Grin and ‘Bare' it: At this nudist resort, everyone has skin in the game
Here at the Avalon Resort, a self-styled 'clothing-optional' retreat two hours west of D.C., the dress code requires no type of dress (or shirt or pants) at all.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fact Check: TikTok Video Labeled "Important Prayer From Pope Leo" Is NOT Authentic
Did Pope Leo XIV issue an important prayer for all Americans on July 25, 2025? No, that's not true: A video originating on TikTok features an AI generated likeness of Pope Leo XIV speaking. The voiceover includes a prayer which does not match recently published public messages from the Pope. The fabricated video first appeared on TikTok account named @prayerswithpopeleo on July 25, 2025 (identical version archived here). This account was deleted from TikTok on July 28, 2025. The post used the following hashtags: #popeleoxiv #god #jesuslovesyou #jesuschrist #jesus #robertfrancisprevost #prayer This is what the post looked like on TikTok at the time of writing: On July 25, 2025 Pope Leo XIV posted only one message on the official @Pontifex account on X (embedded below). The social media post contains a link to the full text of his message (archived here) titled, "Message Of Pope Leo XIV For The 111th World Day Of Migrants And Refugees 2025" that was posted on the Vatican website the same day. The text of the authentic July 25, 2025 message from Pope Leo XIV does not contain similarities with the prayer in the AI generated TikTok video. A search in the index (archived here) of partner news sites and wire services for "Pope Leo prayer so all Americans have a good night" returned a link to a reel on Facebook with a copy of the AI-generated @prayerswithpopeleo TikTok video. A search (pictured below and archived here) returned only one result with the exact phrase from the prayer spoken in the TikTok voiceover, "Heavenly Father, tonight I lift up every believer across this great nation from coast to coast. Wrap your arms around your children." That result points to a post on Instagram (archived here) featuring a copy of the AI generated @prayerswithpopeleo TikTok video. No search results pointed to the official @Pontifex Instagram account of Pope Leo XIV or any other official Vatican sources. The video contains several artifacts common to reels that are artificially generated, such as the overly smooth texture of the skin rendering. Absent is the mole on Pope Leo's left upper lip. Another artifact visible in the video is a distortion in the background, which warps as the subject moves. A detail (pictured below) from a screenshot shows the moment at the start of the video when the doorframe appears to bend as the subject's cheek moves in front of it. Lead Stories uploaded a clip from the TikTok video to the AI generated content detection tool HIVE moderation. The results pictured in the composite image below were varied, ranging from 0.0 percent to 11.9 percent likely to contain AI generated content. Despite these low individual results, Hive gave an aggregated score of 99.6 percent, stating: Overall, the video is likely to be AI-Generated. On July 28, 2025 the @prayerswithpopeleo account on TikTok had six videos posted. These videos had similar prayers. Notably, each was dedicated to Americans specifically, and featured a request for people to engage with the post by adding personal information. Four seconds in, the voiceover says: If you are an American drop your name and the state you're watching from in the comments because I wanna pray for you personally. At the time of writing (Mon Jul 28 23:34:44 2025 UTC) the six videos pictured below and the @prayerswithpopeleo account had been unpublished from TikTok. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Hills alum Lo Bosworth in double joy as she gets married and pregnant
Lo Bosworth is married and expecting her first child with Dom Natale. The Hills alum has revealed the couple tied the knot at her family's home in Laguna Beach, California on July 20, while they are also due to become parents in January. Sharing pictures from their special day on Instagram on Monday (28.07.25), Lo penned: "We said yes with joy. And life, with its most tender timing, said yes right back." The 38-year-old actress admitted the couple considered a lavish "New York City wedding", but when she started trying for a baby, they felt it was best to plan an "intimate" ceremony. In an interview with People, Lo said: "We wanted our wedding to meet the moment of where we're at right now. "I'm about four months pregnant, and before starting our fertility journey, we thought about a big, New York City wedding. Once our family plans got underway, however, we changed course to something we knew would be perfect if I was lucky enough to get pregnant: an intimate wedding with our closest family members enjoyed at home. We could take off our shoes, stretch out, enjoy great food and the beautiful décor, and relax." The couple's child is due two years after they got engaged in January 2024. Alongside a black-and-white snap of the couple embracing and flashing her gigantic diamond ring, she wrote on Instagram at the time: 'For you, my darling, it could only be a 'yes.' 'Thank you for being the best that one could be, for me. 'All my love, L.' It was not clear how long the pair had been dating before investor Dom got down on one knee. Lo previously dated her Hills co-star Scott Hochstadt for two years between 2009 and 2011. She was later linked to Shark Tank contestant Jimmy DeCicco, with the pair last seen together in 2020. The Laguna Beach star moved away from reality television in 2010 to lead a private life. Speaking on Bethenny Frankel's Just B podcast, she previously reflected on having her life play out on screen: "I served a very specific role, which I'm actually grateful for in hindsight. I didn't have to get into it too much. "But in the areas where I did, it still kind of haunts me to this day, because there's so many stories behind this story everybody saw on television that run very counter to what the public thinks of you." She now runs the Love Wellness brand, which she founded in 2016.
