Watchdog group slams major corporation for misleading consumers about hazardous home appliances: 'Tricky claims using tricky information'
The Australian Gas Infrastructure Group spread harmful misinformation, claiming that gas-powered stoves were cheaper and more sustainable than electric stovetops.
According to an article by Renew Economy, the Australian Gas Infrastructure Group (AGIG) was found to be greenwashing by Australia's advertising regulators.
The AGIG posted an advert comparing stovetops to social media, with gas-powered stoves made out to be the greenest choice. The company "owns two of Victoria's three gas networks and several in other states," Renew Economy mentioned, highlighting its interest in promoting gas-powered goods, even if it is at the detriment of the environment.
Australia's Ad Standards Community Panel declared that the advert broke three sections of the Environmental Claims Code. They claimed it was "misleading or deceptive, overstated its claims, and could not be verified or substantiated by an average viewer."
Companies know that there is a trend toward more conscious consumption. In trying to appeal to an ethical shopper, many big brands use greenwashing tactics to appear more sustainable than they are. As a consumer, this can be misleading and frustrating, making it difficult to do the right thing despite having good intentions.
In reality, gas stoves can be dangerous, expensive, and harmful to the environment. In comparison, induction stoves are an easy and affordable solution to avoid the dangers of gas stoves. With the Inflation Reduction Act, consumers can get up to $840 off the cost of an induction range, sweetening the deal even more.
Induction stoves sometimes get a bad rep for taking a long time to heat up, but they tend to cook faster than gas-powered stoves and are more cost-efficient.
If you're not in the market for a major kitchen renovation, or perhaps are renting and can't change your space too drastically, plug-in induction burners are a great option. With some options starting at just $50, they're a great way to reduce the harms of gas stoves without breaking the bank.
Belinda Noble, founder of Comms Declare, a climate advocacy group, said the advertising regulator's ruling would "hopefully put an end to tricky claims using tricky information."
She also commented on AGIG's desire to promote gas products despite the harm they cause, saying: "This is all about keeping gas in the home and giving people an excuse to keep gas despite the overwhelming evidence that it's bad for the climate."
Do you think gas stoves should be banned nationwide?
No way
Let each state decide
I'm not sure
Definitely
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Watchdog group slams major corporation for misleading consumers about hazardous home appliances: 'Tricky claims using tricky information'
The Australian Gas Infrastructure Group spread harmful misinformation, claiming that gas-powered stoves were cheaper and more sustainable than electric stovetops. According to an article by Renew Economy, the Australian Gas Infrastructure Group (AGIG) was found to be greenwashing by Australia's advertising regulators. The AGIG posted an advert comparing stovetops to social media, with gas-powered stoves made out to be the greenest choice. The company "owns two of Victoria's three gas networks and several in other states," Renew Economy mentioned, highlighting its interest in promoting gas-powered goods, even if it is at the detriment of the environment. Australia's Ad Standards Community Panel declared that the advert broke three sections of the Environmental Claims Code. They claimed it was "misleading or deceptive, overstated its claims, and could not be verified or substantiated by an average viewer." Companies know that there is a trend toward more conscious consumption. In trying to appeal to an ethical shopper, many big brands use greenwashing tactics to appear more sustainable than they are. As a consumer, this can be misleading and frustrating, making it difficult to do the right thing despite having good intentions. In reality, gas stoves can be dangerous, expensive, and harmful to the environment. In comparison, induction stoves are an easy and affordable solution to avoid the dangers of gas stoves. With the Inflation Reduction Act, consumers can get up to $840 off the cost of an induction range, sweetening the deal even more. Induction stoves sometimes get a bad rep for taking a long time to heat up, but they tend to cook faster than gas-powered stoves and are more cost-efficient. If you're not in the market for a major kitchen renovation, or perhaps are renting and can't change your space too drastically, plug-in induction burners are a great option. With some options starting at just $50, they're a great way to reduce the harms of gas stoves without breaking the bank. Belinda Noble, founder of Comms Declare, a climate advocacy group, said the advertising regulator's ruling would "hopefully put an end to tricky claims using tricky information." She also commented on AGIG's desire to promote gas products despite the harm they cause, saying: "This is all about keeping gas in the home and giving people an excuse to keep gas despite the overwhelming evidence that it's bad for the climate." Do you think gas stoves should be banned nationwide? No way Let each state decide I'm not sure Definitely Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Musk's Trump Bromance Exploded Over Tweet Backing Biden: Sources
He may be out of the White House, but former president Joe Biden has played a starring role in the messiest divorce in Washington. Days before he went nuclear by calling Donald Trump's mega-spending bill a 'disgusting abomination', Elon Musk blasted out a post that marked a key turning point for the president and his allies. As Musk prepared to depart from his official duties at the Department of Government Efficiency, the Tesla chief and his electric vehicle company took to social media to warn that the 'big beautiful bill' would gut clean energy tax credits and undermine Trump's 'drill baby drill' American energy revival. 'Abruptly ending the energy tax credits would threaten America's energy independence and the reliability of our grid,' Tesla wrote on its X account on May 28, which Musk then reposted to his 220 million-plus followers. 'There is no change to tax incentives for oil & gas, just EV/solar,' Musk added, once again highlighting the fact that clean energy was being gutted while subsidies for other sectors remained. While it was hardly the scorched-earth tirade Musk has embarked on since, Trump and his allies were not impressed. After all, here was a man who had been invited into Trump's inner circle, to Mar-a-Lago and high-level Cabinet meetings, suddenly attacking the bill publicly for gutting a Biden-era initiative that Republicans had long viewed as a 'green new scam'. 'As the president said, he was very disappointed with Elon,' a White House source told the Daily Beast after the pair's bromance ended on Thursday. The clean energy tax credits formed part of the Inflation Reduction Act, which Biden views as a key part of his legacy. 'It's the largest climate investment in history!' the former president would often boast. But Trump's mega-spending bill would put those credits on the chopping block, disqualifying Tesla electric vehicles from a $7,500 incentive at a time when the company's sales have plummeted. In a note to clients on Thursday, JPMorgan estimated that eliminating the EV tax credit could cost Tesla about $1.2 billion annually. Trump has suggested that the loss of federal support for EVs led Musk to turn on him. 'I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' wrote Trump in a post on Truth Social. It wasn't a 'mandate' but a tax credit designed to incentivize investment in clean energy technology. It also happened to be signed into law by the only person who has beaten Trump. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Citi Maintains Sell Rating on Enphase (ENPH), Lowers Price Target to $43
On June 5, analysts at Citi reiterated a 'Sell' rating on Enphase Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:ENPH) but cut their price target to $43 from $47. The price adjustments follow mounting concerns about the future of the US residential solar market. Wind turbines against a backdrop of the sky, signifying the power of renewable energy. The analysts have raised concerns that the leading supplier of home energy solutions could come under pressure should there be changes in residential solar pricing. The Inflation Reduction Act is undergoing some changes. Proposed legislative changes include terminating 25D credits that could affect Enphase and other companies. The Citi analysts have warned that if the bill were to pass in its current form, solar installations could decline. The declines could hit highs of 75%, leading to business closures and slower innovation due to a reduced research and development budget. Assuming no changes are made to avert the slowdown, Citi analysts warn that Enphase Energy's EBITDA could decline by up to 60% next year. Likewise, the stock might end up trading in the high teens. Enphase Energy is an energy technology company specializing in designing, developing, manufacturing, and selling home energy solutions. It offers an intelligent platform that connects solar generation, energy storage, and management. While we acknowledge the potential of ENPH as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and. Disclosure: None. 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤
