Slough council spends £32m on temporary housing
The Local Government Association said councils were facing a combined £76m shortfall in temporary accommodation budgets across the UK.Slough council's bill has risen sharply each year since 2021, when its spending on housing families in need of immediate shelter was about £3.8m.Temporary accommodation, such as hotels, hostels or caravans, is organised by local authorities for those who lack a permanent home. Pat Hayes, council executive director of housing and properties, said the issue was a national problem, compounded by the town's proximity to London.
"At the moment we're getting 50 people a week knocking on our door, asking for housing," he said."These are all people being evicted from the private rented sector because they can't pay the bills or the landlords don't want to rent to people anymore, they want to sell, people moving from West London out to Slough."We're right in the eye of that storm as somewhere that is a little bit cheaper than London and considerably cheaper than the rest of Berkshire and Buckinghamshire."It's going to need a national solution from government."The Housing Benefit subsidy used to pay councils back in full for money spent on temporary housing. However, in 2011 the subsidy was changed to be no longer adjusted for inflation, leaving some councils out of pocket. Currently Slough council's gap between the money spent and the money reclaimed for the 24/25 tax year is £12m. It is still in the process of claiming the remaining money back and has two years to claim.
A government spokesperson said: "The levels of homelessness in this country are unacceptable."That's why we are making a £1bn investment in homelessness and rough sleeping services this year - a £233 million boost from last year - to prevent rises in the number of families in temporary accommodation and help to prevent rough sleeping."We continue to keep the rates used for Housing Benefit subsidy under review and are exploring the impacts of subsidy rates on local authorities."
You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK police arrest more than 365 at protest for banned Palestine Action group
LONDON, Aug 9 (Reuters) - London's Metropolitan Police arrested more than 365 people at a protest against Britain's decision to ban the group Palestine Action, the force said. Protesters, some wearing black and white Palestinian scarves and waving Palestinian flags, chanted "hands off Gaza", and held placards with the message "I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action", video taken by Reuters at the scene showed. Israel denies allegations of being responsible for genocide in Gaza. The Reuters video showed demonstrators who had gathered in Parliament Square by the Houses of Parliament being carried away by police. The crowd chanted "shame on you" at the police. In a post on X, the police force said it had arrested 365 people for supporting a proscribed organisation. It also arrested seven people for other offences including five for assaults on officers, adding none was seriously injured. In July, British lawmakers banned Palestine Action under anti-terrorism legislation after some of its members broke into a Royal Air Force base and damaged planes in protest against Britain's support for Israel. The ban makes it a crime to be a member of the group, carrying a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. The co-founder of Palestine Action, Huda Ammori, last week won a bid to bring a legal challenge against the ban.
Telegraph
3 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain's police must regain public trust
Policing Britain's streets can be a thankless task. Officers this weekend were called upon to attend events from very different parts of the political spectrum. From the Left, supporters of the proscribed group Palestine Action marched in a direct challenge to the state's ability to enforce the law. From the Right, activists gathered outside migrant hotels planted in communities across the country. Police officers can be forgiven for feeling a bit like an occupying force trying to keep the peace between opposing tribes. The breakdown of trust in British policing engendered by widespread perceptions of a two-tiered approach to public order and a conspicuous failure to deal with lower-level disorder in the form of shoplifting and phone-snatching has done great damage. Officers who were trusted members of the community are now talked about by some as if they are representatives of a distant and unaccountable state, deployed to enforce its will rather than to fairly and impartially enforce the law. The blame for such impressions rest partly upon poor operational decision-making and prioritisation, but primarily upon decisions taken in Westminster which have too often left police forces in an invidious position. The migrant hotel protests and their spread through social media have been fuelled by Sir Keir Starmer's conspicuous failure to get to grips with illegal migration, despite his election promises. The wave of shoplifting can in part be traced back to decisions taken under the previous Conservative government. Rebuilding lost trust will take time and effort. As Janet Daley writes today, the brazenness of current offenders produces a sense of social chaos that is deeply demoralising. It will take an effort comparable to that conducted by Bill Bratton in 1990s New York to combat it. The response of the Metropolitan Police to the Palestine Action protests today was a good starting point. Rather than once again being perceived to indulge the hard Left, the police acted swiftly when activists deliberately breached the Terrorism Act by declaring support for a banned group. At least 200 people, including former Guantanamo Bay detainee Moazzam Begg, were arrested. The long-term solution, however, clearly lies with Parliament. Campaigners who had planned today's open declarations of support for Palestine Action had pledged to overwhelm the criminal justice system, to stress-test Britain's ability to actually enforce its laws. Given the overcrowded state of our jails, the woeful backlogs in our courts and the stretched condition of our police forces, such a test was not guaranteed to fail. It would be greatly to the benefit of the public if these elements could be addressed, and the epidemic of lower-level crime confronted.