Fox News
30 minutes ago
- Fox News
Air travel's 'golden age' featured steak dinners, cocktails and formal attire for sophisticated travelers
Conversations about flying today are sparking memories of nostalgic times in the skies and the ways in which travel has changed over the years. A Reddit user recently posted a message in the "r/aviation" forum, asking, "So were the airlines of the 'golden ages' operating at a massive loss?" "Pan Am, for example, lasted 64 years (1927-1991)," the person went on. "Pan Am and similar airlines offered spacious seating arrangements, proper cutlery and fine dining. Not to mention [that] being an airline crew [member] was prestigious, and I'm to assume that meant [a] competitive and subsequently high-paid profession." The user added, "These amenities and circumstances are extremely cost-intensive … Today it is so far from the luxury it once was, [given that] cost-cutting and corporate culture reign supreme." Fox News Digital reached out to travel experts for insights as Redditors took to the comments section to discuss with passion the evolution of flying over the years — with many fawning over the old days and others calling out the high prices. "Look how the passengers are dressed," commented one user. Another user wrote, "Flights [were] mainly for wealthy people. Tickets were really expensive." "Old guy here," one man reflected. "Went on my first flight at 6 years old in 1970 from Chicago to Florida. Each ticket cost $500 (equivalent of maybe $2,500 now). We went out and bought special 'airplane clothes,' the equivalent of church attire. I remember eating steak on the plane. Different days indeed," he added. Another Redditor claimed, "In the '50s, airlines started doing 'themed' flights with a menu to match, and some Scandinavian airlines would even carve a whole ham in front of you. The '50s-'70s was really the Golden Age for travel where the food became a huge selling point of flying." "The meals [were] served on china, cutlery, the actual food, drinks … [the] majority [of it] served by hand … [There was] no 'cart hauling,'" said a user. "It was an experience." Former flight attendant and Florida-based etiquette expert Jacqueline Whitmore also emphasized that flying was once a luxury experience. "Flight attendants served real food on real plates." "Passengers dressed in their Sunday best," she told Fox News Digital. "Flight attendants served real food on real plates." She said flight attendants were "held in high regard," were well-groomed and well-mannered, and were "treated like celebrities." She said that "now, flying is about getting from point A to B. Budgets are tight and air travel is about quantity, not quality. More seats were added, and meals were cut. Personal space is now at a premium." Whitmore added, "Many passengers lack civility and common courtesy. Some treat the cabin crew like servants. Passengers eat whatever they want, regardless of whether it smells or not." She also said, "Seats are getting smaller and are more uncomfortable, giving passengers less leg and arm room. If you want anything special (early boarding, more leg room), you have to pay for it. Everything is now 'extra.'" Gary Leff, a Texas-based travel industry expert and author of the blog "View From the Wing," told Fox News Digital it's easy to look back at the early days of air travel "through rose-colored glasses." "There are many ways in which flying is better now than it's ever been," he said. "Flying is safer than it used to be. Long-haul business class usually means flat beds, and often even with privacy doors. Lounges in airports are far more elevated." He also pointed out that technological advances allow passengers to be entertained while in the air with personal TVs in their seats. Many Reddit users said the changes in flying experiences are due to airline regulation. "You didn't have federally controlled mandates and high taxes," commented one user. Another user wrote, "The airline deregulation act made those days go away. It made travel cheaper and more accessible for the average traveler." "Most people misunderstand the regulated era of airlines," said Leff. "It wasn't about consumer protection. It was about ensuring airline profitability! There was a mistaken belief that airlines would compromise safety if they didn't earn consistent profits …We saw continued strong safety records throughout the bankruptcies most major airlines have been through." He added, "Since fares were so high and airlines weren't allowed to compete by lowering them, they still tried to attract passengers (since each additional passenger was so profitable) — and the way they did it was by investing in services and amenities."
