was a drop off with total value falling by 50% to $26 billion. However, 2022 numbers were boosted by the two biggest deals that had ever been seen in the industry, each valued at $11 billion or more. If mega-deals of $2 billion or more are separated out, then the trend in the flow of what might be termed 'regular deals' shows a different pattern. 2021 was the peak, 2022 dropped off by 32%, 2023 dropped again but only by 7%, and 2024 jumped by 133%.
Looking to 2025, over $7 billion in deals have already closed and there is another $15 billion agreed but not yet formally closed. Synergy is also aware of some $20 billion in possible future deals, where companies are seeking new sources of funding or considering strategic options.
Since 2015 Synergy has logged a total of 1,514 data center-oriented M&A deals, with an aggregate value of $324 billion. Most of this comes from company acquisitions, but the numbers also include minority equity investments, investments in joint ventures, acquisitions of individual data centers, share sales and acquisition of land for data center development.
Prior to late 2024, the four largest deals ever were each valued at $10 billion or more and closed in 2021 and 2022. These were the acquisitions of CyrusOne, Switch, CoreSite and QTS, who all feature in the worldwide top 15 ranking of colocation operators. Apart from the Blackstone acquisition or AirTrunk, the biggest deals closed in 2024 were two separate equity investments in Vantage Data Centers, which combined were valued at $9.2 billion. In two separate deals, Vantage also received $3.1 billion equity investment in its EMEA operations.
Other large 2024 deals were equity investments in EdgeConneX and DataBank. Apart from the rapid rise in overall data center M&A activity over the ten-year period, the most notable feature has been the extent to which private equity has flooded into the market. In 2020 private equity accounted for 54% of the value of closed deals, rising to 65% in 2021, and since then it has remained in the 80-90% range.
'There has been a tremendous increase in the demand for data center capacity, driven by cloud services, social networking and a range of both consumer and enterprise digital services. There is no end in sight to this trend, with generative AI technology and services adding a further boost to already strong demand,' said John Dinsdale, a Chief Analyst at Synergy Research Group. 'Specialist data center operators have either not been able or were not prepared to fund those investments themselves, while private equity investors have been more than willing to step in and fund growth initiatives. Looking at pending deals and the future pipeline, there is plenty of evidence to suggest that 2025 will be another boom year for data center M&A.' 0 0
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
an hour ago
- Arabian Post
A sordid tale of the Blackstone IPO and a jailed NRI private bankster!
Matein Khalid I have had a neurological soft corner for Wall Street's alternative asset manager stocks ever since I resisted the come hither importunings of multiple Morgan Stanley (MS) managing directors before the firm sold its private wealth division in the DIFC to Credit Suisse. Everyone of these MS honchos wanted me to subscribe to the Blackstone IPO in the summer of 2007 at $32. They assured me that the biggest institutional investors in the UAE had all subscribed to the IPO and I was even excluded from a dinner with Stephen Schwartzmann, Blacktone's founder and chairman, since I refused to give MS an order for a $50 million IPO bid. By the summer of 2007, I was convinced that the world was headed into a traumatic global recession and even published an article in English which would have saved my fellow Dubai investors billions of dollars had they bothered to read it for free in the Khaleej Times as far back as January 2007. This article accurately predicted the global financial meltdown a year before it happened and is uploaded above. ADVERTISEMENT Naturally, these Morgan Stanley private bankers despite their fancy titles of MD, Imperial Wizards, King of Kings and Chief Concubine were clueless about the nuances of the global capital markets. I have learnt the hard way that the private banking and wealth business in the Middle East is really the blind leading the blind to the slaughterhouse, invariably with high octane leverage and absurdly high fees for the privileges of helping you gut your financial net-worth in the capital markets they barely understand. I sealed my unpopularity with Morgan Stanely's pinstriped bureaucrats in Dubai when I wrote successive articles, listing myriad reasons why I wanted to short both Morgan Stanley and Blackstone at 32. History or a cursory look at your smartphone will record that MS almost failed in the post Lehman Wall Street panic and the Blackstone IPO plunged from 32 to 4. To compound the insult that Dubai's top NRI investors faced as they haemorrhaged money on the advice of the MS clowns, the top Indian broker on the MS bench (Manoj Prasad) was jailed for fraud, money laundering and trying to bribe a CBI officer in India. So much for Wall Street/Swiss due diligence/ethics when it comes time to fleece the leveraged NRI lambs in the Gulf. My readers know I wrote successive columns in the UAE/British media recommending investors buy Blackstone (BX) shares at 10-12 when the distribution yield was 9%. I even recommended in writing to the chairman of the royal investment office where I was CIO not to allocate $25 million to Abraaj Capital for a board seat that meant squat at 3.5X book value when he could invest in Blackstone at $10 a share, way below book value. That $25 million went to money heaven when Abraaj failed in 2018 after Arif Naqvi's criminal fraud. Blackstone shares I recommended rose from $10 in 2010 to as high as $200. So that $25 million in Abraaj's eternal money heaven would be valued at $500 million if my poor chairman who had never heard of Steve Schwarzman but Magu, our Group CFO, a Karachi accountant, was dazzled by the intellectual brilliance of Arif Naqvi, the Gulf media's financier of the millennium. Moral of the story? If you think Wharton is expensive, try ignorance! Blackstone is now the planet's biggest alt asset manager with $1.2 trillion AUM and is valued at $167 billion on the NYSE. I am a nervous long at $136 since I believe the US private credit market will be gutted in a recession that is now inevitable in Q3, the reason why I went long up the wazoo on TLT at 84 as I expect JayPo to capitulate on rate cuts at the September FOMC. I want to exit my BX long via a covered call strategy before July 4th, our Independence Day. I am pretty sure I will be able to buy BX below 100 when the macro wolf finally swallows Grandma Goldilocks. We saw this movie before in the autumn of 2008 ADVERTISEMENT Also published on Medium. Notice an issue? Arabian Post strives to deliver the most accurate and reliable information to its readers. If you believe you have identified an error or inconsistency in this article, please don't hesitate to contact our editorial team at editor[at]thearabianpost[dot]com. We are committed to promptly addressing any concerns and ensuring the highest level of journalistic integrity.
Gulf Today
2 days ago
- Gulf Today
GOP states embrace paid parental leave for teachers
Anna Claire Vollers, Tribune News Service More Republican-led states are giving paid parental leave to public school teachers and other state employees, signaling a broader acceptance of family-friendly workplace policies once championed primarily by Democrats. 'All of these red states, I think we're late to the party,' said South Carolina state Rep. Beth Bernstein, a Democrat who sponsored a bill this year to increase state employees' paid parental leave from six to 12 weeks. It passed the majority-Republican South Carolina House in April with strong bipartisan support. This year, Alabama, Iowa and Mississippi joined 37 other states in granting paid parental leave to thousands of state workers. The trend has gathered steam in recent years. Some experts link it to the cascade of state abortion bans that followed the US Supreme Court's 2022 Dobbs decision, which dismantled the federal right to abortion. Under fire from critics to do more to care for babies once they're born, at least a dozen conservative-led states with abortion bans have since granted or expanded paid parental leave for their state employees. But others say the increasing bipartisan support for measures that help working parents is also a reaction to economic realities. 'What we've seen, especially in more conservative states, is the public sector has experienced a lot of turnover,' said Kameron Dawson, legal director of the Southern Office of A Better Balance, a legal organization focused on workplace rights. 'They're looking for tools to recruit younger employees.' Paid parental leave is the time off granted to workers for the birth or adoption of a baby, to care for a child, or to recover from a stillbirth or miscarriage. Without it, employees are left to cobble together their sick leave and vacation leave — or go unpaid — to stay home with a child and heal. Alabama Republican state Rep. Ginny Shaver watched her daughter, a public school teacher, struggle to get the leave she needed after the births of her children in recent years. 'With her second, she had complications in her pregnancy and used up her [paid vacation and sick] leave before she even had the baby,' Shaver told Stateline. Her daughter contracted COVID-19, and the baby had to spend time in neonatal intensive care. 