Times
20 minutes ago
- Times
Can Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves escape the economic doom loop?
Rachel Reeves has a new joke. When she greets Labour MPs at Downing Street receptions, the chancellor flashes a smile and says: 'You're only invited because you've not signed one of those nasty open letters.' She's referring to the damaging habit in recent months of restive backbenchers criticising the government's policies in long, petition-like missives, then dispatching them to the newspapers. Since those very rebel MPs stymied her attempts to get through the government's welfare reforms, Reeves has been mired in grim news about the state of the country's finances and a damaging, loud drumbeat about the urgent need for big tax rises. The U-turn they forced on her over disability payments alone has left her with perhaps £3 billion more spending to cover. 'It's been hugely frustrating, and Rachel is furious at them,' says a Reeves ally on the backbenches. 'Frankly … the problems we've got ourselves in are their f***ing fault. They've added to her lack of headroom by listening to pressure groups and giving her more problems to solve.' The National Institute for Economic and Social Research shockingly declared last week that anaemic economic growth has left Britain £50 billion in the red — far worse than the £20 billion previously thought. Hemmed in by her petition-signing backbenchers, Reeves has found herself unable to stem the outpouring of negative sentiment about the tax sledgehammer coming in her autumn budget. With MPs away from parliament, the news vacuum from Westminster has been filled by daily speculation about new tax rises. Last week alone saw blanket coverage of Angela Rayner's idea of higher council taxes and Gordon Brown's call for increased taxes on online casinos to cover the cost of scrapping the two-child cap on benefits. Nobody knows where the tax hikes are going to fall, or who they're going to hit the worst, but everyone is aware they're there, in the distance, coming our way. Britain is in a fiscal sniper's alley. Dangerously for the economy, with the budget not likely until November, the alley is a long one. Adam Smith, chief of staff to Jeremy Hunt during his time as chancellor, is a veteran of two budgets and two autumn statements. He says all this speculation so early in the tax announcement cycle is seriously troubling. 'There is a real danger to confidence of constant speculation about what is and what isn't going to be in. The government is in a jam. They want to rule out some of the wilder speculation, but if they get into that game, everyone assumes if they don't rule something out, they're going to do it,' he says. The result is drift and uncertainty. It's a drift that could end up with the same kind of economic 'doom loop' the government plunged the economy into in the months after last July's election. Then, ministers constantly talked down the economy with claims of a £22 billion 'black hole' left by the Conservatives — scaring the country rigid about a potential budget bloodbath. The result was a crimp on economic growth that did not need to happen, as consumers and businesses put a lid on their spending plans. Worse still, Reeves kept the country waiting nearly four months for the budget to bring us some clarity. It's only natural that the parallels should be drawn between then and now, but this time, Labour is not controlling the narrative. Reeves cannot talk up the economy too much because it is so fragile she may end up eating her words by the autumn. Nor can she rule out any tax rises, because she might have to rule them back in. Amid all this uncertainty, consumer confidence, measured by the GfK market research group, is at its worst state since December. Neil Bellamy, GfK's consumer insights director, cites people's fear of 'stormy conditions ahead' for their taxes. Business leaders talk darkly of the public's willingness to spend 'falling off a cliff'. Those high street barometers of the country's spending power — Domino's Pizza and Greggs — have both rattled investors with warnings of a consumer slowdown. For employers, the lack of clarity around the tax situation feels deadly, from family-run restaurants to major shop chains. Most are still struggling to absorb the shock to their finances of the employers' national insurance hike, which came into effect in April. Labour's workers' rights reforms only make them more jittery. Andrew Murphy, chief executive of The Entertainer, Britain's biggest independent toyshop chain, says the employers' national insurance increase alone will cost his business £3.2 million this year — nearly 40 per cent of his profits. 'We've had to cut 63 roles in our head office in Amersham,' he says. 'And it's the same across every business I speak to. All they're investing in is technology that can save labour, or offshoring jobs to cheaper countries abroad. It's as brutal as that.' He adds that planning future investment in the business — the kind of investment that drives economic growth — is all on hold. 'You just don't know if the government is going to jump out from behind a hedge and hit you with some surprise new tax like they did last time,' he says. 'There is just zero confidence among businesses that the government will come up with anything creative, confidence-inspiring or visionary to boost the economy … It will be just more tax.' Lower investment from businesses means less employment. The rise of employers' national insurance has particularly hit companies that rely on high numbers of workers on modest pay. Restaurants and hotels, which employ about 8 per cent of the UK workforce, look particularly vulnerable, even though it's not quite visible yet. The increase came just as they were going into the busy spring-summer season when the warm weather and sport boosted sales. The question is, what happens when the summer is over? Tim Martin, chief executive of Wetherspoons, says his business can weather the storm but 'there has got to be substantial vulnerability out there because of the scale of the cost rises'. What most frustrates businesses — and centrist Labour MPs — is that Reeves and Sir Keir Starmer appear unable to rein in welfare spending. Even some Starmer allies in parliament express concern at his apparent inability to herd his turbulent party. One says: 'We need to get backbenchers to understand they are part of the government. The way you get things done in a functional government is by quietly and privately talking to ministers and explaining the implications of what they are planning. Not by shouting from the outside.' He still remains more frustrated at his backbench colleagues than the leadership, though: 'Of course, some of that's on Keir, it's up to him to lead. But it can't all come from the same two people who are insanely busy at the centre.' This, some close to Starmer say, is part of the problem. With the rapidly developing situations in Ukraine and Gaza to contend with, plus protests over immigration (by far the biggest concern on constituents' doorsteps), the PM has lacked the 'bandwidth' to focus on the nitty-gritty politicking of bringing discipline to his party. But one former Labour adviser, who knows him well, warns that this is not a good enough excuse. 'He is a lovely guy, but where's the leadership? How did he think he could get the party to rally behind an attack on the poorest in society? The whips were warning them the party was going to blow up over the welfare reforms but they didn't listen.' Those in the Reeves camp say she is working to create a more 'Labour' narrative for the measures that will come in the autumn budget. 'She's not going to get into a Whac-A-Mole about what precise measures we are or aren't going to take, but she is talking about the principles that will be behind the budget,' says one. 'What the economic 'story' will be.' Expect, then, to hear plenty of noises about 'contribution' — meaning rewards for 'hard-working people who pay their way' (as opposed to rich non-doms and wealthy bankers with children at private school). We will also be hearing more about those old favourites, 'productivity and growth', rather than just tax and spend. Those close to Reeves cite as examples the new pension reforms, the go-ahead for an extra terminal at Heathrow and faster planning to get building work started. 'She is constantly pushing officials: 'Is there more we can do on growth?',' one adviser says. Unlike after the election, Reeves is not talking down the economy. She has been out on what her team calls a 'summer tour' since the recess, putting on hi-vis and hard hats, meeting businesses. Her message is that the economy is not broken, but it has been stuck for years, exacerbated by Covid and bad Conservative stewardship. She feels business confidence is fairly strong and that the UK is seen internationally as a safe place to invest. Last week's interest rate cut from the Bank of England was, she says, a testimony to the stability she has brought to the economy. That positivity will chime with Steven Fine, chief executive of the stockbroker Peel Hunt, who says he is fed up with businesses talking down the UK: 'I think we've got a massive domestic lack of self-esteem, and it's just not warranted,' he says. 'We need to take a step back and think how resilient our economy has been: [since 2020] we've had three prime ministers, five chancellors, a cost of living crisis, a U-turn on the welfare state reforms. But we've not had a recession, we've been remarkably resilient given all the s**t that's been thrown at the economy. The rest of Europe's far more unstable than we are, and we've got a government with a decent majority.' The shadow chancellor Mel Stride has been trying to make hay from the government's economic travails. He says: 'When people ask me what I'd do to get out of this mess, I say that's like passing someone the steering wheel after the car's been smashed into a wall at 100 mph by a reckless driver and being asked: 'What would you do now?' The answer is, I wouldn't have crashed the car in the first place. 'I would not have destroyed growth by taxing the living daylights out of business; I would not have spent and borrowed hundreds of billions extra to stoke inflation and kept interest rates higher for longer; I would not have given in to the pay demands of train drivers and junior doctors without productivity strings attached. And I would have done much, much more to bring the welfare budget firmly under control.' Bizarrely enough, though, it's as easy to hear such fervour from Starmer's own backbenchers as the official opposition. Take this nautical message one sent to me on Saturday night: 'We're adrift in choppy seas with a skipper and first mate that can't navigate, and even if they could, they don't know where they're heading. Some of those they've thrown overboard for disciplinary matters have now found their own life raft and are attempting to ram us hard to port. All the while the SS Farage looms on the horizon to our stern — constantly menacing.' It's not only Nigel Farage who's menacing. Asked if his metaphorical meanderings were off the record, the MP who sent it responded: 'For now, yes. The time is fast approaching when it won't be, though.' With friends like these …
