logo
The Texas Senate wants more — and smaller — starter homes in new neighborhoods

The Texas Senate wants more — and smaller — starter homes in new neighborhoods

Yahoo05-03-2025

DALLAS — New homes in certain Texas neighborhoods could be built on smaller lots, allowing for more homes to be built amid a shortage that has driven up housing costs, if a new proposal from the Texas Senate becomes law.
Senate Bill 15 — filed Tuesday by state Sen. Paul Bettencourt, R-Houston — reduces the amount of land cities can require single-family homes in new subdivisions to sit on.
Doing so makes it possible for homebuilders to put smaller homes on smaller lots, driving down the final cost of the home. The bill wouldn't apply to homes built in existing neighborhoods, where homeowners often oppose new housing.
'What we're trying to do is come up with changes that get government out of the way of blocking affordable housing in the major urban cities,' Bettencourt said.
Also on Tuesday, the House unveiled a proposal that aims to bring down housing costs. House Bill 24 — authored by state Rep. Angelia Orr, R-Itasca — would effectively make it harder for property owners to oppose new housing near them.
The state's high housing costs have placed enormous pressure on renters and the dream of homeownership out-of-reach for many Texas families — a large majority of Texans have signaled that those high housing costs are a problem. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick named 'removing barriers to affordable housing' among his top priorities for this year's legislative session.
[High housing costs, inflation bite into Texas sales tax growth]
Lawmakers aim to put a dent in the state's high housing costs by tackling the state's considerable housing shortage. Though Texas builds more homes than any other state, it needs 320,000 more homes than it has, according to one estimate — a finding embraced by state Comptroller Glenn Hegar. That deep shortage, housing advocates have argued, played a key role in driving up home prices and rents — increasing competition for a limited supply of homes amid the state's economic boom.
The Senate bill would prohibit cities from requiring single-family homes in new subdivisions to sit on more than 1,400 square feet — if the subdivision sits on at least five acres of land and is zoned for single-family development. The idea is to give homebuilders more flexibility to provide a broader array of housing options at different price points — and give would-be first-time homebuyers, who have struggled to find a home they can afford amid the state's high home prices, a leg up.
Reducing lot-size requirements by that much, even only in new subdivisions, would be dramatic. Among major Texas cities, the most common requirements sit between 5,000 and 7,500 square feet, according to a Texas Tribune analysis. Those rules, critics argue, drive up a home's final cost by encouraging builders to construct larger, more expensive homes. They also leave less land behind to build other homes, limiting how many homes can ultimately be built and exacerbating the housing shortage.
'The idea of this is to find that area of housing density that will increase the supply to the point where middle-income Texans can afford a house,' said John Bonura, a policy analyst at the conservative Texas Public Policy Foundation. The bill, Bonura said, aims to 'restore the idea of a starter home.'
The lot-size rule would apply in cities that have more than 90,000 residents and sit in a county with more than 300,000 residents — a designation that applies to about 33 cities, Bettencourt said.
The bill's proponents expect the legislation to spur at least some development in major cities. Dallas, for example, has more than 21,000 acres of vacant land, according to a city estimate — though not all of that land is contiguous. Bonura said he expects the bulk of the development spurred by the bill to take place in outlying suburban and exurban areas of major counties.
Any legislative proposal to allow more homes to be built will likely rouse strong resistance from existing homeowners and neighborhood groups, who often can oppose new housing in or even near where they live on the grounds that doing so would alter their neighborhood's character. Some lawmakers have filed bills designed to make it harder for cities to allow more kinds of homes in existing single-family neighborhoods.
Bettencourt's bill attempts to short-circuit that opposition by only applying the new lot-size requirement to new subdivisions, Bonura said.
'We don't have to change everything everywhere,' Bettencourt said. 'We have to change enough to make a difference on home affordability and on housing affordability in general.'
There's also skepticism that building more homes can contain housing costs, despite evidence to the contrary. Legislators can see the dynamic that building more housing has on housing costs in the state capital itself: rents in the Austin region have tumbled for nearly two years amid a massive apartment building boom.
Statewide measures to diminish cities' zoning regulations will likely encounter opposition from city officials and their allies in the Legislature. For much of the past decade, Republican lawmakers have pushed to erode the power of local elected officials in the state's urban areas, who are often Democrats. Some city officials have already expressed anxiety about state lawmakers overriding local rules about what kinds of homes can be built and where — as states like California, Oregon and Montana have done. Such concerns fueled, in part, successful Democratic efforts to kill similar legislation two years ago.
Since then, Texas Democrats have expressed that they're open to zoning reform — with some authoring bills to reduce local regulations. Two Democratic senators, Roland Gutierrez and Royce West, have signed on to Senate Bill 15 as co-authors.
Whether Democratic lawmakers will go along with those efforts remains to be seen.
Neighborhood groups opposed to statewide zoning reform, too, argue cities should have the final say when it comes to the kinds of homes that can be built in their communities.
'Why should zoning not be left to local authorities who know their communities, where small lots work, where they don't and what the mix of smaller and larger lots should be, even in new communities?' said David Schwarte, who heads the Texas Neighborhood Coalition, a group that has fought for restricting short-term rentals and helps residents enforce existing residential zoning laws.
Few parts of Texas have gone untouched by higher housing costs in recent years, proponents note — providing ample pretext for state lawmakers to intervene.
Bettencourt's bill is part of a slate of proposals lawmakers, including Republicans and Democrats, have filed to relax some of those regulations. Those rules, critics say, have played a key role in preventing the state from adding enough homes to meet demand.
Easing zoning regulations can help cities add more homes and contain housing costs, recent research shows — though housing advocates and experts say that relaxing those regulations alone won't resolve the housing crisis.
Lawmakers could relax local rules to make it easier for homeowners to build accessory dwelling units — often called ADUs, mother-in-law suites and casitas, in the backyard of single-family homes. Legislators in the Texas House rejected a similar bill in 2023.
Legislators also are entertaining ideas to allow homes to be built in places that now only allow offices, shopping malls, warehouses and houses of worship.
Disclosure: Texas Public Policy Foundation has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
We can't wait to welcome you to the 15th annual Texas Tribune Festival, Texas' breakout ideas and politics event happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin. Step inside the conversations shaping the future of education, the economy, health care, energy, technology, public safety, culture, the arts and so much more.
Hear from our CEO, Sonal Shah, on TribFest 2025.
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bill could make federal minimum wage $15: The states paying less than that
Bill could make federal minimum wage $15: The states paying less than that

The Hill

time33 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Bill could make federal minimum wage $15: The states paying less than that

(NEXSTAR) — Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) has introduced legislation that would raise the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour as early as next year, replacing the current rate of $7.25 an hour. For the states that already have minimum wage rates at or above $15 an hour, the change likely won't be as significant. In 2025 alone, more than 20 states saw an increase in their minimum wage. With the exception of the District of Columbia, where the current minimum wage is $17.50, the state of Washington has the highest minimum hourly rate of $16.66. In three states — Delaware, Illinois, and Rhode Island — the statewide minimum hourly rate has reached $15 for the first time. Effective July 1, Oregon will also have crossed that threshold. California, Connecticut, New Jersey, Maryland, Massachusetts, and New York also continue to offer above $15 an hour. The interactive map shows where the minimum wage is and isn't rising this year, and the current hourly rate. (The exception is Florida, where a minimum wage hike is expected in September.) It's worth noting that some cities and counties within the states mentioned above have higher rates than the statewide wage, and some industries may have higher (or in the case of tipped workers, lower) hourly pay. There are five states — Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, and South Carolina — that do not have a minimum wage. In Georgia and Wyoming, the minimum wage is $5.15. Employers in these states that are covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act must pay the federal minimum wage of $7.25, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. It's unclear, as of Tuesday. Hawley's bill, which also calls for an automatic rate increase to match inflation over time, does have bipartisan support. Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) cosponsored it. The GOP-controlled House and Senate, though, have also been focused on Trump's priority legislation. President Donald Trump previously referred to the current rate of $7.25 an hour as a 'low number' in December, but the White House declined to comment on Hawley's proposed legislation to The Hill.

Republican Senator Co-Sponsors Bill To Raise The Minimum Wage To $15
Republican Senator Co-Sponsors Bill To Raise The Minimum Wage To $15

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republican Senator Co-Sponsors Bill To Raise The Minimum Wage To $15

Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri proposed a bill Tuesday that would raise the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour, his latest move to frame himself as a new kind of pro-worker Republican. Hawley's legislation is not in any danger of actually becoming law — his fellow Republicans hold a majority in the Senate and have been blocking minimum wage increases for years. But the proposal aligns him with a core Democratic demand and further separates Hawley from the traditional anti-union, free-market wing of the GOP when it comes to labor policy. 'Right now, working families, I mean, they haven't gotten a real wage raise in years, and they can't afford anything,' Hawley told HuffPost. 'Right now, the federal minimum wage, if you index it for inflation, or relative to inflation, it's the lowest level since the 1940s.' The federal minimum is just $7.25 per hour and hasn't been raised in more than 15 years, by far the longest such stretch since it was created during the Great Depression. It prevails in the 21 states that currently don't mandate a higher one, many of them clustered in the South. Right now, working families, I mean, they haven't gotten a real wage raise in years, and they can't afford Josh Hawley of Missouri (R) Hawley's bill, co-sponsored by Democratic Sen. Peter Welch of Vermont, would raise the wage floor to $15, then tie it to an inflation index so that it goes up with the cost of living — a common feature in more progressive legislation. Such a hike would force increases in all but the mostly blue states where the wage floor has already been raised above that level. Hawley did not pretend that his proposal stands much chance of becoming law. 'I will try to move it. I mean, I'd love to get a vote on it,' he said. The proposal puts Hawley far ahead of other Republicans, but still behind Democrats on the issue. Most Democratic lawmakers are now pushing for a $17 minimum wage, arguing that $15 — the rallying cry of the Fight for $15 labor campaign, which began in the fast food industry in 2012 — has become inadequate as a living wage due to inflation. Although he supports a more aggressive raise, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) seemed pleased to see Hawley separate himself from other Republicans on the issue. 'I think every Democrat, last month, voted to raise the minimum wage to $17, and I'll look forward to working with Sen. Hawley,' Sanders told HuffPost on Tuesday, referencing an April vote on an amendment to a symbolic budget resolution. The amendment failed by a vote of 47 to 52 with every Republican except Hawley voting no. Hawley said that if the Republican Party wants to brand itself as the party of working people — which it does, according to statements from President Donald Trump and other leaders — then Republicans need to back policies that benefit the working class. 'This is what President Trump ran on. I mean, if we're going to be a working party, we have to do something for working people, and working people haven't gotten a raise in years,' Hawley said. Hawley's positioning himself as a populist, pro-worker conservative has drawn plenty of suspicion from progressives who fear it's a ploy to further drain the Democratic Party's working-class support. Hawley is not the first Republican to back a minimum wage increase. Back in 2021, Sen. Tom Cotton (Ark.) and then-Sen. Mitt Romney (Utah) proposed a boost from $7.25 to $10. But the bill included an immigration measure that would have mandated nationwide use of e-Verify to crack down on undocumented workers, a poison pill for Democrats that isn't part of Hawley's legislation. Earlier this year, Hawley released a policy platform dubbed a 'Pro-Worker Framework.' It included some pro-labor reforms typically associated with Democrats, like putting limits on mandatory 'captive audience' meetings, in which employers pressure workers not to form unions. Then, in March, he joined Democratic Sen. Cory Booker (N.J.) in proposing a bill that would speed up the process for workers to secure their first union contracts, the sort of legislation a typical Republican wouldn't go near. As with Vice-President J.D. Vance, Hawley's positioning himself as a populist, pro-worker conservative has drawn plenty of suspicion from progressives who fear it's a ploy to further drain the Democratic Party's working-class support. But when it comes to maybe moving legislation, lawmakers like Sanders like the idea of having a Republican to work with. 'It would be great if we could get some other Republicans,' the Vermont senator said. '$7.25 federal minimum wage is a national disgrace. We've got to raise it.'

A new megabill red line
A new megabill red line

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

A new megabill red line

Good Tuesday afternoon. We've been closely following all the megabill action in the Senate, but we've also been keeping an eagle eye on the House. In particular, we've been watching how members have been drawing red lines even after they passed the bill last month and trying to put senators in a box — a big, beautiful box? — as they ponder changes to the legislation. The latest example is just in, exclusive to POLITICO: Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-Pa.) and 37 other members are warning against the use of 'budget gimmicks' in the Senate version of the megabill — saying they will insist 'that any additional tax cuts ... must be matched dollar for-dollar by real, enforceable spending reductions.' The signers include the likes of Budget Chair Jodey Arrington, Conference Vice Chair Blake Moore and Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris. The upshot for Senate leaders? They will have to be extra careful to find real offsets as they strain to make key business tax provisions permanent, ease the phaseout of clean energy tax incentives and sand down the House's cuts to Medicaid and SNAP. One thing that probably won't pass muster back in the House is simply writing off the costs of extending the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act using the 'current policy baseline' tactic and calling it a day. Add this to the list of emerging House demands on the Senate, which now includes members of the vaunted SALT crew demanding their state-and-local-tax deduction deal stay entirely intact, and Rep. Chip Roy's insistence that the clean energy phaseouts remain untouched, while 13 other House Republicans say they want those same provisions watered down before they vote again. Keep in mind all of this is happening as the House prepares to take yet another crucial megabill vote this week — on a package of changes to the bill to address procedural 'fatalities' under Senate rules. Yes, these are small tweaks, and leadership is likely to present them as a mere 'technical' formalities to members. But it's another reminder of the House GOP's tiny majority and the power that a small handful of members has to grind the process to a halt at just about any moment. WHAT'S STILL COMING TODAY: The House Rules Committee is meeting and will vote this afternoon to establish parameters for floor debate on the White House's rescissions package at 2 p.m., setting up a floor vote that is expected Thursday. The House will vote on multiple bills at 5 p.m., including one that would prohibit non-citizens from voting in the District of Columbia. ICYMI: NRCC chair lays out GOP message on LA protests — Rep. Richard Hudson told House Republicans in a closed-door conference meeting this morning to hammer Democrats on the unrest in Los Angeles, according to people granted anonymity to share details of the private discussion. Hudson, a North Carolina Republican who leads the House GOP's campaign arm, said Americans are 'tired' of 'chaos.' CBC chair goes off-message on LA protests — Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.), chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, called President Donald Trump's decision to send 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to Los Angeles an impeachable offense. SecDef sends a message to Dems on LA protests — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth clashed with several Democratic lawmakers today over the California unrest. During a House budget hearing in front of the Defense Appropriations panel, Hegseth argued that California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, both Democrats, mishandled the situation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store