'It was a very difficult time, and she had to take unpaid leave.' Last year, Shaver and Democratic state Sen. Vivian Figures worked to win approval of a paid parental leave bill for state employees. It failed. But they tried again this year. With the support of Republican Gov. Kay Ivey, the state legislature — which has a Republican supermajority — passed it nearly unanimously. The new law gives female state employees, including teachers, eight weeks of paid parental leave in connection with birth, stillbirth or miscarriage, and gives male employees two weeks. Adoptive parents get eight weeks for one parent and two for the other. Shaver said she thinks the law passed thanks to vocal support from the governor and increased awareness of the issue due to the work she and Figures did in previous sessions. 'And the fact that all of the southeast states around us offered it,' Shaver said. 'We're trying to attract and retain state employees and teachers, and we're in competition with everyone around us, and the private sector as well.' For many Republicans, the workforce development argument for paid leave is a persuasive one. For states such as Alabama and South Carolina that have some of the lowest workforce participation rates in the nation, paid leave can be a tool to keep more people — particularly women — working. And it can be a way to retain educators as many states struggle with teacher shortages in K-12 schools. 'For several years we've seen state legislatures acknowledging the importance of child care to businesses and the economy,' said Feroza Freeland, policy director at the Southern Office of A Better Balance. 'But in the last few years, we've seen a growing recognition that paid leave is another piece of that puzzle.' States have taken up the issue because the federal government has not. The United States is a global outlier; among 38 peer nations, it's the only one that doesn't mandate paid parental leave, according to the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development. The group comprises 38 democracies with market-based economies. The federal Family and Medical Leave Act, passed in 1993 and extended in 2020, only requires public agencies and companies with at least 50 employees to give up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave for parents of newborns or newly adopted children, or caregivers of sick family members. During his first term, President Donald Trump publicly supported some forms of paid family leave and signed a defense bill that gives 12 weeks of paid parental leave to most federal employees. Paid family leave was a signature issue for his daughter Ivanka Trump, at the time a senior adviser to the president. She even held a paid leave and child care summit at the White House in late 2019. That set the stage for other Republicans to take up the issue more publicly. And after the Dobbs decision, family-friendly policies have increasingly become conservative talking points in states with restrictive abortion laws. After the Mississippi House unanimously passed a paid parental leave bill earlier this year, Republican House Speaker Jason White celebrated the bill as a reflection of Mississippi's status as a ' pro-life state.' In a recent post on X announcing her signing of a new paid parental leave law, Iowa Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds called Iowa 'a pro-family state.' North Carolina was one of the first Southern states to grant paid parental leave to state workers in 2019 when then-Gov. Roy Cooper, a Democrat, signed an executive order. In 2023, several months after the Dobbs decision, the state's majority-Republican legislature extended paid parental leave to public school employees by tacking it onto a law banning most abortions after 12 weeks of pregnancy. Meanwhile, Indiana Republican Gov. Mike Braun signed an executive order in March to add up to eight additional weeks of paid leave for 'childbirth recovery' to the state's existing four weeks of paid parental leave. The new laws won't apply to most residents, because they only cover state employees. But they could have a downstream effect. Shaver, the Alabama lawmaker, said she hopes her state's new law will not only help the state be competitive with the private sector, but also set a precedent for other employers to follow. 'I hope they will see it's in their benefit to offer what they can,' she said. 'It may not be eight or 12 weeks, but even offering a reduced or flexible work schedule can help families.' Just over a quarter of private-sector workers have access to paid family leave through their employer as of March 2023, according the most recent data from the US Department of Labor. Among the lowest-wage earners, that share drops to 6%. State paid leave programs run the gamut in terms of what they offer. While Alabama's new law offers up to eight weeks of leave for all state employees, including teachers, Mississippi's offers six and does not require public schools to offer paid parental leave to their employees.
Arabian Post
4 days ago
- Arabian Post
Saudi Push Reshapes OPEC+ Oil Production Strategy
Arabian Post Staff -Dubai Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman's tenure as Saudi Arabia's energy minister has marked a decisive shift in OPEC+ dynamics, culminating in a significant production decision that underscores Riyadh's growing influence within the cartel. The latest OPEC+ meeting saw Saudi Arabia successfully advocate for a third consecutive super-sized monthly output increase, a move that has reshaped the alliance's approach to oil supply management despite opposition from key players such as Russia. Since assuming office six years ago, Prince Abdulaziz has positioned Saudi Arabia as a firm leader within OPEC+, emphasising discipline and adherence to agreed production quotas. This approach contrasts with the historically more conciliatory stance the kingdom sometimes took within the cartel. The current strategy reflects a broader ambition to reclaim market share lost to non-compliant members and emerging producers outside the alliance's remit. ADVERTISEMENT The decision to boost output again—by approximately 500,000 barrels per day—signals a willingness to absorb short-term price volatility in favour of longer-term market dominance. Riyadh's strategy appears geared towards punishing those within OPEC+ who have routinely exceeded their quotas, thereby undermining the cartel's collective efforts to control supply and sustain prices. Saudi Arabia's emphasis on stringent compliance aims to reinforce OPEC+ cohesion, even at the risk of dampening crude prices temporarily. Russia's resistance to the output increase highlighted fissures within OPEC+ as Moscow has consistently advocated a more cautious production approach, citing concerns over oversupply and the fragility of global demand recovery. Russia's stance reflects a balancing act between maximising revenue and preserving the alliance's unity. However, Saudi Arabia's assertiveness in pushing the hike through demonstrates Riyadh's readiness to leverage its dominant production capacity and market position to set the cartel's agenda. Global oil markets responded to the output hike by seeing a downward adjustment in prices, reflecting the increased supply entering the market. This shift contrasts with the supply restraint policies of previous years, which had been instrumental in stabilising prices amid fluctuating demand and geopolitical uncertainty. Market analysts note that the Saudi-led increase could signal a new phase in OPEC+ policy, one in which Riyadh is prioritising market share recovery over price support. The broader context of this development involves multiple factors. The energy transition and climate policies worldwide have added pressure on oil producers, particularly those heavily reliant on hydrocarbons. Saudi Arabia's move suggests a pragmatic response to these challenges, aiming to maximise current revenues while investing in diversification strategies such as renewable energy and petrochemicals. The kingdom's position as the de facto swing producer within OPEC+ gives it substantial leverage. Saudi Arabia can modulate output to influence global prices, a power that has been increasingly evident under Prince Abdulaziz's stewardship. The kingdom's vast spare capacity and low production costs enable it to sustain output increases that smaller or higher-cost producers cannot match. ADVERTISEMENT The decision also reflects Saudi Arabia's geopolitical considerations. Energy policy remains a critical tool of regional influence and international diplomacy. By asserting control over OPEC+ production decisions, Riyadh reinforces its leadership role not only within the cartel but also in broader energy markets, which remain pivotal to global economic stability. The internal dynamics of OPEC+ have evolved since the alliance's formation in 2016. Initially established to coordinate between OPEC members and major non-OPEC producers like Russia, the group has faced ongoing challenges balancing competing national interests. Saudi Arabia's push for discipline and market share signals a new era where Riyadh asserts a more centralised command, even if that risks tensions with key allies. The output increase also responds to market signals, including stronger oil demand forecasts and inventory levels that have stabilised. By expanding supply, Saudi Arabia aims to pre-empt supply shortages that could push prices beyond levels palatable to consuming nations and industries. This approach seeks to sustain demand growth by ensuring adequate supply and avoiding disruptive price spikes. Critics argue that the output hike risks destabilising markets by flooding them with excess supply amid uncertainties in global economic growth, inflation, and energy transition timelines. They caution that prolonged lower prices could undermine investment in the oil sector, affecting long-term supply security. However, proponents view Saudi Arabia's move as a necessary recalibration to reinforce market order and assert control over a fragmented supply landscape. The ripple effects of the Saudi-led decision extend beyond OPEC+ members. Non-OPEC producers, including the United States shale industry, watch closely as changes in cartel policy impact global price signals and investment decisions. The output hike could influence the pace and scale of shale production, which remains a significant factor in global supply dynamics. As the alliance navigates these complexities, Saudi Arabia's approach under Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman sets a clear tone of leadership and strategic resolve. The kingdom's readiness to push through output increases despite opposition illustrates its confidence in wielding its production capacity as a geopolitical and economic tool. This assertive posture aligns with Saudi Arabia's broader economic vision, including the ambitious Vision 2030 plan to diversify its economy and reduce dependence on oil revenues. Managing oil production to balance market share and price stability forms a critical part of this strategy, enabling the kingdom to finance diversification projects and maintain fiscal stability.
